Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners logoLink to The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
. 1981 Jul;31(228):410-413, 416-419.

The accuracy of age—sex registers, practice medical records and family practitioner committee registers

Robin C Fraser, David G Clayton
PMCID: PMC1972113  PMID: 7320986

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a point prevalent evaluation of the comparative reliability and validity of age-sex registers, practice medical records and family practitioner committee (FPC) registers from five teaching practices. They all exhibited similar levels of acceptable accuracy for patient names, sex and age, but the distribution of wrong addresses varied greatly: practice medical records 3·9 per cent, age-sex registers 8·2 per cent and FPC registers 17·1 per cent. The presence of a patient entry in all three registers was associated with a high degree of probability (95·3 per cent) that this individual would be a bona fide practice patient. The register population inflation rates were FPC records 5·5 per cent, practice records 9·8 per cent and age-sex registers 10·6 per cent, but there were large variations between individual practices. A statistically significant contribution to inflation rates came from the age groups 0 to 1 and 21 to 40 (p<0·0005). The register population deflation rates were minimal. The significance of these findings is discussed and the need for practices to determine the accuracy of their individual age-sex registers is stressed. A convenient and economic method for so doing is suggested. We also suggest ways of making it easier to construct and use age-sex registers, since they can be a most versatile and useful aid to research in general practice.

Full text

PDF
410

Images in this article

412Figure 1.
on p.412

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bass M. Approaches to the denominator problem in primary care research. J Fam Pract. 1976 Apr;3(2):193–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boyle R. M. Accuracy of the patient identifier in a family practice data system. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 Apr;31(225):242–244. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dawes K. S. Survey of general practice records. Br Med J. 1972 Jul 22;3(5820):219–223. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5820.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Forbes J. A. Locating the elderly in a general practice. Br Med J. 1969 Apr 5;2(5648):46–47. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5648.46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fraser R. C. The reliability and validity of the age-sex register as a population denominator in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1978 May;28(190):283–286. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goodman M. Using an age-sex register. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1975 May;25(154):379–382. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hannay D. R. Accuracy of health-centre records. Lancet. 1972 Aug 19;2(7773):371–373. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)91748-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hannay D. R., Maddox E. J. Missing patients on a health centre file. Community Health (Bristol) 1977 May;8(4):210–216. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Heward J., Clayton D. G. The point accuracy of paediatric population registers. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1980 Jul;30(216):412–416. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Morrell D. C., Gage H. G., Robinson N. A. Patterns of demand in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1970 Jun;19(95):331–342. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Newell J. P., Bass M. J., Dickie G. L. An information system for family practice. Part 1: Defining the practice population. J Fam Pract. 1976 Oct;3(5):517–520. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Pinsent R. J. The evolving age-sex register. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1968 Aug;16(2):127–134. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Richardson I. M., Dingwall-Fordyce I. Patient geography in general practice. Catchment areas of Aberdeen practices. Lancet. 1968 Dec 14;2(7581):1290–1293. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(68)91779-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Russell I. Matched controls in surveys of the use of general practice. Another use for research practice age-sex registers. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1975 Nov;25(160):801–810. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Warren M. D. Identifying handicapped people in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1976 Nov;26(172):828–836. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES