Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Journal of Pharmacology logoLink to British Journal of Pharmacology
. 1984 Jul;82(3):623–642. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1984.tb10801.x

The channel-blocking action of methonium compounds on rat submandibular ganglion cells.

A M Gurney, H P Rang
PMCID: PMC1987010  PMID: 6146366

Abstract

The effects of drugs of the polymethylene bis-trimethylammonium (methonium) series on the characteristics of the synaptic currents (e.s.cs) recorded from voltage-clamped rat submandibular ganglion cells have been studied. The drugs studied were from C4 to C10 (decamethonium). All of the drugs except C4 shortened the initial decay phase of the e.s.c.; C9 and C10 produced an additional slowly decaying component. These effects were interpreted in terms of an open channel block mechanism, the calculated rate constants for association with the open channel at -80 mV being fairly similar (5.9 X 10(6) to 18.1 X 10(6)M-1S-1) for all of the compounds except C4, which had no effect on the e.s.c. decay. All of the compounds produced use-dependent block when tested with short trains of stimuli at 10 Hz, or with trains of ionophoretic pulses of acetylcholine, consistent with their channel blocking property. Tubocurarine had a similar effect, but not trimetaphan or mecamylamine. Recovery from use-dependent block with short chain methonium compounds, up to C8, was very slow in the absence of agonist, being incomplete even after several minutes. With C9 or C10 or tubocurarine, recovery from use-dependent block was complete within a few seconds. With C6 recovery in the absence of agonist was unaffected by membrane potential, but could be accelerated by applying acetylcholine with the cell depolarized to -40 mV. This persistent block was ascribed to the ability of the blocking molecule to become trapped by closure of the channel. With C9 and C10 it is assumed that their presence inhibits channel closure, so they can escape without the help of agonist. When use-dependent block is avoided by leaving the ganglion unstimulated during equilibration with the blocking drug, the first e.s.c. elicited shows no appreciable reduction of amplitude, though with C6, C7 or C8 subsequent responses elicited at 0.1 Hz become progressively more blocked. Even at 1 mM, C6 does not prevent acetylcholine from opening ionic channels. It is concluded that all of the effects on e.s.c. amplitude can be interpreted in terms of channel block, there being no evidence of any receptor blocking action.

Full text

PDF
623

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams D. J., Nonner W., Dwyer T. M., Hille B. Block of endplate channels by permeant cations in frog skeletal muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1981 Dec;78(6):593–615. doi: 10.1085/jgp.78.6.593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams P. R. Acetylcholine receptor kinetics. J Membr Biol. 1981 Feb 28;58(3):161–174. doi: 10.1007/BF01870902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Adams P. R. Drug blockade of open end-plate channels. J Physiol. 1976 Sep;260(3):531–552. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Adams P. R., Feltz A. Quinacrine (mepacrine) action at frog end-plate. J Physiol. 1980 Sep;306:261–281. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Adams P. R., Sakmann B. Decamethonium both opens and blocks endplate channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Jun;75(6):2994–2998. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.6.2994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Adams P. R. Voltage jump analysis of procaine action at frog end-plate. J Physiol. 1977 Jun;268(2):291–318. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Armstrong C. M. Interaction of tetraethylammonium ion derivatives with the potassium channels of giant axons. J Gen Physiol. 1971 Oct;58(4):413–437. doi: 10.1085/jgp.58.4.413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ascher P., Large W. A., Rang H. P. Studies on the mechanism of action of acetylcholine antagonists on rat parasympathetic ganglion cells. J Physiol. 1979 Oct;295:139–170. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Beam K. G. A quantitative description of end-plate currents in the presence of two lidocaine derivatives. J Physiol. 1976 Jun;258(2):301–322. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Burgermeister W., Catterall W. A., Witkop B. Histrionicotoxin enhances agonist-induced desensitization of acetylcholine receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Dec;74(12):5754–5758. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.12.5754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cahalan M. D. Local anesthetic block of sodium channels in normal and pronase-treated squid giant axons. Biophys J. 1978 Aug;23(2):285–311. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(78)85449-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Colquhoun D., Dreyer F., Sheridan R. E. The actions of tubocurarine at the frog neuromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1979 Aug;293:247–284. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Colquhoun D., Hawkes A. G. Relaxation and fluctuations of membrane currents that flow through drug-operated channels. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1977 Nov 14;199(1135):231–262. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1977.0137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Colquhoun D., Range H. P. Effects of inhibitors of the binding of iodinated alpha-bungarotoxin to acetylcholine receptors in rat muscle. Mol Pharmacol. 1976 Jul;12(4):519–535. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Courtney K. R. Mechanism of frequency-dependent inhibition of sodium currents in frog myelinated nerve by the lidocaine derivative GEA. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1975 Nov;195(2):225–236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Creese R., England J. M. Decamethonium in depolarized muscle and the effects of tubocurarine. J Physiol. 1970 Sep;210(2):345–361. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1970.sp009214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dreyer F., Peper K. Iontophoretic application of acetylcholine: advantages of high resistance micropipettes in connection with an electronic current pump. Pflugers Arch. 1974 Apr 22;348(3):263–272. doi: 10.1007/BF00587417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dwyer T. M., Adams D. J., Hille B. The permeability of the endplate channel to organic cations in frog muscle. J Gen Physiol. 1980 May;75(5):469–492. doi: 10.1085/jgp.75.5.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Feltz A., Large W. A., Trautmann A. Analysis of atropine action at the frog neutromuscular junction. J Physiol. 1977 Jul;269(1):109–130. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Glavinović M. I. Presynaptic action of curare. J Physiol. 1979 May;290(2):499–506. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gray P. T., Rang H. P. Analysis of current noise evoked by nicotinic agonists in rat submandibular ganglion neurones. Br J Pharmacol. 1983 Oct;80(2):235–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1983.tb10025.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hubbard J. I., Wilson D. F. Neuromuscular transmission in a mammalian preparation in the absence of blocking drugs and the effect of D-tubocurarine. J Physiol. 1973 Jan;228(2):307–325. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Katz B., Miledi R. A re-examination of curare action at the motor endplate. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1978 Dec 4;203(1151):119–133. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1978.0096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lingle C., Auerbach A. Comparison of excitatory currents activated by different transmitters on crustacean muscle. I. Acetylcholine-activated channels. J Gen Physiol. 1983 Apr;81(4):547–569. doi: 10.1085/jgp.81.4.547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lingle C. Blockade of cholinergic channels by chlorisondamine on a crustacean muscle. J Physiol. 1983 Jun;339:395–417. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lingle C. Different types of blockade of crustacean acetylcholine-induced currents. J Physiol. 1983 Jun;339:419–437. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Magleby K. L., Stevens C. F. The effect of voltage on the time course of end-plate currents. J Physiol. 1972 May;223(1):151–171. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1972.sp009839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Maleque M. A., Souccar C., Cohen J. B., Albuquerque E. X. Meproadifen reaction with the ionic channel of the acetylcholine receptor: potentiation of agonist-induced desensitization at the frog neuromuscular junction. Mol Pharmacol. 1982 Nov;22(3):636–647. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Manalis R. S. Voltage-dependent effect of curare at the frog neuromuscular junction. Nature. 1977 May 26;267(5609):366–368. doi: 10.1038/267366a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Milne R. J., Byrne J. H. Effects of hexamethonium and decamethonium on end-plate current parameters. Mol Pharmacol. 1981 Mar;19(2):276–281. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Neher E., Steinbach J. H. Local anaesthetics transiently block currents through single acetylcholine-receptor channels. J Physiol. 1978 Apr;277:153–176. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1978.sp012267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ogden D. C., Siegelbaum S. A., Colquhoun D. Block of acetylcholine-activated ion channels by an uncharged local anaesthetic. Nature. 1981 Feb 12;289(5798):596–598. doi: 10.1038/289596a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. PATON W. D. M., ZAIMIS E. J. Paralysis of autonomic ganglia by methonium salts. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1951 Mar;6(1):155–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1951.tb00631.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. PATON W. D. M., ZAIMIS E. J. The pharmacological actions of polymethylene bistrimethyl-ammonium salts. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1949 Dec;4(4):381–400. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1949.tb00565.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rang H. P., Colquhoun D., Rang H. P. The action of ganglionic blocking drugs on the synaptic responses of rat submandibular ganglion cells. Br J Pharmacol. 1982 Jan;75(1):151–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1982.tb08768.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rang H. P. The characteristics of synaptic currents and responses to acetylcholine of rat submandibular ganglion cells. J Physiol. 1981 Feb;311:23–55. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1981.sp013571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Schwarz W., Palade P. T., Hille B. Local anesthetics. Effect of pH on use-dependent block of sodium channels in frog muscle. Biophys J. 1977 Dec;20(3):343–368. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(77)85554-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Strichartz G. R. The inhibition of sodium currents in myelinated nerve by quaternary derivatives of lidocaine. J Gen Physiol. 1973 Jul;62(1):37–57. doi: 10.1085/jgp.62.1.37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Tsai M. C., Oliveira A. C., Albuquerque E. X., Eldefrawi M. E., Eldefrawi A. T. Mode of action of quinacrine on the acetylcholine receptor ionic channel complex. Mol Pharmacol. 1979 Sep;16(2):382–392. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Pharmacology are provided here courtesy of The British Pharmacological Society

RESOURCES