Abstract
β1- and β2-adrenergic receptors (AR) regulate cardiac myocyte function through distinct signaling pathways. In addition to regulating cardiac rate and contractility, β1AR and β2AR may play different roles in the pathogenesis of heart failure. Studies on neonatal cardiac myocytes from β1AR and β2AR knockout mice suggest that subtype-specific signaling is determined by subtype-specific membrane targeting and trafficking. Stimulation of β2ARs has a biphasic effect on contraction rate, with an initial increase followed by a sustained Gi-dependent decrease. Recent studies show that a PDZ domain-binding motif at the carboxyl terminus of human β2AR interacts with ezrin-binding protein 50/sodium–hydrogen exchanger regulatory factor, a PDZ-domain-containing protein. The human β2AR carboxyl terminus also binds to N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor, which does not contain a PDZ domain. We found that mutation of the three carboxyl-terminal amino acids in the mouse β2AR (β2AR-AAA) disrupts recycling of the receptor after agonist-induced internalization in cardiac myocytes. Nevertheless, stimulation of the β2AR-AAA produced a greater contraction rate increase than that of the wild-type β2AR. This enhanced stimulation of contraction rate can be attributed in part to the failure of the β2AR-AAA to couple to Gi. We also observed that coupling of endogenous, wild-type β2AR to Gi in β1AR knockout myocytes is inhibited by treatment with a membrane-permeable peptide representing the β2AR carboxyl terminus. These studies demonstrate that association of the carboxyl terminus of the β2AR with ezrin-binding protein 50/sodium–hydrogen exchanger regulatory factor, N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor, or some related proteins dictates physiologic signaling specificity and trafficking in cardiac myocytes.
The β-adrenergic receptors (ARs) are essential for the physiologic regulation of cardiac function by the sympathetic nervous system (1), and may play important roles in the pathogenesis of heart failure (2). The three known subtypes of βARs (β1AR, β2AR, and β3AR) belong to the large family of G protein-coupled receptors. Although all three subtypes have been detected in mammalian hearts (3), most of the functional responses to β-agonists can be attributed to β1AR and β2AR (3, 4). Although β1AR and β2AR respond to the same physiologic ligands (the hormone epinephrine and the neurotransmitter norepinephrine), they have distinct functional properties in vivo (5, 6). Specifically, β1AR knockout mice lack the normal inotropic and chronotropic response to the adrenergic agonist isoproterenol (6), whereas these responses are preserved in β2AR knockout mice (5).
When expressed in undifferentiated fibroblast cells, β1AR and β2AR exhibit similar signaling properties (7). However, recent studies suggest that these subtypes activate different signaling pathways in differentiated cells in vivo (8, 9). We have recently reported that β1AR and β2AR regulate the intrinsic contraction rate in mouse neonatal myocytes through different signal-transduction pathways (4). Activation of β1ARs leads to a PKA-dependent increase in contraction rate. In contrast, activated β2ARs undergo sequential coupling to Gs and Gi, which has a biphasic effect on contraction rate, with an initial PKA-independent increase followed by a sustained decrease that can be blocked by pertussis toxin (PTX) (4). The functional differences between β1AR and β2AR in cardiac myocytes are mediated in part by subtype-specific targeting of the receptors on the myocyte plasma membrane (10, 11). Immunofluorescence and membrane fractionation studies show that the β2ARs are concentrated in caveolar structures, whereas the β1ARs are mainly distributed in noncaveolar membrane in cardiac myocytes (11, 12). Disruption of caveolar structures in cardiac myocytes selectively enhances and prolongs the increase in myocyte contraction rate mediated by β2AR activation, but has no effect on signaling by the β1AR (12). Moreover, studies show that β2AR signaling can modulate L-type Ca2– channel activity in distinct subcellular microdomains in hippocampal neurons and cardiac myocytes (13–15). These observations suggest that subtype-specific signaling complexes conduct β1AR and β2AR signaling in cardiac myocytes.
A growing body of evidence from in vitro studies supports the notion that G protein-coupled receptors can form complexes with downstream effectors to facilitate signaling. Activated β2AR recruits β-arrestin that scaffolds many trafficking molecules such as clathrin, AP-2, and ARF, and signaling molecules including the tyrosine kinase Src and mitogen-activated kinases c-Jun amino-terminal kinase and extracellular signal-regulate kinase 1/2 (16). β2ARs can also associate with AKAP79 and Gravin, which are scaffolding proteins that connect β2AR to PKA, PKC, PP2A, and L-type Ca– channels (17–19). Moreover, interactions mediated by carboxyl-terminal PDZ-domain-binding motifs serve as another general mechanism to recruit G protein-coupled receptors into signaling complexes. Studies show that the β1AR PDZ motif can interact with postsynaptic scaffolding proteins PSD-95 (synaptic associated protein 90) and membrane-associated guanylate-inverted 2 in HEK293 cells (20, 21). In cardiac myocytes, the interaction between β1AR PDZ motif with PSD-95 or related proteins dictates signaling specificity by retaining the receptor at the cell surface and preventing interaction with Gi proteins (22).
It has been shown that the β2AR carboxyl-terminal PDZ motif interacts with the Na–/H– exchanger regulatory factor [NHERF, also known as ezrin-binding protein 50 (EBP50) (23, 24)], which affects Na–/H– exchange in HEK293 cells (23). The β2AR carboxyl terminus also binds to N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF) (25), which does not contain a PDZ domain. This interaction is critical for receptor recycling to the plasma membrane after agonist-induced internalization. However, the functional role of an interaction between the β2AR carboxyl terminus and its associated protein(s) in cardiac myocytes has not been reported. To examine the role of the β2AR carboxyl terminus on receptor trafficking and signaling in neonatal cardiac myocytes, we generated recombinant adenovirus expressing a mutant β2AR in which the three carboxyl-terminal amino acids are mutated to alanine (β2AR-AAA). This mutation is predicted to disrupt interactions with NSF- and PDZ-domain-containing proteins. We compared the functional properties of wild-type β2AR and β2AR-AAA in neonatal myocytes from β1/β2AR knockout (KO) mice. Our results demonstrate that the carboxyl terminus of the β2AR is essential for physiologic signaling and trafficking in cardiac myocytes.
Materials and Methods
Culture and Adenovirus Infection of Neonatal Mouse Ventricular Myocytes. Spontaneously beating neonatal cardiac myocytes were prepared from hearts of 1-day-old mouse pups (from wild-type, β1AR-KO, β2AR-KO, and β1/β2AR-KO mice) as described (4). The myocyte-enriched cells remaining in suspension after preplating were plated in 35-mm dishes for contraction-rate studies, in 12-well plates for ELISA, in 12-well plates with coverslips for immunocytochemistry, or in 10-cm dishes for Western blot and ligand-binding assays as described (22).
Recombinant adenovirus encoding amino-terminal Flag-tagged mouse β2AR-AAA (the β2AR carboxyl terminus DSPL was mutated into DAAA) was generated with the pAdEasy system (Q.biogen, Carlsbad, CA); adenoviruses encoding HA-β1AR-PDZmut and Flag-β2AR were described (12, 22). Neonatal myocytes were infected with viruses at a multiplicity of infection of 100 after being cultured for 24 h as described (12).
Measurement of Myocyte Contraction Rate and cAMP Accumulation. Measurement of spontaneous contraction rate was carried out as described (4). In the time-course experiments, statistical significance between groups was analyzed with two-way analysis of variance with prism software (GraphPad, San Diego). Myocyte cAMP accumulation was determined by using a RIA as described (12).
Tat peptide, Tat-β2-DSPL consisting of Tat linked to GRQGFSSDSPL of β2AR, Tat-β2-DAAA consisting of Tat linked to GRQGFSSDAAA, Tat-β2-DSAL consisting of Tat linked to GRQGFSSDSAL, and Tat-β2-ASPL consisting of Tat linked to GRQGFSSASPL through a cysteine bridge were synthesized in the Stanford Core facility. Neonatal myocytes were preincubated at 37°C with 1 μM peptide (Tat, Tat-β2-DSPL, Tat-β2-DAAA, Tat-β2-DSAL, or Tat-β2-ASPL) for 25 min, or filipin (2 μg/ml; Sigma) for 30 min before isoproterenol (10 μM; Sigma) exposure. In some assays, PTX (0.75 μg/ml; Sigma) or PKI (20 μM; Calbiochem) was used as described (12) before isoproterenol stimulation.
Immunofluoresence Microscopy and ELISA. Myocytes cultured on coverslips were infected with the Flag-β2AR, Flag-β2AR-AAA, or HA-β1AR-PDZmut adenoviruses as described above. Myocytes were pulsed with 10 μM isoproterenol for 10 min. The cells were either fixed with 1× PBS containing 5% paraformaldhyde or washed three times before being chased for 15, 30, or 60 min with medium containing 1 μM aprenelol. The fixed cells were permeablized with 1× PBS containing 1% Nonidet P-40, and stained with anti-Flag M1 antibody (mouse monoclonal IgG2b, 1:600 dilution; Sigma) or anti-HA 16B12 antibody (mouse monoclonal IgG1, 1:600 dilution; Covance, Berkeley, CA). The primary antibodies were detected with FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG2b (1:200) and Texas red-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG1 (1:400; Fisher). The images were acquired with a Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope. Quantitative analysis of myocyte cell-surface receptors was carried out with ELISA as described (22).
Ligand Binding and Western Blot Analysis. Membrane proteins were prepared from adenovirus-infected β1/β2AR-KO myocytes as described (22). Saturation binding was carried out with 20 nM nonselective βAR antagonist [3H]dihydroalprenolol (NEN). Alprenolol (1 μM) was used to define nonspecific binding. In competition binding experiments, assay tubes contained 5 μg of membrane protein, 2 nM [3H]dihydroalprenolol, and different concentrations of the β2AR antagonist ICI118551 or the βAR agonist isoproterenol. Membrane proteins were subjected to Western blot analysis with anti-Flag M1 antibody as described (22).
Results
Mutation of the Carboxyl-Terminal Three Amino Acids of the β2AR Inhibits Receptor Coupling to Gi. To study the role of the β2AR PDZ motif in receptor function in neonatal cardiac myocytes, we generated a recombinant adenovirus expressing a mutant β2AR that lacks a functional PDZ motif (Flag-β2AR-AAA). This mutation would also be predicted to disrupt interactions between the β2AR and NSF (25). Flag-β2AR and Flag-β2AR-AAA were expressed in β1/β2AR-KO neonatal myocytes by recombinant adenovirus infection at a multiplicity of infection of 100. Both receptors could be efficiently expressed in neonatal myocytes, and the levels of the functional receptor expression were similar (Fig. 1A). Moreover, β2AR-AAA and the wild-type β2AR displayed similar binding affinities to the agonist isoproterenol and to the β2AR-selective antagonist ICI118551 (Fig. 1B).
Fig. 1.
Functional expression of Flag-β2AR or Flag-β2AR-AAA in β1/β2AR-KO myocytes. (A) The expression of Flag-β2AR and Flag-β2AR-AAA protein in the β1β2AR-KO myocytes was examined by Western blot analysis (Left) and saturation binding (Right) to determine Bmax.(B) The expression of Flag-β2AR and Flag-β2AR-AAA was characterized by competition binding assays with β2AR agonist isoproterenol (IC50 = 284 and 294 nM, respectively) and the selective antagonist ICI118551 (IC50 = 3 and 3.5 nM, respectively). The data represent the mean ± SE of five experiments (triplicates) from different myocyte preparations. [3H]DHA, [3H]dihydroalprenolol; Iso, isoproterenol; ICI, ICI118551.
Fig. 2 shows the effect of isoproterenol on the contraction rate of β1AR-KO myocytes or β1/β2AR-KO myocytes expressing either Flag-β2AR or Flag-β2AR-AAA. The activated Flag-β2ARs induce a contraction rate response in the β1/β2AR-KO myocytes similar to that induced by the activated endogenous β2AR in the β1AR-KO myocytes. The response displayed an initial increase followed by a decrease to below the basal level (Fig. 2 A) (4). In comparison with the wild-type β2AR, the activated β2AR-AAA induced a much more robust contraction-rate increase, and the contraction rate did not drop below the basal level (Fig. 2B). We have previously shown that β2ARs are enriched in the caveolar structures on myocyte plasma membrane. Filipin, a reagent that disrupts caveolar structure by binding cholesterol, selectively enhances and prolongs the contraction-rate increase mediated by β2ARs, but not by β1ARs (4). Disruption of caveolar structures with filipin also enhanced the contraction rate increase induced by the activated β2AR-AAA (Fig. 2C). We also examined cAMP accumulation in the cultures of β1/β2AR-KO myocytes expressing either the Flag-β2AR or the Flag-β2AR-AAA. In contrast to the different contraction-rate responses, the cAMP accumulations by the activated receptors were not significantly different in the myocytes expressing either β2ARs (basal, 10.6 ± 2.9 pmol per dish; isoproterenol, 35.6 ± 5.5 pmol per dish) or β2AR-AAA (basal, 10 ± 3.8 pmol per dish; isoproterenol, 37.7 ± 5.8 pmol per dish).
Fig. 2.
The β2AR PDZ mutation alters receptor regulation of contraction rate in cardiac myocytes. (A) The effect of 10 μM isoproterenol on the contraction rate of the β1/β2AR-KO myocytes expressing Flag-β2AR or of the β1AR-KO myocytes with endogenous β2AR. (B) The effect of 10 μM isoproterenol on the contraction rate of β1/β2AR-KO myocytes expressing Flag-β2AR-AAA or of the β1AR-KO myocytes with endogenous β2AR. (C) Disruption of caveolae with filipin enhances the increase in contraction rate after β2AR-AAA stimulation. The data represent the mean ± SE of N experiments from at least three different myocyte preparations. *, P < 0.05; time-course curves were found to be significantly different by two-way analysis of variance.
The biphasic contraction-rate response mediated by the activated β2AR is due to sequential coupling of the receptor to Gs and Gi (4). PTX, a Gi protein inhibitor, efficiently prevents the secondary decrease in contraction rate induced by activation of the β2AR (Fig. 3A). The larger, monophasic contraction-rate response to stimulation of the β2AR-AAA suggests a limited role of Gi signaling. Furthermore, pretreatment of myocytes with PTX had no significant effect on the contraction rate induced by the β2AR-AAA (Fig. 3B). Thus, the β2AR-AAA appears to couple only to Gs in β1/β2AR-KO neonatal myocytes. We also examined the role of PKA in the contraction-rate response induced by the wild-type β2AR and the β2AR-AAA. We have previously shown that PKI, a selective PKA inhibitor, has no significant effect on the β2AR-mediated contraction-rate increase at concentrations that markedly inhibit β1AR signaling (4). Thus, the β2AR normally stimulates contraction rate through a PKA-insensitive mechanism, possibly through activation of the cAMP-gated, nonselective cation channel. PKI partially inhibits the maximum contraction-rate increase after β2AR-AAA stimulation (Fig. 3C).
Fig. 3.
Disruption of the β2AR PDZ motif inhibits receptor coupling to Gi. PTX (0.75 μg/ml) treatment selectively affected the contraction rate of the β1/β2AR-KO myocytes expressing Flag-β2AR (A) but not Flag-β2AR-AAA (B). (C) PKI partially inhibits the myocyte contraction-rate increase mediated by Flag-β2AR-AAA, but not by Flag-β2AR. The data represent the mean ± SE of four experiments from at least three different myocyte preparations. *, P < 0.05; time-course curves were found to be significantly different by two-way analysis of variance.
Mutation of the Carboxyl-Terminal Three Amino Acids of the β2AR Disrupts Receptor Recycling After Endocytosis in Neonatal Myocytes. Immunostaining shows that both Flag-β2AR and Flag-β2AR-AAA are localized predominantly on the cell surface of neonatal myocytes at steady state (Fig. 4A). On isoproterenol stimulation, both receptors undergo significant internalization, as indicated by punctate intracellular staining (Fig. 4A). Quantitative ELISAs confirm that isoproterenol stimulation causes an equivalent (≈21–24%) decrease in cell-surface receptor density in the myocytes expressing either the Flag-β2AR or the Flag-β2AR-AAA (Fig. 4C). However, whereas the wild-type β2AR efficiently recycles back to the cell surface, the mutant Flag-β2AR-AAA fails to do so (Fig. 4 B and C). These results are consistent with previously published studies (24) and suggest that the β2AR PDZ motif is required for the receptor recycling to the cell surface and for the receptor coupling to Gi in the myocytes. In contrast, mutation of the PDZ-binding motif in the β1AR has very different consequences. Disruption of the PDZ motif in the HA-β1AR (HA-β1AR-PDZmut) dramatically enhances agonist-induced internalization and promotes coupling to Gi in the neonatal myocytes. In contrast to the β2AR-AAA, the β1AR-PDZmut efficiently recycles back to the cell surface after isoproterenol-induced internalization in myocytes (Fig. 4 B and C).
