Abstract
Background and purpose:
Resting superior cervical ganglion (SCG) neurones are phasic cells that switch to a tonic mode of firing upon muscarinic receptor stimulation. This effect is partially due to the muscarinic inhibition of the M-current. Because delayed rectifier K+ channels are essential to sustain tonic firing in central neurones, we asked whether the delayed rectifier current IKV in SCG neurones was modulated by the muscarinic receptors expressed in these cells.
Experimental approach:
Whole-cell patch-clamp records of M-current and IKV were done in cultured or acutely dissociated rat SCG neurones. To characterize the receptor that regulates IKV, cells were bathed with muscarinic agonists and antagonists, relatively specific for receptor subtypes.
Key results:
The muscarinic agonist oxotremorine-M (Oxo-M) enhanced IKV by ∼46% relative to its basal value. This effect remained unaltered when M-current was suppressed by linopirdine or Ba2+. Enhancement of IKV was insensitive to the M1-antagonist pirenzepine, whereas it was inhibited (∼60%) by the M2/4-antagonist himbacine. Further, the relatively specific M2-agonist bethanechol was as potent as Oxo-M in enhancing IKV. The modulation of IKV was insensitive to pertussis toxin (PTX), but was severely attenuated when internal ATP was replaced by its non-hydrolysable analogue AMP-PNP.
Conclusions and Implications:
These results suggest that an M2-like muscarinic receptor couples to a PTX-insensitive G-protein and to an ATP-dependent pathway to enhance IKV. Modulation of IKV must be taken into consideration in order to understand more precisely how muscarinic receptors acting on different ion channels regulate sympathetic excitability.
Keywords: muscarinic receptors, muscarinic antagonists, G proteins, M-current, delayed rectifier K current, ion channel modulation
Introduction
In the nervous system, the slow synaptic actions of acetylcholine (ACh) are mediated by muscarinic ACh receptors (mAChRs) and their coupled G proteins. Stimulation of postsynaptic mAChRs very often elicits a slow membrane depolarization that increases firing frequency or switches firing pattern from a burst to a tonic mode (McCormick, 1993; Marrion, 1997). Most of the knowledge in relation to the signalling pathways activated by mAChRs that regulate cell excitability come from studies carried out in rat superior cervical ganglion (SCG) neurones. According to their similarity in amino-acid sequence and pharmacological profile, mAChRs are grouped into the M1-like (M1, M3 and M5) and M2-like (M2 and M4) subtypes. Of these, SCG neurones mostly express the M1, M2 and M4 receptors (Brown et al., 1995).
SCG neurones are considered phasic nerve cells because during a maintained depolarizing current stimulus, they respond with few action potentials that show adaptation, that is, their firing rate slows down (Wang and McKinnon, 1995). This electrical behaviour is partially determined by the Kv7.2 and Kv7.3 (KCNQ) K+ channel subunits that generate the voltage-activated and non-inactivating M-current (Wang et al., 1998). As M-current dominates the membrane conductance around the cell firing threshold, its slow activation strongly damps the depolarizing effects by inward Na+ or Ca2+ currents, thereby contributing to spike frequency adaptation (Wang et al., 1998; Yue and Yaari, 2004). Conversely, inhibition of M-current by muscarinic agonists produces a slow depolarization that promotes high-frequency tonic firing (Brown and Constanti, 1980; Adams et al., 1982; McCormick, 1993; Marrion, 1997). In SCG cells, the inhibition of M-current is disrupted by the relatively selective M1-antagonist pirenzepine and its modulation disappears upon deletion of the m1 gene (Hamilton et al., 1997). This pharmacological and genetic evidence indicates that the M1 subtype underlies the muscarinic modulation of the M-current (Marrion et al., 1989; Bernheim et al., 1992; Hamilton et al., 1997). The signalling pathway downstream from the M1 receptor has been elucidated and involves a Gαq-activated phospholipase that depletes membrane PIP2 (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate) as the ultimate signal for M-current inhibition (Haley et al., 1998; Suh and Hille, 2002; Zhang et al., 2003; Winks et al., 2005). A second ionic current modulated by mAChRs is the N-type Ca2+ current (ICaN). Its muscarinic inhibition develops with an initial fast (τ∼1 s) and voltage-dependent component, followed by a slow (τ∼9 s) and voltage-independent component (Zhou et al., 1997). The slower component is blocked by pirenzepine, whereas the voltage-dependent inhibition is disrupted by the relatively selective M2/4-antagonist himbacine (Bernheim et al., 1992). Genetic deletion strategies indicate that the M1 subtype mediates the slow component, whereas the M2 subtype is responsible for the voltage-dependent inhibition of ICaN (Shapiro et al., 1999).
Despite the well-documented muscarinic inhibition of both M-current and ICaN, it is not known whether other SCG-endogenous K+ currents are modulated by mAChRs. One potential target for muscarinic action might be the delayed rectifier K+ current (IKV), because: (a) delayed rectifier K+ currents are essential to sustain tonic firing of action potentials (McCrossan et al., 2003; Melnick et al., 2004), as muscarinic stimulation does in SCG neurones; (b) in SCG neurones, IKV significantly contributes to both the late spike repolarization and the early fast spike afterhyperpolarization (Marsh and Brown, 1991), and its transient genetic elimination prolongs action potentials, thereby reducing the probability of tonic firing (Malin and Nerbonne, 2002); (c) it has been reported that muscarinic agonists modulate delayed rectifier K+ currents from central neurones (Zhang et al., 1992; ffrench-Mullen et al., 1994). In this paper, we report that the muscarinic agonist oxotremorine-M (Oxo-M) enhanced the amplitude of IKV, with a pharmacological profile that suggested the involvement of an M2-like mAChR. Furthermore, some properties of this novel signalling pathway are characterized.
