Skip to main content
PMC home page
Canadian Family Physician logoLink to Canadian Family Physician
. 2000 Feb;46:340–346.

CPR or DNR? End-of-life decision making on a family practice teaching ward.

B Calam 1, R Andrew 1
PMCID: PMC1987695  PMID: 10690490

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of patients on a family practice ward who had "code status" orders and end-of-life discussions documented on their charts in the first week of admission. To examine the correlation between a tool predicting the likelihood of benefit from cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and actual end-of-life decisions made by family physicians and their patients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive study using a retrospective chart review. SETTING: A 14-bed teaching ward where family physicians admit and manage their own patients in an urban tertiary care teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients admitted to the ward for 7 or more days between December 1, 1995, and August 31, 1996. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of documented "do not resuscitate" (DNR) or "full code" orders and documented end-of-life discussions. Prognosis-after-resuscitation (PAR) score. RESULTS: In the 103 charts reviewed, code status orders were entered within 7 days for 60 patients (58%); 31 were DNR, and 29 were full code. Discussion of code status was documented in 25% of charts. The PAR score for 40% of patients was higher than 5, indicating they were unlikely to survive to discharge from hospital should they require CPR. There was a significant association between PAR scores done retrospectively and actual code status decisions made by attending family physicians (P < .005). CONCLUSIONS: End-of-life discussions and decisions were not fully documented in patients' charts, even though patients were being cared for in hospital by their family physicians. A PAR score obtained during the first week of admission could assist physicians in discussing end-of-life orders with their patients.

Full text

PDF
340

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Buckman R., Senn J. Eligibility for CPR: is every death a cardiac arrest? CMAJ. 1989 May 1;140(9):1068–1069. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ebell M. H. Practical guidelines for do-not-resuscitate orders. Am Fam Physician. 1994 Nov 1;50(6):1293-9, 1303-4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ebell M. H. Prearrest predictors of survival following in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta-analysis. J Fam Pract. 1992 May;34(5):551–558. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ginn D., Zitner D. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Not for all terminally ill patients. Can Fam Physician. 1995 Apr;41:649-52, 655-7. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gordon M., Cheung M. DNR policy and CPR practice in geriatric long-term institutional care. CMAJ. 1991 Aug 1;145(3):209–212. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hill M. E., MacQuillan G., Forsyth M., Heath D. A. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: who makes the decision? BMJ. 1994 Jun 25;308(6945):1677–1677. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6945.1677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Keyserlingk Edward W. Second-generation advance directives: will reforming the law improve the practice? Humane Med. 1993 Jan;9(1):57–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Molloy D. W., Alemayehu E., Roberts R. Reliability of a Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination compared with the traditional Mini-Mental State Examination. Am J Psychiatry. 1991 Jan;148(1):102–105. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.1.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Morgan R., King D., Prajapati C., Rowe J. Views of elderly patients and their relatives on cardiopulmonary resuscitation. BMJ. 1994 Jun 25;308(6945):1677–1678. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6945.1677a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Morris B. A., Van Niman S. E., Perlin T., Lucic K. S., Vieth J., Agricola K., McMurry M. K. Health care professionals' accuracy in predicting patients' preferred code status. J Fam Pract. 1995 Jan;40(1):41–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Murphy D. J., Burrows D., Santilli S., Kemp A. W., Tenner S., Kreling B., Teno J. The influence of the probability of survival on patients' preferences regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation. N Engl J Med. 1994 Feb 24;330(8):545–549. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199402243300807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. O'Keeffe S., Ebell M. H. Prediction of failure to survive following in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: comparison of two predictive instruments. Resuscitation. 1994 Jul;28(1):21–25. doi: 10.1016/0300-9572(94)90050-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Senn J. S. Writing "no-CPR" orders: must resuscitation always be offered? CMAJ. 1994 Oct 15;151(8):1125–1128. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Stewart K. Discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation with patients and relatives. Postgrad Med J. 1995 Oct;71(840):585–589. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.71.840.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Varon J., Fromm R. E., Jr In-hospital resuscitation among the elderly: substantial survival to hospital discharge. Am J Emerg Med. 1996 Mar;14(2):130–132. doi: 10.1016/S0735-6757(96)90118-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ventres W., Nichter M., Reed R., Frankel R. Do-not-resuscitate discussions: a qualitative analysis. Fam Pract Res J. 1992 Jun;12(2):157–169. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Youngner S. J. Who defines futility? JAMA. 1988 Oct 14;260(14):2094–2095. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Family Physician are provided here courtesy of College of Family Physicians of Canada

RESOURCES