Abstract
Silica is the most abundant oxide component in the Earth mantle by weight, and stishovite, the rutile-structured (P42/mnm) high-pressure phase with silica in six coordination by oxygen, is one of the main constituents of the basaltic layer of subducting slabs. It may also be present as a free phase in the lower mantle and at the core–mantle boundary. Pure stishovite undergoes a displacive phase transition to the CaCl2 structure (Pnnm) at ≈55 GPa. Theory suggests that this transition is associated with softening of the shear modulus that could provide a significant seismic signature, but none has ever been observed in the Earth. However, stishovite in natural rocks is expected to contain up to 5 wt % Al2O3 and possibly water. Here we report the acoustic velocities, densities, and Raman frequencies of aluminum- and hydrogen-bearing stishovite with a composition close to that expected in the Earth mantle at pressures up to 43.8(3) GPa [where (3) indicates an uncertainty of 0.3 GPa]. The post-stishovite phase transition occurs at 24.3(5) GPa (at 298 K), far lower than for pure silica at 50–60 GPa. Our results suggest that the rutile–CaCl2 transition in natural stishovite (with 5 wt % Al2O3) should occur at ≈30 GPa or ≈1,000-km depth at mantle temperatures. The major changes in elastic properties across this transition could make it visible in seismic profiles and may be responsible for seismic reflectors observed at 1,000- to 1,400-km depth.
Keywords: hydrogen, phase transition, silica, high pressure, Brillouin scattering
Stishovite is the lowest-pressure SiO2 polymorph with octahedrally coordinated silicon. It adopts the tetragonal rutile structure (P42/mnm) and is stable from ≈9 GPa to ≈50 GPa at room temperature where it undergoes a displacive phase transition to the orthorhombic CaCl2 structure (Pnnm), e.g. (1, 2). Estimates for the temperature dependence of this transition (dP/dT) (1, 3, 4) suggested that it might occur at depths of ≈1,500 km or more in the mantle (more than ≈60 GPa), but the expected seismic signatures have never been observed in that depth range. In fact, the phase relations for pure SiO2 may not be directly relevant to the mantle because they do not include the possible effects of Al2O3 and H2O, which are known to be soluble in stishovite (5, 6). It was previously speculated that impurities might lower the pressure for this transition (7), but clear experimental evidence was lacking. If these effects are significant, they may bring the depth of this phase transition into the region where it could possibly explain seismic reflections observed at 900- to 1,400-km depth (8–11).
Results
Fig. 1 shows the angle-dispersive x-ray spectra of the stishovite and post-stishovite (CaCl2) polymorphs. Because these single-crystal x-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra were obtained by a rotation of only ±12° on the ω-circle, not all reflections are present. However, the CaCl2 phase was clearly observed on our x-ray spectra above 24 GPa. The volume change of transition is apparently small (12), and the tetragonal–orthorhombic symmetry change can be difficult to resolve. This limitation is a common one among XRD methods of detecting displacive phase transitions, sometimes leading to an uncertainty of >10 GPa in the transition pressure, Ptr (13, 14). Here, the MAR-345 images (Fig. 1) clearly show splitting of the (121) and (211) peaks for the orthorhombic higher-pressure phase at 24.8(3) GPa.
Brillouin scattering measurements were performed from nearly the same scattering volume that was probed in the XRD measurements. The orientation of the sample allowed us to collect acoustic velocities close to the [110] phonon direction. In this direction, the elastic shear modulus VsH2 ρ = C11–C12 should vanish approaching Ptr (15). Our Brillouin sound velocity measurements show softening of this acoustic mode (Fig. 2), allowing us to bracket the pressure of the phase transition between 20.0(3) and 24.8(3) GPa. In the lower-symmetry CaCl2 phase, dVsH/dP is larger by the nature of the transition, hence the Ptr should be located at a pressure closer to 24.8(3) GPa.
Raman scattering results obtained on pressure decrease (Fig. 2) help to refine further the pressure of the transition. The softening of the mode B1g in the rutile structure is clearly followed by a stiffening of the Ag mode in the CaCl2 structure. The intersection of linear least-squares fits to the squares of the mode frequencies provides us with a transition pressure Ptr = 24.3(3) GPa (15, 16).
Discussion
The post-stishovite phase transition in pure SiO2 is thought to occur at 50–60 GPa (1, 2, 15, 17). The enormous decrease of transition pressure in aluminous stishovite (which to some extent can be considered a SiO2-δAlOOH solid solution) (18), compared with the pure end-member, and the pronounced acoustic mode softening documented in our work, opens the possibility of a signature of this phase transition in the upper part of the lower mantle. Our results should be more directly applicable to the Earth mantle because the Al2O3 content of natural stishovite in chemically complex mantle assemblages may be as high as 5 wt % (19, 20). If we assume a linear dependence of the transition pressure on aluminum content, dPtr/dXAl2O3 (Fig. 3), and a Clapeyron slope, dPtr/dT = 0.004 GPa/K(1), we estimate a lower bound of P ≈36 GPa for the pressure at which this phase transition would occur in the mantle, corresponding to a depth of ≈1,000 km.
