Abstract
PPARα is a ligand-dependent transcription factor expressed at high levels in the liver. Its activation by the drug gemfibrozil reduces clinical events in humans with established atherosclerosis, but the underlying mechanisms are incompletely defined. To clarify the role of PPARα in vascular disease, we crossed PPARα-null mice with apoE-null mice to determine if the genetic absence of PPARα affects vascular disease in a robust atherosclerosis model. On a high-fat diet, concentrations of atherogenic lipoproteins were higher in PPARα–/–apoE–/– than in PPARα+/+apoE–/– mice, due to increased VLDL production. However, en face atherosclerotic lesion areas at the aortic arch, thoracic aorta, and abdominal aorta were less in PPARα-null animals of both sexes after 6 and 10 weeks of high-fat feeding. Despite gaining as much or more weight than their PPARα+/+apoE–/– littermates, PPARα–/–apoE–/– mice had lower fasting levels of glucose and insulin. PPARα-null animals had greater suppression of endogenous glucose production in hyperinsulinemic clamp experiments, reflecting less insulin resistance in the absence of PPARα. PPARα–/–apoE–/– mice also had lower blood pressures than their PPARα+/+apoE–/– littermates after high-fat feeding. These results suggest that PPARα may participate in the pathogenesis of diet-induced insulin resistance and atherosclerosis.
Introduction
Vascular disease is the most common cause of death in people with type 2 diabetes, which is characterized by obesity, hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. Insulin resistance is associated with each of these disorders (1). PPARs, ligand-activated nuclear transcription factors (2), represent a potential biologic link between insulin resistance and atherogenesis. Fibrates and thiazolidinediones, drugs commonly used to treat people with diabetes and vascular disease, are respective ligands for two of these receptors, PPARα and PPARγ.
PPARα is present at high levels in the liver (3), where its activation increases fatty acid oxidation and alters apolipoprotein expression. PPARγ is present at high levels in adipose tissue (4) where its activation increases lipid storage and enhances insulin sensitivity through poorly understood mechanisms. PPARs are found at multiple other sites including the kidney, a key determinant of blood pressure, and the vascular wall (5), a site commonly affected by insulin resistance (6, 7).
Atherosclerosis is characterized by the abnormal accumulation of lipid in blood vessels. Functional binding sites for PPARs are found in the promoters for several genes involved in cellular lipid accumulation, including lipoprotein lipase (LPL) (8), the scavenger receptor CD36 (9), fatty acid transport protein (10), and long-chain acyl-CoA synthase (11). LPL and CD36 are expressed in the vascular wall. Mice deficient in LPL (12) or CD36 (13) are resistant to atherosclerosis. These findings raise the possibility that PPARs and their natural ligands may participate in the progression of atherosclerotic lesions. Conflicting data (9, 14) address the capacity of PPARs to promote the development of foam cells, essential participants in the atherosclerotic process. Gemfibrozil, a PPARα activator, decreases vascular events in humans with established atherosclerosis (15), and PPARγ ligands decrease lesion formation in male (but not female) mice (16). These findings raise the possibility that systemic effects of PPAR activators overcome any potential adverse effects of these agents at the vessel wall. Defects in PPAR signaling have been implicated in the development of hypertension (17, 18). Hepatic activation of PPARα affects production of fibrinogen and plasminogen-activator inhibitor-1 and improves dyslipidemia (19). PPARα agonists may decrease adiposity and increase insulin sensitivity (20). Collectively, these data suggest that the absence of PPARα would increase lipids and blood pressure, decrease insulin sensitivity, and promote atherosclerosis.
In this study, we address the role of PPARα in diet-induced atherosclerosis and insulin resistance by crossing PPARα-null mice (21) with apoE-deficient mice (22). High-fat–fed PPARα-null mice have higher levels of atherogenic lipoproteins, but surprisingly, are more responsive to insulin, have lower blood pressures, and develop less atherosclerosis.
Methods
Animals.
PPARα-null mice (21) were crossed with apoE-null mice (22) in the C57Bl/6 background. Once PPARα/apoE double-null mice were generated, these animals were again crossed with apoE-null mice in the C57Bl/6 background, and offspring were bred to generate PPARα–/–apoE–/– mice and PPARα+/+apoE–/– littermates that were used as controls. We studied large numbers of these littermates with the same C57Bl/6 background of approximately 75%. Identical atherosclerosis results were seen in mice with a C57Bl/6 background of approximately 50% (see Figure 5a). Double-knockout founder mice were genotyped by Southern blotting and multiplex PCR. Offspring were genotyped by PCR techniques alone. Mice were weaned to a rodent diet with a total fat content of 6% at 21 days of age. At 8 weeks of age, animals were started on a Western diet containing 0.15% cholesterol and providing 42% calories as fat (TD 88137; Harlan Teklad, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). In some experiments, animals were fed the Western diet containing the PPARα agonist WY-14,643 (TD 00591; Harlan Teklad). For these experiments, WY-14,643 was shipped directly from the supplier (Biomol Research Laboratories, Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, USA) to Harlan Teklad and incorporated into diet TD88137 at a concentration of 0.1% (wt/wt).
Analytical procedures.
Mice were fasted for 4 hours before blood drawing. On the same day as blood drawing, serum was assayed for triglycerides, cholesterol, glucose, and nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA), as described (12, 23). Insulin was assayed by radioimmunoassay (Linco Research Inc., St. Charles, Missouri, USA). Levels of lipoproteins were analyzed by fast-protein liquid chromatography as described (12, 23).
Lipoprotein metabolism.
VLDL turnover was determined using radiolabeled VLDL as described by Weinstock et al. (24). PPARα+/+apoE–/– mice were injected with 200 μCi [9,10-3H] palmitic acid in corn oil. Forty-five minutes later, serum was isolated and subjected to centrifugation overnight at 95,700 g using a Beckman TL55 rotor and a TL-100 ultracentrifuge. Radiolabeled VLDL was isolated and injected in fasting mice followed by collection of serum at 0.5, 1, 2, 5, and 20 minutes. Triglyceride production rates were determined by chemically inhibiting intravascular lipolysis (25). Triton WR 1339 was made 4% (vol/vol) in PBS (pH 7.4). Baseline triglycerides were measured in fasted mice, animals were injected with Triton WR 1339 at a dose of 100 mg/kg, then serum triglycerides were determined 15 and 30 minutes later.
Determination of LPL activity in postheparin plasma and macrophages.
For postheparin LPL, mice were injected intraperitoneally with 200 U of sodium heparin as described (26). Thirty minutes later, venipuncture was performed, plasma was isolated, and LPL enzyme activity was assayed as described (27). Macrophages were isolated as described by Febbraio et al. (13). Mice were injected intraperitoneally with a 4% solution of thioglycolate on day 1. On day 5, peritoneal macrophages were isolated, washed, counted, and plated in DMEM plus 10% FBS. Cells were fed on day 6. On day 7, cells were washed and incubated in DMEM plus 0.5% BSA for 4 hours, followed by incubation with 0.5 U/ml heparin, collection of medium, and subsequent determination of LPL activity.
Intimal lesion quantification.
Lesion area was determined as described (12, 23). Images of pinned aortas were captured using a digital camera and analyzed using an image-processing program. Data are reported as the percentage of involvement of the intimal surface area for the arch (extending from the aortic valve to a point just distal to the left subclavian artery), the thoracic aorta (extending to the last intercostal artery), and the abdominal aorta (extending to the ileal bifurcation).
Immunocytochemistry.
Hearts were frozen in Tissue-Tek OCT compound (Sakura Finetek, Torrance, California, USA). Frozen sections at the proximal aorta were fixed with acetone, and endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 0.6% hydrogen peroxide in methanol. Slides were blocked for 45 minutes at room temperature in PBS with 1% BSA, 0.3% Triton X-100, and 5% horse serum (S-2000; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, California, USA). Slides were incubated for 60 minutes at room temperature with a 1:50 dilution of goat polyclonal anti-PPARα Ab (SC-1982; Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, California, USA), rinsed, then incubated with a 1:200 dilution of biotinylated anti-goat Ab (BA-9500; Vector Laboratories). Slides were rinsed again, sequentially incubated with streptavidin peroxidase followed by aminoethyl carbazole substrate solution, then rinsed and counterstained with hematoxylin.
Quantitative RT-PCR–based gene expression analyses.
Animals were fed a Western diet plus 0.1% WY-14,643 for 1 or 4 weeks, then aortas (from the origin to the iliac arteries) were isolated, weighed, and used to prepare RNA using guanidinium isothiocyanate and sedimentation through cesium chloride. Hepatic RNA was also prepared from each animal. Aortas from three to seven animals were pooled for each RNA analysis. There was no effect of genotype on aortic weights or RNA yields. Monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP-1), LPL, CD36, and GAPDH mRNA levels were quantified in the aorta, and acyl CoA oxidase (ACO) and GAPDH mRNA were determined in the liver. After treatment with DNase, 1 μg of total RNA was reverse transcribed using Superscript II (Life Technologies, Rockville, Maryland, USA) with an oligo-dT primer. PCR was performed with the GeneAmp 5700 Sequence Detection System using the SYBR green dye kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA). Each assay included a negative control using RNA not subjected to reverse transcription. The following primers were used: LPL: 5′ CAGCAAGACCTTCGTGGTGA 3′ (forward) and 5′ GTACAGGGCGGCCACAAGT 3′ (reverse); CD36: 5′ CAAGCTCCTTGGCATGGTAGA 3′ (forward) and 5′ TGGATTTGCAAGCACAA-TATGAA 3′ (reverse); ACO: 5′ ATTCTCACAGCAGTGGGAT-TCC 3′ (forward) and 5′ TCTGCAGCATCATAACAGTGTTCTC 3′(reverse); MCP-1: 5′ CAGCCAGATGCAGTTAACGC 3′ (forward) and 5′ GCCTACTCATTGGGATCATCTTG 3′ (reverse); GAPDH: 5′ GGCAAATTCAAC-GGCACAGT 3′ (forward) and 5′ CGCTCCTGGAAGATGGTGAT 3′ (reverse). Product specificity was verified by running products on an agarose gel and by subjecting products to a heat-dissociation protocol. Messenger RNA levels were expressed as a percentage of GAPDH mRNA levels, which were not significantly different between genotypes.
Glucose-tolerance and insulin-tolerance tests.
Studies were performed as described (28). For several days before each study, mice were accustomed to handling. Glucose-tolerance testing preceded insulin-tolerance testing by at least 1 week. Both were performed following an overnight fast, accounting for the lower fasting glucose levels (seen in Figure 8a) as compared with those (seen in Figure 2) which followed a 4-hour fast. Mice received an intraperitoneal injection of 10% D-glucose (1 g/kg body weight) for glucose-tolerance testing, and an intraperitoneal injection of human regular insulin (Eli Lilly and Co., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA) at a dose of 0.75 U/kg body weight for insulin-tolerance testing. Tail vein blood (5–10 μl) was assayed for glucose at 0, 30, 60, and 120 minutes.
Hyperinsulinemic clamp.
Clamp experiments were performed exactly as described previously (29). After placement of a double-lumen catheter, 3-[3H]glucose was administered as a priming dose followed by an infusion of 0.04 μCi/minute for a 1-hour control period. Tail vein glucose specific activity was determined at 45, 52, and 60 minutes to verify steady-state conditions. An insulin infusion (regular human; Eli Lilly and Co.) was started with an infusion of dextrose (25%) that was varied to maintain the blood glucose at 120 mg/dl for at least 90 minutes of the experimental period. 3-[3H]glucose infusion was maintained, and 3-[3H]glucose was added to the 25% dextrose infusion to approximate the glucose specific activity in the blood at the end of the control period. Specific activity in blood samples was determined 10, 20, and 30 minutes before and at the end of the experimental period. The glucose infusion rate was stable for at least 30 minutes before the first specific-activity determination. Both blood glucose and glucose specific activity were at steady state during these sampling periods. The rate of appearance of glucose (Ra), which is equal to glucose utilization (Rd) at steady state, was determined by dividing the infusion rate of labeled glucose by the specific activity at the same time. Endogenous glucose production was determined by subtracting the unlabeled glucose infusion rate from Ra.
Blood pressure determinations.
Systolic blood pressure was measured noninvasively in conscious mice using a tail-cuff system (RTBP2005; Kent Scientific, Litchfield, Connecticut, USA). Mice were habituated to handling and placement in the blood pressure system for several days. To optimize the pulse signal, mice were heated to 38°C during each session. Five to eight measurements were recorded for each mouse at each session. Blood pressure results represent the mean of two or three sessions for each mouse on consecutive days.
Results
Effects of high-fat feeding on body weight.
Mice were started on a high-fat, cholesterol-containing diet at the age of 8 weeks. In males, weight gain associated with high-fat feeding was not affected by PPARα genotype (Figure 1a). There was a genotype effect on weight gain in females (Figure 1b). PPARα–/–apoE–/– females (open circles) gained more weight than their PPARα+/+apoE–/– littermates with high-fat feeding. By week 10, female PPARα–/–apoE–/– weighed 27% more than female PPARα+/+apoE–/– mice (P < 0.0001). Food intake was unaffected by PPARα genotype. Single-knockout PPARα female (but not male) mice eating chow diets are known to develop obesity with aging (30).
Fasting serum chemistries.
For all serum measurements, values tended to be higher in males, but genotype effects were the same in both sexes so data from males and females are presented together. Fasting triglycerides (Figure 2a) were significantly higher in PPARα–/–apoE–/– mice than PPARα+/+apoE–/– mice at baseline (week 0) and remained significantly higher at 3, 6, and 10 weeks of high-fat feeding. Cholesterol levels (Figure 2b) were the same in PPARα–/–apoE–/– and PPARα+/+apoE–/– on a chow diet (week 0) and increased threefold in both genotypes with cholesterol feeding by 3 weeks. Cholesterol levels were 10% higher in PPARα–/–apoE–/– mice at 6 weeks and 20% higher at 10 weeks (P = 0.0019; n = 30 for PPARα–/–apoE–/– and n = 29 for PPARα+/+apoE–/–).
Fasting glucose (Figure 2c) was 18% lower in PPARα–/–apoE–/– mice compared with PPARα+/+apoE–/– mice at baseline (P = 0.0006). High-fat feeding increased glucose levels in both genotypes, but levels were significantly lower at each time point in PPARα–/– mice. After 10 weeks on the Western diet, glucose levels were 23% lower in PPARα–/–apoE–/– mice (P = 0.0022; n = 32 for PPARα–/– and n = 38 for PPARα+/+). Insulin levels were 0.25 ± 0.03 ng/ml in PPARα–/–apoE–/– mice (n = 15) and 0.55 ± 0.08 ng/ml in PPARα+/+apoE–/– mice (n = 17) at the 10-week time point (P = 0.0036), suggesting that lower glucose levels in PPARα-null mice reflect enhanced insulin sensitivity compared with their wild-type littermates.
Fasting NEFA levels (Figure 2d) were 39% higher in PPARα-null mice at baseline (week 0, P < 0.0001; n = 50 for PPARα–/–apoE–/– and n = 42 for PPARα+/+apoE–/–). This genotype-specific difference was lost with high-fat feeding (compare weeks 3, 6, and 10 with week 0 in Figure 2d).
Lipoprotein characterization and metabolism in PPARα+/+apoE–/– and PPARα–/– apoE–/– mice.
Size exclusion chromatography of lipoproteins (Figure 3) from male mice fed a Western diet for 6 weeks showed that elevated triglycerides in PPARα–/–apoE–/– mice were due to elevated concentrations of VLDL (Figure 3a). PPARα–/–apoE–/– mice also tended to have higher levels of VLDL and IDL/LDL cholesterol (Figure 3b) that became more pronounced by 10 weeks on the Western diet (not shown). The same patterns were seen in female mice.
VLDL clearance was the same in animals of each genotype (Figure 4a). For these studies, we used radiolabeled VLDL synthesized by PPARα+/+apoE–/– mice to focus on LPL and not particle composition. VLDL from PPARα–/–apoE–/– animals would be expected to have decreased clearance in part due to an elevated apoCIII content. Triglyceride production was increased in PPARα–/–apoE–/– animals (Figure 4b), providing an explanation for the elevated VLDL concentrations seen in these mice (Figure 3).
Lesion extent in Western diet–fed mice.
Atherosclerosis was quantified by pinning aortas en face and measuring the percentage of intimal surface affected by atheroma at three different sites in each animal: aortic arch, thoracic aorta, and abdominal aorta. Figure 5 shows lesion extent in 54 PPARα+/+apoE–/– mice and 53 PPARα–/–apoE–/– mice studied after either 6 weeks (Figure 5, a and b) or 10 weeks (Figure 5c) on the Western diet. Littermates with the same C57Bl/6 background of approximately 75% were used for Figure 5, b and c. Figure 5a shows data from mice with a C57Bl/6 background of approximately 50%.
Despite having 20% higher serum cholesterol than PPARα+/+apoE–/– littermates, PPARα–/–apoE–/– mice fed the Western diet for 10 weeks had less atherosclerosis (Figure 5c). Median lesion area was 25% lower at the arch (P < 0.0001), 54% lower at the thoracic aorta (P < 0.0001), and 65% lower at the abdominal aorta (P < 0.0001) in PPARα–/–apoE–/– compared with PPARα+/+apoE–/– mice. As expected, overall lesion extent was less after 6 weeks on the Western diet, but PPAR genotype effects were the same (Figure 5b). Lesion area at 6 weeks was 31% lower at the arch (P = 0.0038), 60% lower at the thoracic aorta (P < 0.0001), and 100% lower at the abdominal aorta (P = 0.0385) in the PPARα-null animals. The same genotype effects on atherosclerosis were seen in mice with a lower admixture of C57Bl/6 background genes (Figure 5a). At 6 weeks, lesion area was 34% lower at the arch (P = 0.0017), 34% lower at the thoracic aorta (P < 0.0001), and 29% lower at the abdominal aorta (P = 0.0316) in PPARα-null animals.
Immunocytochemistry of vascular lesions.
To confirm that PPARα was present in the atherosclerotic lesions of PPARα+/+apoE–/– mice, immunocytochemical studies were performed (Figure 6). Immunostaining for PPARα was prominent in nuclei throughout the lipid-filled neointima of PPARα+/+apoE–/– lesions. Some endothelial cells showed staining for PPARα. In addition, nuclear staining was detected in the media within elongated, spindle-shaped cells (arrows, Figure 6) resembling smooth muscle cells. Parallel staining (not shown) using an anti-macrophage Ab (MAC-3; BD Pharmingen, San Diego, California, USA) and an anti-smooth muscle α actin Ab (Zymed, South San Francisco, California, USA) confirmed that the PPARα+/+-positive cells in the neointima and media were macrophages and smooth muscle cells, respectively.
Plasma and macrophage LPL enzyme activity.
PPARα may regulate LPL expression, and LPL in the vasculature can promote atherosclerosis. The lack of a difference in VLDL clearance (Figure 4a) suggests that PPARα genotype does not have a major effect on LPL activity in these mice. Heparin-releasable activity was identical in thioglycolate-elicited peritoneal macrophages from PPARα+/+apoE–/– mice and PPARα–/–apoE–/– mice (Table 1). There was also no significant difference in postheparin plasma LPL activity between these animals (Table 1). However, these animals were studied in the fasting state and natural PPARα agonists provided by feeding might alter LPL expression.
Table 1.
To determine if PPAR activation can affect LPL in these animals, mice were fed Western diet containing 0.1% WY-14,643, a potent PPARα agonist. After 1 week, postheparin plasma LPL activity was significantly higher in PPARα+/+ mice (Table 1). However, VLDL clearance after 1 week of dietary supplementation with WY-14,643 was virtually identical in PPARα+/+apoE–/– and PPARα–/–apoE–/– mice (n = 4 per genotype, data not shown).
Aortic gene expression.
Consistent with our finding of greater postheparin LPL enzyme activity in PPARα agonist–treated PPARα+/+ mice, LPL mRNA levels (normalized to GAPDH) were significantly higher in the aortas of PPARα+/+apoE–/– as compared with PPARα–/–apoE–/– mice after 1 week of agonist treatment (Figure 7a). At the same time point, aortic message levels for CD36 and MCP-1 were also higher in agonist-treated PPARα+/+ mice (Figure 7, b and c). This difference was sustained at 4 weeks of agonist treatment for MCP-1 (Figure 7f). However, CD36 mRNA levels were the same in both genotypes (Figure 7e), and LPL mRNA levels were significantly lower in PPARα+/+ mice after 4 weeks of WY-14,643 (Figure 7d). In the same animals, hepatic ACO (a known PPARα-responsive gene) mRNA levels were 10.7-fold higher in PPARα+/+apoE–/– as compared with PPARα–/–apoE–/– mice (P = 0.0004) at 1 week and 4.3-fold higher in PPARα+/+apoE–/– as compared with PPARα–/–apoE–/– mice (P = 0.0002) at 4 weeks.
Glucose metabolism.
To determine if a difference in insulin sensitivity is present before the time points showing differences in atherosclerosis, we performed glucose-tolerance and insulin-tolerance tests in separate cohorts of animals after 4 weeks of high-fat feeding. PPARα–/–apoE–/– mice had lower glycemic excursions than PPARα+/+apoE–/– mice at 30 minutes (P = 0.0003) and 60 minutes (P = 0.0162) after a glucose challenge (Figure 8a). PPARα–/–apoE–/– mice became more hypoglycemic than PPARα+/+apoE–/– mice in response to exogenous insulin (Figure 8b). Hyperinsulinemic clamp experiments demonstrated that the lower glucose levels were due to the effects of insulin on endogenous glucose production (Table 2).
Table 2.
Blood pressure determinations.
Since hypertension is associated with insulin resistance and promotes atherosclerosis, we measured blood pressures in these mice. There was no effect of PPARα on systolic blood pressure at baseline (Figure 9a). Blood pressure increased in both genotypes after 4 weeks of high-fat feeding (Figure 9b), but were 10% lower in PPARα–/–apoE–/– mice as compared with PPARα+/+apoE–/– mice (P = 0.0336; n = 29 for PPARα–/–apoE–/– and n = 17 for PPARα+/+apoE–/–).
Discussion
In this study, we show that apoE-null mice are relatively protected from diet-induced insulin resistance and atherosclerosis by the genetic absence of the ligand-activated transcription factor PPARα. Mice deficient in PPARα had higher concentrations of atherogenic lipoproteins but more insulin sensitivity, lower blood pressures, and fewer intimal lesions. These results were unexpected since PPARα agonists decrease clinical events in humans with vascular disease.
To our knowledge, humans with complete PPARα deficiency have not yet been described. However, a leucine to valine missense mutation at residue 162 of the PPARα molecule is common in different ethnic groups (31–33). This mutation is in the DNA-binding domain and has functional consequences in transactivation assays (33). Humans with this mutation, like mice with PPARα deficiency, have higher concentrations of atherogenic lipoproteins. The current results raise the possibility that dyslipidemia in these individuals may not have the same adverse consequences as dyslipidemia in those with wild-type PPARα.
PPARα deficiency in mice may decrease atherosclerosis either through systemic or vessel wall effects. In terms of systemic effects, the liver is a source of several PPARα-responsive molecules implicated in atherosclerosis, including fibrinogen, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), and apoAI. Genetic modulation of fibrinogen (34) or PAI-1 (35) does not appear to affect lesion size in apoE-null mice. Overexpression of apoAI decreases atherosclerosis in apoE-null mice (36), and apoAI levels are known to be elevated in PPARα-null mice (37). We did not measure apoAI levels in our experiments. As expected, HDL levels in these Western diet–fed mice were extremely low regardless of genotype, making it unlikely that HDL has a major effect on the vascular phenotype.
Glucose levels were significantly lower in PPARα-null animals, providing another potential systemic etiology for less atherosclerosis in these mice. In humans, glucose levels are strongly and positively associated with ischemic heart disease even among nondiabetics (38). In mice, experimental diabetes can be associated with increased atherosclerosis (39, 40). However, dyslipidemia rather than hyperglycemia may be responsible for this effect (41).
Blood pressures were lower in PPARα-null animals, a systemic effect that might explain why animals with higher concentrations of atherogenic lipoproteins would have fewer lesions. Independent of lipid levels, apoE-null mice deficient in endothelial nitric oxide synthase have higher blood pressures and more atherosclerosis (42). PPARα-null mice were protected from insulin resistance, which might explain the lower blood pressures in these mice. Insulin infusion does not dilate blood vessels in subjects with insulin resistance due to impaired nitric oxide production by insulin-resistant endothelial cells (7). Endothelial expression of Akt, a mediator of insulin signaling, increases nitric oxide production and promotes vasodilation (43).
The absence of PPARα in the vessel wall may have contributed to the vascular phenotype. PPARα can increase LPL activity. Vascular wall LPL promotes the retention of atherogenic lipoproteins and has been shown to be proatherogenic by independent groups using different mouse models (12, 44–46). Using short-term administration of a potent PPARα agonist (WY-14,643) as a tool to mimic activation of PPARα that might be expected to occur with feeding, we found higher levels of plasma postheparin LPL enzyme activity and higher levels of aortic mRNA for LPL in PPARα mice. Message levels for the proatherogenic molecules CD36 (13) and MCP-1 (47) were also higher in PPARα+/+ as compared with PPARα–/– mice at a time point when large differences in atherosclerosis would not be expected. These observations do not prove that PPARα in the vessel wall is proatherogenic since systemic effects can alter vessel wall gene expression. However, they are consistent with recent data showing that WY-14,643 induces MCP-1 synthesis by endothelial cells and that atherogenic lipids increase MCP-1 production by these cells through a PPARα-dependent mechanism (48).
PPARα promotes fatty acid oxidation. Defects in fatty acid oxidation are known to affect glucose metabolism, and PPARα-null mice are prone to the development of hypoglycemia in response to stressors (49, 50). Our data show that these mice are protected from diet-induced insulin resistance, consistent with the notion that inhibition of fatty acid oxidation is a potential strategy for the treatment of diabetes (51).
More than 30 years ago, Williamson and colleagues (52) showed that fatty acid oxidation promotes insulin resistance in the liver, a major site of PPARα expression, in part by generating NADH. The availability of cytosolic NADH promotes an NADH/NADPH oxidase activity (53), a major source of superoxide generation. Superoxide anion may promote atherogenesis by multiple mechanisms, including the promotion of hypertension. PPARα deficiency in the vessel wall could decrease fatty acid oxidation, leading to less production of NADH, less superoxide production, lower blood pressure, less oxidative modification of lipoproteins, and less atherosclerosis. If this scheme is true, selective antagonists of PPARα acting at the vessel wall could decrease vascular disease.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the NIH grants HL-58427, DK-53198, the Washington University Clinical Nutrition Research Unit (DK56341), and the Washington University Diabetes Research and Training Center (DK20579). L. Zemany was supported by the Four Schools Physician-Scientist Program. We thank Jay Heinecke and Jeff Saffitz for commenting on the manuscript.
Footnotes
Karen Tordjman and Carlos Bernal-Mizrachi contributed equally to this work.
References
- 1.Howard G, et al. Insulin sensitivity and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 1996;93:1809–1817. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.93.10.1809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kersten S, Desvergne B, Wahli W. Roles of PPARs in health and disease. Nature. 2000;405:421–424. doi: 10.1038/35013000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Palmer CNA, Hsu M-H, Griffin KJ, Raucy JL, Johnson EF. Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-α expression in human liver. Mol Pharmacol. 1998;53:14–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Braissant O, Foufelle F, Scotto C, Dauca M, Wahli W. Differential expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: tissue distribution of PPAR-α, -β, and -γ in the adult rat. Endocrinology. 1996;137:354–366. doi: 10.1210/endo.137.1.8536636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chinetti G, et al. CLA-1/SR-BI is expressed in atherosclerotic lesion macrophages and regulated by activators of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Circulation. 2000;101:2411–2417. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.20.2411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Laakso M, Edelman SV, Brechtel G, Baron AD. Decreased effect of insulin to stimulate skeletal muscle blood flow in obese man. A novel mechanism of insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 1990;85:1844–1852. doi: 10.1172/JCI114644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Steinberg HO, et al. Elevated circulating free fatty acid levels impair endothelium-dependent vasodilation. J Clin Invest. 1997;100:1230–1239. doi: 10.1172/JCI119636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schoonjans K, et al. PPARα and PPARγ activators direct a tissue-specific transcriptional response via a PPRE in the lipoprotein lipase gene. EMBO J. 1996;15:5336–5348. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tontonoz P, Nagy L, Alvarez JG, Thomazy VA, Evans RM. PPARγ promotes monocyte/macrophage differentiation and update of oxidized LDL. Cell. 1998;93:241–252. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81575-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Frohnert BI, Nui TY, Bernlohr DA. Identification of a functional peroxisome proliferator-activated responsive element in the murine fatty acid transport protein gene. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:3970–3977. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.7.3970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Schoonjans K, et al. Induction of the acyl-coenzyme A synthetase gene by fibrates and fatty acids is mediated by a peroxisome proliferator response element in the C promoter. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:19269–19276. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.33.19269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Semenkovich CF, Coleman T, Daugherty A. Effects of heterozygous lipoprotein lipase deficiency on diet-induced atherosclerosis in mice. J Lipid Res. 1998;39:1141–1151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Febbraio M, et al. Targeted disruption of the class B scavenger receptor CD36 protects against atherosclerotic lesion development in mice. J Clin Invest. 2000;105:1049–1056. doi: 10.1172/JCI9259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chinetti G, et al. PPAR-α and PPAR-γ activators induce cholesterol removal from human macrophage foam cells through stimulation of the ABCA1 pathway. Nat Med. 2001;7:53–58. doi: 10.1038/83348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rubins HB, et al. Gemfibrozil for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in men with low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:410–418. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908053410604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Li AC, et al. Peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor γ ligands inhibit development of atherosclerosis in LDL receptor-deficient mice. J Clin Invest. 2000;106:523–531. doi: 10.1172/JCI10370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yu H, Nicolantonio R. Altered nuclear protein binding to the first intron of the renin gene of the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Clin Exp Hypertens. 1998;20:817–832. doi: 10.3109/10641969809053249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Barroso I, et al. Dominant negative mutations in human PPARgamma associated with severe insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Nature. 1999;402:880–883. doi: 10.1038/47254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Torra IP, Gervois P, Staels B. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha in metabolic disease, inflammation, atherosclerosis and aging. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1999;10:151–159. doi: 10.1097/00041433-199904000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Guerre-Millo M, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha activators improve insulin sensitivity and reduce adiposity. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:16638–16642. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.22.16638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lee SST, et al. Targeted disruption of the α isoform of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gene in mice results in abolishment of the pleiotropic effects of peroxisome proliferators. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15:3012–3022. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.6.3012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang SH, Reddick RL, Burkey B, Maeda N. Diet-induced atherosclerosis in mice heterozygous and homozygous for apolipoprotein E gene disruption. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:937–945. doi: 10.1172/JCI117460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Towler DA, Bidder M, Latiffe T, Coleman T, Semenkovich CF. Diet-induced diabetes activates an osteogenic gene regulatory program in the aortas of low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:30427–30434. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.46.30427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Weinstock PH, et al. Severe hypertriglyceridemia, reduced high density lipoprotein, and neonatal death in lipoprotein lipase knockout mice. Mild hypertriglyceridemia with impaired very low density lipoprotein clearance in heterozygotes. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:2555–2568. doi: 10.1172/JCI118319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Abdel-Fattah G, Fernandez ML, McNamara DJ. Regulation of guinea pig very low density lipoprotein secretion rates by dietary fat saturation. J Lipid Res. 1995;36:1188–1198. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Coleman T, et al. COOH-terminal disruption of lipoprotein lipase in mice is lethal in homozygotes, but heterozygotes have elevated triglycerides and impaired enzyme activity. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:12518–12525. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.21.12518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Seip RL, Angelopoulos TJ, Semenkovich CF. Exercise induces human lipoprotein lipase gene expression in skeletal muscle but not adipose tissue. Am J Physiol. 