Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1984 May;49(5):603–614. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1984.95

Metastasis of murine mammary tumour lines from the mammary gland and ectopic sites.

E N Unemori, N Ways, D R Pitelka
PMCID: PMC1976718  PMID: 6722008

Abstract

A murine model of spontaneous metastasis of mammary adenocarcinomas in mice was developed by serial transplantation of spontaneous BALB/cfC3H/ Crgl tumours into the mammary gland. Through 8 transplant generations, 5 lines demonstrated maintenance of metastatic phenotype and consistent gross and histological morphology and growth properties. Tumour lines M12, M35 , and M51 metastasized from the mammary gland with overall frequencies of 53, 80, and 85%, respectively. Line T5 was weakly metastatic, capable of a minor degree of lung colonization in 8% of hosts, while line WT2 failed to establish any grossly or histologically detectable pulmonary foci. The significance of the mammary gland as transplant site was shown by comparing the growth and metastasis of these lines in mammary gland with that observed upon subcutaneous transplantation. Subcutaneous metastatic frequency of one tumour line was significantly reduced from that obtained when grown in the mammary gland while histological organization differed markedly in 2 of the tumours. Furthermore, while tumours implanted into the gland grew as well encapsulated masses, the same tumours grown subcutaneously frequently invaded the body wall and occasionally colonized adjacent peritoneal organs and, more often, mesenteries. Intravenous injection of dissociated tumours further emphasized the importance of events that occur at the primary site. There was no correlation between spontaneous metastatic ability and the capacity to colonize the lung following i.v. inoculation. This study demonstrates the importance of transplant site in the assessment of metastasis in experimental systems.

Full text

PDF
603

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson J. C., Fugmann R. A., Stolfi R. L., Martin D. S. Metastatic incidence of a spontaneous murine mammary adenocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 1974 Aug;34(8):1916–1920. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Auerbach R., Morrissey L. W., Sidky Y. A. Regional differences in the incidence and growth of mouse tumors following intradermal or subcutaneous inoculation. Cancer Res. 1978 Jun;38(6):1739–1744. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blair P. B., Kripke M. L., Lappé M. A., Bonhag R. S., Young L. Immunologic deficiency associated with mammary tumor virus (MTV) infection in mice: hemagglutinin response and allograft survival. J Immunol. 1971 Feb;106(2):364–370. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blair P. B., Moretti R. L. Transplantation of isologous male mammary gland tissue into the mammary fat-pads of female mice. Transplantation. 1970 Jul;10(1):44–52. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197007000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DEOME K. B., FAULKIN L. J., Jr, BERN H. A., BLAIR P. B. Development of mammary tumors from hyperplastic alveolar nodules transplanted into gland-free mammary fat pads of female C3H mice. Cancer Res. 1959 Jun;19(5):515–520. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FAULKIN L. J., Jr, DEOME K. B. Regulation of growth and spacing of gland elements in the mammary fat pad of the C3H mouse. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1960 Apr;24:953–969. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fidler I. J. Biological behavior of malignant melanoma cells correlated to their survival in vivo. Cancer Res. 1975 Jan;35(1):218–224. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fidler I. J., Gersten D. M., Hart I. R. The biology of cancer invasion and metastasis. Adv Cancer Res. 1978;28:149–250. doi: 10.1016/s0065-230x(08)60648-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fidler I. J., Hart I. R. Biological and experimental consequences of the zonal composition of solid tumors. Cancer Res. 1981 Aug;41(8):3266–3267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Folkman J., Hochberg M. Self-regulation of growth in three dimensions. J Exp Med. 1973 Oct 1;138(4):745–753. doi: 10.1084/jem.138.4.745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Giavazzi R., Alessandri G., Spreafico F., Garattini S., Mantovani A. Metastasizing capacity of tumour cells from spontaneous metastases of transplanted murine tumours. Br J Cancer. 1980 Sep;42(3):462–472. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1980.259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hager J. C., Miller F. R., Heppner G. H. Influence of serial transplantation on the immunological-clinical correlates of BALB/cfC3H mouse mammary tumors. Cancer Res. 1978 Aug;38(8):2492–2500. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Heppner G. H., Dexter D. L., DeNucci T., Miller F. R., Calabresi P. Heterogeneity in drug sensitivity among tumor cell subpopulations of a single mammary tumor. Cancer Res. 1978 Nov;38(11 Pt 1):3758–3763. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hewitt H. B. The choice of animal tumors for experimental studies of cancer therapy. Adv Cancer Res. 1978;27:149–200. doi: 10.1016/s0065-230x(08)60932-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kripke M. L., Gruys E., Fidler I. J. Metastatic heterogeneity of cells from an ultraviolet light-induced murine fibrosarcoma of recent origin. Cancer Res. 1978 Sep;38(9):2962–2967. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Liotta L. A., Abe S., Robey P. G., Martin G. R. Preferential digestion of basement membrane collagen by an enzyme derived from a metastatic murine tumor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 May;76(5):2268–2272. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.5.2268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Liotta L. A., Kleinerman J., Saidel G. M. Quantitative relationships of intravascular tumor cells, tumor vessels, and pulmonary metastases following tumor implantation. Cancer Res. 1974 May;34(5):997–1004. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Miller F. R., Medina D., Heppner G. H. Preferential growth of mammary tumors in intact mammary fatpads. Cancer Res. 1981 Oct;41(10):3863–3867. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Miller F. R., Miller B. E., Heppner G. H. Characterization of metastatic heterogeneity among subpopulations of a single mouse mammary tumor: heterogeneity in phenotypic stability. Invasion Metastasis. 1983;3(1):22–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Morton D. L., Miller G. F., Wood D. A. Demonstration of tumor-specific immunity against antigens unrelated to the mammary tumor virus in spontaneous mammary adenocarcinomas. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1969 Feb;42(2):289–301. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Piessens W. F., Churchill W. H. Transplantable mammary tumors in Wistar/Furth rats: development, antigenicity, and effect of hormone manipulations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1977 Sep;59(3):911–918. doi: 10.1093/jnci/59.3.911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pitelka D. R., Hamamoto S. T., Taggart B. N. Epithelial cell junctions in primary and metastatic mammary tumors of mice. Cancer Res. 1980 May;40(5):1588–1599. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Poste G., Doll J., Brown A. E., Tzeng J., Zeidman I. Comparison of the metastatic properties of B16 melanoma clones isolated from cultured cell lines, subcutaneous tumors, and individual lung metastases. Cancer Res. 1982 Jul;42(7):2770–2778. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Poste G. Experimental systems for analysis of the malignant phenotype. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1982;1(2):141–199. doi: 10.1007/BF00048224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Price J. E., Carr D., Jones L. D., Messer P., Tarin D. Experimental analysis of factors affecting metastatic spread using naturally occurring tumours. Invasion Metastasis. 1982;2(2):77–112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ryan J. N., Woessner J. F., Jr Oestradiol inhibition of collagenase role in uterine involution. Nature. 1974 Apr 5;248(448):526–528. doi: 10.1038/248526a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sheldon W. G., Owen K., Weed L., Kodell R. Distribution of mammary gland neoplasms and factors influencing metastases in hybrid mice. Lab Anim Sci. 1982 Apr;32(2):166–168. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Smith H. S., Riggs J. L., Mosesson M. W. Production of fibronectin by human epithelial cells in culture. Cancer Res. 1979 Oct;39(10):4138–4144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Stackpole C. W. Distinct lung-colonizing and lung-metastasizing cell populations in B16 mouse melanoma. Nature. 1981 Feb 26;289(5800):798–800. doi: 10.1038/289798a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sweeney F. L., Pot-Deprun J., Poupon M. F., Chouroulinkov I. Heterogeneity of the growth and metastatic behavior of cloned cell lines derived from a primary rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer Res. 1982 Sep;42(9):3776–3782. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tarin D., Price J. E. Influence of microenvironment and vascular anatomy on "metastatic" colonization potential of mammary tumors. Cancer Res. 1981 Sep;41(9 Pt 1):3604–3609. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tarin D., Price J. E. Metastatic colonization potential of primary tumour cells in mice. Br J Cancer. 1979 Jun;39(6):740–754. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1979.128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Toole B. P., Biswas C., Gross J. Hyaluronate and invasiveness of the rabbit V2 carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Dec;76(12):6299–6303. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.12.6299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Vaage J., Agarwal S. Stimulation or inhibition of immune resistance against metastatic or local growth of a C3H mammary carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1976 May;36(5):1831–1836. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Vaage J. Changing transplantation characteristics with serial in vivo passage of C3H/He mammary carcinomas. Cancer Res. 1978 Oct;38(10):3264–3268. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. WEISS D. W., FAULKIN L. J., Jr, DEOME K. B. ACQUISITION OF HEIGHTENED RESISTANCE AND SUSCEPTIBILITY TO SPONTANEOUS MOUSE MAMMARY CARCINOMAS IN THE ORIGINAL HOST. Cancer Res. 1964 May;24:732–741. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wahl L. M. Hormonal regulation of macrophage collagenase activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1977 Jan 24;74(2):838–845. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(77)90379-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Weiss L. Metastasis: differences between cancer cells in primary and secondary tumors. Pathobiol Annu. 1980;10:51–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Welch D. R., Neri A., Nicolson G. L. Comparison of 'spontaneous' and 'experimental' metastasis using rat 13762 mammary adenocarcinoma metastatic cell clones. Invasion Metastasis. 1983;3(2):65–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Wexler H., Orme S. K., Ketcham A. S. Biological behavior through successive transplant generations of transplantable tumors derived originally from primary chemically induced and spontaneous sources in mice. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1968 Mar;40(3):513–523. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. White A. C., Levy J. A., McGrath C. M. Site-selective growth of a hormone-responsive human breast carcinoma in athymic mice. Cancer Res. 1982 Mar;42(3):906–912. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Wicha M. S., Lowrie G., Kohn E., Bagavandoss P., Mahn T. Extracellular matrix promotes mammary epithelial growth and differentiation in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 May;79(10):3213–3217. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.10.3213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. den Otter W., Runhaar B. A., Ruitenbeek A., Dullens H. F. Site-dependent differences in rejection of tumor cells with and without preimmunization. Eur J Immunol. 1974 Jun;4(6):444–446. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830040611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES