Skip to main content
PMC home page
BMC Medical Genetics logoLink to BMC Medical Genetics
. 2007 Sep 19;8(Suppl 1):S4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-8-S1-S4

Genome-wide association study for subclinical atherosclerosis in major arterial territories in the NHLBI's Framingham Heart Study

Christopher J O'Donnell 1,5,9,✉, L Adrienne Cupples 1,3, Ralph B D'Agostino 4, Caroline S Fox 1,7,9, Udo Hoffmann 6, Shih-Jen Hwang 1,9, Erik Ingellson 1, Chunyu Liu 3, Joanne M Murabito 1,2, Joseph F Polak 8, Philip A Wolf 1,2, Serkalem Demissie 3
PMCID: PMC1995605  PMID: 17903303

Abstract

Introduction

Subclinical atherosclerosis (SCA) measures in multiple arterial beds are heritable phenotypes that are associated with increased incidence of cardiovascular disease. We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for SCA measurements in the community-based Framingham Heart Study.

Methods

Over 100,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped (Human 100K GeneChip, Affymetrix) in 1345 subjects from 310 families. We calculated sex-specific age-adjusted and multivariable-adjusted residuals in subjects tested for quantitative SCA phenotypes, including ankle-brachial index, coronary artery calcification and abdominal aortic calcification using multi-detector computed tomography, and carotid intimal medial thickness (IMT) using carotid ultrasonography. We evaluated associations of these phenotypes with 70,987 autosomal SNPs with minor allele frequency ≥ 0.10, call rate ≥ 80%, and Hardy-Weinberg p-value ≥ 0.001 in samples ranging from 673 to 984 subjects, using linear regression with generalized estimating equations (GEE) methodology and family-based association testing (FBAT). Variance components LOD scores were also calculated.

Results

There was no association result meeting criteria for genome-wide significance, but our methods identified 11 SNPs with p < 10-5 by GEE and five SNPs with p < 10-5 by FBAT for multivariable-adjusted phenotypes. Among the associated variants were SNPs in or near genes that may be considered candidates for further study, such as rs1376877 (GEE p < 0.000001, located in ABI2) for maximum internal carotid artery IMT and rs4814615 (FBAT p = 0.000003, located in PCSK2) for maximum common carotid artery IMT. Modest significant associations were noted with various SCA phenotypes for variants in previously reported atherosclerosis candidate genes, including NOS3 and ESR1. Associations were also noted of a region on chromosome 9p21 with CAC phenotypes that confirm associations with coronary heart disease and CAC in two recently reported genome-wide association studies. In linkage analyses, several regions of genome-wide linkage were noted, confirming previously reported linkage of internal carotid artery IMT on chromosome 12. All GEE, FBAT and linkage results are provided as an open-access results resource at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/cgi-bin/study.cgi?id=phs000007.

Conclusion

The results from this GWAS generate hypotheses regarding several SNPs that may be associated with SCA phenotypes in multiple arterial beds. Given the number of tests conducted, subsequent independent replication in a staged approach is essential to identify genetic variants that may be implicated in atherosclerosis.

Background

Myocardial infarction, stroke and other atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases comprise the leading cause of death for men and women in the U.S. [1], and will soon become the leading cause of death worldwide [2]. Atherosclerosis in the arterial wall precedes the onset of most cases of clinically apparent cardiovascular disease by decades, and subclinical atherosclerosis (SCA) is quite common in young and middle-aged persons [3-5]. SCA can be detected and quantified in major arteries, such as the carotid and coronary arteries, which provide essential blood flow to major organs, using noninvasive, high resolution imaging modalities. Such measures include peripheral arterial atherosclerosis detected by the ankle-brachial index (ABI); internal and common carotid intimal medial thickness (IMT) detected by B-mode ultrasound; and coronary artery calcium (CAC) and abdominal aortic calcium (AAC) deposits by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). We have previously reported evidence for incomplete correlations between carotid IMT, CAC and aortic calcium [6]. Both genetic and environmental factors underlie interindividual variability in SCA, and significant heritability has been found for measures of SCA in the peripheral vasculature [7], carotid arteries [8], aorta [9], and coronary arteries [10]. Further, while there is evidence for partial correlation of major cardiovascular risk factors with atherosclerosis, multiple SCA measures, including ABI, carotid IMT, CAC, and AAC, have been shown to predict future risks for cardiovascular disease independent of risk factors [11-14].

While SCA measures are heritable, relatively little is known regarding the role of genetic variants in the interindividual variability in these quantitative measures of atherosclerosis. To date, results from candidate gene association studies for clinically apparent cardiovascular disease or subclinical disease have been inconsistent, though overviews of multiple studies seem to provide evidence for modest associations for variants in a number of candidate genes, such as APOE and ACE [8,15]. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) using densely spaced single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) provide a more comprehensive approach unconstrained by existing knowledge to test common genetic variation across the genome using high-throughput genotyping arrays. From GWAS, several previously unrecognized genes have been identified that may contribute to disease, including CFH and age-related macular degeneration [16], INSIG2 and obesity [17], NOS1AP with QT interval variation [18], and several genes including TCF7L2 [19] as well as IGF2BP2 and CDKA1 with diabetes mellitus [20-22]. Additionally, two other GWAS have identified an association with coronary heart disease of SNPs in a region of chromosome 9p21 [23,24] that was also associated with diabetes mellitus in three previous GWAS [20-22]. Of note, there was an association of this chromosome 9 region with the SCA measure of coronary artery calcium in one replication study [19,24].

With the availability of high resolution imaging of atherosclerosis phenotypes in specific arterial beds in community-based cohorts such as the Framingham Heart Study, GWAS analysis is now possible for quantitative SCA phenotypes in major arterial beds. Recently, over 100,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were genotyped (Human 100K GeneChip, Affymetrix) in 1,345 subjects from 310 pedigrees in the Framingham Heart Study. The primary objective of this report is to present a brief summary of the results of this GWAS for SCA detected in the lower extremity arteries, carotid arteries, aorta and coronary arteries, by conduct of genetic association analyses and genetic linkage mapping. This report is one of a series of manuscripts from a collaborative project conducted by Framingham Heart Study investigators; the overall approach to this project's statistical genetic methods is summarized in an Overview manuscript that summarizes the 100K genome-wide association study [25].

Materials and methods

Study sample

Participants from the Offspring Cohort of the Framingham Heart Study who underwent one or more SCA measurements and genotyping with the Affymetrix 100K GeneChip are included in the study sample; genotyping was completed in a total of 1,345 subjects (1,084 Offspring cohort subjects). Original cohort subjects did not undergo the recently conducted MDCT or carotid IMT testing and as such were not included in this study. Of the 1,084 Offspring cohort subjects with genotyping, up to 984 participants with SCA phenotype information were analyzed. Details regarding selection of participants and genotyping are provided in the Overview [25].

Phenotype definitions & methods

Determination of the clinical characteristics in Offspring participants reported here was obtained at study entry (baseline) and at each follow-up examination, including Offspring examinations 6 and 7. The methods of measurement of the covariates (blood pressure, body height and weight, lipids, diabetes mellitus, smoking and other clinical characteristics) used in these analyses have been previously described [26]. For imaging tests conducted between two examination cycles, covariates used in the analysis were obtained from the earlier examination cycle.

Carotid ultrasonography for carotid IMT

Participants underwent carotid ultrasonography according to a previously reported standardized protocol at Offspring examination 6 (1995 to 1998) [27]. Imaging was conducted with a Toshiba SSH-140A imaging unit using a high resolution 7.5 MHz transducer for the common carotid artery, and a 5.0 MHz transducer for the internal carotid artery. Images were gated to an electrocardiogram; end-diastolic images were acquired. As previously described, correlation coefficients for the mean and maximum internal carotid artery were 0.83 and 0.84, respectively, based upon 25 readings by two separate readers [28].

All studies were recorded on optical disk and read according to a standardized protocol [29]. To quantify the degree of thickening of the carotid artery walls, the measures of IMT were summarized into two variables: one for common carotid artery and one for internal carotid artery. Mean and maximum wall thicknesses of the common and internal carotid artery were defined as the mean of the wall thickness or the mean of the maximum wall thickness for the near and far wall on the left and right sides. The number of available measurements for averaging ranged from 1–4 for the common carotid artery, and 1–8 for the internal carotid artery.

MDCT for CAC and AAC

Measures of CAC and AAC were obtained between 2002 and 2005 in Offspring participants, between examinations 7 and 8. All eligible participants were imaged with an eight-slice multidetector computed tomography (Lightspeed Ultra, GE, Milwaukee, WI, USA) of the chest, as previously described [30], as well as the abdomen. Each subject underwent two chest CT scans and one abdominal scan that were performed using a sequential scan protocol with a slice collimation of 8 mm × 2.5 mm (120 KVp, 320/400 mA for .220 lbs body weight, respectively) during a single end-inspiratory breath hold (typical duration 18 s). Image acquisition (330 ms) was prospectively initiated at 50% of the cardiac cycle. For the abdominal scan, thirty contiguous 5 mm thick slices of the abdomen were acquired covering 150 mm above the level of S1. A calibration phantom (Image Analysis, Lexington, KY, USA) that contained rods of water and 75 and 150 mg/cm3 calcium hydroxyapatite, was placed underneath each subject.

Calcium measurements were performed on an offline workstation (Acquarius, Terarecon, San Matteo, CA, USA) by a trained technician. Scoring of coronary calcification has been previously described, and we reported excellent intra and inter reader reproducibility for the CAC measurements [30]. A calcified lesion in either the coronary arteries or in the aorta was defined as an area of at least three connected pixels with CT attenuation >130 Hounsfield Units using 3D connectivity criteria. A score for AAC (for the abdominal scan) and CAC (for each of the two chest scans) was calculated by multiplying the area of a calcified lesion with a weighted CT attenuation score dependent on the maximal CT attenuation (Hounsfield Units) within a lesion. In modification to the original Agatston Score that was originally developed for electron beam CT, we applied this algorithm to our MDCT scan protocol to score for CAC, as used in numerous previous studies [30], as well as for AAC.

Ankle brachial index (ABI) for peripheral arterial disease

Ankle-brachial systolic blood pressure measurements were obtained at Offspring examinations 6 and 7 according to a standard protocol by trained technicians, as previously described [7]. Participants rested for a minimum of five minutes in the supine position on the examining table prior to blood pressure measurement. Blood pressure cuffs were applied to bare ankles with the midpoint of the bladder over the posterior tibial artery approximately three centimeters above the medial malleolus. Systolic blood pressure was measured using an 8 megahertz Doppler pen probe and an ultrasonic Doppler flow detector (Parks Medical Electronics, Inc.). For each limb, (right and left arms, right and left ankles) the cuff was inflated quickly to the maximal inflation level and deflated at a rate of 2 mmHg per second until the systolic blood pressure became audible. All limb blood pressures were repeated in reverse order. If the initial and repeat blood pressures differed by more than 10 mmHg at any one site, a third measurement was taken. Measurement was taken from the dorsalis pedis artery only if the posterior tibial pulse could not be located by palpation or with the Doppler probe [7].

The ABI is defined as the ratio of the average systolic blood pressure in the ankle divided by the average systolic blood pressure in the arm. The higher arm mean was used to calculate the ankle-brachial index for each leg. The lower of the two ankle-brachial index measurements was used for analysis.

Genotyping methods

Details of the genotyping methods are available in the Overview [25]. Briefly, 112,990 SNPs on the Affymetrix 100K chip were genotyped using DNA from family members of the Framingham Heart Study. For this report, SNPs were excluded for the following reasons: minor allele frequency ≤10% (n = 38,062); genotypic call rate ≤80% (n = 2346); Hardy Weinberg Equilibrium p-value ≤ 0.001(n = 1,595), leaving 70,987 SNPs available for analysis [25]. Results for all SNPs are reported on the open-access results website.

Statistical analysis methods

In total, of the 1,084 Offspring cohort subjects with genotyping, 673 to 984 participants with analyzable phenotype information were available for analysis. Residuals were created from multiple linear regression models in all subjects with the SCA measures, regardless of whether they were genotyped or not, to adjust phenotypes for covariates; these residuals were created in women and men separately. Covariate adjustment for blood pressure and/or hypertension was performed is several different ways. For ABI, a dichotomous measure for hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 140 or diastolic blood pressure > 90 or on treatment) was used. For CAC and AAC, systolic blood pressure and use of anti-hypertensive treatment were used as covariates. For carotid IMT, treatment-adjusted systolic blood pressure was used. As previously described, systolic blood pressures for those on treatment are imputed to estimate what these values would be if the subject were not on treatment [31]. Ranked normalized deviates, created from the standardized residuals from the regression models, were used in the genetic analyses. For each sex, SCA phenotypes were age-adjusted and multivariable-adjusted; details of the covariates included in the multivariable adjustment for each phenotype are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Phenotype distribution, examination cycle, and numbers of participants with subclinical atherosclerosis phenotypes

Subclinical atherosclerosis measure Phenotype Variable name N Offspring, exam Covariate adjustment
Ankle-brachial index RANKLEBI6 984 Offspring, 6 Age, sex-specific
RANKLEBI6MV 984 Offspring, 6 Age, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, total cholesterol/HDL ratio, log triglyceride, sex-specific
RANKLEBI7 982 Offspring, 7 Age, sex-specific
RANKLEBI7MV 982 Offspring, 7 Age, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, total cholesterol/HDL ratio, log triglyceride, sex-specific
Maximum carotid artery bulb IMT RNKCAROTBULBAS6 959 Offspring, 6 Age, sex-specific
RNKCAROTBULBMV6 951 Offspring, 6 Age, treatment-adjusted systolic blood pressure, BMI, cigarettes per day, HDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, diabetes, log triglyceride, and in women, menopausal status, hormone therapy, sex-specific
Maximum common carotid artery IMT RNKCAROTCCAMAXAS6 978 Offspring, 6 Age, sex-specific
RNKCAROTCCAMAXMV6 969 Offspring, 6 Age, treatment-adjusted systolic blood pressure, BMI, cigarettes per day, HDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, diabetes, log triglyceride, and in women, menopausal status, hormone therapy, sex-specific
Mean common carotid artery IMT RNKCAROTCCAMEANAS6 978 Offspring, 6 Age, sex-specific
RNKCAROTCCAMEANMV6 969 Offspring, 6 Age, treatment-adjusted systolic blood pressure, BMI, cigarettes per day, HDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, diabetes, log triglyceride, and in women, menopausal status, hormone therapy, sex-specific
Maximum internal carotid artery IMT RNKCAROTICAMAXAS6 888 Offspring, 6 Age, sex-specific
RNKCAROTICAMAXMV6 880 Offspring, 6 Age, treatment-adjusted systolic blood pressure, BMI, cigarettes per day, HDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, diabetes, log triglyceride, and in women, menopausal status, hormone therapy, sex-specific
Mean internal carotid artery IMT RNKCAROTICAMEANAS6 888 Offspring, 6 Age, sex-specific
RNKCAROTICAMEANMV6 880 Offspring, 6 Age, treatment-adjusted systolic blood pressure, BMI, cigarettes per day, HDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, diabetes, log triglyceride, and in women, menopausal status, hormone therapy, sex-specific
Maximum carotid artery stenosis RNKCAROTSTENAS6 977 Offspring, 6 Age, sex-specific
RNKCAROTSTENMV6 968 Offspring, 6 Age, treatment-adjusted systolic blood pressure, BMI, cigarettes per day, HDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, diabetes, log triglycerides, menopausal status, hormone therapy, sex-specific
Mean abdominal aortic calcification RESMDCTAACAS7 675 Offspring, 7 Age, sex-specific
RESMDCTAACMV7 673 Offspring, 7 Age, BMI, current cigarette smoking status, diabetes, systolic blood pressure, anti-HTN therapy, total-to-HDL-C ratio, lipid therapy, sex-specific
Mean coronary artery calcification RESMDCTCACAS7 680 Offspring, 7 Age, sex-specific
RESMDCTCACMV7 678 Offspring, 7 Age, BMI, current cigarette smoking status, Diabetes, systolic blood pressure, anti-HTN therapy, total-to-HDL cholesterol ratio, lipid therapy, sex-specific
Maximum coronary artery calcification RESMDCTCACMAXAS7 680 Offspring, 7 Age, sex-specific
RESMDCTCACMAXMV7 678 Offspring, 7 Age, BMI, current cigarette smoking status, diabetes, systolic blood pressure, anti-HTN therapy, total-to-HDL cholesterol ratio, lipid therapy, sex-specific
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: IMT = intimal medial thickness; MDCT = multidetector Computed Tomography; AAC = abdominal aortic calcification; CAC = coronary artery calcification; HDL = high density lipoprotein; BMI = body mass index; anti-HTN therapy = drug treatment for hypertension; lipid therapy = drug treatment for hyperlipidemia.

All association analyses were performed using either generalized estimating equations (GEE) or family-based association testing (FBAT). We evaluated associations of the SCA phenotypes using an additive genetic model with 70,987 SNPs meeting criteria above. Details regarding these analytic methods are provided in the Overview [25]. Only results of multivariable-adjusted SCA phenotypes are displayed in Table 2. Linkage analysis was performed using variance components methods on a subset of the 100K chip SNPs in linkage equilibrium and Marshfield STR markers that were previously obtained [25].

Table 2.

25 Most significant results for multivariable-adjusted subclinical atherosclerosis measures in multiple arterial territories by GEE (2a), FBAT (2b) and linkage (2c) analyses

2a. Most significant results for GEE analyses for multivariable-adjusted subclinical atherosclerosis measures
GEE rank Phenotype SNP Chr Physical location GEE P-value FBAT P-value Gene position Gene symbol
1 Internal carotid artery IMT rs1376877 2 204,097,596 3.8 × 10-7 0.15 IN ABI2
3 Coronary artery calcification rs2390582 1 90,655,928 1.4 × 10-6 0.34 OUT
4 Abdominal aortic calcification rs3849150 10 49,779,229 1.6 × 10-6 4.0 × 10-3 NEAR LRRC18
6 Ankle brachial index rs2896103 5 13,817,419 4.5 × 10-6 0.01 IN DNAH5
7 Coronary artery calcification rs10483853 14 72,826,052 6.1 × 10-6 1.7 × 10-3 IN NUMB
8 Common carotid artery IMT rs1400544 1 186,593,061 6.2 × 10-6 4.7 × 10-4 OUT
9 Ankle brachial index rs7715811 5 13,822,974 6.4 × 10-6 0.02 IN DNAH5
10 Coronary artery calcification rs10507130 12 100,256,422 6.7 × 10-6 1.6 × 10-3 IN DRIM
11 Ankle brachial index rs1320267 4 127,290,897 6.9 × 10-6 0.03 OUT
13 Ankle brachial index rs1350445 11 91,591,802 8.5 × 10-6 0.07 OUT
14 Ankle brachial index rs1502050 5 13,832,743 8.7 × 10-6 0.02 IN DNAH5
15 Coronary artery calcification rs10519394 4 137,962,214 1.1 × 10-5 0.03 OUT
16 Internal carotid artery IMT rs683366 18 52,370,975 1.2 × 10-5 0.01 NEAR TXNL1
19 Abdominal aortic calcification rs2850711 18 59,938,018 1.5 × 10-5 0.05 IN C18orf20
20 Internal carotid artery IMT rs601746 10 96,932,273 1.6 × 10-5 0.22 NEAR C10orf129
21 Ankle brachial index rs1905155 5 113,301,097 1.6 × 10-5 5.1 × 10-3 OUT
22 Ankle brachial index rs10501784 11 91,592,192 1.6 × 10-5 0.30 OUT
23 Ankle brachial index rs10493529 1 74,335,469 1.9 × 10-5 0.098 NEAR LRRC44, FPGT
24 Common carotid artery IMT rs28207 5 13,267,852 1.9 × 10-5 2.1 × 10-4 OUT
25 Abdominal aortic calcification rs8094641 18 59,873,880 2.0 × 10-5 0.04 NEAR C18orf20
26 Ankle brachial index rs2949535 18 26,111,783 2.0 × 10-5 7.5 × 10-4 OUT
27 Coronary artery calcification rs2270861 12 100,238,849 2.0 × 10-5 6.8 × 10-3 IN DRIM
28 Common carotid artery IMT rs853406 6 4,002,159 2.2 × 10-5 1.9 × 10-3 IN PRPF4B
29 Common carotid artery IMT rs853407 6 4,002,232 2.2 × 10-5 2.5 × 10-3 IN PRPF4B
30 Common carotid artery IMT rs1581413 3 158,532,867 2.2 × 10-5 1.8 × 10-3 IN VEPH1
2b. Most significant results for FBAT analyses for multivariable-adjusted subclinical atherosclerosis measures
FBAT rank Phenotype SNP Chr Physical location GEE P-value FBAT P-value Gene position Gene symbol
1 Common carotid artery IMT rs4814615 20 17,305,573 4.9 × 10-5 3.4 × 10-6 IN PCSK2
2 Common carotid artery IMT rs6053733 20 5,763,074 7.2 × 10-3 3.7 × 10-6 IN C20orf196
3 Ankle brachial index rs10499903 7 90,504,268 1.9 × 10-3 4.1 × 10-6 NEAR PFTK1, FZD1
4 Ankle brachial index rs9302997 17 71,723,439 4.8 × 10-3 5.1 × 10-6 IN RNF157
5 Ankle brachial index rs590183 4 23,733,535 0.01 8.6 × 10-6 OUT
7 Ankle brachial index rs6832344 4 23,733,805 9.9 × 10-3 1.0 × 10-5 OUT
8 Abdominal aortic calcification rs1023568 2 191,340,948 0.09 1.2 × 10-5 IN NAB1
9 Common carotid artery IMT rs2214959 12 124,674,521 0.01 1.5 × 10-5 NEAR TMEM132B
10 Ankle brachial index rs9285151 13 42,712,236 0.06 1.7 × 10-5 IN ENOX1
11 Ankle brachial index rs1381632 4 88,926,163 0.36 1.8 × 10-5 NEAR DMP1
12 Coronary artery calcification rs4461066 16 51,469,110 8.7 × 10-3 3.1 × 10-5 OUT
15 Coronary artery calcification rs367421 20 15,202,689 2.5 × 10-3 3.6 × 10-5 IN C20orf133
16 Internal carotid artery IMT rs9323431 14 62,638,241 0.24 3.6 × 10-5 IN KCNH5
17 Common carotid artery IMT rs1997463 3 54,782,280 0.01 3.8 × 10-5 IN CACNA2D3
19 Common carotid artery IMT rs304409 18 1,096,342 1.8 × 10-4 4.6 × 10-5 OUT
21 Internal carotid artery IMT rs1349008 3 76,804,103 0.23 4.9 × 10-5 OUT
22 Ankle brachial index rs2251671 8 40,501,973 1.3 × 10-4 4.9 × 10-5 NEAR ZMAT4
23 Abdominal aortic calcification rs243030 2 60,518,222 3.1 × 10-5 5.6 × 10-5 OUT
24 Abdominal aortic calcification rs321967 7 77,959,200 4.7 × 10-4 6.0 × 10-5 IN MAGI2
25 Ankle brachial index rs6569792 6 132,736,444 0.56 6.4 × 10-5 IN MOXD1
26 Abdominal aortic calcification rs4985741 17 17,028,605 7.2 × 10-3 6.6 × 10-5 IN MRIP
27 Ankle brachial index rs7995026 13 42,751,550 6.9 × 10-4 6.9 × 10-5 IN ENOX1
28 Coronary artery calcification rs10520541 4 184,055,754 0.08 7.0 × 10-5 IN AK001336
29 Internal carotid artery IMT rs2113945 15 29,111,823 0.09 7.2 × 10-5 IN TRPM1
30 Common carotid artery IMT rs6944400 7 131,389,740 0.12 8.2 × 10-5 OUT
2c. Genomic regions with LOD > 2.0 for linkage analyses for multivariable-adjusted subclinical atherosclerosis measures
Rank Phenotype Marker Chr Physical location LOD score 1.5 interval bounds Maximum LOD
1 Internal carotid artery IMT ATA29A06 12 128,922,618 127,583,749 129,277,512 5.05
2 Internal carotid artery IMT rs959987 12 127,817,680 126,600,362 129,277,512 4.78
3 Internal carotid artery IMT rs1180937 1 54,903,665 45,417,474 56,950,040 4.23
8 Abdominal aortic calcification rs17030524 12 99,640,364 97,320,770 102,339,523 3.51
6 Coronary artery calcification SNP_A-1679277 6 149,300,408 136,476,887 154,228,170 2.81
7 Ankle brachial index rs394884 2 151,954,268 142,801,622 168,477,710 2.73
9 Internal carotid artery IMT rs300574 4 124,681,343 118,755,997 131,657,093 2.49
10 Internal carotid artery IMT rs714647 15 99,870,157 96,719,695 100,152,332 2.49
12 Coronary artery calcification rs1106679 14 102,555,405 91,636,556 106,312,036 2.33
13 Abdominal aortic calcification rs1454183 2 13,935,308 3,238,478 20,119,479 2.31
15 Coronary artery calcification rs7000744 8 140,003,669 136,360,837 146,039,126 2.23
16 Ankle brachial index rs10483084 21 42,268,393 40,113,290 45,025,009 2.12
17 Internal carotid artery IMT rs1948685 5 21,064,843 10,288,046 31,560,322 2.11
19 Internal carotid artery IMT rs10832008 11 13,232,905 6,384,682 19,637,706 2.09
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism; Chr = chromosome; GEE = generalized estimating equations; FBAT = family based association testing; LOD = logarithm of the odds; IMT = intimal medial thickness;. Gaps appear in the rank order for markers that appear more than once. In the column entitled “Phenotype”, 'internal carotid artery IMT' denotes either mean or maximum internal carotid IMT, 'common carotid artery IMT' denotes either mean or maximum common carotid IMT, 'coronary artery calcification' denotes either mean CAC or max CAC, and 'ankle brachial index' denotes and ankle brachial index from either examination cycle 6 or cycle 7. For proximity to known genes (Table columns nine and ten), “IN” refers to a SNP within a protein-coding gene intron or exon, “OUT” refers to a SNP greater than 60 kb away from a protein-coding gene gene, and “NEAR” refer to a SNP within 60 kb of a protein-coding gene.

