Skip to main content
Bulletin of the Medical Library Association logoLink to Bulletin of the Medical Library Association
. 1978 Jul;66(3):319–326.

Evaluation of a clinical medical librarian program at the Yale Medical Library.

B Greenberg, S Battison, M Kolisch, M Leredu
PMCID: PMC199490  PMID: 678700

Abstract

A clinical medical librarian (CML) program in a large university-based teaching hospital setting is viewed by the majority of clinicians as education-oriented, with slightly fewer clinicians viewing it as patient care oriented. The CML service has been utilized for research purposes only when it is clear that case-relevant information can evolve into research intended to have "clinical" impact. This study reports the results of a questionnaire circulated among clinicians receiving CML support by a large medical school library. Results indicate that (1) the CML effected a change in information-seeking behavior by the clinicians--they obtained information that would not have been available to them if the CML had not been present in patient-management conferences; (2) relevancy of information provided by the CML was judged by the clinicians to be very high; (3) the accuracy of the CML's search, coupled with the rapidity of delivery, was found to be highly satisfactory; (4) acceptance of the CML within the patient care setting was acknowledged by the majority of clinicians, who contact the CML in-hospital and overwhelmingly prefer to do so; and (5) there was no statistically significant variation in the manner in which different medical specialties use the services of a CML. These findings justify implementation of a clinical medical librarian program, on a modified basis, as an additional service to already existing reference services offered by a large medical school library.

Full text

PDF
319

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Algermissen V. Biomedical librarians in a patient care setting at the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1974 Oct;62(4):354–358. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Colaianni L. A. Clinical medical librarians in a private teaching-hospital setting. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1975 Oct;63(4):410–411. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Greenberg B., Breedlove R., Berger W. MEDLINE demand profiles: an analysis of requests for clinical and research information. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1977 Jan;65(1):22–30. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kaluzny A. D. Innovation in health services: Theoretical framework and rewiew of research. Health Serv Res. 1974 Summer;9(2):101–120. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lamb G. Bridging the information gap. Hosp Libr. 1976 Nov 15;1(10):2–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Roach A. A., Addington W. W. The effects of an information specialist on patient care and medical education. J Med Educ. 1975 Feb;50(2):176–180. doi: 10.1097/00001888-197502000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Schnall J. G., Wilson J. W. Evaluation of a clinical medical librarianship program at a university Health Sciences Library. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1976 Jul;64(3):278–283. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Staudt C., Halbrook B., Brodman E. A clinical librarians' program--an attempt at evaluation. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1976 Apr;64(2):236–238. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bulletin of the Medical Library Association are provided here courtesy of Medical Library Association

RESOURCES