1995;268:E229–E236. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1995.268.2.E229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li B, et al. Skeletal muscle respiratory uncoupling prevents diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance in mice. Nat Med. 2000;6:1115–1120. doi: 10.1038/80450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Marshall B, et al. Relative hypoglycemia and hyperinsulinemia in mice with heterozygous lipoprotein lipase (LPL) deficiency: islet LPL regulates insulin secretion. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:27426–27432. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.39.27426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Costet P, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α-isoform deficiency leads to progressive dyslipidemia with sexually dimorphic obesity and steatosis. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:29577–29585. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.45.29577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Flavell DM, et al. Variation in the PPARalpha gene is associated with altered function in vitro and plasma lipid concentrations in type II diabetic subjects. Diabetologia. 2000;43:673–680. doi: 10.1007/s001250051357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Vohl MC, et al. Molecular scanning of the human PPARα gene: association of the L162V mutation with hyperapobetalipoproteinemia. J Lipid Res. 2000;41:945–952. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sapone A, et al. The human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha gene: identification and functional characterization of two natural allelic variants. Pharmacogenetics. 2000;10:321–333. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200006000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Xiao Q, et al. Fibrinogen deficiency is compatible with the development of atherosclerosis in mice. J Clin Invest. 1998;101:1184–1194. doi: 10.1172/JCI1461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sjoland H, et al. Atherosclerosis progression in LDL receptor-deficient and apolipoprotein E-deficient mice is independent of genetic alterations in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:846–852. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.20.3.846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Paszty C, Maeda N, Verstuyft J, Rubin EM. Apolipoprotein AI transgene corrects apolipoprotein E deficiency-induced atherosclerosis in mice. J Clin Invest. 1994;94:899–903. doi: 10.1172/JCI117412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Peters JM, et al. Alterations in lipoprotein metabolism in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α-deficient mice. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:27307–27312. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.43.27307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Khaw K-T, et al. Glycated hemoglobin, diabetes, and mortality in men in Norfolk cohort of European Prospective Investigation of Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk) BMJ. 2001;322:1–6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7277.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Schreyer SA, Wilson DL, LeBoeuf RC. C57BL/6 mice fed high fat diets as models for diabetes-accelerated atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 1998;136:17–24. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(97)00165-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Park L, et al. Suppression of accelerated diabetic atherosclerosis by the soluble receptor for advanced glycation endproducts. Nat Med. 1998;4:1025–1031. doi: 10.1038/2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Reaven P, Merat S, Casanada F, Sutphin M, Palinski W. Effect of streptozotocin-induced hyperglycemia on lipid profiles, formation of advanced glycation endproducts in lesions, and extent of atherosclerosis in LDL receptor-deficient mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997;17:2250–2256. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.17.10.2250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Knowles JW, et al. Enhanced atherosclerosis and kidney dysfunction in eNOS(–/–)Apoe(–/–) mice are ameliorated by enalapril treatment. J Clin Invest. 2000;105:451–458. doi: 10.1172/JCI8376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Luo Z, et al. Acute modulation of endothelial Akt/PKB activity alters nitric oxide-dependent vasomotor activity in vivo. J Clin Invest. 2000;106:493–499. doi: 10.1172/JCI9419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Babaev V, et al. Macrophage lipoprotein lipase promotes foam cell formation and atherosclerosis in vivo. J Clin Invest. 1999;103:1697–1705. doi: 10.1172/JCI6117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Babaev V, Carter KJ, Semenkovich CF, Fazio S, Linton MF. Macrophage lipoprotein lipase promotes foam cell formation and atherosclerosis in LDL receptor deficient mice. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:26293–26299. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002423200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Van Eck M, Zimmermann R, Groot PHE, Zechner R, Van Berkel TJC. Role of macrophage-derived lipoprotein lipase in lipoprotein metabolism and atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2000;20:e53–e62. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.20.9.e53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gu L, et al. Absence of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 reduces atherosclerosis in low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice. Mol Cell. 1998;2:275–281. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80139-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lee H, et al. Role for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha in oxidized phospholipid-induced synthesis of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 and interleukin-8 by endothelial cells. Circ Res. 2000;15:516–521. doi: 10.1161/01.res.87.6.516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Djouadi F, et al. A gender-related defect in lipid metabolism and glucose homeostasis in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α-deficient mice. J Clin Invest. 1998;102:1083–1091. doi: 10.1172/JCI3949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kersten S, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α mediates the adaptive response to fasting. J Clin Invest. 1999;103:1489–1498. doi: 10.1172/JCI6223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Foley JE. Rationale and application of fatty acid oxidation inhibitors in treatment of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1992;15:773–784. doi: 10.2337/diacare.15.6.773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Williamson JR, Browning T, Scholz R. Control mechanisms of gluconeogenesis and ketogenesis. I. Effects of oleate on gluconeogenesis in perfused rat liver. J Biol Chem. 1969;244:4607–4616. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gupte S, Rupawalla BA, Phillibert D, Wolin MS. Regulation of NO-elicited pulmonary artery relaxation and guanylate cyclase activity by NADH oxidase and SOD. Am J Physiol. 1999;276:H1535–H1542. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1999.276.5.H1535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]