Fig. 4.
Agonist-induced internalization of Flag-β2AR, Flag-β2AR-AAA, and HA-β1AR-PDZmut in neonatal cardiac myocytes. (A) Flag-β2AR and Flag-β2AR-AAA are localized on the cell surface in neonatal myocytes at steady state. Punctate intracellular staining is observed after agonist stimulation of both receptors. (B) Flag-β2AR and HA-β1AR-PDZmut efficiently recycle back to the myocyte cell surface after removal of isoproterenol, while the Flag-β2AR-AAA remains inside the cell. (C) The cell-surface receptor level was measured by ELISAs after agonist-induced internalization and recycling. Cell-surface HA-β1AR-PDZmut (11%), Flag-β2AR (22%), and Flag-β2AR-AAA (23%) decreased significantly after isoproterenol stimulation. Although the surface density of HA-β1AR-PDZmut and Flag-β2AR was restored by 60 min after removal of isoproterenol, the surface density of Flag-β2AR-AAA remained low. Iso, isoproterenol; Alp, alprenolol.
A Membrane-Permeable Peptide Containing the β2AR Carboxyl Terminus Alters β2AR Signaling in Cardiac Myocytes. The experiments using adenovirus to express β2AR-AAA in β1/β2AR-KO myocytes provide strong evidence for a functionally important interaction between the β2AR and a PDZ-domain-containing protein, such as EBP50/NHERF, or another protein that binds to the β2AR carboxyl terminus, such as NSF. To confirm these observations with endogenously expressed β2AR, we used a membrane-permeable peptide representing the wild-type β2AR carboxyl terminus (Tat-β2-DSPL) to interfere with the interaction between the endogenous β2ARs and their binding partners in β1AR-KO myocytes. In comparison with the control cells, the Tat-β2-DSPL-treated myocytes showed a greater maximum contraction-rate increase, and the contraction rate did not decrease below the basal level (Fig. 5A). In contrast, the control peptide, Tat-Flag-β2-DAAA, had no significant affect on the contraction rate (Fig. 5B). Previous studies have shown that disruption of the carboxyl-terminal PDZ motif of the human β2AR could alter binding to NHERF/EBP50, a PDZ-domain-containing protein, and NSF, a protein that lacks a PDZ domain (25). Interactions between these proteins could be distinguished by more selective mutations of the carboxyl terminus (25). We therefore examined the effect of two additional Tat-peptides, Tat-β2-ASPL and Tat-β2-DSAL. Based on the D410A mutation in the human β2AR (25), Tat-β2-ASPL would not be expected to bind NHERF/EBP50. We found that, like Tat-β2-DAAA, Tat-β2-ASPL had no effect on myocyte contraction rates (Fig. 5C). Based on the L412A mutation in the human β2AR (25), Tat-β2-DSAL would be expected to bind NHERF/EBP50, but not NSF. The carboxyl terminus of the mouse β2AR (-DSPL) differs from the human (-DSLL), and it is not known whether the wild-type mouse β2AR binds to NSF. Myocytes treated with Tat-β2-DSAL exhibited the same behavior as myocytes treated with Tat-β2-DSPL, showing a greater agonist-stimulated contraction rate (Fig. 5D). Thus, our results suggest that peptides that can bind NHERF/EBP50 can selectively modulate β2AR-mediated signaling in cardiac myocytes by competing with the endogenous β2ARs for binding to one or more PDZ-domain-containing proteins.
Fig. 5.
Cell-permeable β2AR carboxyl-terminal peptides affect the contraction rate in β1AR-KO myocytes. β1AR-KO neonatal myocytes were cultured and treated with peptide (1 μM) for 25 min before contraction-rate experiments. The basal contraction rate of myocytes was not altered significantly by peptide treatment. Pretreatment with Tat-β2-DSPL (A) and Tat-β2-DSAL (D), but not Tat-β2-DAAA (B) or Tat-β2-ASPL (C), significantly changed the isoproterenol (Iso)-stimulated contraction-rate increase in β1AR-KO myocytes. *, P < 0.05; time-course curves were found to be significantly different by two-way analysis of variance.
Discussion
β-Adrenergic receptors play critical roles in mediating physiologic responses to the hormone epinephrine and the neurotransmitter norepinephrine in animal hearts. Both β1AR and β2AR are expressed in cardiac myocytes and respond to the same stimuli, but they possess distinct functions in vivo. We have previously shown that β1AR and β2AR display different trafficking and signaling properties in neonatal myocytes. Activated β1ARs remain on the cell surface and couple to Gs (22). In contrast, activated β2ARs undergo robust endocytosis, and the receptors couple sequentially to Gs and Gi in cardiac myocytes (4). A mutation disrupting the interaction between the β1AR PDZ motif and its binding partners enables agonist-induced receptor internalization (22). The same mutation also enables the receptor to couple sequentially to Gs and Gi after activation (22).
In this study, we examined the effect of mutating the carboxyl-terminal amino acids of the mouse β2AR. Based on previous studies (25), β2AR-AAA should not bind to NSF or PDZ domain proteins such as NHERF/EBP50. Stimulation of wild-type β2AR induces a biphasic contraction-rate response in neonatal myocytes, with an initial Gs-dependent increase in contraction rate and a secondary Gi-dependent decrease in contraction rate below baseline. In contrast, stimulation of β2AR-AAA leads to a larger, more sustained increase in contraction rate that does not decrease below baseline and is not altered by pretreatment of cells with PTX. These results are most consistent with the failure of β2AR-AAA to couple to Gi. One must also consider the possibility that Gi coupling is masked by much more efficient coupling of β2AR-AAA to Gs, thereby exceeding the cAMP levels needed for maximum contractionrate response. However, we found that it is possible to further stimulate contraction rate with forskolin after isoproterenol stimulation of β2AR-AAA (data not shown). Thus, we feel our results are most consistent with a failure of β2AR-AAA to couple to Gi. Moreover, the results of the Tat-peptide studies (Fig. 5) suggest that the failure of β2AR-AAA to couple to Gi is caused by disruption of an interaction with a PDZ-domain-containing protein, such as NHERF/EBP50, and not by disruption of an interaction with NSF.
It has recently been reported that activation of Gs by βARs is involved in inducing myocyte apoptosis, whereas activation of Gi confers a protective effect against myocyte apoptosis (26, 27). The dual signaling mediated by β2ARs in cardiac myocytes may represent a sophisticated mechanism enabling enhanced cardiac function in response to acute increases in sympathetic tone, but protecting myocytes from the detrimental effects of chronic catecholamine stimulation. Indeed, moderate overexpression of β2AR in the heart of transgenic mice leads to an enhanced cardiac contractility without developing cardiomyopathy (28). In contrast, overexpression of the β1AR leads to heart failure (29). Because the coupling of β2ARs to Gi is inhibited by mutation of the PDZ binding motif, we might expect that a similar mutant expressed in vivo would have a significant and possibly detrimental effect in animal hearts under chronic stress.
Filipin is a reagent that disrupts caveolar structures in cardiac myocytes. Filipin does not affect the basal contraction rate and has no effect on β1AR stimulation of contraction rate; however, it selectively enhances the contraction-rate increase after stimulation of β2AR (12). In this study, the β2AR-AAA-induced contraction-rate increase under isoproterenol stimulation is further enhanced by filipin. Thus, the PDZ motif may not be required for the targeting of the β2AR to caveolae in cardiac myocytes. In contrast to the wild-type β2AR, the contractionrate increase induced by β2AR-AAA is partially inhibited by the PKA inhibitor PKI (Fig. 3C). This inhibition suggests that the enhanced coupling of the β2AR-AAA to an increase in contraction rate is due in part to activation of a PKA-dependent pathway that is not activated by the wild-type β2AR. This altered signaling may be explained by the inability of the β2AR-AAA to associate with regulatory components of a signaling complex. β2ARs associate with different scaffold proteins, including arrestin, A-kinase associate protein (AKAP), NSF, and the PDZ-domain-containing protein NHERF/EBP50 (16). EBP50 associates with an A-kinase-anchoring protein (AKAP) ezrin (23). A muscle-specific mAKAP can scaffold both PKA and a phospho-diesterase PDE4D in cardiac myocytes (30). Therefore, the signaling complexes containing the β2ARs can orchestrate tight regulation of the second messenger cAMP within a plasma membrane microdomain (31). For example, disruption of the PDZ-mediated interaction between β2ARs and PDE4 may allow cAMP to diffuse over a larger subcellular volume, thereby activating signaling pathways not normally activated by the wild-type β2AR. We did not observe detectable differences in the whole-cell cAMP accumulation stimulated by the wild-type β2AR and β2AR-AAA. However, the cAMP studies were performed in myocytes that are preincubated with a phospho-diesterase inhibitor (3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine).
In contrast to the inhibitory effect of mutating the β2AR PDZ-binding motif on receptor coupling to Gi, mutation of the PDZ-binding motif in the β1AR promotes coupling to Gi in the neonatal myocytes (12). The ability of these receptors to couple to Gi correlates with their propensity to undergo agonist-induced internalization and recycle back to the plasma membrane. The wild-type β1AR does not undergo agonist-induced internalization, and the β2AR-AAA cannot recycle back to the cell surface after internalization. In contrast, both the wild-type β2AR and β1AR-PDZmut undergo agonist-induced internalization and efficient recycling to the plasma membrane (Fig. 4C). The role of the PDZ-binding motif in subtype-specific trafficking has previously been demonstrated in HEK293 cells. The β1AR PDZ motif has been shown to interact with two postsynaptic scaffold proteins, PSD-95 (synaptic associated protein 90) (20) and membrane-associated guanylate-inverted 2 (21), in HEK293 cells. In contrast, the β2AR PDZ motif selectively associates with EBP50/NHERF (23, 24) and NSF (25). Although overexpression of PSD-95 in HEK293 cells inhibits agonist-induced internalization of the β1AR (20), mutations disrupting of the interaction between the human β2AR and NSF inhibit receptor recycling (25). However, it is noteworthy that a key residue (leucine 410) in human β2AR necessary for NSF binding is not conserved in the mouse β2AR used in this study. Therefore, we cannot be certain that disruption of interactions between NSF and the mouse β2AR account for the failure of β2AR-AAA to efficiently recycle after agonist-induced internalization (Fig. 4).
In conclusion, we present evidence that the β2AR PDZ motif is essential for the physiologic signaling of this receptor subtype in neonatal mouse cardiac myocytes. Disruption of the β2AR PDZ motif inhibited receptor recycling after isoproterenol-induced internalization and inhibited the receptor coupling to Gi. These results, together with our previous studies on the β1AR, demonstrate that interactions between β-adrenergic receptors and specific PDZ-domain-containing proteins play an essential role in subtype-specific signaling of β-adrenergic receptors in cardiac myocytes. These interactions may serve to organize receptors, G proteins, effectors, and regulatory proteins into discrete signaling complexes in the plasma membrane (13). The formation of signaling complexes facilitates local, rapid, and highly specific cellular responses in vivo.
Acknowledgments
Y.X. is the recipient of a postdoctoral fellowship from the American Heart Association. This study was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant 1R01 HL71078-01 (to B.K.).
This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.
Abbreviations: AR, adrenergic receptor; NHERF, sodium-hydrogen exchanger regulatory factor; EBP50, ezrin-binding protein 50; PTX, pertussis toxin; AKAP, A-kinase associate protein; KO, knockout; NSF, N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor.
