Abstract
General practitioners' views about premenstrual symptoms and about the women who suffer from them were sought by means of a postal questionnaire. An hormonal aetiology was favoured by the majority of the doctors and significantly more female than male doctors held this view. There was a diversity of opinion about the most appropriate management; the most favoured treatments were with progesterone analogues, pyridoxine and diuretics. Approximately half of the practitioners thought that women who suffer from premenstrual symptoms are no different from women in general. Those practitioners who felt that differences do exist claimed that sufferers from such symptoms are more likely than women in general to be more hypochondriacal, introverted and intelligent, as well as being more likely to be married, to have small families and to be from a higher social class. In general, the views of the doctors were not related to their years of experience, their practice base (that is, rural or urban) or their sex.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Dalton K. What is this PMS? J R Coll Gen Pract. 1982 Dec;32(245):717–723. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'Brien P. M. The premenstrual syndrome: a review of the present status of therapy. Drugs. 1982 Aug;24(2):140–151. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198224020-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steiner M., Carroll B. J. The psychobiology of premenstrual dysphoria: review of theories and treatments. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1977 Oct;2(4):321–335. doi: 10.1016/0306-4530(77)90002-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tonks C. M. Premenstrual tension. Br J Psychiatry. 1975;Spec No 9:399–408. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]