Skip to main content
The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners logoLink to The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
. 1982 Nov;32(244):681–683.

The family medicine cabinet *

G P L Edwards
PMCID: PMC1972808  PMID: 7153968

Abstract

Medicine selection and storage was examined in 130 families. Over 50 per cent were found to be less than adequate. Health education advice helped half the inadequate group to change to adequate. Age and social class were not related to hoarding of prescribed drugs, to initial standards of storage or selection, nor to the likelihood of a response to advice. Those who hoarded medicines but stored them well were highly likely to change. Those who stored and selected poorly were unlikely to make any changes. The 130 families had an average of 8.6 prescribed drugs per house, over half of which were completely out of date and were not being kept for emergency usage. There were also an average of 14.2 non-prescribed items per house, giving a total of 22.8 per house.

Full text

PDF
681

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gjemdal E., Hjorten A. De 117 medisinskap. En undersøkelse over hva 117 familier har stående av medisiner i sine hjem og av familienes syn på dagens apotek. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1979 Jun 20;99(17-18):880–883. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hayes P., Hickey K., Lovell S., Dugdale A. E. The storage of drugs in homes. Med J Aust. 1976 Feb 21;1(8):235–236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. MacGregor G. A., Markandu N. D., Best F. E., Elder D. M., Cam J. M., Sagnella G. A., Squires M. Double-blind randomised crossover trial of moderate sodium restriction in essential hypertension. Lancet. 1982 Feb 13;1(8268):351–355. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)91389-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

RESOURCES