Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 2007 Sep 8;335(7618):513. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39273.537778.AD

Using a combination inhaler (budesonide plus formoterol) as rescue therapy improves asthma control

Peter J Barnes 1,
PMCID: PMC1971172  PMID: 17823193

The clinical problem

Asthma is one of the commonest chronic diseases worldwide and is effectively controlled in most patients with maintenance treatment. In those with moderate or severe persistent asthma, control may be achieved with an inhaled corticosteroid or a combination inhaler containing a corticosteroid and a long acting β2 agonist. The combination inhaler is more effective, but patients still require short acting β2 agonists such as salbutamol or terbutaline to relieve symptoms. I describe a new approach for acute exacerbation—SMART (single inhaler maintenance and reliever therapy). This uses the combination inhaler, rather than the short acting β2 agonist, as the reliever.

The evidence for change

Using a formulation of budesonide plus formoterol (budesonide/formoterol) both as a reliever and as maintenance therapy once or twice daily is more effective in controlling asthma than conventional approaches using budesonide/formoterol, fluticasone/salmeterol, or high dose corticosteroids (budesonide or fluticasone) as the maintenance treatment with short acting β2 agonists as relievers (table).1 2 3 4 5 The most striking benefits are fewer exacerbations (severe exacerbations, defined as needing a course of oral corticosteroids, are about halved) and fewer admissions to hospital. The mean number of extra puffs of budesonide/formoterol taken in the SMART studies was about one a day. The single inhaler approach with budesonide/formoterol seems to be effective in mild, moderate, and severe persistent asthma.

Studies of single inhaler maintenance and reliever therapy (SMART)*

Study and design Participants Treatments tested Main outcomes of SMART
Double blind, randomised, parallel group, 12 months (Scicchitano et al4) 1890 adults with moderate to severe persistent asthma SMART v budesonide + terbutaline rescue Fewer exacerbations, fewer days on oral steroids, better symptom control
Double blind, randomised, parallel group, 12 months (O'Byrne et al1) 2760 patients of all ages with moderate to severe persistent asthma SMART v budesonide/formoterol + terbutaline rescue or high dose budesonide +terbutaline rescue Reduced mild and severe exacerbations, improved symptoms reduced reliever use
Dose finding, open label study, 12 months (Vogelmeier et al3) 2143 adolescents and adults with moderate to severe persistent asthma SMART v fluticasone/salmeterol + salbutamol rescue Fewer exacerbations, fewer rescue inhaler doses, improved lung function and quality of life
Double blind, randomised, parallel group, 6 months (Rabe et al2) 697 adults with mild persistent asthma SMART v higher dose budesonide + terbutaline rescue Reduced symptoms and exacerbations
Double blind, randomised, parallel group, 12 months (Bisgaard et al11) 341 children (4-11 years) with moderate to severe asthma SMART v budesonide/formoterol + terbutaline rescue or budesonide +terbutaline rescue Reduced exacerbations and improved symptom scores
Double blind, randomised, parallel group, 12 months (Rabe et al7) 3394 adults with moderate to severe persistent asthma SMART v budesonide/formoterol + formoterol rescue or budesonide/formoterol +terbutaline rescue Reduced exacerbations, improved symptom control
Double blind, randomised, parallel group, 6 months (Kuna et al5) 3335 adolescents and adults with mild to moderate persistent asthma SMART v budesonide/formoterol + terbutaline rescue or fluticasone/salmeterol +terbutaline rescue Reduced exacerbations, reduced courses of oral corticosteroids, no difference in other measures of asthma control

*All studies were sponsored by AstraZeneca.

Previous studies have shown that inhaled formoterol is even more effective than salbutamol as a rescue therapy, with an onset as fast and with similar side effects.6 However, using the budesonide/formoterol inhaler as rescue therapy is more effective than formoterol alone, indicating that the inhaled corticosteroid in the rescue inhaler also plays an important role.7

Analysis of asthma exacerbations shows a slow evolution over several days with increasing symptoms and use of rescue medication.8 Studies in unselected populations also show that, as an exacerbation develops, patients increase the dose of rescue inhalers but not usually the dose of inhaled corticosteroid.9 This new, simplified, single inhaler approach may also improve compliance.

The fluticasone/salmeterol combination inhaler is unsuitable as a rescue therapy as salmeterol has a slower onset of action than formoterol and cumulative side effects. However, other combination inhalers (with different corticosteroids plus formoterol) are now in development; a beclomethasone/formoterol inhaler is already available in Germany.

Barriers to change

Early experience suggests that it is helpful for patients to have two combination inhalers: one at home for maintenance therapy, the other carried for rescue therapy. An initial concern was that patients may overuse the rescue inhaler and therefore end up taking high doses of inhaled corticosteroids. In fact, this practice was not seen in the large clinical trials, presumably as the SMART strategy was more effective in controlling asthma. Patients should be advised to see their doctor if they need to use more than six additional puffs of budesonide/formoterol rescue inhaler.

Another concern is the cost of the SMART approach. On average, however, only one extra inhalation of combination therapy daily is used, so there is little increase in the total drug cost, whereas the reduction in severe exacerbations results in overall healthcare saving.10 Also, as the new inhalers containing a corticosteroid plus formoterol come on to the market, the drug costs are likely to drop. Because controlled clinical trials include selected patients, studies of clinical effectiveness in unselected populations are now needed.

How should we change our practice?

Single inhaler therapy using combined budesonide/formoterol for both maintenance and rescue therapy is more effective than conventional therapy (maintenance with combination inhaler or inhaled corticosteroids, and rescue therapy with a short acting β2 agonist). Eligible patients are those with moderate to severe asthma whose condition is not controlled with conventional therapy and who are using rescue inhaler therapy.

Single inhaler maintenance and reliever therapy is easy to implement as the patient merely replaces their usual rescue inhaler with the budesonide/formoterol inhaler. Maintenance budesonide/formoterol may be given twice daily for severe asthma (or once daily for moderate asthma).2 The strategy has also been shown to be effective in children aged 4-12 years but has not yet been approved by regulatory authorities for use in patients under 12 years.11 Single inhaler therapy is not suitable for patients who overuse their rescue inhalers or who find it difficult to recognise if their asthma is worsening. Several new inhaled corticosteroid/formoterol combinations are likely to become available soon.

Key points

  • • Single inhaler therapy for asthma with combined budesonide and formoterol as maintenance therapy and also as a reliever provides better control of asthma than combination inhalers or higher doses of inhaled corticosteroids as maintenance plus a short acting β2 agonist as reliever

  • • The greatest benefit is the reduction of asthma exacerbations

  • • The strategy is simple for patients to adopt and is cost effective

  • • Overuse of rescue combination therapy does not seem to be a problem

Methods

PubMed search on 22 June 2007 for controlled clinical trials using search terms “budesonide and formoterol and asthma”

Change Page aims to alert clinicians to the immediate need for a change in practice to make it consistent with current evidence. The change must be implementable and must offer therapeutic or diagnostic advantage for a reasonably common clinical problem. Compelling and robust evidence must underpin the proposal for change.

Series adviser: Joe Collier (changepage@bmj.com), emeritus professor of medicines policy, St George's, University of London.

References

  • 1.O'Byrne PM, Bisgaard H, Godard PP, Pistolesi M, Palmqvist M, Zhu Y, et al. Budesonide/formoterol combination therapy as both maintenance and reliever medication in asthma. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 2005;171:129-36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rabe KF, Pizzichini E, Stallberg B, Romero S, Balanzat AM, Atienza T, et al. Budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler for maintenance and relief in mild-to-moderate asthma: a randomized, double-blind trial. Chest 2006;129:246-56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vogelmeier C, D'Urzo A, Pauwels R, Merino JM, Jaspal M, Boutet S, et al. Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy: an effective asthma treatment option? Eur Respir J 2005;26:819-28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Scicchitano R, Aalbers R, Ukena D, Manjra A, Fouquert L, Centanni S, et al. Efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol single inhaler therapy versus a higher dose of budesonide in moderate to severe asthma. Curr Med Res Opin 2004;20:1403-18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kuna P, Peters MJ, Manjra AI, Jorup C, Naya IP, Martinez-Jimenez NE, et al. Effect of budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy on asthma exacerbations. Int J Clin Pract 2007;61:725-36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pauwels RA, Sears MR, Campbell M, Villasante C, Huang S, Lindh A, et al. Formoterol as relief medication in asthma: a worldwide safety and effectiveness trial. Eur Respir J 2003;22:787-94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rabe KF, Atienza T, Magyar P, Larsson P, Jorup C, Lalloo UG. Effect of budesonide in combination with formoterol for reliever therapy in asthma exacerbations: a randomised controlled, double-blind study. Lancet 2006;368:744-53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tattersfield AE, Postma DS, Barnes PJ, Svensson K, Bauer CA, O'Byrne PM, et al. Exacerbations of asthma. A descriptive study of 425 severe exacerbations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:594-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Partridge MR, van der Molen T, Myrseth SE, Busse WW. Attitudes and actions of asthma patients on regular maintenance therapy: the INSPIRE study. BMC Pulm Med 2006;6:13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lundborg M, Wille S, Bjermer L, Tilling B, Lundgren M, Telg G, et al. Maintenance plus reliever budesonide/formoterol compared with a higher maintenance dose of budesonide/formoterol plus formoterol as reliever in asthma: an efficacy and cost-effectiveness study. Curr Med Res Opin 2006;22:809-21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bisgaard H, Le Roux P, Bjamer D, Dymek A, Vermeulen JH, Hultquist C. Budesonide/formoterol maintenance plus reliever therapy: a new strategy in pediatric asthma. Chest 2006;130:1733-43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES