Skip to main content
The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association logoLink to The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association
letter
. 2007 Jul-Sep;51(3):187.

Hart J. Structural problems of the spine do not necessarily require intervention. JCCA 2007; 51(1):8–13 (Commentary).

Martin Jolicoeur 1
PMCID: PMC1978451  PMID: 17882317

To the Editor:

In response to the Commentary by Dr. John Hart in the March 2007 issue I must quickly state that I am amazed by the lack of respect for proper function and health and the development of symptoms and disease. Any disease is a process that takes time. So Dr. Hart, what would you do if your medical doctor told you you had high blood pressure and elevated cholesterol in the absence of symptoms?

Would you really wait for your first heart attack before you take care of it? For the same reason, I do not wait for my patients to come to my office in pain before I correct their dysfunctions that we can now easily measure scientifically. In chiropractic I care for patients. I hope you do to.

J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2007 Jul-Sep;51(3):187.

To the Editor in reply

John Hart

I would like to thank Dr. Jolicoeur for his response to my article.1 In reply I would answer that if a medical doctor told me I had high blood pressure and elevated cholesterol (HBP&EC), I would do the same thing I did in my article – search the recent literature – in an effort to determine what, if anything, should be done about it. In particular, I would look to see if there were differences (i.e., in morbidity and mortality rates) between those with HBP&EC versus without. If there were no differences, then I would be hesitant to act on the information. HBP&EC is however linked with heart disease23 but what outcomes can be related to asymptomatic SPOTS?

My search in the area of structural problems of the spine (SPOTS) suggested to me that there were often little or no differences, in the long run, between patients with SPOTS versus without. Personally I do not adjust SPOTS (vertebral misalignment) unless there is evidence that nerve dysfunction is also present. If SPOTS is accompanied by nerve dysfunction, then this would, by definition, be considered a chiropractic subluxation. I do not wait for symptoms either but I admit that the validity of the approach I use (SPOTS + nerve dysfunction) is not well-supported by health outcomes research. Rather than base what we do on catchy slogans, such as structure dictates function, the various approaches we use should be supported by health outcomes research.

Reference


Articles from The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association are provided here courtesy of The Canadian Chiropractic Association

RESOURCES