There have been numerous reports of seismic discontinuities and heterogeneities in the depth range of 1,000–1,500 km (8–10). Kaneshima and Helffrich (8) and Niu et al. (11) found a dipping low-velocity layers (LVL) in the vicinity of the Mariana and Izu–Bonin subduction zones, and they estimated the thickness of the LVL to be ≈8 km (8) to ≈12 km (11), with a shear velocity anomaly of 2–6%. These authors ruled out a phase transition source for the LVL because of the dipping nature of the anomaly. However, shear softening related to the rutile–CaCl2 transition in aluminous stishovite within the mid-ocean ridge basalts (MORB) part of a subducted slab may provide a viable explanation for this feature. Similarly, LeStunff et al. (9) observed a reflector at ≈1,200 km in a rather different tectonic setting, under the African Rift zone. They concluded that a sharp (<20–25 km thick) feature was responsible for the reflection of low-frequency P′P′ precursors. Only a few vol % of stishovite is needed to cause a visible seismic discontinuity (21), whereas stishovite may comprise up to ≈20 vol % of subducted MORB material.
Previously, stishovite had been considered to be an explanation of these reflectors (1, 15), but it appeared that the transition would occur too deep in the lower mantle (4). Our observations show that seismic reflectors in the depth interval of ≈1,000–1,500 km may be the signature of subducted MORB material not only in the regions of active subduction (8), but also in the regions where subduction became extinct in Mesozoic or even Proterozoic (9). On the other hand, some authors have argued for the existence of stishovite in “ambient” lower-mantle lithologies (22–25). Although it appears likely that the bulk of the lower mantle is dominated by magnesian silicate perovskite and ferropericlase, the possibility of stishovite (rutile or CaCl2-structured) occurring locally in lower mantle chemical heterogeneities may explain the spatially restricted character of seismic reflectors in this depth interval.
Natural occurrences of stishovite are largely restricted to meteorites and impact craters. In studies of impacts, stishovite serves as an important pressure marker. However, sometimes, as in case of the Shergotty meteorite, there is a mismatch between the observed phase assemblages and the pressure deduced from such markers e.g., refs. 26 and 27. Chemical analyses of stishovite from the Shergotty meteorite show that it contains >1.5 wt % impurities such as Na2O and Al2O3. Our results show that aluminum and possibly hydrogen have a large effect on the stability fields of silica phases. Thus, careful chemical analysis of quenched phases and consideration of the effect of minor elements on phase boundaries are required for an accurate determination of peak pressure in shocked assemblages.
Materials and Methods
The sample studied in this work [K324, containing 6.07(5) wt % Al2O3 and 0.24(2) wt % H2O synthesized at 20 GPa and 1,800°C (28)] was a single-crystal plate with the normal to the surfaces having direction cosines of (−0.603 0.522 0.603). The ambient-pressure elastic properties and Raman frequencies of this and other crystals from the same batch were reported elsewhere (28). The crystal was loaded into a symmetric piston-cylinder diamond-anvil cell along with four ruby spheres (29) and two chips of NaCl. Neon served as a pressure-transmitting medium because it provides quasi-hydrostatic conditions to pressures >60 GPa (1, 30). The choice of pressure medium was important because displacive phase transitions are sensitive to nonhydrostatic stress (15, 31).
Simultaneous Brillouin scattering and synchrotron XRD measurements were performed at 13-BMD, GeoSoilEnviroCARS, Advanced Phonon Source (Argonne, IL). We used the recently developed Brillouin scattering system (32) and angle-dispersive x-ray diffraction with an MAR-345 (Mar-USA, Evanston, IL) imaging plate detector. Pressure was increased in small (<1 GPa) increments with a typical spacing of ≈5 GPa between Brillouin measurements. After each pressure increase above 20 GPa, the cell was annealed in an oven at 200–300°C for 0.5–24 h or laser-heated at ≈1,500°C (CO2 laser, λ = 10 μm) to relax deviatoric stresses in the sample chamber. The pressure gradient never exceeded 0.5 GPa in any experiment, as monitored by x-ray diffraction from the pressure medium (neon) and ruby fluorescence.
Raman scattering measurements obtained on decreasing pressure were performed at the University of Illinois. At pressures of 38.4(7) and 28.7(3) GPa, the pressure medium was annealed at 300°C for 30 min.
Acknowledgments
We thank H.-K. Mao and R. J. Hemley for providing the gas-loading facility at Carnegie Institution of Washington, and R. J. Hemley, M. A. Carpenter, and anonymous reviewers for useful comments. Ruby fluorescence measurements were performed at the GeoSoilEnviroCARS and High Pressure Collaborative Access Team sectors of the Advanced Phonon Source, Argonne National Laboratory. This work was supported by National Science Foundation Grants EAR 00-03383 and 0135642 (to J.D.B.). Construction of the Brillouin spectrometer at Sector 13 of the Advanced Phonon Source was supported by Consortium for Materials Properties Research in Earth Science (COMPRES) as an infrastructure development project. GeoSoilEnviroCARS is supported by National Science Foundation Earth Sciences Grant EAR-0622171, Department of Energy Geosciences Grant DE-FG02-94ER14466, and the State of Illinois. Use of the Advanced Photon Source was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract DE-AC02-06CH11357.
Abbreviations
- MORB
mid-ocean ridge basalts
- Ptr
transition pressure
- XRD
x-ray diffraction.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Kingma KJ, Cohen RE, Hemley RJ, Mao HK. Nature. 1995;374:243–245. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Andrault D, Fiquet G, Guyot F, Hanfland M. Science. 1998;282:720–724. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5389.720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tsuchiya T, Caracas R, Tsuchiya J. Geophys Res Lett. 2004;31 art no L11610. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ono S, Hirose K, Murakami M, Isshiki M. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2002;197:187–192. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pawley AR, Mcmillan PF, Holloway JR. Science. 1993;261:1024–1026. doi: 10.1126/science.261.5124.1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chung JI, Kagi H. Geophys Res Lett. 2002;29 art no 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lakshtanov DL, Vanpeteghem CB, Jackson JM, Bass JD, Shen GY, Prakapenka VB, Litasov K, Ohtani E. Phys Chem Miner. 2005;32:466–470. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kaneshima S, Helffrich G. Science. 1999;283:1888–1891. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5409.1888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.LeStunff Y, Wicks CW, Jr, Romanowicz B. Science. 1995;270:74–77. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kawakatsu H, Niu FL. Nature. 1994;371:301–305. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Niu FL, Kawakatsu H, Fukao Y. J Geophys Res-Solid Earth. 2003;108 art no 2419. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hemley RJ, Shu J, Carpenter MA, Hu J, Mao HK, Kingma KJ. Solid State Commun. 2000;114:527–532. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Andrault D, Angel RJ, Mosenfelder JL, Le Bihan T. Am Mineral. 2003;88:301–307. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shim SH, Jeanloz R, Duffy TS. Geophys Res Lett. 2002;29 art no 2166. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Carpenter MA, Hemley RJ, Mao HK. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. 2000;105:10807–10816. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dove MT. Introduction to Lattice Dynamics. New York: Cambridge Univ Press; 1993. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cohen RE. In: High Pressure Research: Applications to Earth and Planetary Sciences. Syono Y, Manghnani MH, editors. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union; 1992. pp. 425–432. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Panero WR, Stixrude LP. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2004;221:421–431. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Irifune T, Ringwood AE. Earth Planet Sci Lett. 1993;117:101–110. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Litasov K, Ohtani E. Physics Earth Planetary Interiors. 2006;150:239–263. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Karki BB, Stixrude L, Crain J. Geophys Res Lett. 1997;24:3269–3272. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Saxena SK, Dubrovinsky LS, Lazor P, Cerenius Y, Haggkvist P, Hanfland M, Hu JZ. Science. 1996;274:1357–1359. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5291.1357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Meade C, Mao HK, Hu JZ. Science. 1995;268:1743–1745. doi: 10.1126/science.268.5218.1743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Knittle E, Jeanloz R. Geophys Res Lett. 1986;13:1541–1544. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Stixrude L, Bukowinski MST. Geophys Res Lett. 1992;19:1057–1060. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sharp TG, El Goresy A, Wopenka B, Chen M. Science. 1999;284:1511–1513. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5419.1511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.El Goresy A, Dubrovinsky L, Sharp TG, Chen M. J Phys Chem Solids. 2004;65:1597–1608. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lakshtanov DL, Litasov KD, Sinogeikin SV, Hellwig H, Li J, Ohtani E, Bass JD. Am Mineral. 2007;92:1026–1030. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chervin JC, Canny B, Mancinelli M. High Pressure Res. 2002;21:305–314. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hemley RJ, Zha CS, Jephcoat AP, Mao HK, Finger LW, Cox DE. Phys Rev B. 1989;39:11820–11827. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.39.11820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dubrovinsky LS, Belonoshko AB. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1996;60:3657–3663. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sinogeikin S, Bass J, Prakapenka V, Lakshtanov D, Shen GY, Sanchez-Valle C, Rivers M. Rev Sci Instrum. 2006;77:1–11. [Google Scholar]