Abstract
We present the first reported case of a partial thickness burn to the skin from discarded bone cement during a routine total hip replacement (THR). The patient required plastic surgical attention for 5 months before the skin was healed. We summarise the reported incidents of cement burns to various other structures and the circumstances in which these injuries can potentially occur.
Keywords: Cement, Burn, Skin, Hip replacement
A 63-year-old female was admitted for elective total hip replacement (THR) for osteoarthritis of her right hip. She underwent hybrid fixation with an uncemented Harris Galante cup (Zimmer; Warsaw, IN, USA) and a cemented CPT stem (Zimmer), using Palacos R cement (Biomet; Warsaw, IN, USA) through a posterior approach. During cementing of the femoral component, discarded excess cement came into contact with the patient's skin for several minutes during the exothermic phase of polymerisation. This resulted in partial thickness burns to both her right lower leg and her right popliteal fossa. The presence of these burns was not noticed until the end of the surgery. Postoperatively, the patient complained of severe pain in the affected areas, requiring opiate and NSAID analgesia. The larger of the two deep dermal defects measured 2 cm × 3 cm. Initial treatment consisted of hydrocolloid dressings, followed by regular dressing changes, which continued in the community following the patient's discharge on the fifth postoperative day. A plastic surgical opinion was sought, who felt that a non-operative approach should be followed. The wounds progressively reduced in size, and were healed by 20 weeks after the injury. The area of scar tissue remained hypersensitive for the following 6 months, eventually resolving with simple massage. Although relieved, the patient was left with significant concerns regarding the cosmetic appearances of her lower limbs. She is delighted with the result of her THR.
Discussion
The exothermic phase of bone cement polymerisation liberates as much as 13 kcal (55 kJ) per 100 g,1 and the temperature can reach over 100°C in the laboratory.2,3 However, the rate of setting, the volume of cement, the time of contact and the thermal properties of the surrounding structures all potentially influence the actual peak temperature that is reached.4 In vivo, most of the heat is dissipated to the surrounding tissues and implants so that the temperature probably only reaches about 40°C (range, 38–56°C),4–6 and cement mantles are typically only 2–3 mm thick. Cell injury from heat is also time dependent: 5 s at 60°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 5 min at 50°C. Hence, the potential for thermal damage is unlikely during standard THR;3,6 however, it does exist and has been implicated as a potential factor in aseptic loosing by some authors.2
Larger volumes of cement, not normally encountered in standard THR, can reach much more dangerous temperatures. Meyer et al.7 showed that the surface temperature of setting cement varied with setting time and thickness of cement, with a 10 mm specimen reaching 107°C at room temperature (25°C). A larger piece of cement can, therefore, cause severe burns to structures in direct contact. We measured the maximum thickness of discarded cement during routine primary THR at our institution (Fig. 1) and found that an average of 5 pieces of cement per THR were at least 10 mm thick. Hence, there is considerable potential for skin burns to occur if these are not diligently discarded.
Figure 1.
Cement discarded from routine THR.
In the literature, burns from bone cement to the sciatic nerve,8 femoral nerve,1 obturator nerve,9 intrapelvic vasculature,10 and ureter11 have been described, but the present report is the first description of a skin burn by this mechanism.
Conclusion
Care should be taken to discard excess cement carefully in order to prevent this potentially common complication.
References
- 1.Weber E, Daube J, Coventry J. Peripheral neuropathies associated with total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:66–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Huiskes R. Some fundamental aspects of human joint replacement. Analyses of stresses and heat conduction in bone-prosthesis structures. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1980;185:27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jefferiss C, Lee A, Ling R. Thermal aspects of self-curing polymethylmethacrylate. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1975;57:511–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Toksvig-Larsen S, Franzen H, Ryd L. Cement interface temperature in hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand. 1991;62:102–5. doi: 10.3109/17453679108999232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Li C, Kotha S, Huang C-H, Mason J, Yakimicki D, Hawkins M. Finite element thermal analysis of bone cement for joint replacements. J Biomech Eng. 2003;125:315–22. doi: 10.1115/1.1571853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Reckling F, Dillon W. The bone cement interface temperature during total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977;59:80–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Meyer P, Lautenschlager E, Moore B. On the setting of acrylic bone cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55:149–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Birch R, Wilkinson M, Vijayan K, Gschmeissner S. Cement burn of the sciatic nerve. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74:731–3. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.74B5.1527124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Siliski J, Scott R. Obturator nerve palsy resulting from intrapelvic extrusion of cement during total hip replacement: report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:1225–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nachbur B, Meyer R, Verkkala K, Zurcher R. The mechanisms of severe arterial injury in surgery of the hip joint. Clin Orthop. 1979;141:121–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Waters E, Bouchier Hayes D, Hickey D. Delayed presentation of ureteric injury after thermal insult at total hip replacement. Br J Urol. 1998;82:594. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00788.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

