Skip to main content
Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England logoLink to Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England
. 2005 Jul;87(4):277–282. doi: 10.1308/147870805X45957

An evaluation of operative training lists for senior house officers in a district general hospital.

Melanie Feldman 1, George Nasmyth 1
PMCID: PMC1963945  PMID: 16053690

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To address concerns about reduced opportunities for operative training, a programme of training operating lists for senior house officers was established. The entire patient pathway was used as a learning resource so that training was offered in a range of areas including development of knowledge, communication skills and attitudes as well as operative technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The programme was evaluated using a stakeholder approach, considering the impact on patients, the trainees and the host institution, including costs. Forty-two operations were performed during the 6-month evaluation period and the patients were compared with control patients undergoing the same procedure during a consultant-run operating list within 4 weeks. RESULTS: There was no difference in the patients' experience or overall satisfaction when comparing the trainees' patients with controls. Senior house officers performed only six other supervised operations on routine lists during the period; the programme increased their experience by 700%. Costs were increased by 12% per patient. CONCLUSIONS: There is an imperative to find new, efficient ways to train surgeons. Dedicated training operating lists with an appropriately controlled case-mix can both address a service need and provide a high intensity learning experience.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (117.3 KB).


Articles from Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England are provided here courtesy of The Royal College of Surgeons of England

RESOURCES