Abstract
Previous reports have suggested that the relationship between survival and thickness of primary cutaneous malignant melanoma is not linear, but that there are natural breakpoints at which survival worsens in a step fashion. Nine hundred and ninety-seven cases of primary cutaneous malignant melanoma less than 9.75 mm thick, excised in Scotland between 1979 and 1983 inclusive, were examined to see if this could be confirmed. An adjusted Cox's regression analysis showed that age, sex, site and thickness were all significant predictors of survival. Thickness was grouped either empirically or by the breakpoints reported by other authors. It was then entered into a model either as a regressor or as a factored variable. The ranges 0-9.75 mm and 0-2 mm were studied separately. In the 0-9.75 mm range the factored variable was a statistically significant better fit than the regressor for each set of breakpoints, including an empirical analysis with eight groups. This suggests that there is no single best fit and that a step-effect is unlikely. Across the 0-2 mm range there was no significant improvement in the fit if thickness was entered as a factored variable, again indicating that a step effect is unlikely. We argue that there is no biological or statistical evidence to support the existence of natural breakpoints.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Balch C. M., Murad T. M., Soong S. J., Ingalls A. L., Halpern N. B., Maddox W. A. A multifactorial analysis of melanoma: prognostic histopathological features comparing Clark's and Breslow's staging methods. Ann Surg. 1978 Dec;188(6):732–742. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197812000-00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bonett A., Roder D., Esterman A. Melanoma case survival rates in South Australia by histological type, thickness and level of tumour at diagnosis. Med J Aust. 1986 Jun 23;144(13):680–682. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1986.tb113693.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Breslow A. Thickness, cross-sectional areas and depth of invasion in the prognosis of cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg. 1970 Nov;172(5):902–908. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197011000-00017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clark W. H., Jr, Elder D. E., Guerry D., 4th, Braitman L. E., Trock B. J., Schultz D., Synnestvedt M., Halpern A. C. Model predicting survival in stage I melanoma based on tumor progression. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989 Dec 20;81(24):1893–1904. doi: 10.1093/jnci/81.24.1893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Day C. L., Jr, Lew R. A., Mihm M. C., Jr, Harris M. N., Kopf A. W., Sober A. J., Fitzpatrick T. B. The natural break points for primary-tumor thickness in clinical Stage I melanoma. N Engl J Med. 1981 Nov 5;305(19):1155–1155. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198111053051916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Day C. L., Jr, Sober A. J., Kopf A. W., Lew R. A., Mihm M. C., Jr, Hennessey P., Golomb F. M., Harris M. N., Gumport S. L., Raker J. W. A prognostic model for clinical stage I melanoma of the upper extremity. The importance of anatomic subsites in predicting recurrent disease. Ann Surg. 1981 Apr;193(4):436–440. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198104000-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meyskens F. L., Jr, Berdeaux D. H., Parks B., Tong T., Loescher L., Moon T. E. Cutaneous malignant melanoma (Arizona Cancer Center experience). I. Natural history and prognostic factors influencing survival in patients with stage I disease. Cancer. 1988 Sep 15;62(6):1207–1214. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19880915)62:6<1207::aid-cncr2820620628>3.0.co;2-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Søndergaard K., Schou G. Survival with primary cutaneous malignant melanoma, evaluated from 2012 cases. A multivariate regression analysis. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1985;406(2):179–195. doi: 10.1007/BF00737084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]