Skip to main content
Genes & Development logoLink to Genes & Development
. 2003 May 15;17(10):1293–1307. doi: 10.1101/gad.1079403

An intersubunit contact stimulating transcription initiation by E. coli RNA polymerase: interaction of the α C-terminal domain and σ region 4

Wilma Ross 1, David A Schneider 1, Brian J Paul 1, Aaron Mertens 1, Richard L Gourse 1,1
PMCID: PMC196054  PMID: 12756230

Abstract

The C-terminal domain of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) alpha subunit (αCTD) stimulates transcription initiation by interacting with upstream (UP) element DNA and a variety of transcription activators. Here we identify specific substitutions in region 4.2 of sigma 70 (σ70) and in αCTD that decrease transcription initiation from promoters containing some, but not all, UP elements. This decrease in transcription derives from a decrease in the initial equilibrium constant for RNAP binding (KB). The open complexes formed by the mutant and wild-type RNAPs differ in DNAse I sensitivity at the junction of the αCTD and σ DNA binding sites, correlating with the differences in transcription. A model of the DNA–αCTD–σ region 4.2 ternary complex, constructed from the previously determined X-ray structures of the Thermus aquaticus σ region 4.2–DNA complex and the E. coli αCTD–DNA complex, indicates that the residues identified by mutation in σ region 4.2 and in αCTD are in very close proximity. Our results strongly suggest that αCTD, when bound to an UP element proximal subsite, contacts the RNAP σ70 subunit, increasing transcription. Previous data from the literature suggest that this same σ–αCTD interaction also plays a role in transcription factor-mediated activation.

Keywords: RNA polymerase, promoter, UP element, α subunit, σ subunit, transcription activation


The Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) core enzyme (α2ββ‘ω) is capable of transcription elongation, but only the holoenzyme (α2ββ‘ωσ) containing one of the seven σ factors can carry out specific transcription initiation. Promoter recognition by the holoenzyme containing the major σ factor (Eσ70) occurs through interactions of σ with up to three promoter modules. The −10 hexamer (consensus sequence 5′-TATAAT-3′) is recognized by σ region 2.3–2.4 (Gross et al. 1998); the extended −10 region (consensus 5′-TGTGn-3′) is recognized by σ region 3.0 (Burr et al. 2000; Murakami et al. 2002b); and the −35 hexamer (consensus 5′-TTGACA-3′) is recognized by σ region 4.2 (Campbell et al. 2002). In addition, the C-terminal domains of the two α subunits (αCTDs) are flexibly tethered to the α N-terminal domains (αNTDs; Blatter et al. 1994) and at some promoters interact with specific sequences referred to as UP elements located upstream of the −35 hexamer (Ross et al. 1993, 1998; Gourse et al. 2000).

The UP element consensus sequence was determined by in vitro selection (full UP element consensus; Estrem et al. 1998). These results and other data suggested that UP elements can consist of one or two subsites, proximal and distal (Fig. 1). Consensus sequences for the proximal and distal subsites, each of which can interact with one of the two αCTDs, were then identified individually by in vitro selection (Estrem et al. 1999). Extensive genetic analyses by random and alanine scanning mutagenesis identified seven amino acid side chains in αCTD critical for DNA binding (Gaal et al. 1996; Murakami et al. 1996). These residues reside in two helix-hairpin-helix (HhH) motifs (Shao and Grishin 2000) that interact with UP element DNA in and across the minor groove (Ross et al. 2001; Yasuno et al. 2001). A high resolution X-ray structure of αCTD bound to DNA confirmed the roles of the two HhH motifs of αCTD in DNA recognition, and of five of the seven crucial side chains (R265, N268, G296, K298, S299) in direct or water-mediated DNA contacts (Benoff et al. 2002).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

DNA sequences from −27 to −59 (with respect to the transcription start site) for rrn P1 promoter constructs. The top group of promoters contains the rrnB P1 core promoter, and the bottom group contains the rrnD P1 core promoter. The sequences designated “4547” and “4549” contain the consensus proximal subsites derived by in vitro selection (Estrem et al. 1999). “rrnB P1 proximal” contains the rrnB P1 natural proximal subsite and an EcoRI linker upstream of position −50 (Rao et al. 1994) and was used in a previous study of effects of σ70 region 4.2 mutants (Lonetto et al. 1998). “rrnB P1 full” contains the natural rrnB P1 full UP element. “Consensus full” contains the full UP element derived by in vitro selection (Estrem et al. 1998). “rrnB no UP” contains the “SUB” sequence fused to the rrnB P1 core promoter (Rao et al. 1994). “rrnD P1 full” contains the natural rrnD P1 full UP element. “rrnD no UP” is the rrnD P1 core promoter; sequence upstream of the EcoR1 linker is derived from pRLG770 (Ross et al. 1998; Table 1). The −35 hexamer is shown in lowercase and boldface. UP element sequences are in uppercase and boldface.

The αCTD also plays a critical role in transcription activation by serving as a target of transcription factors [e.g., cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP), Fis] that bind upstream of the core promoter region (for review, see Hochschild and Dove 1998; Busby and Ebright 1999), either adjacent to the −35 hexamer (Class II promoters; Savery et al. 1998; McLeod et al. 2002), or further upstream (Class I promoters; Aiyar et al. 2002; Savery et al. 2002). In addition to (or instead of) interacting with αCTD, some activators binding at a Class II position can interact with σ70 region 4 (Kuldell and Hochschild 1994; Li et al. 1994; Kim et al. 1995; Lonetto et al. 1998; Landini and Busby 1999; Rhodius and Busby 2000; Nickels et al. 2002; Pande et al. 2002) or with the α N-terminal domain (NTD; Niu et al. 1996). In both Class I and II activation complexes, αCTD can interact in a non-sequence-specific fashion with DNA adjacent to the activator binding site.

In addition to solution and X-ray structures of αCTD and the αCTD–DNA complex (Jeon et al. 1995, 1997; Wada et al. 2000; Benoff et al. 2002), structures are available of the RNAP holoenzymes from Thermus aquaticus (Murakami et al. 2002a) and Thermus thermophilus (Vassylyev et al. 2002), of the T. aquaticus holoenzyme bound to a short promoter fragment (Murakami et al. 2002b), and of T. aquaticus region 4 of σ bound to a DNA fragment containing the −35 element (Campbell et al. 2002). These structures provide detailed information about many of the intersubunit interactions and RNAP–promoter interactions in the transcription initiation complex. However, because the flexibly tethered αCTD is not resolved in any of the RNAP core or holoenzyme X-ray structures, no structural information is available concerning potential interactions of αCTD with other RNAP subunits or with DNA in the context of an RNAP–promoter complex.

The location of the proximal UP element subsite, where αCTD binds centered at approximately −42 (Newlands et al. 1991; Estrem et al. 1999; Ross et al. 2001), suggested that αCTD might, like some activators at Class II promoters, interact with the region of σ70 bound to the −35 hexamer (region 4). Although a previous study using a promoter containing an rrnB P1 UP element did not support the model that αCTD–σ70 region 4 interactions are important for UP element function (Lonetto et al. 1998), we have reexamined this issue in the context of more recently identified UP element sequences consisting of the proximal subsites isolated by in vitro selection (Estrem et al. 1999). Hydroxyl radical protection and missing base interference footprinting studies suggested that these consensus proximal subsites were protected better by αCTD when in an UP element lacking a distal subsite (Estrem et al. 1999; Ross et al. 2001; data not shown) and have larger stimulatory effects on transcription than the UP element tested previously (∼170-fold compared with ∼20-fold in vivo; Estrem et al. 1999).

Here, we report the identification of specific substitutions in σ70 region 4 and in αCTD that reduce the function of certain UP elements in vivo and in vitro. We identify a position in promoter complexes containing these UP elements where accessibility to DNAse I cleavage is altered by the α and σ mutants. This position is at the junction of the α and σ binding sites. We construct a model for the αCTD–DNA–σ70 region 4 ternary complex based on our previous identification of the precise position where αCTD interacts with the proximal subsite in the RNAP holoenzyme–promoter complex (Ross et al. 2001), on the X-ray structure of T. aquaticus σ region 4 bound to DNA (Campbell et al. 2002), and on the x-ray structure of E. coli αCTD bound to DNA (Benoff et al. 2002). Our genetic, biochemical, and modeling studies strongly suggest there is a functionally important interaction between specific surface-exposed residues in αCTD and σ70. Together with data from the literature concerning residues in αCTD required for transcription activation at Class I promoters, our work suggests that this interaction can contribute not only to the mechanism of UP element function, but also to activation by transcription factors.

Results

Substitutions in σ70 region 4 reduce UP element function in vivo

We assessed the role of σ70 in UP element function by testing a previously described library of single alanine substitutions in region 4.2 (Lonetto et al. 1998). Strains were constructed in which a λ prophage carried lacZ fused to either an rrnB P1 promoter containing a consensus proximal subsite (UP element 4547; Fig. 1) or an rrnB P1 core promoter lacking an UP element. [The UP element examined in a previous study (Lonetto et al. 1998), the rrnB P1 natural proximal subsite, is also shown in Fig. 1.] The host chromosome also contained rpoD fused to the trp promoter, resulting in control of wild-type σ70 expression by the trp repressor (Lonetto et al. 1998). These cells were then transformed with plasmids expressing mutant or wild-type σ70 (pGEX-2T σ70 and derivatives; see Materials and Methods).

β-Galactosidase activities from the promoter–lacZ fusions were determined in the rpoD plasmid-containing strains when the chromosomally encoded σ70 was repressed (see Materials and Methods). Effects of 14 alanine substitutions in σ on UP element function were determined by measuring the ratio of activities of promoters with and without UP elements and then calculating the fraction of the UP element effect in a strain expressing mutant σ versus wild-type σ (Fig. 2; see also Materials and Methods). One σ70 substitution, R603A, reduced the effect of the consensus proximal subsite by ∼75%. Two substitutions, K593A and K597A, reduced the function of this UP element by ∼25%–35%.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effects of σ70 region 4 alanine substitutions on UP element function in vivo. β-Galactosidase activities were determined from promoter–lacZ fusions in strains with rrnB P1 constructs containing either proximal subsite 4547 or the “SUB” sequence (no UP element) and with plasmids encoding either wild-type or mutant σ. Expression of the host rpoD gene was repressed (see Materials and Methods). The “UP element effect” in the presence of the plasmid-encoded mutant σ was determined as the ratio of activities of promoters with or without the UP element, expressed as a fraction of the UP element effect in the presence of plasmid-encoded wild-type σ (see Materials and Methods).

Two other σ70 mutants, E591A and R596A, had phenotypes not specific to UP element function. E591A reduced transcription from reporter fusions both containing and lacking UP elements by ∼25% (data not shown). Although the corresponding residue in T. aquaticus σA (E416) does not contact DNA directly in the crystal structure (Campbell et al. 2002), it has been proposed that this substitution alters σ interactions with the −35 hexamer indirectly (Nickels et al. 2002). The effect of R596A on UP element function could not be evaluated in vivo, because this substitution led to induction of λ prophages carrying the promoter–lacZ fusions and cell lysis. R596 has been implicated previously in activation of the λPRM promoter by λcI (Li et al. 1994; Nickels et al. 2002). Therefore, the effect of this mutant σ on UP element function was examined only in vitro (see following).

The effects of the σ mutants on the function of a different UP element, the consensus full UP element (Estrem et al. 1998), were also measured. None of the σ mutants reduced the function of this UP element by >20% (data not shown).

Substitutions in σ70 region 4 reduce UP element function in vitro

To determine whether the effects of σ R603A, K593A, or K597A on proximal subsite function in vivo were direct, we examined transcription by RNAPs containing these mutant σ subunits in vitro. Figure 3 shows the results from in vitro transcription experiments in which the same preparation of core RNAP was saturated with wild-type or mutant σ subunits (see Materials and Methods for details). Similar results were obtained with RNAPs containing σ subunits with histidine (his) tags or GST tags (data not shown).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effects of σ70 region 4 alanine substitutions on UP element function in vitro. Promoters containing or lacking UP elements were transcribed in vitro with wild-type or σ mutant RNAPs. (A) Transcript bands from representative gels. Templates contained either the rrnB P1 or rrnD P1 core promoter and the UP element indicated above the images of the transcripts (see Fig. 1 for sequences). RNAP holoenzymes were reconstituted from core RNAP and the purified wild-type or mutant σ indicated at the left of each set of transcripts. Duplicate reactions are shown for most of the promoters. (BE) Effects of σ mutant RNAPs on UP element function. To calculate the “UP element effect” for each RNAP (mutant and wild type), we compared the amount of transcript from a promoter with an UP element to that from the same promoter lacking an UP element (“no UP”). The bars in the histograms represent the UP element effects obtained with the mutant holoenzyme divided by that with the wild-type holoenzyme. Error bars indicate standard deviations from at least three independent experiments. A ratio of 1.0 (horizontal line) indicates no difference in the UP element effect using the wild-type and mutant holoenzyme. (B) σ RA603A RNAP. (C) σ KA597A RNAP. (D) σ KA593A RNAP. (E) σ RA596A RNAP.

Transcription was measured from promoters containing or lacking UP elements (transcripts from representative gels are pictured in Fig. 3A; see Fig. 1 for promoter sequences). The UP element effects with the σ mutant RNAPs were then calculated as ratios of the UP element effects with the wild-type RNAP (Fig. 3B–E). σ R603A reduced the effects of each of two different consensus proximal subsites (UP elements 4549 and 4547) by ∼50%–60% and of the natural rrnD P1 full UP element by almost 40%. In contrast, R603A did not reduce the effects of the natural rrnB P1 or consensus full UP elements (Fig. 3B). Thus, the results obtained in vitro were fully consistent with the results obtained in vivo, indicating that the effect of σ region 4 on UP element function is direct.

The effects of σ substitutions K597A (Fig. 3C) and K593A (Fig. 3D) on UP element function in vitro were smaller than the effects of R603A, reducing 4549 and 4547 UP element function by only ∼15%–30%, and the effects of σ K597A and σ K593A on rrnD P1 UP element function were not different from the effect of wild-type σ within error. Like σ R603A, σ K597A and σ K593A did not decrease the effect of the consensus full or rrnB P1 full UP elements. Because we were not able to test the effect of σ R596A in vivo (see earlier), we measured its effect on transcription in vitro. σ R596A did not decrease UP element function in vitro (Fig. 3E).

In a few cases, effects of the rrnB full or consensus full UP elements were reproducibly enhanced by the σ substitutions both in vitro (Fig. 3) and in vivo (data not shown). We will return to this subject in the Discussion.

Identification of αCTD mutants causing defects in UP element proximal subsite function

The identification of σ R603 as a residue important for the function of some (but not all) UP elements suggested that σ region 4 might interact with αCTD, but that this interaction might occur (or have functional consequences) only in some contexts. To identify residues in αCTD that might interact with σ region 4, we used our library of rpoA constructs coding for single alanine substitutions at each position in the αCTD (α residues 255–329; Gaal et al. 1996; Kainz and Gourse 1998). We screened for mutants with a phenotype similar to that observed for the σ mutants described earlier: a defect in consensus proximal subsite function and not in rrnB P1 full UP element function. Effects of a subset of the alanine library on rrnB P1 full UP element function were reported previously (residues 255–273 and 291–302; Gaal et al. 1996; Murakami et al. 1996). Effects of the remaining substitutions in αCTD on full UP element function, as well as effects of the entire library on consensus proximal subsite function, have not been reported previously.

Plasmids carrying wild-type or mutant rpoA genes were transformed into strains containing one of three chromosomal promoter–lacZ fusions (rrnB P1 with the consensus proximal subsite, with the native rrnB P1 full UP element, or without an UP element). Effects of α substitutions on UP element function were determined by measuring the ratio of activities from promoters with and without UP elements and then determining the ratio of these UP element effects in strains expressing mutant versus wild-type α from the rpoA plasmids (Fig. 4; see also Materials and Methods).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Effects of single alanine substitutions in αCTD on UP element function in vivo. Strains contained plasmids encoding either wild-type or mutant rpoA alleles and rrnB P1 promoter–lacZ fusions containing an UP element [the consensus proximal subsite 4547 (A) or the native rrnB P1 full UP element (B)] or lacking an UP element. The “UP element effect” for each α mutant was determined as the ratio of β-galactosidase activities from promoters with and without an UP element. The bars in the figure indicate the UP element effects with each plasmid-encoded α mutant as a fraction of the UP element effect with plasmid-encoded wild-type α (see Materials and Methods). Striped bars indicate a class of α mutants (D261A or E259A) reducing the effect of the consensus proximal subsite approximately twofold, but not reducing the effect of the full UP element. Dark bars indicate alanine substitutions that reduced the effects of both the consensus proximal subsite and the rrnB P1 full UP element. The effects of these substitutions on transcription are attributable to defects in UP element DNA binding (see text). Open bars indicate positions that are alanine residues in wild-type α. Asterisks indicate positions where the plasmids contained either additional mutations or (for 312) wild-type rpoA (see Materials and Methods).

Twelve substitutions in plasmid-encoded α reduced the effect of consensus proximal subsite 4547 by at least 40% (D259A, E261A, T263A, R265A, N268A, C269A, L290A, L295A, G296A, K298A, S299A, and E302A; Fig. 4A), despite moderation of the effect of the mutant subunit by the presence of the wild-type rpoA gene on the host chromosome. Two of these substitutions, D259A and E261A, reduced consensus proximal subsite function in vivo by 50%–60% but had little if any effect on rrnB P1 full UP element function (i.e., <10% different from wild-type α; Fig. 4B) or on consensus full UP element function (data not shown). α E261A also reduced rrnD P1 and 4549 UP element function by about 40% (data not shown), whereas D259A had smaller effects on the function of these UP elements (15%–25%; data not shown). D259A and E261A therefore constitute a distinct phenotypic class whose effects on UP element function are similar to those of σ R603A. In the αCTD–UP element complex, D259 and E261 are surface exposed and relatively distant from the DNA (Ross et al. 2001; Benoff et al. 2002). Furthermore, it was shown previously that substitutions for E261 do not affect DNA binding (Tang et al. 1994; Savery et al. 1998). Therefore, these residues are candidates for direct interaction with σ70 region 4.

The other 10 substitutions reduced the effect not only of the consensus proximal subsite, but also of the rrnB full UP element (Fig. 4B). Effects of all 10 substitutions on DNA binding can be rationalized from the positions of these residues in the X-ray structure of the αCTD–DNA complex (Benoff et al. 2002), and most have been reported previously to disrupt binding of α to UP element DNA in vitro (Gaal et al. 1996; Murakami et al. 1996).

Several other alanine substitutions in αCTD (D258A, L260A, L262A, V264A, S266A, I303A, and V306A) reduced consensus proximal subsite function by ∼30%, that is, by less than the substitutions listed earlier. Like α D259A and α E261A, α D258A reduced proximal subsite 4547 (but not full UP element) function in vivo. The other substitutions reduced both 4547 and full UP element function, and generally affected full UP element function more than proximal subsite function (Fig. 4). We suggest that these residues may have indirect effects on DNA binding that are most prominent in the context of full UP elements. L314A, a residue that is surface exposed but located far from either the DNA binding surface of αCTD or from D259 and E261, also reduced full UP element function (by ∼50%) and had a slight effect on proximal subsite function. Further characterization revealed that the plasmid encoding L314A contained an additional, previously undetected, mutation coding for an arginine substitution for L281. L281 is not surface exposed. We suspect that introduction of a large basic side chain at this position disrupts the (HhH)2 fold sufficiently to alter the DNA binding surface indirectly.

α E261A and D259A reduce UP element proximal subsite function in vitro

To determine whether E261A and D259A affect UP element function directly, we reconstituted RNAPs using purified wild-type α, α E261A, or α D259A, and transcription was measured in vitro from promoters containing or lacking UP elements (Fig. 5A). Consistent with the results obtained in vivo, E261A reduced the function of the consensus proximal subsites (4547 and 4549) by ∼40% and of the rrnD P1 full UP element by ∼30%, and had little or no effect on the function of the rrnB P1 full and consensus full UP elements (Fig. 5B). Although the effects of E261A were relatively small, they were very reproducible in multiple experiments and with different RNAP preparations. Although only a subset of these templates was tested with D259A RNAP, it had similar, albeit not identical, effects on UP element function as E261A RNAP (Fig. 5C). As in the in vivo experiments, D258A RNAP had smaller effects on proximal subsite function than either E261A or D259A RNAP (data not shown).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Effects of α E261A and α D259A on UP element function in vitro. Promoters containing or lacking UP elements were transcribed in vitro with wild-type or α mutant RNAPs. (A) Transcript bands from representative gels. Templates contained either the rrnB P1 or rrnD P1 core promoter and the UP element indicated above the images of the transcripts (see Fig. 1 for sequences). RNAP holoenzymes were reconstituted from purified subunits using the wild-type or mutant α indicated at the left of each set of transcripts (Materials and Methods). Duplicate reactions are shown. (BC) Effects of α mutant RNAPs on UP element function. To calculate the “UP element effect” for each RNAP (mutant and wild type), we compared the amount of transcript from a promoter with an UP element to that from the same promoter lacking an UP element (“no UP”). The bars in the histograms represent the UP element effects obtained with the mutant holoenzyme divided by the UP element effects obtained using the wild-type holoenzyme. Error bars indicate standard deviations from at least three independent experiments. A ratio of 1.0 (horizontal line) indicates no difference in UP element effect using the wild-type and mutant holoenzyme. (B) α E261A RNAP. (C) α D259A RNAP.

σ R603A decreases initial binding of RNAP (KB)

Previous kinetic analyses indicated that the native rrnB P1 UP element increased the overall association rate (ka) of RNAP with the rrnB P1 promoter ∼20–30× in vitro (Rao et al. 1994). Most of this stimulation resulted from increasing the initial binding constant, KB, but there also appeared to be an increase in the rate of isomerization to the open complex, kf (Rao et al. 1994). Later studies showed that an UP element sequence fused to a synthetic promoter could facilitate isomerization (Strainic et al. 1998). We carried out kinetic studies to determine the step(s) responsible for the effect of σ R603A on UP element function.

Concentrations of active wild-type and σ R603A reconstituted RNAPs were determined, and the rates of formation of heparin-stable complexes on a promoter containing a consensus proximal subsite (UP element 4549) were measured as a function of active enzyme concentration using a filter binding assay (Roe et al. 1984; Rao et al. 1994; Barker et al. 2001). The composite association rate constant, ka, has contributions from both initial binding (KB) and subsequent isomerization (kf) steps (ka = KBkf). ka and kf were determined from both linear and nonlinear analysis of kobs as a function of RNAP concentration (see Materials and Methods). A linear representation of the data [Tau plot; 1/kobs vs. 1/(RNAP); McClure 1980] is shown in Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Effects of σ R603A on association of RNAP with the rrnB P1 promoter containing the consensus proximal subsite 4549. Association rate constants, kobs, were determined at different RNAP concentrations, and the results are shown as a Tau plot (McClure 1980). The kinetic parameters, ka = KBkf (determined from the nonlinear fit described in Materials and Methods), indicated that σ R603A reduced ka, the observed second order association rate constant, by eightfold, all of which was caused by a decrease in the initial binding constant, KB. Kinetic parameters: ka (wild-type RNAP) = 9.7 ± 0.8 × 106 (M−1sec−1); ka (R603A RNAP) = 1.2 ± 0.1 × 106 (M−1sec−1); kf (wild-type RNAP) = 1.3 ± 0.1 × 10−2 (sec−1); kf (R603A RNAP) = 2.3 ± 0.6 × 10−2 (sec−1).

The value of ka for σ R603A RNAP was eightfold smaller than for wild-type RNAP under these solution conditions, even though isomerization was slightly faster (Fig. 6 legend). As a consequence, the equilibrium binding constant KB (KB = ka/kf) for σ R603 RNAP was 14-fold smaller than for wild-type RNAP. Kinetic parameters determined for RNAPs reconstituted with α E261A versus wild-type α indicated that α E261A reduced the association rate 2.7-fold, and, as with σ R603A RNAP, the reduction resulted largely from a change in KB (data not shown). The complexes formed with either wild-type or σ R603A polymerase showed no dissociation over the time course of the experiments (data not shown). The combination of these association and dissociation kinetic data demonstrate that the σ region 4–αCTD interaction primarily affects recruitment of RNAP to the promoter, rather than subsequent steps in the transcription mechanism. The larger defect caused by σ R603A in Figure 6 versus Figure 3 could derive either from the greater sensitivity of the kinetic assay or from an UP element-independent component contributing to the effect of the mutant. Studies addressing this issue are in progress.

σ R603A and α E261A alter the structure of the transcription initiation complex

We asked whether α E261A or σ R603A affected the structure of the RNAP–promoter complex using DNAse I footprinting. A selection of these footprints is shown in Figure 7A–D. On the 4547 promoter (a template where these mutants reduced UP element function both in vitro and in vivo), the footprints with α E261A and wild-type RNAP were virtually identical, except at position −38 on the template strand (numbering refers to the phosphodiester bond connecting −38 and −39). This position, which is located at the junction of the proximal subsite and the −35 element, was more accessible to DNAse I in the α E261A RNAP complex (Fig. 7A) than in the wild-type RNAP complex (Fig. 7A, inset). Likewise, on the 4549 promoter (another template where these mutants reduced UP element function both in vitro and in vivo), template strand position −38 was more accessible to DNAse I in the σ R603A (Fig. 7B, see inset) or α E261A (data not shown) RNAP complex than in the wild-type RNAP complex. In contrast, cleavage at −38 was not altered in promoter complexes containing the mutant RNAPs and the rrnB P1 full UP element (σ R603A RNAP, Fig. 7C; α E261A RNAP, data not shown), where these mutants did not affect UP element-dependent transcription. Similarly, altered cleavage by DNAse I was not observed with σ R603A versus wild-type RNAP on the lacUV5 promoter (which does not contain an UP element; Ross et al. 1998; Fig. 7D). These results suggest that the RNAP substitutions alter the structure at the junction of the binding sites for αCTD and σ region 4, but only at promoters where the mutant RNAPs affect UP element-dependent transcription (see also Discussion).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

DNAse I footprints of promoters in the presence of wild-type and mutant RNAPs. Footprints were performed on rrnB P1 containing UP element 4547 (A), UP element 4549 (B), the rrnB P1 full UP element (C), or the lacUV5 promoter (D; see Materials and Methods). The regions in DNA protected from DNAse I cleavage and the regions corresponding to the UP elements are indicated under the gel images. The RNAP used in each lane is indicated at the left of the gel images: wild-type RNAP (WT), αE261A RNAP (αE261A), σ R603A RNAP (σR603A), or no RNAP (−). Superimposed scans of gel lanes are shown above the images. Scans corresponding to footprints with mutant RNAPs are red, footprints with wild-type RNAP are blue, and footprints without RNAP are gray. Red arrows indicate position −38, and this region is magnified in the inset in each panel. Footprints of an E261A RNAP–4549 promoter complex were very similar to those shown in A, and footprints on an E261A RNAP–rrnB P1 full UP element promoter complex were very similar to those shown in C (data not shown). On the 4547 (A) and 4549 (B) promoters, position −38 was more sensitive to DNAse I cleavage in the complexes formed with the mutant RNAPs than with the wild-type RNAP.

Structure-based identification of an interaction between αCTD and σ region 4

Our studies suggest that an interaction between σ R603 and α D259 and/or E261 plays an important role in UP element-dependent transcription at certain promoters. High resolution X-ray structures of E. coli αCTD bound to a DNA fragment containing an A-tract (Benoff et al. 2002) and of T. aquaticus σA domain 4.2 bound to a DNA fragment containing a −35 hexamer (Campbell et al. 2002) indicate that these residues are surface exposed and relatively distant from the DNA. (T. aquaticus σA region 4.2 is 79% similar or identical to E. coli σ70 region 4.2.) In order to determine whether σ R603 and α D259 and/or E261 are likely to be in close proximity, we juxtaposed the structures of the αCTD–DNA complex and the σ region 4–DNA complex to model a ternary complex, positioning the center of the αCTD binding site precisely 6 bp from the upstream end of the −35 hexamer (promoter position −42; sequence numbering from rrnB P1). This placement of αCTD relative to the −35 element was based on detailed information provided by protection and interference footprinting studies of RNAP on rrnB P1 promoters containing consensus proximal subsites (UP elements 4547 and 4549; Ross et al. 2001).

Figure 8 indicates that when the αCTD and σ region 4 binding sites are thus aligned, residues D259 and E261 of αCTD are in very close proximity to R429 of T. aquaticus σA (which corresponds to R603 of σ70; σ70 residue numbers are used on the figure), in complete agreement with their proposed interaction. σ70 Residues K593 and K597 (corresponding to σA K418 and K422, respectively), which had small effects on UP element-dependent transcription (Figs. 2, 3), are not in the proposed σ–α interface and are discussed following. Position −38, whose accessibility to DNAse I was increased when the proposed functional interaction between α and σ was altered by mutation, is on the DNA surface opposite to the binding sites of α and σ. This suggests that the functional interaction between α and σ distorts the DNA, altering the width of the minor groove, and thereby reducing access to cleavage by DNAse I (see Discussion).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Structure-based model for the interaction between αCTD and σ region 4. The structure of the E. coli αCTD–DNA complex is from Benoff et al. (2002), and the structure of the T. aquaticus σA region 4.2 to −35 region DNA complex is from Campbell et al. (2002). αCTD is shown centered at −42, 6 bp upstream of the upstream boundary of the −35 hexamer (position −36; numbering from rrnB P1), based on results from extensive footprinting studies of a complex containing RNAP and rrnB P1 promoters with UP elements 4547 and 4549 (Ross et al. 2001). DNA from −49 through −38 is from the αCTD–DNA structure, and DNA from position −37 through −28 is from the σA region 4–DNA complex. αCTD is shown in ribbon form in white, with α D259 and α E261 in spacefill in blue. T. aquaticus σA region 4.2 is shown in ribbon form in green (labeled with corresponding E. coli amino acid numbers). σ R603 (spacefill in red) corresponds to σA R429, and σ K593 and σ K597 (spacefill in light pink) correspond to σA K418 and K422, respectively. DNA is shown in stick form. The views in A and B differ by a 90° rotation. The models were constructed using Insight II. The phosphodiester linkages on both strands between positions −38 and −37, the junction of the αCTD–DNA and σA region 4.2–DNA structures, are not modeled. The two complexes are positioned to produce a continuous B-form DNA helix because the degree of DNA bending, if any, at their junction is not known. The DNAse I cleavage site on the template strand between −38 and −39 (referred to here as −38), which is affected by the proposed α–σ interaction (Fig. 7 and text), is indicated by a magenta sphere. The upstream DNA in the structure of σ bound to the −35 region (Campbell et al. 2002) is bent toward σ, and K593 interacts with nontemplate strand position −39 [−38 in the promoter used by Campbell et al. (2002) corresponds to −39 in rrnB P1]. This DNA distortion is not modeled in our complex (because the upstream DNA comes from the αCTD–DNA structure), and σ K593 is closer to −38 than to −39.

Discussion

Interaction of αCTD and σ70 region 4.2

The genetic and biochemical results presented here strongly suggest there is a functional interaction between acidic side chains D259 and E261 on αCTD and basic side chain R603 on σ70. The proposed interaction is based on several criteria: (1) the identification of alanine substitutions at these positions, leading to defects in UP element function in vivo and in vitro at the same subset of promoters; (2) the identification of a structural alteration (detected by altered DNAse I sensitivity of promoter position −38) in complexes containing either α E261A RNAP or σ R603A RNAP; (3) the proximity of α residues D259 and E261 to σ residue R603 in a structure-based model of the ternary complex formed by αCTD, σ region 4, and DNA.

The structure-based model (Fig. 8) provides a clear explanation for our genetic and biochemical observations. However, we emphasize that the model is based on a complex containing region 4.2 from T. aquaticus σA, not from E. coli σ70. Therefore, although the σ70 and σA sequences are very similar, confirmation of the model awaits solution of a structure of a ternary complex with subunits derived from the same bacterium.

Although α D259, α E261, and σ R603 are positioned appropriately to interact, our model of the ternary complex suggests that two other nearby residues in σ that slightly affected UP element-dependent transcription (K593 and K597) are unlikely to interact directly with αCTD. In the −35 hexamer–T. aquaticus σA region 4 complex (Campbell et al. 2002), K418 (σ70 K593) contacts the DNA backbone at the promoter position corresponding to −39 (see also Fig. 8 legend). K593 mutants also reduce activator-dependent transcription (e.g., Lonetto et al. 1998; Landini and Busby 1999; Nickels et al. 2002), suggesting that the same K593–DNA backbone interaction plays a role in both UP element function and in activation by transcription factors. T. aquaticus σA residue K422 (σ70 K597) does not contact DNA in the crystal structure (Campbell et al. 2002). Although the mechanism responsible for its small effect on UP element function therefore remains to be determined, one possibility is that it alters DNA binding indirectly by affecting K593. Our results do not exclude potential roles for other nearby residues in σ, although the in vivo data suggest that these effects are small, if they occur.

Our data suggest that αCTD residues E261 and D259 contact σ region 4. α D258 could also be part of the patch contacting σ because the alanine substitution at this position slightly reduced proximal subsite 4547 (but not full UP element) function. However, in our model of the complex (Fig. 8), α D258 is not as close to the σ interface as E261 and D259, suggesting that either the DNA is distorted in the actual complex, slightly changing the orientation of D258 with respect to σ, or that D258A affects UP element function indirectly by altering the E261 and/or D259 interaction with σ R603. It is possible that α subunits containing E261A, D259A, and D258A would cause greater defects in UP element-dependent transcription than the single-substitution mutants.

Context dependence of the αCTD–σ interaction

The proposed αCTD–σ interaction affects use of three different UP elements tested here: two consensus proximal subsites, originally identified by in vitro selection (Estrem et al. 1999), and the native UP element from the rrnD P1 promoter. The proximal subsite in the rrnD P1 UP element more closely resembles the consensus proximal subsites than the proximal subsites in the other three promoter constructs tested (which were unaffected by the proposed αCTD–σ interaction; rrnB P1 full, consensus full, or rrnB P1 proximal; Fig. 1). Although further studies will be required to understand the context dependence of the αCTD–σ interaction, we propose two potential (nonexclusive) explanations:

(1) The context dependence of the αCTD–σ interaction reflects differing contributions of the proximal subsite to overall UP element function. This model is suggested by results from interference footprinting experiments, in which missing bases in the proximal subsite greatly reduced RNAP binding to a promoter containing only the consensus proximal subsite, but did not affect binding to promoters containing the native rrnB P1 full UP element or the consensus full UP element (Ross et al. 2001; data not shown). Furthermore, the proximal subsite was less strongly protected from hydroxyl radical attack by αCTD in promoter complexes containing both subsites than in complexes containing only the proximal subsite (Newlands et al. 1991; Estrem et al. 1999).

It is possible that, in some full UP elements, a reduced contribution of the proximal subsite to transcription results from a decrease in αCTD occupancy of this subsite, thereby reducing effects of the proposed α–σ interaction. The mechanism by which the distal subsite might reduce occupancy of the proximal subsite remains unclear, however. Perhaps the distal subsite in some UP elements binds both αCTDs at closely adjacent positions along the minor groove, as observed in the crystal of the αCTD–DNA complex (Benoff et al. 2002). This configuration would explain why the length of the protected region is greater for the distal subsite than for the proximal subsite in hydroxyl radical footprints and missing base interference footprints of full UP elements (Newlands et al. 1991; Estrem et al. 1998, 1999; Ross et al. 2001). We speculate that, at some promoters containing two UP element subsites, transcription might be favored by having both αCTDs positioned at the distal subsite. The slight transcription enhancement observed at these promoters by mutations that inhibit α–σ interactions might be explained by reduced competition for αCTD at the distal subsite by αCTD bound at the proximal subsite (see Results).

(2) The context dependence of the effect of the αCTD–σ interaction could also reflect effects of local DNA sequence near the junction of the α and σ binding sites. Slight differences in the mode of DNA binding might affect the spatial separation of the relevant side chains in α and σ. For example, differences in the proximal subsite DNA sequence could affect the trajectory of the DNA and thereby the orientation of the bound αCTD in the promoter complex. Binding of σ region 4.2 to the −35 hexamer induces a bend in the DNA of about 36° (Campbell et al. 2002), facilitating interactions between σ and the DNA backbone on the nontemplate strand immediately upstream of the −35 hexamer. It is conceivable that differences in local DNA sequence could affect these σ–DNA backbone interactions, thereby affecting the orientation of σ R603 at the α–σ interface.

We note that the extent of DNAse I cleavage of template strand position −38 in wild-type RNAP–consensus proximal subsite promoter complexes differs from that in some other promoter complexes, where cleavage at this position is enhanced by binding of RNAP (Fig. 7C,D; Ross et al. 1993; Craig et al. 1995). We suggest that the major DNA bend proposed to occur at this position in many promoter complexes (Craig et al. 1995) is less pronounced when there is an interaction between αCTD and σ70 region 4.

αCTD–σ interactions at other promoters

It is likely that the αCTD–σ interactions described here are important for many bacterial promoters. UP elements are present in promoters transcribing rRNAs, tRNAs, and mRNAs, and good proximal subsites are more frequent than good distal subsites or good full UP elements in E. coli promoters (Estrem et al. 1999). In this regard, it has been reported that substitutions for E261 reduce factor-independent transcription from the metE promoter in vitro and in vivo (Jafri et al. 1995, 1996).

The same αCTD–σ interaction that facilitates UP element proximal subsite function apparently also plays a role in activation by transcription factors at Class I promoters, where αCTD is at the same position relative to σ as at promoters with proximal subsites (Busby and Ebright 1999). α E261A reduces Class I CRP-dependent activation of the lac promoter (Tang et al. 1994; Savery et al. 2002) and Class I TyrR-dependent activation of the mtr promoter (Yang et al. 1997). E. coli strains haploid for E261K also display a variety of other phenotypes (Jafri et al. 1995, 1996), suggesting that this surface on αCTD plays a role in multiple cell functions.

Residues in σ70 region 4.2 have also been identified as activation determinants at several Class II promoters, for example, alkA (Landini and Busby 1999), melRcon (Lonetto et al. 1998), narG and dmsA (Lonetto et al. 1998), and λPRM (Nickels et al. 2002), where transcription factors bind just upstream of the −35 hexamer. Not surprisingly, different amino acid side chains in σ may interact with different activator proteins at these promoters: R603 for CRP, FNR, and Ada (Lonetto et al. 1998; Landini and Busby 1999) and R588 for λ cI (Nickels et al. 2002). Therefore, at Class II promoters, σ region 4 interactions with activator proteins might function like σ–αCTD interactions at the UP element-dependent promoters described here.

It was suggested previously that σ R603A might cause a general transcription defect (Lonetto et al. 1998) because its effects on Class II CRP-dependent transcription did not depend on the putative σ interaction surface on CRP, it affected transcription from all promoters tested, and strains expressing R603A displayed reduced growth rates in the defined media used. As indicated earlier, it is possible that R603A has general effects in addition to its specific effects on UP element-dependent transcription (Fig. 3), although it did not reduce the growth rate of our strain in the rich medium used (data not shown).

Amino acid sequences C-terminal to σ70 R599 diverge in the alternative σ factors (Gruber and Bryant 1997). Future studies will be required to determine whether alternative σ–α interactions can contribute to transcription by other holoenzymes.

In conclusion, our results indicate that a σ region 4–αCTD interaction plays a role in transcription from a subset of UP element-dependent promoters, where an αCTD protomer binds to the DNA minor groove adjacent to the −35 hexamer, adjacent to σ region 4.2 bound in the DNA major groove. We suggest that this same interaction participates in activation by transcription factors at Class I promoters, where an αCTD protomer binds at a comparable position in the activation complex.

Ebright and colleagues (H. Chen and R. Ebright, unpubl.) independently have proposed that an interaction between the 261 determinant of αCTD and region 4 of σ70 plays roles in activator-dependent and UP element-dependent transcription.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and plasmids

Strains and plasmids are listed in Table 1. Effects of rpoA and rpoD mutations on promoter activities were measured in strains carrying promoter–lacZ fusions on a single copy λ prophage. Effects of rpoA mutations were measured in derivatives of NK5031 (Gaal et al. 1989), and effects of rpoD mutations were measured in derivatives of VH1000 (Gaal et al. 1997). The trp promoter–rpoD chromosomal fusion coding for wild-type σ70 was introduced into λ lysogens by P1 transduction from CAG20153 (Lonetto et al. 1998), with selection on LB agar containing chloramphenicol (25 μg/mL), indole-3-acrylic acid (IAA; 0.2 mM; Sigma), and sodium citrate (50 mM). Fresh transductants were used for each set of experiments.

Table 1.

Strains and plasmids

Strain
Genotypea
Source
VH1000 MG1655 lacZ lacI pyrE+ Gaal et al. 1997
NK5031 lacM5265 NalR SupF Gaal et al. 1989
RLG957 NK5031/λ rrnB Pl (−61 to +50)-lacZ Ross et al. 1990
RLG4547 NK5031/λ rrnB Pl (−66 to +50; proximal UP 4547)-lacZ Estrem et al. 1999
RLG4549 NK5031/λ rrnB Pl (−66 to +50; proximal UP 4549)-lacZ Estrem et al. 1999
RLG2258 NK5031/λ system II rrnB Pl (−41 to +50)-lacZ Rao et al. 1994
RLG4755 VH1000/λ system II rrnB Pl (−41 to +50)-lacZ This work
RLG5643 VH1000/λ system II rrnB Pl (−41 to +50)-lacZ ptrp-rpoD This work
RLG5417 VH1000/λ rrnB Pl (−66 to +50; proximal UP 4547)-lacZ This work
RLG5601 VH1000/λ rrnB Pl (−66 to +50; proximal UP 4547)-lacZ ptrp-rpoD This work
RLG5600 VH1000/λ rrnB Pl (−66 to +50; full consensus UP 4192)-lacZ This work
RLG5602 VH1000/λ rrnB Pl (−66 to +50; full consensus UP 4192)-lacZ ptrp-rpoD This work



Plasmid Description Source



pRLG770 Transcription Vector Ross et al. 1990
pRLG4210 rrnB Pl (−66 to +50, with SUB, an upstream sequence lacking UP element function) in pRLG770 Estrem et al. 1999
pRLG4213 rrnB Pl (−66 to +50, with selected proximal subsite UP element 4547) in pRLG770 Estrem et al. 1999
pRLG3289 rrnB Pl (−66 to +50, with selected proximal subsite UP element 4549) in pRLG770 Ross et al. 2001
pRLG3278 rrnB Pl (−66 to +50, with consensus full UP element 4192) in pRLG770 Estrem et al. 1998
pRLG4238 rrnB Pl (−66 to +50, with native UP element) in pRLG770 Estrem et al. 1998
pRLG3266 rrnD Pl (−60 to +1, with native UP element) in pRLG770 Ross et al. 1998
pRLG3267 rrnD Pl (−41 to +1); lacking an UP element) in pRLG770 Ross et al. 1998
pRLG593 placUV5 (−60 to +39) in pRLG770 Ross et al. 1990
pGEX-2T σ70 GST-σ70 (8-613) fusion pasmid, with wild-type or region 4.2 alanine substitutions Lonetto et al. 1998
pRLG4734 pGEX-2Tσ70 (8–613, L598A) This work
pETHis6-σ70 pET28 with wild-type σ70 Marr and Roberts 1997
pRLG3293 pETHis6- σ70 K593A This work
pRLG3295 pETHis6- σ70 K597A This work
pRLG3296 pETHis6- σ70 R603A This work
pHTf1α pHTf1 with wild-type and α273–329 alanine substitutions Gaal et al. 1996; Kainz and Gourse 1998; Tang et al. 1994
pREIIα pREII with wild-type or α255–271 alanine substitutions Tang et al. 1994; Gaal et al. 1996
a

λ Prophage carrying promoter–lacZ fusions are system I (Rao et al. 1994) unless otherwise indicated. 

Plasmid pGEX-2Tσ70 (residues 8–613) and derivatives containing individual alanine substitutions in σ region 4.2 (Lonetto et al. 1998) were kindly provided by K. Lamberg and P. Kiley (University of Wisconsin). A new version of the rpoD plasmid coding for the L598A substitution was constructed by J. Toplin and W. Ross using a two-step PCR procedure and Pfu DNA polymerase (Invitrogen), in which a fragment bounded by an XhoI site (rpoD codon 528) and an AatII site (downstream of the rpoD gene in plasmid vector sequence) was replaced with a mutant fragment coding for the L598A substitution to form plasmid RLG4734. Plasmids for purification of N-terminally hexahistidine tagged mutant derivatives of σ70 were constructed using the wild-type σ expressing plasmid pHis6 σ70, a derivative of pET28 (Novagen), kindly provided by C. Roberts (Cornell University). σ70 Mutant derivatives K593A, K597A, and R603A were constructed by replacing the BamHI–HindIII fragment from the wild-type plasmid (from σ70 codon 434 to vector sequence downstream of rpoD) with similarly digested mutant fragments generated by a two-step PCR procedure using Turbo Pfu Polymerase (Invitrogen). Additional details of constructions of plasmids coding for wild-type and alanine-substituted hexahistidine-tagged σ70 factors and for GST-tagged σ L598A are available on request. Sequences of all fragments inserted into rpoD plasmids were verified by Big Dye sequencing (UW Biotechnology Center).

Plasmids containing the rpoA gene coding for single alanine substitutions in the αCTD were derivatives of pHTf1α or pREIIα, as described previously (Gaal et al. 1996; Kainz and Gourse 1998). After the scans of the 74-amino acid αCTD were completed, three of the plasmids used for this purpose were discovered to contain additional substitutions, and one plasmid (thought to code for L312A) was found to be wild type. The plasmid coding for K304A also contains a second mutation, coding for E241V; the plasmid coding for L314A also contains a mutation coding for L281R; and the plasmid coding for M316A also codes for P323S and D328N. None of these substitutions are in regions of αCTD with the potential to interact with σ according to the structure-based model, and none except L281R (see Results) affected transcription in vivo. Furthermore, because the multiple mutations in the plasmids coding for K304A and M316A had no phenotype (Fig. 4), it is unlikely that K304A or M316A when alone would exert any effect on UP element function.

Plasmids used for in vitro transcription were derivatives of pRLG770 (Ross et al. 1990) and are listed in Table 1.

In vivo promoter activity determinations

To determine effects of substitutions in αCTD or σ70 on promoter activity, we transformed strains containing promoter–lacZ fusions (see earlier) with plasmids encoding α, σ70, or mutant derivatives (see earlier). Competent cells for transformation were prepared as described (Chung et al. 1989), and transformants were selected on LB agar containing ampicillin (100 μg/mL). For strains encoding the trp promoter–rpoD fusion, selective plates also contained IAA (0.2 mM). For assay of α or σ function, fresh colonies scraped from the selective agar plates were used to inoculate LB liquid cultures with ampicillin and without IAA. Cultures were inoculated to an OD600 ∼0.02 and grown for three to four generations at 30°C; β-galactosidase activity was assayed as described (Gaal et al. 1989). Effects of alanine substitutions in α or σ on UP element function were determined by measuring the ratio of activities of promoters with and without UP elements and then calculating the fraction of the UP element effect in a strain expressing mutant versus wild-type α or σ [(activity of UP element-containing promoter in the presence of mutant subunit/activity of SUB sequence-containing promoter in the presence of mutant subunit) ÷ (activity of UP element-containing promoter in the presence of wild-type subunit/activity of SUB sequence-containing promoter in the presence of wild-type subunit)].

RNA polymerases

RNAP holoenzymes containing wild-type or mutant α subunits were reconstituted as described previously (Gaal et al. 1996; Tang et al. 1996). RNAP holoenzymes containing wild-type or mutant σ subunits were assembled at 30°C by incubating core RNAP (a gift from R. Landick, University of Wisconsin) for 30 min with sufficient σ to saturate the core RNAP (determined by titration; ∼10:1 molar ratio of purified σ to core RNAP). Purified GST-tagged σ subunits were gifts from the laboratories of C. Gross and P. Kiley. Hexahistidine tagged σ subunits were purified from the soluble fraction using nickel-agarose (Qiagen) after brief overexpression in BL21 (DE3; Novagen). His tags on σ R603A, σ K597A, σ K593A, and wild-type σ were removed by cleavage with biotinylated thrombin, followed by removal of thrombin using streptavidin agarose (Thrombin Cleavage Capture Kit; Novagen). The RNAP containing σ R596A contained a GST tag and was compared with an RNAP containing a GST-tagged wild-type σ.

In vitro transcription

Supercoiled plasmid DNAs containing promoters inserted upstream of an rrnB T1 terminator in vector pRLG770 (Ross et al. 1990; see Table 1) were used as templates. Transcription reactions (25 μL) contained 0.5 nM plasmid DNA in 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.9); 150 mM NaCl; 10 mM MgCl2; 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT); 100 μg/mL bovine serum albumin (BSA); 200 μM ATP, GTP, and CTP; 10 μM UTP; and 2 μCi α32P-UTP (Perkin Elmer Life Sciences). Reactions were initiated by addition of RNAP (∼2 nM) and were terminated after 15 min at 25°C by addition of gel loading solution. Equivalent active concentrations of mutant and wild-type RNAPs were used, as determined from the activities of the enzymes on a promoter lacking an UP element (lacUV5). Samples were analyzed by electrophoresis in 5% acrylamide-7M urea gels, and promoter-specific transcripts were quantified by phosphorimaging (Molecular Dynamics). Duplicate reactions were performed in each experiment, and most experiments were carried out at least three times.

DNAse I footprinting

DNA fragments containing the lacUV5 promoter, the rrnB P1 promoters with UP elements 4547 or 4549 (consensus proximal subsites), or the rrnB P1 full UP element were prepared by PCR from appropriate plasmid templates (see Table 1 for sequence endpoints). Fragments were 32P 3′end labeled and gel purified, as described (Ross et al. 2001), and labeled fragments (∼0.5 nM) were incubated with 20 nM RNAP for 15 min at 37°C. Footprints comparing the effects of wild-type and σ R603A RNAP used the same core RNAP preparation and σ70 lacking hexahistidine or GST tags (see Results). Footprints comparing the effects of wild-type and α E261A RNAP used holoenzymes reconstituted from purified subunits. The 25-μL reaction contained 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.9), 30 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 100 μg/mL BSA, 500 μM ATP, and 50 μM CTP. Heparin (final concentration 10 μg/mL) was added, and after 30 sec, DNAse I (0.4 μg/mL; Worthington) was added for 30 sec, as described (Ross et al. 1990). Samples were processed and analyzed by electrophoresis on 9% acrylamide-7M urea gels, followed by phosphorimaging, as described (Ross et al. 2001).

Association kinetics

32P end-labeled DNA fragments [∼190 bp containing centrally located promoters, either rrnB P1 with UP element 4549 (−66 to +50) or lacUV5 (−60 to +39)] were prepared by PCR from appropriate plasmid templates, as described earlier for footprinting (Ross et al. 2001). Concentrations of active wild-type or mutant RNAPs (both containing hexahistidine-tagged σ subunits) were determined by titration with a known concentration of lacUV5 promoter fragment using a filter-binding assay (Roe et al. 1984). The rates of association of wild-type and σ R603A RNAP with rrnB P1 containing the consensus proximal subsite were measured in 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.9), 30 mM KCl, 3 mM NaCl (from RNAP storage buffer), 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, and 100 mg/mL BSA at 25°C in the presence of the initiating NTPs (500 μM ATP, 50 μM CTP). The complexes formed with the wild-type and mutant RNAPs were stable for longer than 30 min following heparin addition (data not shown), consistent with previous results with the native rrnB P1 promoter (Gourse 1988; Borukhov et al. 1993). All experiments were done under pseudo first-order conditions, where RNAP was in large excess over promoter DNA. At time zero, RNAP was added to promoter DNA and NTPs, aliquots were removed at time intervals to tubes containing heparin (final 10 μg/mL), and samples were filtered after 30 sec through Schleicher and Schuell NC45 nitrocellulose filters. After correcting for background retention in the absence of RNAP, observed counts per minute (cpmobs) were fit to a single exponential to obtain the observed rate constant kobs: cpmobs = cpmplateau − (1−e−kobst), where cpmplateau is the value of counts per minute retained at equilibrium.

Data were linearly fit to 1/kobs versus 1/(RNAP) using the equation 1/kobs = 1/ka(RNAP) + 1/kf (McClure 1980) and also fit to the nonlinear form of this equation: [kobs = kakf(RNAP)]/[ka(RNAP) + kf] for error propagation. In these equations, ka is a composite second-order association constant, and kf is the composite first-order isomerization rate constant. In general, fitting of data to the nonlinear expression for kobs is necessary for proper weighting (Saecker et al. 2002). Data points in the nonlinear fit were weighted by 1/(the uncertainty in kobs)2. For this set of data, either method of fitting yielded the same values of ka and kf within uncertainty. All data were fit using SigmaPlot 5.0 (SSPS).

Acknowledgments

We thank Julie Toplin, Rachel Mooney, Meg Burgess, Sara Bales, and Kai Zhou for experimental contributions; Ruth Saecker, Tom Record, and Melanie Barker for help with analysis of association kinetics; Karin Lamberg, Tricia Kiley, Christine Hirvonen, and Chris Roberts for providing strains, plasmids, and technical advice; Liz Campbell and Seth Darst for σ region 4.2–DNA structure coordinates prior to publication; Rick Wolf for bringing to our attention unintended mutations in some of the rpoA constructs; Richard Ebright for information prior to publication; Bob Landick for purified core RNA polymerase; and Tamas Gaal and other members of our laboratory for helpful discussions. Research in our laboratory is supported by RO1 GM37048 from the National Institutes of Health to R.L.G. D.A.S. and B.J.P. were supported by predoctoral fellowships from the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health, respectively.

 The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Footnotes

E-MAIL rgourse@bact.wisc.edu; FAX (608) 262-9865.

Article and publication are at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.1079403.

References

  1. Aiyar SE, McLeod SM, Ross W, Hirvonen CA, Thomas MS, Johnson RC, Gourse RL. Architecture of Fis-activated transcription complexes at the Escherichia coli rrnB P1 and rrnE P1 promoters. J Mol Biol. 2002;316:501–516. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barker MM, Gaal T, Josaitis CA, Gourse RL. Mechanism of regulation of transcription initiation by ppGpp. I. Effects of ppGpp on transcription initiation in vivo and in vitro. J Mol Biol. 2001;305:673–688. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benoff B, Yang H, Lawson CL, Parkinson G, Liu J, Blatter E, Ebright YW, Berman HM, Ebright RH. Structural basis of transcription activation: The CAP-αCTD–DNA complex. Science. 2002;297:1562–1566. doi: 10.1126/science.1076376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blatter EE, Ross W, Tang H, Gourse RL, Ebright RH. Domain organization of RNA polymerase α subunit: C-terminal 85 amino acids constitute a domain capable of dimerization and DNA binding. Cell. 1994;78:889–896. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(94)90682-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Borukhov S, Sagitov V, Josaitis CA, Gourse RL, Goldfarb A. Two modes of transcription initiation at the rrnB P1 promoter of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1993;268:23477–23482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burr T, Mitchell J, Minchin S, Busby S. DNA sequence elements located immediately upstream of the −10 hexamer in Escherichia coli promoters: A systmeatic study. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:1864–1870. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.9.1864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Busby S, Ebright RH. Transcription activation by catabolite activator protein (CAP) J Mol Biol. 1999;293:199–213. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Campbell EA, Muzzin O, Chlenov M, Sun JL, Olson CA, Weinman O, Trester-Zedlitz ML, Darst SA. Structure of the bacterial RNA polymerase promoter specificity σ subunit. Mol Cell. 2002;9:527–539. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(02)00470-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chung CT, Niemela SL, Miller RH. One-step preparation of competent Escherichia coli: Transformation and storage of bacterial cells in the same solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1989;86:2172–2175. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.7.2172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Craig ML, Suh W-C, Record MT., Jr HO· and DNAse I probing of Eσ70 RNA polymerase-λPR promoter open complexes: Mg2+ binding and its structural consequences at the transcription start site. Biochemistry. 1995;34:15624–15632. doi: 10.1021/bi00048a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Estrem ST, Gaal T, Ross W, Gourse RL. Identification of an UP element consensus sequence for bacterial promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1998;95:9761–9766. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.17.9761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Estrem ST, Ross W, Gaal T, Chen ZWS, Niu W, Ebright RH, Gourse RL. Bacterial promoter architecture: Subsite structure of UP elements and interactions with the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase α subunit. Genes & Dev. 1999;13:2134–2147. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.16.2134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gaal T, Barkei J, Dickson RR, de Boer HA, deHaseth PL, Alavi H, Gourse RL. Saturation mutagenesis of an E. coli rRNA promoter and initial characterization of promoter variants. J Bacteriol. 1989;171:4852–4861. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.9.4852-4861.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gaal T, Ross W, Blatter EE, Tang H, Jia X, Krishnan VV, Assa-Munt N, Ebright RH, Gourse RL. DNA-binding determinants of the α subunit of RNA polymerase: Novel DNA-binding domain architecture. Genes & Dev. 1996;10:16–26. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.1.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gaal T, Bartlett MS, Ross W, Turnbough CL, Jr, Gourse RL. Transcription regulation by initiating NTP concentration: rRNA synthesis in bacteria. Science. 1997;278:2092–2097. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5346.2092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gourse RL. Visualization and quantitative analysis of complex formation between E. coli RNA polymerase and an rRNA promoter in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988;16:9789–9809. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.20.9789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gourse RL, Ross W, Gaal T. UPs and downs in bacterial transcription initiation: Role of the α subunit of RNA polymerase in promoter recognition. Mol Microbiol. 2000;37:687–695. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01972.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gross CA, Chan C, Dombroski A, Gruber T, Sharp M, Tupy J, Young B. The functional and regulatory roles of σ factors in transcription. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1998;63:141–155. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1998.63.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gruber TM, Bryant DA. Molecular systematic studies of eubacteria, using σ70-type σ factors of group 1 and group 2. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:1734–1747. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.5.1734-1747.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hochschild A, Dove S. Protein–protein contacts that activate and repress prokaryotic transcription. Cell. 1998;92:597–600. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81126-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jafri S, Urbanowski ML, Stauffer GV. A mutation in the rpoA gene encoding the α subunit of RNA polymerase that affects metE-metR transcription in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:524–529. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.3.524-529.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. ————— The glutamic acid residue at amino acid 261 of the α subunit is a determinant of the intrinsic efficiency of RNA polymerase at the metE core promoter in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:6810–8106. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.23.6810-6816.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jeon YH, Negishi T, Shirakawa M, Yamazaki T, Fujita N, Ishihama A, Kyogoku Y. Solution structure of the activator contact domain of the RNA polymerase α subunit. Science. 1995;270:1495–1497. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5241.1495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jeon YH, Yamazaki T, Otomo T, Ishihama A, Kyogoku Y. Flexible linker in the RNA polymerase α subunit facilitates the independent motion of the C-terminal activator contact domain. J Mol Biol. 1997;267:953–962. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kainz M, Gourse RL. The C-terminal domain of the α subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase is required for efficient rho-dependent transcription termination. J Mol Biol. 1998;284:1379–1390. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim SK, Makino K, Amemura M, Nakata A, Shinagawa H. Mutational analysis of the role of the first helix of region 4.2 of the σ70 subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase in transcriptional activation by activator protein PhoB. Mol Gen Genet. 1995;248:1–8. doi: 10.1007/BF02456607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kuldell N, Hochschild A. Amino acid substitutions in the −35 recognition motif of σ70 that result in defects in phage λ repressor-stimulated transcription. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:2991–2998. doi: 10.1128/jb.176.10.2991-2998.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Landini P, Busby S. The Escherichia coli Ada protein can interact with two distinct determinants in the σ70 subunit of RNA polymerase according to promoter architecture: Identification of the target of Ada activation at the alkA promoter. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:1524–1529. doi: 10.1128/jb.181.5.1524-1529.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Li M, Moyle H, Susskind MM. Target of the transcriptional activation function of phage lambda cI protein. Science. 1994;263:75–77. doi: 10.1126/science.8272867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lonetto MA, Rhodius V, Lamberg K, Kiley P, Busby S, Gross C. Identification of a contact site for different transcription activators in region 4 of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase σ70 subunit. J Mol Biol. 1998;284:1353–1365. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Marr MT, Roberts JW. Promoter recognition as measured by binding of polymerase to nontemplate strand oligonucleotide. Science. 1997;276:1258–1260. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5316.1258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. McClure WR. Rate-limiting steps in RNA chain initiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1980;77:5634–5638. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.10.5634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. McLeod SM, Aiyar SE, Gourse RL, Johnson RC. The C-terminal domains of the RNA polymerase α subunits: Contact site with Fis and localization during co-activation with CRP at the Escherichia coli proP P2 promoter. J Mol Biol. 2002;316:517–529. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Murakami K, Fujita N, Ishihama A. Transcription factor recognition surface on the RNA polymerase α subunit is involved in contact with the DNA enhancer element. EMBO J. 1996;15:4358–4367. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Murakami KS, Masuda S, Darst SA. Structural basis of transcription initiation: RNA polymerase holoenzyme at 4 A resolution. Science. 2002a;296:1280–1284. doi: 10.1126/science.1069594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Murakami KS, Masuda S, Campbell EA, Muzzin O, Darst SA. Structural basis of transcription initiation: An RNA polymerase holoenzyme–DNA complex. Science. 2002b;296:1285–1290. doi: 10.1126/science.1069595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Newlands JT, Ross W, Gosink KK, Gourse RL. Factor-independent activation of Escherichia coli rRNA transcription. II. Characterization of complexes of rrnB P1 promoters containing or lacking the upstream activator region with Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. J Mol Biol. 1991;220:569–583. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90101-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Nickels BE, Dove SL, Murakami KS, Darst SA, Hochschild A. Protein–protein and protein–DNA interactions of σ70 region 4 involved in transcription activation by λ cI. J Mol Biol. 2002;324:17–34. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)01043-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Niu W, Kim Y, Tau G, Heyduk T, Ebright RH. Transcription activation at class II CAP-dependent promoters: Two interactions between CAP and RNA polymerase. Cell. 1996;87:1123–1134. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81806-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Pande S, Makela A, Dove SL, Nickels BE, Hochschild A, Hinton DM. The bacteriophage T4 transcription activator MotA interacts with the far-C-terminal region of the σ70 subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:3957–3964. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.14.3957-3964.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Rao L, Ross W, Appleman JA, Gaal T, Leirmo S, Schlax PJ, Record MT, Jr, Gourse RL. Factor independent activation of rrnB P1. An “extended” promoter with an upstream element that dramatically increases promoter strength. J Mol Biol. 1994;235:1421–1435. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Rhodius VA, Busby SJW. Interactions between activating region 3 of the Escherichia coli cyclic AMP receptor protein and region 4 of the RNA polymerase σ70 subunit: Application of suppression genetics. J Mol Biol. 2000;299:311–324. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Roe JH, Burgess RR, Record MT., Jr Kinetics and mechanism of the interaction of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase with the λ PR promoter. J Mol Biol. 1984;176:495–522. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90174-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ross W, Thompson JF, Newlands JT, Gourse RL. E. coli Fis protein activates rRNA transcription in vitro and in vivo. EMBO J. 1990;9:3733–3742. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07586.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ross W, Gosink KK, Salomon J, Igarashi K, Zou C, Ishihama A, Severinov K, Gourse RL. A third recognition element in bacterial promoters: DNA binding by the α subunit of RNA polymerase. Science. 1993;262:1407–1413. doi: 10.1126/science.8248780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ross W, Aiyar SE, Salomon J, Gourse RL. Escherichia coli promoters with UP elements of different strengths: modular structure of bacterial promoters. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:5375–5383. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.20.5375-5383.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ross W, Ernst A, Gourse RL. Fine structure of E. coli RNA polymerase-promoter interactions: α Subunit binding to the UP element minor groove. Genes & Dev. 2001;15:491–506. doi: 10.1101/gad.870001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Saecker RM, Tsodikov OV, McQuade KL, Schlax PE, Jr, Capp MW, Record MT., Jr Kinetic studies and structural models of the association of E. coli σ70 RNA polymerase with the λPR promoter: Large scale conformational changes in forming the kinetically significant intermediates. J Mol Biol. 2002;319:649–671. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00293-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Savery NJ, Lloyd GS, Kainz M, Gaal T, Ross W, Ebright RH, Gourse RL, Busby SJW. Transcription activation at class II CRP-dependent promoters: Identification of determinants in the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase α subunit. EMBO J. 1998;17:3439–3447. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.12.3439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Savery NJ, Lloyd GS, Busby SJW, Thomas MS, Ebright RH, Gourse RL. Determinants of the C-terminal domain of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase α subunit important for transcription at class I cyclic AMP receptor protein-dependent promoters. J Bacteriol. 2002;184:2273–2280. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.8.2273-2280.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Shao X, Grishin NV. Common fold in helix-hairpin-helix proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:2643–2650. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.14.2643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Strainic MG, Jr, Sullivan JJ, Velevis A, deHaseth PL. Promoter recognition by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: Effects of the UP element on open complex formation and promoter clearance. Biochemistry. 1998;37:18074–18080. doi: 10.1021/bi9813431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Tang H, Severinov K, Goldfarb A, Fenyo D, Chait B, Ebright RH. Location, structure, and function of the target of a transcriptional activator protein. Genes & Dev. 1994;8:3058–3067. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.24.3058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Tang H, Kim Y, Severinov K, Goldfarb A, Ebright RH. Escherichia coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme: Rapid reconstitution from recombinant α, β, β‘, and σ subunits. Methods Enzymol. 1996;273:130–140. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(96)73012-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Vassylyev DG, Sekine S, Laptenko O, Lee J, Vassylyeva MN, Borukhov S, Yokoyama S. Crystal structure of a bacterial RNA polymerase holoenzyme at 2.6 A resolution. Nature. 2002;417:712–719. doi: 10.1038/nature752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wada T, Yamazaki T, Kyogoku Y. The structure and the characteristic DNA binding property of the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase α subunit from Thermus thermophilus. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:16057–16063. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.21.16057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Yang J, Murakami K, Camakaris H, Fujita N, Ishihama A, Pittard AJ. Amino acid residues in the α-subunit C-terminal domain of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase involved in activation of transcription from the mtr promoter. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:6187–6191. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.19.6187-6191.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Yasuno K, Yamazaki T, Tanaka Y, Kodama TS, Matsugami A, Katahira M, Ishihama A, Kyogoku Y. Interaction of the C-terminal domain of the E. coli RNA polymerase α subunit with the UP element: Recognizing the backbone structure in the minor groove surface. J Mol Biol. 2001;306:213–225. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genes & Development are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

RESOURCES