Skip to main content
The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners logoLink to The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
. 1986 Dec;36(293):555–556.

Video recording in general practice: the patients do mind

John B Servant, John AB Matheson
PMCID: PMC1960646  PMID: 3668906

Abstract

The consent rate for video recording of consultations was examined in a semi-rural training practice in Scotland using a sample of over 1000 patients. An attempt was made to reduce the coercive methods of obtaining consent used in previous studies. In a first study explanatory letters were left in the waiting area — 273 patients returning to reception were asked if they wished to be filmed at a later date — 61 patients (22%) agreed. In a second study 830 patients were handed an explanatory letter asking if they wished to be filmed — 48 patients (6%) volunteered. The overall consent rate for the two studies combined was 10%. The low rate of consent obtained from these patients questions the propriety of using coercive methods.

Full text

PDF
555

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Herzmark G. Reactions of patients to video recording of consultations in general practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 Aug 3;291(6491):315–317. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6491.315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Martin E., Martin P. M. The reactions of patients to a video camera in the consulting room. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984 Nov;34(268):607–610. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES