Abstract
During the period 1957-1984 the annual age-adjusted incidence rate of cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) increased by 350% for men and 440% for women in Norway. The annual exposure to carcinogenic sunlight in Norway, calculated by use of measured ozone levels, showed no increasing trend during the same period. Thus, ozone depletion is not a cause of the increasing trend of the incidence rates of skin cancers. The incidence rates of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) increase with decreasing latitude in Norway. The same is true for CMM in Norway, Sweden, and Finland. Our data were used to estimate the implications of a future ozone depletion for the incidence rates of skin cancer: a 10% ozone depletion was found to give rise to a 16-18% increase in the incidence rate of SCC (men and women), a 19% increase in the incidence rate of CMM for men and a 32% increase in the incidence rate of CMM for women. The difference between the numbers for men and women is almost significant and may be related to a different intermittent exposure pattern to sunlight of the two sexes. The increasing trend in the incidence rates of CMM is strongest for the trunk and lower extremities of women, followed by that for the trunk of men. The increasing incidence rates of skin cancers as well as the changing pattern of incidence on different parts of the body is most likely due to changing habits of sun exposure. Comparisons of relative densities of CMM, SCC, LMM and SCC falling per unit area of skin at different parts of the body indicate that sun exposure is the main cause of these cancer forms although other unknown factors may play significant roles as well. For the population as a whole sun exposure during vacations to sunny countries has so far been of minor importance in skin cancer induction.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Baker-Blocker A. Ultraviolet radiation and melanoma mortality in the United States. Environ Res. 1980 Oct;23(1):24–28. doi: 10.1016/0013-9351(80)90089-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cascinelli N., Marchesini R. Increasing incidence of cutaneous melanoma, ultraviolet radiation and the clinician. Photochem Photobiol. 1989 Oct;50(4):497–505. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1989.tb05555.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dahlback A., Moan J. Annual exposures to carcinogenic radiation from the sun at different latitudes and amplification factors related to ozone depletion. The use of different geometrical representations of the skin surface receiving the ultraviolet radiation. Photochem Photobiol. 1990 Nov;52(5):1025–1028. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1990.tb01820.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elwood J. M., Lee J. A., Walter S. D., Mo T., Green A. E. Relationship of melanoma and other skin cancer mortality to latitude and ultraviolet radiation in the United States and Canada. Int J Epidemiol. 1974 Dec;3(4):325–332. doi: 10.1093/ije/3.4.325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Green A. Incidence and reporting of cutaneous melanoma in Queensland. Australas J Dermatol. 1982 Dec;23(3):105–109. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.1982.tb00739.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Green A., Siskind V. Geographical distribution of cutaneous melanoma in Queensland. Med J Aust. 1983 Apr 30;1(9):407–410. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1983.tb136136.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moan J., Dahlback A., Henriksen T., Magnus K. Biological amplification factor for sunlight-induced nonmelanoma skin cancer at high latitudes. Cancer Res. 1989 Sep 15;49(18):5207–5212. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moan J., Dahlback A., Larsen S., Henriksen T., Stamnes K. Ozone depletion and its consequences for the fluence of carcinogenic sunlight. Cancer Res. 1989 Aug 1;49(15):4247–4250. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pearl D. K., Scott E. L. The anatomical distribution of skin cancers. Int J Epidemiol. 1986 Dec;15(4):502–506. doi: 10.1093/ije/15.4.502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rampen F. H., Fleuren E. Melanoma of the skin is not caused by ultraviolet radiation but by a chemical xenobiotic. Med Hypotheses. 1987 Apr;22(4):341–346. doi: 10.1016/0306-9877(87)90028-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]