References
- 1.Koch, W. J., Milano, C. A. & Lefkowitz, R. J. (1996) Circ. Res. 78, 511–516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lefkowitz, R. J., Rockman, H. A. & Koch, W. J. (2000) Circulation 101, 1634–1637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gauthier, C., Langin, D. & Balligand, J. L. (2000) Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 21, 426–431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Devic, E., Xiang, Y., Gould, D. & Kobilka, B. (2001) Mol. Pharmacol. 60, 577–583. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chruscinski, A. J., Rohrer, D. K., Schauble, E., Desai, K. H., Bernstein, D. & Kobilka, B. K. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 16694–16700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Rohrer, D. K., Desai, K. H., Jasper, J. R., Stevens, M. E., Regula, D. P., Jr., Barsh, G. S., Bernstein, D. & Kobilka, B. K. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 7375–7380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Green, S. A., Holt, B. D. & Liggett, S. B. (1992) Mol. Pharmacol. 41, 889–893. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Aprigliano, O., Rybin, V. O., Pak, E., Robinson, R. B. & Steinberg, S. F. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 272, H2726–H2735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhou, Y. Y., Cheng, H., Bogdanov, K. Y., Hohl, C., Altschuld, R., Lakatta, E. G. & Xiao, R. P. (1997) Am. J. Physiol. 273, H1611–H1618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ostrom, R. S., Gregorian, C., Drenan, R. M., Xiang, Y., Regan, J. W. & Insel, P. A. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 42063–42069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rybin, V. O., Xu, X., Lisanti, M. P. & Steinberg, S. F. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 41447–41457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Xiang, Y., Rybin, V. O., Steinberg, S. F. & Kobilka, B. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 34280–34286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Davare, M. A., Avdonin, V., Hall, D. D., Peden, E. M., Burette, A., Weinberg, R. J., Horne, M. C., Hoshi, T. & Hell, J. W. (2001) Science 293, 98–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chen-Izu, Y., Xiao, R. P., Izu, L. T., Cheng, H., Kuschel, M., Spurgeon, H. & Lakatta, E. G. (2000) Biophys. J. 79, 2547–2556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kuschel, M., Zhou, Y. Y., Cheng, H., Zhang, S. J., Chen, Y., Lakatta, E. G. & Xiao, R. P. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 22048–22052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hall, R. A. & Lefkowitz, R. J. (2002) Circ. Res. 91, 672–680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shih, M., Lin, F., Scott, J. D., Wang, H. Y. & Malbon, C. C. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 1588–1595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cong, M., Perry, S. J., Lin, F. T., Fraser, I. D., Hu, L. A., Chen, W., Pitcher, J. A., Scott, J. D. & Lefkowitz, R. J. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 15192–15199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fraser, I. D., Cong, M., Kim, J., Rollins, E. N., Daaka, Y., Lefkowitz, R. J. & Scott, J. D. (2000) Curr. Biol. 10, 409–412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Hu, L. A., Tang, Y., Miller, W. E., Cong, M., Lau, A. G., Lefkowitz, R. J. & Hall, R. A. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 38659–38666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Xu, J., Paquet, M., Lau, A. G., Wood, J. D., Ross, C. A. & Hall, R. A. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 41310–41317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Xiang, Y., Devic, E. & Kobilka, B. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 33783–33790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hall, R. A., Premont, R. T., Chow, C. W., Blitzer, J. T., Pitcher, J. A., Claing, A., Stoffel, R. H., Barak, L. S., Shenolikar, S., Weinman, E. J., et al. (1998) Nature 392, 626–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cao, T. T., Deacon, H. W., Reczek, D., Bretscher, A. & von Zastrow, M. (1999) Nature 401, 286–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cong, M., Perry, S. J., Hu, L. A., Hanson, P. I., Claing, A. & Lefkowitz, R. J. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 45145–45152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zhu, W. Z., Zheng, M., Koch, W. J., Lefkowitz, R. J., Kobilka, B. K. & Xiao, R. P. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 1607–1612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Xiao, R. P. (2000) Circ. Res. 87, 635–637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dorn, G. W., II, Tepe, N. M., Lorenz, J. N., Koch, W. J. & Liggett, S. B. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 6400–6405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Engelhardt, S., Hein, L., Wiesmann, F. & Lohse, M. J. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 7059–7064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Dodge, K. L., Khouangsathiene, S., Kapiloff, M. S., Mouton, R., Hill, E. V., Houslay, M. D., Langeberg, L. K. & Scott, J. D. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 1921–1930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zaccolo, M. & Pozzan, T. (2002) Science 295, 1711–1715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





