Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1990 Nov;62(5):791–795. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1990.381

The radiation dose-rate effect in two human neuroblastoma cell lines.

A Holmes 1, T J McMillan 1, J H Peacock 1, G G Steel 1
PMCID: PMC1971544  PMID: 2245172

Abstract

The current use of targeted radiotherapy in the treatment of neuroblastoma has generated a requirement for further information on the radiobiology of these cells. Here we report on studies of the dose-rate effect in two human neuroblastoma cell lines (HX138 and HX142) and the recovery that they demonstrate in split-dose experiments. The sensitivity of the two cell lines to high dose-rate irradiation was confirmed. Surviving fractions at 2 Gy were 0.083 for HX138 and 0.11 for HX142. There was little evidence of a dose-rate effect above 2 cGy min-1 but significant sparing was seen at lower dose rates. Substantial recovery was seen in split-dose experiments on both cell lines, to an extent that was consistent with the linear quadratic equation. The data were used to derive values for the beta parameter of the linear-quadratic equation; the values for the neuroblastomas were higher than for any of the other human tumour cell lines that we have investigated to date. Thus, despite their high sensitivity to ionising radiation HX138 and HX142 do exhibit substantial levels of cellular recovery, suggesting that they may have a significant capacity for repair of radiation-induced lesions.

Full text

PDF
791

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Courtenay V. D., Mills J. An in vitro colony assay for human tumours grown in immune-suppressed mice and treated in vivo with cytotoxic agents. Br J Cancer. 1978 Feb;37(2):261–268. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1978.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Deacon J., Peckham M. J., Steel G. G. The radioresponsiveness of human tumours and the initial slope of the cell survival curve. Radiother Oncol. 1984 Dec;2(4):317–323. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(84)80074-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fertil B., Malaise E. P. Inherent cellular radiosensitivity as a basic concept for human tumor radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1981 May;7(5):621–629. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(81)90377-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jacobson H. M., Marcus R. B., Jr, Thar T. L., Million R. R., Graham-Pole J. R., Talbert J. L. Pediatric neuroblastoma: postoperative radiation therapy using less than 2000 rad. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1983 Apr;9(4):501–505. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(83)90068-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. McKinnon P. J. Ataxia-telangiectasia: an inherited disorder of ionizing-radiation sensitivity in man. Progress in the elucidation of the underlying biochemical defect. Hum Genet. 1987 Mar;75(3):197–208. doi: 10.1007/BF00281059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McMillan T. J., Eady J. J., Holmes A., Peacock J. H., Steel G. G. The radiosensitivity of human neuroblastoma: a cellular and molecular study. Int J Radiat Biol. 1989 Nov;56(5):651–656. doi: 10.1080/09553008914551871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ohnuma N., Kasuga T., Nojiri I., Furuse T. Radiosensitivity of human neuroblastoma cell line (NB-1). Gan. 1977 Oct;68(5):711–712. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Peacock J. H., Cassoni A. M., McMillan T. J., Steel G. G. Radiosensitive human tumour cell lines may not be recovery deficient. Int J Radiat Biol. 1988 Dec;54(6):945–953. doi: 10.1080/09553008814552341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Peacock J. H., Eady J. J., Edwards S., Holmes A., McMillan T. J., Steel G. G. Initial damage or repair as the major determinant of cellular radiosensitivity? Int J Radiat Biol. 1989 Nov;56(5):543–547. doi: 10.1080/09553008914551711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Pinkerton C. R. Where next with therapy in advanced neuroblastoma? Br J Cancer. 1990 Mar;61(3):351–353. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1990.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Radford I. R. Evidence for a general relationship between the induced level of DNA double-strand breakage and cell-killing after X-irradiation of mammalian cells. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1986 Apr;49(4):611–620. doi: 10.1080/09553008514552861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shadley J. D., Wiencke J. K. Induction of the adaptive response by X-rays is dependent on radiation intensity. Int J Radiat Biol. 1989 Jul;56(1):107–118. doi: 10.1080/09553008914551231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Steel G. G., Deacon J. M., Duchesne G. M., Horwich A., Kelland L. R., Peacock J. H. The dose-rate effect in human tumour cells. Radiother Oncol. 1987 Aug;9(4):299–310. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(87)80151-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Steel G. G., McMillan T. J., Peacock J. H. The radiobiology of human cells and tissues. In vitro radiosensitivity. The picture has changed in the 1980s. Int J Radiat Biol. 1989 Nov;56(5):525–537. doi: 10.1080/09553008914551691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Thames H. D. An 'incomplete-repair' model for survival after fractionated and continuous irradiations. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1985 Mar;47(3):319–339. doi: 10.1080/09553008514550461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Weichselbaum R. R., Nove J., Little J. B. X-ray sensitivity of human tumor cells in vitro. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1980 Apr;6(4):437–440. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(80)90057-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES