Skip to main content
Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1975 Mar 22;112(6):710–711.

Pulsus paradoxus in asthmatic children.

A S Rebuck, J L Tomarken
PMCID: PMC1956205  PMID: 1122442

Abstract

Pulsus paradoxus is a useful physical sign in the assessment of the severity of asthma in adults. Whether this is also true for asthmatic children was determined by measuring respiratory fluctuations in systolic blood pressure during attacks of asthma in 24 children. A decrease in systolic pressure during inspiration exceeding 15 mm Hg was found only when the 1-second forced expiratory volume was less tha 60 percent of the predicted value. There was a highly significant (P smaller than 0.001) correlation between the degree of pulsus paradoxus and the severity of airway obstruction. In nonasthmatic children the systolic pressure was found to fluctuate by as much as 7 mm Hg during the respiratory cycle. It is concluded that, as in adults, the presence of pulsus paradoxus (larger than or equal to 15 mm Hg) in children indicates that their asthma is very severe.

Full text

PDF
710

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. DORNHORST A. C., HOWARD P., LEATHART G. L. Pulsus paradoxus. Lancet. 1952 Apr 12;1(6711):746–748. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(52)90502-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Knowles G. K., Clark T. J. Pulsus paradoxus as a valuable sign indicating severity of asthma. Lancet. 1973 Dec 15;2(7842):1356–1359. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(73)93324-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Levison H., Kamel M., Weng T. R., Kruger K. Expiratory flow rates determined by wedge and water spirometer in children and young adults. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1970 Nov;59(6):648–652. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1970.tb17699.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McDonald I. G., Hirsh J., Jelinek V. M., Hale G. S. Acute major pulmonary embolism as a cause of exaggerated respiratory blood pressure variation and pulsus paradoxus. Br Heart J. 1972 Nov;34(11):1137–1141. doi: 10.1136/hrt.34.11.1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rebuck A. S., Pengelly L. D. Development of pulsus paradoxus in the presence of airways obstruction. N Engl J Med. 1973 Jan 11;288(2):66–69. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197301112880203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rebuck A. S., Read J. Assessment and management of severe asthma. Am J Med. 1971 Dec;51(6):788–798. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(71)90307-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Weng T. R., Featherby E. A., Goold J., Levison H. Relative sensitivity of methods for measuring airway resistance in asthmatic children. Ann Allergy. 1969 Nov;27(11):565–570. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES