Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1993 Aug;68(2):368–373. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1993.342

Smear misclassification in a cervical cancer screening programme.

E Lynge 1, E Arffmann 1, P Poll 1, P K Anderson 1
PMCID: PMC1968579  PMID: 8347493

Abstract

A nested case-control study was undertaken in the Maribo County cohort of 27,811 women with negative Pap smears. Sixty women who later developed invasive cervical cancer constituted the cases, and five matched controls were selected from the cohort for each case. A total of 633 previous, negative smears for the cases and controls were reviewed independently by two pathologists. The review showed misclassification to be frequent in these smears collected in the period 1966-82. Thirty-five smears were considered positive at the review. The misclassification was differential in respect to the women's later disease status. The odds ratio for patients compared with controls for having at least one positive smear was 22.12 (95% CI 7.54-64.94). We were unable to identify specific characteristics of misclassified smears coming from later cases. Koilocytosis/dyskeratosis, herpes virus changed cells and hyperkeratosis were equally rare in smears from patients and controls. The Maribo County data indicate that the fraction of preventable cases of invasive cervical cancer in women aged 30-64 within the first 5 years after a negative smear could be increased from 62-72% to 83-86%, if misclassification of true positive smears could be eliminated. As a rough estimate, this would be at the cost of a 2% increase in the work load. It should be remembered that there is a large element of extrapolation in applying these results based on relatively poor quality specimens from 1966-82 as compared to a modern screening service.

Full text

PDF
368

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Attwood M. E., Woodman C. B., Luesley D., Jordan J. A. Previous cytology in patients with invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Acta Cytol. 1985 Mar-Apr;29(2):108–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkeley A. S., LiVolsi V. A., Schwartz P. E. Advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with recent normal Papanicolaou tests. Lancet. 1980 Aug 16;2(8190):375–376. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)90378-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berkowitz R. S., Ehrmann R. L., Lavizzo-Mourey R., Knapp R. C. Invasive cervical carcinoma in young women. Gynecol Oncol. 1979 Dec;8(3):311–316. doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(79)90040-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gad C., Koch F. The limitation of screening effect. A review of cervical disorders in previously screened women. Acta Cytol. 1977 Nov-Dec;21(6):719–722. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gay J. D., Donaldson L. D., Goellner J. R. False-negative results in cervical cytologic studies. Acta Cytol. 1985 Nov-Dec;29(6):1043–1046. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Holman C. D., McCartney A. J., Hyde K. L., Armstrong B. K. Cervical cytology histories of 100 women with invasive carcinoma of the cervix. Med J Aust. 1981 Nov 28;2(11):597–598. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1981.tb113010.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lynge E., Poll P. Incidence of cervical cancer following negative smear. A cohort study from Maribo County, Denmark. Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Sep;124(3):345–352. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mitchell H., Medley G., Drake M. Quality control measures for cervical cytology laboratories. Acta Cytol. 1988 May-Jun;32(3):288–292. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mitchell H., Medley G., Giles G. Cervical cancers diagnosed after negative results on cervical cytology: perspective in the 1980s. BMJ. 1990 Jun 23;300(6740):1622–1626. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6740.1622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Morell N. D., Taylor J. R., Snyder R. N., Ziel H. K., Saltz A., Willie S. False-negative cytology rates in patients in whom invasive cervical cancer subsequently developed. Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Jul;60(1):41–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Paterson M. E., Peel K. R., Joslin C. A. Cervical smear histories of 500 women with invasive cervical cancer in Yorkshire. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1984 Oct 6;289(6449):896–898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6449.896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rylander E. Negative smears in women developing invasive cervical cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1977;56(2):115–118. doi: 10.3109/00016347709158352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Walker E. M., Hare M. J., Cooper P. A retrospective review of cervical cytology in women developing invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983 Nov;90(11):1087–1091. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb06449.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. van der Graaf Y., Vooijs G. P., Gaillard H. L., Go D. M. Screening errors in cervical cytologic screening. Acta Cytol. 1987 Jul-Aug;31(4):434–438. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES