Abstract
The conventionally erected and reported circulation analysis of serial use in the individual and the feeder library is found to be statistically invalid and misleading, since it measures neither the intellectual use of the serial's contents nor the physical handlings of serial units, and is nonrepresentative of the in-depth library use of serials. It fails utterly to report or even to suggest the relation of intralibrary and interlibrary serial resources. The actual mechanics of the serial use analysis, and the active variables in the library situation which affect serial use, are demonstrated in a simulated analysis and are explained at length. A positive design is offered for the objective gathering and reporting of data on the local intellectual use and physical handling of serials and the relating of resources. Data gathering in the feeder library, and implications for the extension of the feeder library's resources, are discussed.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- FLEMING T. P., KILGOUR F. G. MODERATELY AND HEAVILY USED BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1964 Jan;52:234–241. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KILGOUR F. G. Use of medical and biological journals in the Yale Medical Library. I. Frequently used journals. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1962 Jul;50:429–443. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kovacs H. Analysis of one year's circulation at the Downstate Medical Center Library. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1966 Jan;54(1):42–47. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- RAISIG L. M. Statistical bibliography in the health sciences. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1962 Jul;50:450–461. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raisig L. M. World biomedical journals, 1951-60: a study of the relative significance of 1,388 titles indexed in Current List of Medical Literature. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1966 Apr;54(2):108–125. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]