Methods
Cell culture
Experiments were mostly carried out on cultured SCG neurones taken from juvenile (2- to 4-week old) Wistar rats, although some current recordings were carried out in older animals (10 weeks old, 210 g weight). Rats were quickly anesthetized with chloroform and decapitated. Superior cervical ganglia were quickly removed, cleaned from non-neuronal tissue and placed for 18 min in modified Hank's solution containing papain (20 U ml−1 at 37°C). Thereafter, papain was replaced by a mixture of collagenase I (1.6 mg ml−1) and dispase II (5 mg ml−1) and further incubated for 14 min, with gentle pipette trituration every 7 min to increase cell dissociation. The acutely dissociated cells were suspended twice in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), centrifuged and plated on 4 × 4 mm glass chips (coated with poly-L-lysine). Cells were incubated for 10 h at 37°C (5% CO2) with DMEM supplemented with 10% of heat-inactivated foetal bovine serum (FBS), before current recording. For some experiments, the acutely dissociated neurones were directly placed in the recording chamber for immediate patch-clamping.
Electrophysiology
Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings of IKV or M-current were made with a List EPC-7 amplifier and seals were obtained with patch pipettes having 1–2 MΩ resistance. The resulting steady series resistance was 3–4 MΩ, 2 min after seal breakthrough. The cell membrane capacitance was measured by integrating the capacitive current generated during a 10 mV depolarizing step, from a holding of −80 mV. The experiments were carried out in SCG neurones with a mean membrane cell capacitance of 73±3.4 pF (range: 47–88 pF). Voltage command pulses and current records were generated and acquired (sampling rate, 5 kHz) using a 12-bit interface (Indec Systems Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Membrane currents were low-pass filtered at 1 kHz and analysed using BASIC-FASTLAB (Indec Systems) and Sigma Plot (SPSS Inc.). The M-current was fully activated by setting the holding potential (Vh) at −25 mV and further deactivated by 500 ms pulses from −25 to −60 mV, every 4 s. The amplitude of M-current and its percentage of inhibition were measured as described (Cruzblanca et al., 1998). For IKV isolation, neurones were held at −50 mV to fully inactivate the IA K+ current (Wang and McKinnon, 1995) and Cd2+ (200 μM) was added to the external solution to block the voltage-activated Ca2+ currents and the Ca2+-activated K+ currents. Thereafter, IKV was elicited by 100 ms command pulses from −50 to 40 mV, in steps of 10–20 mV. IKV was quantified from leakage subtracted records, as the difference between the average of a 10 ms segment of basal current and the averaged outward current recorded during the last 5 ms of the command step. Thus, current density (pA pF−1) was calculated by dividing the amplitude of IKV (pA) and the cell membrane capacitance (pF). Modulation of IKV was measured as the change in its current density at 0 mV. Membrane voltages were corrected on line for a −2 mV junction potential (standard internal solution).
Solutions
The composition of the modified Hank's solution was (in mM): 137 NaCl, 5.4 KCl, 0.44 KH2PO4, 0.34 NaH2PO4, 5 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethyl-sulphonic acid (HEPES), 5 glucose, pH=7.4. SCG cells were transferred to a recording chamber (400 μl) and bathed (2.8 ml min−1) with the appropriate external solution. For M-current recording, the external solution was (in mM): 160 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 5 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 HEPES, 8 glucose and 0.5 μM tetrodotoxin (TTX). The pH was adjusted to 7.4 with NaOH. For IKV recording, Cd2+ (200 μM) was added to the external saline. Solution changes were accomplished in <10 s and the experiments were carried out at 25°C.
The composition of the standard pipette internal solution was (in mM): 175 KCl, 5 MgCl2, 5 HEPES, 0.1 1,2-bis(2-aminophenoxy) ethane-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid (BAPTA), 3 K2-ATP (adenosine 5′-triphosphate), 0.1 Na-GTP, 0.08 leupeptin (pH=7.4). For experiments requiring cell dialysis with a test molecule (adenosine 5′-(β,γ-imido)triphosphate (AMP-PNP)) from the patch pipette, we waited for 5 min dialysis before beginning the K+ current recordings. To avoid systematic bias, control and test measurements were alternated within each set of experiments.
Statistical analysis
Average results are given as the mean±s.e.m. and sample means were compared using Student's t-test. Differences between means were considered significant at P<0.05.
Materials
Reagents were obtained as follows: pertussis toxin (PTX) (List Biological Labs., Campbell, CA, USA); collagenase I, poly-L-lysine, HEPES, Na-GTP, pirenzepine, himbacine, linopirdine, Oxo-M, bethanechol (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA); BAPTA (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA); papain, dispase II, leupeptin and K2-ATP (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany); DMEM and heat-inactivated FBS (GIBCO/Invitrogen Co, Carlsbad, CA, USA); TTX and AMP-PNP (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA, USA). Stock solutions of AMP-PNP and Na-GTP were prepared in water and stored at −20°C.
Results
The muscarinic agonist Oxo-M enhances the amplitude of IKV
In our preparations, by setting the Vh at −50 mV and bathing the cells with a TTX- and Cd2+-containing external solution, it was possible to block the Na+ and Ca2+ inward currents and to eliminate the contribution of the A-type and Ca2+-activated K+ currents, revealing a delayed-like outward current named here as IKV (see inset in Figure 1a). IKV was activated at membrane voltages more positive than −40 mV (Figure 1c) and was significantly more sensitive to external 4-AP than tetraethylammonium (TEA) (500 μM TEA or 4-AP suppressed IKV tail current by 29±2% and 56±4%, respectively; n=6). To assess whether IKV is under regulation by mAChRs, the cultured SCG neurones were bathed with 10 μM of the muscarinic agonist Oxo-M. As shown in Figure 1, Oxo-M produced an increase of IKV that was more noticeable at membrane potentials more positive than −20 mV (Figure 1a and b). For instance at 0 mV, Oxo-M increased the amplitude of IKV from 4.1 to 5.5 nA (Figure 1c). For comparison purposes among cells, the enhancement of IKV was normalized to the cell membrane capacitance. Thus, in eight cells Oxo-M increased IKV current density by 16.1±1.4 pA pF−1 from a non-stimulated basal level, at 0 mV, of 35±3.6 pA pF−1. In most of the cells tested (60%), there were neither changes on the holding current elicited at −50 mV nor on the leakage current generated by a 10 mV hyperpolarizing command pulse, from a Vh of −60 mV (control, 33±4 pA; Oxo-M, 31±4 pA). In the rest of the cells (40%), the enhancement of IKV occurred in parallel with a small inward shift (67±11 pA) of the holding current and with a reproducible, but not statistically significant, increase of the leakage current from 40±4.4 to 48±4.6 pA.
Figure 1.
The muscarinic agonist Oxo-M enhances the amplitude of IKV. IKV records elicited from −40 to +40 mV (Vh=−50 mV), taken before (a) and during (b) Oxo-M (10 μM) exposure. The inset in (a) shows the superposition of the membrane currents recorded at 0 mV when a cultured SCG neurone was bathed with the normal external solution (Control saline) and during addition of TTX (500 nM) plus Cd2+ (200 μM); the dashed line indicates the zero current level. (c) I–V relationship taken before (open circles) and during (filled circles) Oxo-M bath application. (d) Superimposition of IKV traces generated in an acutely dissociated SCG neurone from a juvenile rat, recorded before (Control) during Oxo-M exposure (Oxo-M) and after 2 min of the agonist removal (Wash).
It may be argued that the muscarinic enhancement of IKV reported here could be induced by the culturing process or that modulation of IKV could be mediated by a developmental process that disappears during the adult age. To assess for these possibilities, the effect of Oxo-M was tested on acutely dissociated SCG cells from juvenile rats (2–4 weeks old) and on cultured cells from adult (10 weeks old) animals. Stimulation of mAChRs resulted in a slowly reversible enhancement of IKV, both in acutely dissociated juvenile SCG cells (Figure 1d) and cultured SCG neurones from adult rats as well. The mean increase in IKV current density was 11.7±1.5 pA pF−1 (n=5) for juvenile recently dissociated SCG cells and 17.4±2 pA pF−1 (n=6) for cultured neurones from 10-week old rats.
The enhancement of IKV reflects a novel muscarinic signalling pathway operating in SCG neurones
The modulation of IKV was further characterized by clarifying whether its enhancement reflected the activity of a novel muscarinic pathway or whether it was a space-clamp artefact generated by the parallel strong muscarinic inhibition of the M-current (Adams et al., 1982; Marrion et al., 1989). To address this question, some experiments were carried out in the presence of linopirdine, a relatively selective M-channel blocker (Wang et al., 1998). As expected, linopirdine (10 μM) practically abolished M-current (Figure 2a, upper records). Nevertheless, in the presence of linopirdine, Oxo-M still enhanced IKV (Figure 2a, bottom records). In summary, the increments of IKV current density in the absence or presence of linopirdine were 16.1±1.4 (n=8) and 12.5±1.6 pA pF−1 (n=5), respectively, a difference not statistically significant. Similar results were found when Ba2+ was used to suppress M-current (Adams et al., 1982). Application of Ba2+ (4 mM) reduced the amplitude of IKV by only 12.8±1.5% (n=9) (cf. Adams et al., 1982), however, the residual IKV was still enhanced by Oxo-M (Figure 1b). Thus, Oxo-M enhanced IKV by 16.9±1.7 pA pF−1 (n=6) in control cells, whereas in the presence of Ba2+, the enhancement of current density was 12.1±1.6 pA pF−1 (n=9).
Figure 2.
Stimulation of mAChRs produces independent modulation of M-current and IKV. (a) Top panel, M-current deactivation records elicited before (Control) and during bath application of 10 μM of the M-channel blocker linopirdine (Linop). (a) Bottom panel, records of IKV elicited before (Control) and during Oxo-M (10 μM) superfusion (Oxo-M); linopirdine was present throughout the experiment as indicated by the wide bar. The dashed line on current records indicates the zero current level. (b) The symbols represent the amplitude of IKV measured every 4 s, before and when Ba2+ and Oxo-M were applied as indicated by the horizontal bars. Note that Ba2+ reduced IKV; nevertheless, the residual outward current was enhanced by Oxo-M. Lower plots show the time course of the muscarinic-induced modulation of M-current (c) and IKV (d). Inhibition of M-current was calculated as 1−[(M-current (Oxo-M)/M-current (control)], whereas the enhancement of IKV was measured as [IKV (Oxo-M)−IKV (Control)]/IKV (Control). Current records were taken every 4 s and Oxo-M (10 μM) was applied during periods as indicated by the horizontal bars. For comparison, note the slower enhancement of IKV and its partial recovery 96 s after Oxo-M was removed.
Furthermore, the time course of the enhancement of IKV was relatively slower than that of the inhibition of M-current. For instance, a 20 s bath application of Oxo-M was enough to attain the maximum effect on M-current (Figure 2c), whereas the maximum enhancement of IKV required at least 60 s (Figure 2d). The time course of the IKV enhancement was described by a single exponential having a mean time constant of 20.4±3.9 s (n=6), whereas the corresponding time constant for M-current inhibition was only 3.6±0.5 s (n=6). Moreover, it was observed that recovery of IKV modulation was slow with a mean time constant of 76.2±5.4 s (n=6).
The M1-antagonist pirenzepine does not disrupt the modulation of IKV
In SCG neurones, the M1 receptor underlies the suppression of M-current (Hamilton et al., 1997) and the relatively selective M1-antagonist pirenzepine (pKB=8.2; Ellis, 2002) blocks the effects of muscarinic agonists on M-current (Marrion et al., 1989; Bernheim et al., 1992). In order to assess whether the M1 receptor underlies the modulation of IKV, cells were treated with 100 nM pirenzepine 2 min before and throughout the Oxo-M challenge. Initially, modulation of M-current was used as a positive control to verify the potency of pirenzepine in our experimental conditions. M-current suppression by Oxo-M at 200 nM (a concentration close to its reported IC50, 300 nM; Bernheim et al., 1992) was 43±2% (n=11) but, in the presence of pirenzepine, this effect of Oxo-M was significantly reduced (n=10; Figure 3a and b). Conversely, pirenzepine did not prevent the enhancement of IKV elicited by Oxo-M (Figure 3c and d).
Figure 3.
The M1-antagonist pirenzepine disrupts the modulation of M-current, while leaves intact the muscarinic enhancement of IKV. Representative traces of M-current (a) and IKV (c) from non-treated neurones (No PZ) and those incubated with 100 nM pirenzepine (PZ). For each panel, recordings were taken before (1) and during (2) bath application of 200 nM Oxo-M and the dashed line indicates zero current level. Bar plots show the mean (±s.e.m.) Oxo-M-induced inhibition of M-current (b) and mean enhancement of IKV current density (d) in control cells (solid bars) and in neurones treated with PZ (open bars). In PZ-treated cells only the muscarinic inhibition of M-current was significantly (**P<0.01) attenuated from 43±2 to 19.3±2.3%. Oxo-M increased IKV current density by 11.6±1.7 and 11.4±1.2 pA pF−1 in No PZ- and PZ-treated cells, respectively. The numbers above bars indicate the numbers of cells tested for each condition.
The M2/4-receptor antagonist himbacine disrupts the modulation of IKV
The M2/4-antagonist himbacine (pKB=8.1–8.2; Ellis, 2002) has been successfully used to distinguish between M1- and M2/4-mediated signalling pathways. Therefore, to test whether modulation of IKV is mediated by an M2-like receptor, cells were treated with himbacine (100 nM) 2 min before and during Oxo-M bath application. For these experiments, the M1-mediated modulation of M-current was checked again because himbacine antagonizes M1-receptors with a lower potency (pKB=7.1) than it does for M2/4 mAChRs (Ellis, 2002) and because 100 nM himbacine is expected to produce some effect on M-current modulation (Bernheim et al., 1992). Indeed, in control neurones the suppression of M-current by 200 nM Oxo-M was 44.9±2.6% (n=6), whereas in himbacine-treated cells the suppression was slightly lower (35.9±1%, n=6). On the other hand and in contrast to pirenzepine, himbacine significantly attenuated the muscarinic enhancement of IKV (Figure 4a, b).
Figure 4.
The muscarinic modulation of IKV has a pharmacological M2/4-profile. (a) Effect of Oxo-M on IKV in a non-treated cell (No HIMB) and in a neurone incubated with the M2/4-antagonist himbacine (HIMB). For each panel, IKV was elicited before (1) and during (2) bath application of 200 nM Oxo-M. (b) Mean (±s.e.m.) increase of IKV current density in control cells (solid bar) and in neurones treated with HIMB (open bar); HIMB significantly (**P<0.01) reduced the muscarinic enhancement of IKV from 10.4±1 to 4.3±0.5 pA pF−1 (c) Effect on M-current of the sequential application of the muscarinic agonists bethanechol (BeCh) and Oxo-M; note that BeCh was applied for a longer period than Oxo-M, as indicated by the horizontal bars. (d) The mean suppression of M-current by BeCh (solid bar) and Oxo-M (open bar) were 22.2±6.1 and 79.6±2%, respectively; a difference statistically significant (**P<0.01). (e) BeCh (solid bar) and Oxo-M (open bar) applied at the same concentration (10 μM) enhanced IKV current density by 10.9±1 and 13.3±2.3 pA pF−1, respectively. For all bar plots, the numbers on columns indicate the numbers of cells tested.
So far, the muscarinic modulation of IKV has been tested with the unspecific agonist Oxo-M. To confirm that an M2-like mAChR subtype underlies the enhancement of IKV, the effect of the agonist bethanechol was tested because this agonist selectively activated the M2-mediated inhibition of ICaN in neonatal SCG neurones (Liu and Rittenhouse, 2003). In our preparations of SCG neurones, bethanechol (10 μM) produced a small inhibition of M-current, as compared with the large effect generated by Oxo-M (Figure 4c and d). There was no significant difference in the potency between these muscarinic agonists (both at 10 μM) when they were tested on the modulation of IKV (Figure 4e).
PTX does not block the muscarinic modulation of IKV
In many cell types, the M2 and M4 mAChRs couple to and signal through PTX-sensitive G proteins (Ellis, 2002). To assess whether modulation of IKV is sensitive to PTX, cells were incubated overnight with 500 ng ml−1 of that toxin. Surprisingly, PTX did not prevent the enhancement of IKV elicited by 10 μM Oxo-M (Figure 5a). Summarizing, in non-treated neurones the muscarinic agonist increased current density by 17.9±2.5 pA pF−1 (n=8), whereas in PTX-treated cells the increment was 16.7±1.7 pA pF−1 (n=10), a difference not statistically significant (P<0.05%). To validate these results, we tested the well-known PTX sensitivity of the α2-adrenoceptor-mediated inhibition of ICaN, which is voltage-dependent and mediated by Go/i (Delmas et al., 1999). The voltage-dependent inhibition of ICaN was revealed with two 10 ms depolarizing test pulses from a Vh of −80 to +10 mV, interposed by a 25-ms depolarization to +125 mV. In the absence of agonist, each +10 mV pulses generated identical Ca2+ currents as shown in Figure 5b (C1, C2). Application of noradrenaline (NA) reduced ICaN, although this effect was partially reversed by the +125 mV depolarization, facilitating ICaN during the second test pulse (left panel in Figure 5b). As expected, PTX attenuated both the inhibitory effect of NA on ICaN and current facilitation that results from the transient removal of its voltage-dependent inhibition (right panel in Figure 5b).
Figure 5.
PTX does not prevent the muscarinic modulation of IKV. (a) Representative delayed rectifier K+ and (b) Ca2+ current records from non-treated neurones (No PTX) and those cells incubated overnight with 500 ng ml−1 of PTX. Note that PTX did not block the muscarinic enhancement of IKV (traces were taken before (1) and during (2) bath application of 10 μM Oxo-M). (b) Typical ICaN traces elicited by a two-pulse protocol (see text) in a control cell (left panel) and in a PTX-incubated neurone (right panel); ICaN records were elicited before (C1 and C2) and during adrenergic stimulation (NA). As expected, PTX reduced the voltage-dependent inhibition of ICaN. The dashed lines are the zero current level.
ATP is required for muscarinic modulation of IKV
It is now well accepted that the activity of ion channels can be modulated by the activation of protein kinases linked to second-messenger systems (Hilgemann, 1997). Given that ATP is commonly used by protein kinases, we tested whether modulation of IKV required the presence of ATP. Thus, cells were dialysed for ∼8 min with a standard internal solution containing the non-hydrolysable ATP analogue, AMP-PNP, instead of ATP. Figure 6a shows the Oxo-M response in a cell dialysed with the standard ATP-containing pipette solution. The long-term dialysis procedure, by itself, did not prevent the muscarinic-induced enhancement of IKV. In contrast, in a cell dialysed with AMP-PNP, the muscarinic enhancement of IKV was absent (Figure 6b). Similar results were found in two more paired experiments.
Figure 6.
Muscarinic modulation of IKV is mediated by an ATP-dependent process. Representative effect of Oxo-M on IKV in a neurone dialysed with the ATP-containing pipette standard internal solution (a) and in a cell where ATP was replaced with its non-hydrolysable parent compound, AMP-PNP (b). The ATP-analogue readily blocked the muscarinic enhancement of IKV, as are shown in the current records and plots describing the value of current density (pA pF−1) measured every 4 s, before (open circles) and during Oxo-M challenge (filled circles and horizontal bars). Similar results were found in two more paired experiments.
Discussion and conclusions
Our experiments have shown that stimulation of mAChRs induced a robust enhancement of IKV in cultured or acutely dissociated SCG neurones from juvenile rats (Figure 1). This effect did not result from the improvement of the space-clamp conditions, secondary to the strong muscarinic inhibition of M-current, because: (a) the enhancement of IKV by Oxo-M remained practically unaltered when M-channels were blocked either by linopirdine or Ba2+ (Figure 2); (b) the kinetic for muscarinic inhibition of M-current was, at least, five times faster than the time course of IKV modulation (Figure 2); (c) the enhancement of IKV was noticeable at membrane voltages more positive than −20 mV (Figure 1), a voltage range where M-channels reached their maximal activation (Wang et al., 1998). Therefore, it is suggested that the enhancement of IKV reflects a novel muscarinic pathway operating in rat sympathetic SCG neurones.
Given that these nerve cells mostly express the M1, M2 and M4 receptor subtypes (Brown et al., 1995), the M1-antagonist pirenzepine and the M2/4-antagonist himbacine were used to pharmacologically characterize the mAChR that underlies the modulation of IKV. The use of these muscarinic antagonists has been reported to be a valuable pharmacological tool to identify the subtypes of mAChR that modulate different SCG endogenous ion currents including the M-current, ICaN and the Ca2+-activated chloride current (Marrion et al., 1989; Bernheim et al., 1992; Marsh et al., 1995). Here, it was found that the enhancement of IKV was insensitive to pirenzepine, whereas this M1-antagonist reduced the inhibition of M-current by ∼50% (Figure 3). In contrast, the enhancement of IKV was significantly reduced by himbacine (Figure 4). In agreement with these results, the relatively selective M2/4-agonist bethanechol (Constanti, 2003; Liu and Rittenhouse, 2003) showed an ability to enhance IKV, comparable to that of Oxo-M (Figure 4). Taken together, these results suggest that an M2-like mAChR is responsible for the muscarinic modulation of IKV. However, we cannot distinguish between the M2 and M4 because himbacine antagonizes both subtypes with similar potency (pKB for M2=8.1 and pKB for M4=8.2) (Ellis, 2002). Further genetic studies are required to identify the exact M2-like receptor subtype that mediates the modulation of IKV.
It is generally accepted that M2-like receptors prefer to couple to G proteins of the PTX-sensitive Gi family (Ellis, 2002). Indeed, in SCG neurones M2/M4 subtypes couple to GoA, the most abundant isoform of Gαo expressed in these cells, to induce the Gβγ-mediated and voltage-dependent inhibition of ICaN (Beech et al., 1992; Delmas et al., 1998). Surprisingly, PTX did not affect the muscarinic enhancement of IKV (Figure 5) suggesting that in SCG cells the M2-like receptor couples to a PTX-insensitive G protein as well. Such potential divergence at the level of G proteins has been reported for M2 receptors co-expressed with CaV2.3 channels in human embryonic kidney cells. In this heterologous expression system, the agonist carbachol produces a rapid and PTX-sensitive inhibition, followed by a slow and PTX-insensitive stimulation of the Ca2+ current (Meza et al., 1999). Moreover, G-protein-activated, inwardly rectifying, K+ (GIRK) currents also show a biphasic PTX-sensitive and -insensitive modulation by M2 receptors, when receptors and GIRK channel subunits are co-expressed in Chinese hamster ovary K1 cells (Bünemann et al., 2000). For IKV modulation, the most plausible candidate might be Gz because: (a) Gz is the unique PTX-insensitive member that belongs to the Gi family; (b) SCG neurones express Gz and its overexpression in PTX-treated cells rescued the voltage-dependent inhibition of ICaN by α2-adrenergic or somatostatin receptors, thereby indicating that Gz is able to link Gi-coupled receptors to ion channels (Jeong and Ikeda, 1998). Whatever the nature of the PTX-insensitive G protein might be, it stimulated an ATP-dependent, slow signalling pathway to modulate IKV.
Muscarinic modulation of delayed rectifier K+ currents has been reported to occur in some central neurones as well. However, the effect depends on the cell type because in CA1 hippocampal neurones, like in SCG cells, stimulation of mAChRs potentates a voltage-activated sustained K+ current (Zhang et al., 1992), whereas in hypothalamic neurones a IKV is inhibited (ffrench-Mullen et al., 1994). It is possible that the muscarinic enhancement of IKV seen both in CA1 and SCG neurones reflects the modulation of either Kv2.1 or Kv2.2 subunits, because they mostly contribute to the delayed rectifier currents generated in these neurone types (Murakoshi and Trimmer, 1999; Malin and Nerbonne, 2002). In agreement with this suggestion, IKV had a pharmacological profile consistent with the involvement of Kv2.1 subunits. For instance, (a) like rat cloned Kv2.1 channels (Chandy and Gutman, 1995), IKV had a greater sensitivity to 4-AP than to TEA; (b) it was reported that 500 μM of 4-AP blocked homomeric Kv2.1 currents by 50% (Chandy and Gutman, 1995) and this concentration of 4-AP applied to the SCG cells reduced IKV by ∼55%; (c) 500 μM 4-AP practically abolished the enhancement of IKV by Oxo-M or angiotensin II (unpublished observations).
An effect of muscarine on action potential shape was not observed in microelectrode recordings from adult rat or bullfrog sympathetic neurones (Brown and Constanti, 1980; Adams et al., 1982). The data presented in this study would have predicted an effect. This apparent discrepancy is not due to the different ages among the animals used or to the cell culture process per se, because: (a) it was found that Oxo-M enhanced IKV, both in cultured SCG neurones from juvenile (2–4 weeks old) or adult (10 weeks old) rats; (b) in SCG cells from juvenile rats, the enhancement of IKV was similar both in cultured and fresh dissociated cells. There is evidence from SCG cells that a delayed rectifier K+ current (IK(DR)) with a pharmacological profile similar to that of IKV, significantly contributes to the early fast spike afterhyperpolarization (Marsh and Brown, 1991). Thus, it might be expected that the effect of Oxo-M on IKV would cause an increase of the fast spike afterhyperpolarization. This had been reported previously (see Figure 8 in Brown and Constanti, 1980). It is possible that the final effect of muscarinic agonists on single action potential shape would be difficult to discern, because of specific roles that each voltage- and Ca2+-activated K+ currents have in shaping the SCG action potential. For instance, when IKV was blocked in bullfrog sympathetic neurones its contribution to the action potential was only revealed (prolonged action potential duration and reduced fast afterhyperpolarization) when the Ca2+-activated K+ currents IC and IAHP were also blocked (Goh et al., 1989). In SCG cells, IC and IAHP are mediated by BK- and SK-type K+ channels that are activated by Ca2+ entry through L-type and N-type Ca2+ channels, respectively (Davies et al., 1996). Given that BK- and SK channels contribute to spike repolarization and afterhyperpolarization, respectively, their indirect suppression secondary to the well-known muscarinic inhibition of the L- and N-type Ca2+ currents (Bernheim et al., 1992; Shapiro et al., 1999), could mask the effect of the muscarinic enhancement of IKV on spike repolarization (faster) and afterhyperpolarization (larger amplitude), thereby resulting in no noticeable changes in single action potential morphology. So, the impact of each of these K+ currents on the action potential repolarization and fast afterhyperpolarization may depend on the corresponding K+ channel-type density (Malin and Nerbonne, 2002) and the strength and duration of their muscarinic modulation.
It is concluded that in SCG neurones from juvenile and adult rats, an M2-like muscarinic receptor couples to a PTX-insensitive G protein and to an ATP-dependent pathway to modulate the delayed rectifier current IKV. The muscarinic enhancement of IKV must be taken into consideration in order to understand better how mAChRs acting on different ion channels regulate sympathetic excitability.
Conflict of interest
The author states no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by CONACYT Grant 44933-Q, Grant Ramón Alvarez-Buylla, U de Colima, The PEW Latin American Fellows Program in Biomedical Sciences and The Third World Academy of Sciences Grant 00-241 RG/BIO/LA. I thank Dr B Hille for reading the manuscript and Mrs Graciela Urbina for technical assistance.
Abbreviations
- AMP-PNP
adenosine 5′-(β,γ-imido)triphosphate
- ICaN
N-type Ca2+ current
- IKV
delayed rectifier K+ current
- mAChRs
muscarinic acetylcholine receptors
- NA
noradrenaline
- Oxo-M
oxotremorine-M
- PTX
pertussis toxin
- SCG
superior cervical ganglion
References
- Adams PR, Brown DA, Constanti A. Pharmacological inhibition of the M-current. J Physiol. 1982;332:223–262. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beech DJ, Bernheim L, Hille B. Pertussis toxin and voltage dependence distinguish multiple pathways modulating calcium channels of rat sympathetic neurons. Neuron. 1992;8:97–106. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90111-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bernheim L, Mathie A, Hille B. Characterization of muscarinic receptor subtypes inhibiting Ca2+ current and M current in rat sympathetic neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:9544–9548. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brown DA, Buckley NJ, Caulfield MP, Duffy SM, Jones S, Lamas JA, et al. Coupling of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors to neural ion channels: closure of K+ channels Molecular Mechanisms of Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Function 1995R.G. Landes Company: Austin, TX; 165–182.In: Wess J (ed) [Google Scholar]
- Brown DA, Constanti A. Intracellular observations on the effects of muscarinic agonists on rat sympathetic neurones. Br J Pharmacol. 1980;70:593–608. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1980.tb09778.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bünemann M, Meyer T, Pott L, Hosey M. Novel inhibition of Gβγ-activated potassium currents induced by M2 muscarinic receptors via a pertussis toxin-insensitive pathway. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:12537–12545. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.17.12537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chandy KG, Gutman GA.Voltage-gated K+ channel genes Handbook of Receptors and Channels: Ligand- and Voltage-gated Ion Channels 1995CRC Press Inc.: Boca Raton, FL; 1–71.In: North AR (ed) [Google Scholar]
- Constanti A. Can bethanechol distinguish between different muscarinic signalling pathways in neurones. Br J Pharmacol. 2003;138:1185–1187. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cruzblanca H, Koh D-S, Hille B. Bradykinin inhibits M current via phospholipase C and Ca2+ release from IP3-sensitive Ca2+ stores in rat sympathetic neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:7151–7156. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.12.7151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davies PJ, Ireland DR, McLachlan EM. Sources of Ca2+ for different Ca2+-activated K+ conductances in neurones of the rat superior cervical ganglion. J Physiol. 1996;495:353–366. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delmas P, Abogadie FC, Dayrell M, Haley JE, Milligan G, Caulfield MP, et al. G-proteins and G-protein subunits mediating cholinergic inhibition of N-type calcium currents in sympathetic neurons. Eur J Neurosci. 1998;10:1654–1666. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1998.00170.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Delmas P, Abogadie FC, Milligan G, Buckley NJ, Brown DA. βγ dimers derived from Go and Gi proteins contribute different components of adrenergic inhibition of Ca2+ channels in rat sympathetic neurones. J Physiol. 1999;518:23–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0023r.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ellis J.Muscarinic receptors Understanding G protein-coupled receptors and their role in the CNS 2002Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK; 349–371.In: Pangalos MN, Davies CH (eds) [Google Scholar]
- ffrench-Mullen JMH, Plata-Salamán CR, Buckley NJ, Danks P. Muscarinic modulation by a G-protein α-subunit of delayed rectifier K+ current in rat ventromedial hypothalamic neurones. J Physiol. 1994;474:21–26. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp019998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goh JW, Kelly MEM, Pennefather PS. Electrophysiological function of the delayed rectifier (IK) in bullfrog sympathetic ganglion neurones. Pflügers Arch. 1989;413:482–486. doi: 10.1007/BF00594177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haley JE, Abogadie FC, Delmas P, Dayrell M Vallis Y, Milligan G, Caulfield MP, et al. The α subunit of Gq contributes to muscarinic inhibition of the M-type potassium current in sympathetic neurons. J Neurosci. 1998;18:4521–4531. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-12-04521.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamilton SE, Loose MD, Qi M, Levey AI, Hille B, McKnight GS, et al. Disruption of the m1 receptor gene ablates muscarinic receptor-dependent M current regulation and seizure activity in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:13311–13316. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.24.13311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hilgemann DW. Cytoplasmic ATP-dependent regulation of ion transporters and channels: mechanisms and messengers. Annu Rev Physiol. 1997;59:193–220. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.59.1.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jeong S-W, Ikeda SR. G protein α subunit Gαz couples neurotransmitter receptors to ion channels in sympathetic neurons. Neuron. 1998;21:1201–1212. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80636-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu L, Rittenhouse AR. Pharmacological discrimination between muscarinic receptor signal transduction cascades with bethanechol chloride. Br J Pharmacol. 2003;138:1259–1270. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malin SA, Nerbonne JM. Delayed rectifier K+ currents, IK, are encoded by Kv2 α-subunits and regulate tonic firing in mammalian sympathetic neurons. J Neurosci. 2002;22:10094–10105. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-23-10094.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marrion NV. Control of M-current. Annu Rev Physiol. 1997;59:483–505. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.59.1.483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marrion NV, Smart TG, Marsh SJ, Brown DA. Muscarinic suppression of the M-current in the rat sympathetic ganglion is mediated by receptors of the M1-subtype. Br J Pharmacol. 1989;98:557–573. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1989.tb12630.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marsh SJ, Brown DA. Potassium currents contributing to action potential repolarization in dissociated cultured rat superior cervical sympathetic neurones. Neurosci Lett. 1991;133:298–302. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(91)90593-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marsh SJ, Trouslard J, Leaney JL, Brown DA. Synergistic regulation of a neuronal chloride current by intracellular calcium and muscarinic receptor activation: a role for protein kinase C. Neuron. 1995;15:729–737. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90160-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCormick DA. Actions of acetylcholine in the cerebral cortex and thalamus and implications for function. Prog Brain Res. 1993;98:303–308. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)62412-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCrossan ZA, Lewis A, Panaghie G, Jordan PN, Christini DJ, Lerner DJ, et al. MinK-related peptide 2 modulates Kv2.1 and Kv3.1 potassium channels in mammalian brain. J Neurosci. 2003;23:8077–8091. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-22-08077.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Melnick IV, Santos SFA, Szokol K, Szûcs P, Safronov BV. Ionic basis of tonic firing in spinal substancia gelatinosa neurons of rat. J Neurophysiol. 2004;91:646–655. doi: 10.1152/jn.00883.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meza U, Bannister R, Melliti K, Adams B. Biphasic, opposing modulation of cloned neuronal α1E Ca channels by distinct signaling pathways coupled to M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. J Neurosci. 1999;19:6806–6817. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-16-06806.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murakoshi H, Trimmer JS. Identification of the Kv2.1 K+ channel as a major component of the delayed rectifier K+ current in rat hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci. 1999;19:1728–1735. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-05-01728.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shapiro MS, Loose MD, Hamilton SE, Nathanson NM, Gomeza J, Wess J, et al. Assignment of muscarinic receptor subtypes mediating G-protein modulation of Ca2+ channels by using knockout mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:10899–10904. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.19.10899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suh B-C, Hille B. Recovery from muscarinic modulation of M current channels requires phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate synthesis. Neuron. 2002;35:507–520. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00790-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang H-S, McKinnon D. Potassium currents in rat prevertebral and paravertebral sympathetic neurones: control of firing properties. J Physiol. 1995;485:319–335. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1995.sp020732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang H-S, Pan Z, Shi W, Brown BS, Wymore RS, Cohen IS, et al. KCNQ2 and KCNQ3 potassium channel subunits: molecular correlates of the M-channel. Science. 1998;282:1890–1893. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5395.1890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Winks JS, Hughes S, Filippov AK, Tatulian L, Abogadie FC, Brown DA, et al. Relationship between membrane phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate and receptor-mediated inhibition of native neuronal M channels. J Neurosci. 2005;25:3400–3413. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3231-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yue C, Yaari Y. KCNQ/M channels control spike afterdepolarization and burst generation in hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci. 2004;24:4614–4624. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0765-04.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang H, Craciun LC, Mirshahi T, Rohács T, Lopes CMB, Jin T, et al. PIP2 activates KCNQ channels, and its hydrolysis underlies receptor-mediated inhibition of M currents. Neuron. 2003;37:963–975. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00125-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang L, Weiner JL, Carlen PL. Muscarinic potentiation of IK in hippocampal neurons: electrophysiological characterization of the signal transduction pathway. J Neurosci. 1992;12:4510–4520. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-11-04510.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou J, Shapiro MS, Hille B. Speed of Ca2+ channel modulation by neurotransmitters in rat sympathetic neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1997;77:2040–2048. doi: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.4.2040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






