Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1990 Mar;61(3):447–450. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1990.98

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of didox administered by 36 hour infusion. The Cancer Research Campaign Phase I/II Clinical Trials Committee.

J Carmichael 1, B M Cantwell 1, K A Mannix 1, D Veale 1, H L Elford 1, R Blackie 1, D J Kerr 1, S B Kaye 1, A L Harris 1
PMCID: PMC1971305  PMID: 2183873

Abstract

Twelve patients were treated with didox, a new ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor, by 36 h infusion. The maximum tolerated dose was 6 g m-2, above which dose-limiting hepatic toxicity was observed. Patient tolerance was significantly better using the 36 h infusion compared to patients receiving the drug by a 30 min infusion; in particular, there were no reports of nausea or vomiting. No responses were seen in these patients. Detailed pharmacokinetics were performed at 6 g m-2 comparing the 36 h and 30 min infusions in four patients. Parent drug AUC values were lower for the 36 h infusion, 67.8 micrograms ml-1 h-1 compared to 232 micrograms ml-1 h-1 for the 30 min infusion. AUC values for the 3-hydroxy metabolite were much higher following the 36 h infusion: 55.4 compared to 18.6 micrograms ml-1 h-1. In contrast, the amide metabolite was not detected following the 36 h infusion, but AUC values of 23 micrograms ml-1 h-1 were seen after the 30 min infusion. The mean peak plasma level was 72 micrograms ml-1 following 6 g m-2 given by a 30 min infusion compared to 2.8 micrograms ml-1 following the prolonged infusion. Clearance was higher following the 36 h infusion: 97.6 versus 24.4 l h-1.

Full text

PDF
447

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Elford H. L. Effect of hydroxyurea on ribonucleotide reductase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1968 Oct 10;33(1):129–135. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(68)90266-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Elford H. L., Freese M., Passamani E., Morris H. P. Ribonucleotide reductase and cell proliferation. I. Variations of ribonucleotide reductase activity with tumor growth rate in a series of rat hepatomas. J Biol Chem. 1970 Oct 25;245(20):5228–5233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Elford H. L., Van't Riet B., Wampler G. L., Lin A. L., Elford R. M. Regulation of ribonucleotide reductase in mammalian cells by chemotherapeutic agents. Adv Enzyme Regul. 1980;19:151–168. doi: 10.1016/0065-2571(81)90014-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Elford H. L., van't Riet B. Inhibition of nucleoside diphosphate reductase by hydroxybenzohydroxamic acid derivatives. Pharmacol Ther. 1985;29(2):239–254. doi: 10.1016/0163-7258(85)90031-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Turner M. K., Abrams R., Lieberman I. Levels of ribonucleotide reductase activity during the division cycle of the L cell. J Biol Chem. 1968 Jul 10;243(13):3725–3728. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Veale D., Cantwell B. M., Kerr N., Upfold A., Harris A. L. Phase 1 study of high-dose hydroxyurea in lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1988;21(1):53–56. doi: 10.1007/BF00262739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. van't Riet B., Wampler G. L., Elford H. L. Synthesis of hydroxy- and amino-substituted benzohydroxamic acids: inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase and antitumor activity. J Med Chem. 1979 May;22(5):589–592. doi: 10.1021/jm00191a027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES