Abstract
Sound management data are needed to evaluate the collections of health sciences libraries. This study reports the utilization of computer data bases to compare the libary collections of The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. The University of Texas Medical Branch, and the National Library of Medicine's CATLINE data base. The imprint dates of the records of two libraries are compared to measure acquisitions rates. Subject profiles for the Q and W classes demonstrate the similarity of the collections. Reasons for the variances are considered.
Full text
PDFSelected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Crawford S. Medical School Libraries in the United States 1960 through 1975. JAMA. 1977 Jan 31;237(5):464–468. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fenske R. E. Mechanization of Library Procedures in the Medium-Sized Medical Library: XIV. Correlations between National Library of Medicine Classification Numbers and MeSH Headings. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1972 Apr;60(2):319–324. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kronick D. A., Bowden V. M. A union catalog of monographs: another approach. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1978 Jul;66(3):281–289. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]