We further sought to identify SNPs with consistent associations with phenotypes within measurement groups using GEE and FBAT analyses. SNPs were selected based on associations with multiple correlated traits in both population- and family-based tests. We evaluated the following five phenotypic subgroups using sex-specific age-adjusted and multivariable-adjusted residuals (Table 1): ABI, common carotid artery IMT, internal carotid artery IMT, AAC, and CAC. For each SNP we calculated the proportion of phenotypes significantly associated with the SNP with P < 0.01 in both GEE and FBAT. For instance, for ABI, we evaluated GEE and FBAT results for both age-sex-adjusted and multivariable-adjusted measures of ankle-brachial index from both examination cycle 6 and 7 (in Table 1, these variables are named RANKLEBI6, RANKLEBI6MV, RANKLEBI7, and RANKLEBI7MV). Results are displayed in Table 3 of the top 5 SNPs with the highest proportions of significantly (P < 0.01) associated phenotypes. For identical proportions of significant phenotypes, SNPs were additionally ranked by the logarithm of the mean of GEE p-values.

Table 3.

Five most significant association results using FBAT and GEE within phenotype clusters for each of five multivariable-adjusted subclinical atherosclerosis measures

Phenotype group Rank GEE/FBAT SNP Chr Physical location %Phenotypes
P < 0.01 for GEE & FBAT		 GEE P-value geometric mean MAF Gene position Gene symbol
Ankle brachial index 1 rs7989017 13 25,164,878 100 4.7 × 10-3 0.22 IN ATP8A2
2 rs7546903 1 6,870,538 75 1.7 × 10-3 0.27 IN CAMTA1
3 rs6135095 20 1,422,405 75 3.0 × 10-3 0.14 NEAR SIRPB2
4 rs1875517 3 118,790,257 75 3.4 × 10-3 0.44 OUT
5 rs6507763 18 43,310,669 75 3.5 × 10-3 0.14 OUT
Common carotid artery IMT 1 rs1039610 18 74,049,795 100 4.9 × 10-5 0.32 OUT
2 rs1587893 18 74,039,913 100 5.8 × 10-5 0.31 OUT
3 rs28207 5 13,267,852 100 8.1 × 10-5 0.37 OUT
4 rs4814615 20 17,305,573 100 1.3 × 10-4 0.16 IN PCSK2
5 rs2470209 17 28,263,442 100 1.9 × 10-4 0.39 NEAR MYO1D
Internal carotid artery IMT 1 rs933890 12 106,941,389 100 6.6 × 10-4 0.22 OUT
2 rs8075776 17 36,408,189 100 9.8 × 10-4 0.16 NEAR KRTAP1-1, KRTAP1-3
3 rs252984 5 106,780,236 100 1.0 × 10-3 0.16 IN EFNA5
4 rs10490889 3 6,257,028 100 1.6 × 10-3 0.36 OUT
5 rs10516308 4 16,780,451 100 3.3 × 10-3 0.41 OUT
Coronary artery calcification 1 rs10483853 14 72,826,052 100 9.8 × 10-6 0.19 IN NUMB
2 rs10507130 12 100,256,422 100 1.3 × 10-5 0.22 IN DRIM
3 rs9321354 6 132,946,880 100 3.4 × 10-5 0.12 NEAR TAAR8, TAAR6, TAAR5
4 rs220457 17 27,126,748 100 3.8 × 10-4 0.25 OUT
5 rs10505182 8 113,337,274 100 5.2 × 10-4 0.23 IN CSMD3
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism; Chr = chromosome; GEE = generalized estimating equations; FBAT = family based association testing; IMT = intimal medial thickness; MAF = minor allele frequency.

Column Definitions: For each Phenotype Group (Table column one), a cluster analysis is conducted for several phenotype variables defined in Table 1. For “Ankle brachial index,” GEE and FBAT results were evaluated for RANKLEBI6, RANKLEBI6MV, RANKLEBI7, and RANKLEBI7MV; for “Common carotid artery IMT,” RNKCAROTCCAMAXAS6, RNKCAROTCCAMAXMV6, RNKCAROTCCAMEANAS6, and RNKCAROTCCAMEANMV6; for “Internal carotid artery IMT,” RNKCAROTICAMAXAS6, RNKCAROTICAMAXMV6, RNKCAROTICAMEANAS6, and RNKCAROTICAMEANMV6; and for “Coronary artery calcification,” RESMDCTCACMAXMV7 and RESMDCTCACMV7. The percent of phenotypes in the cluster analysis for which there was a p < 0.01 by both GEE and FBAT analyses is shown in Table column five. The geometric mean p-value is shown in Table column six for GEE associations for all phenotypes in the cluster analyses. For proximity to known genes (Gene position, Table column eight), “IN” refers to a SNP within a protein-coding gene intron or exon, “OUT” refers to a SNP greater than 60 kb away from a protein-coding gene gene, and “NEAR” refer to a SNP within 60 kb of a protein-coding gene.

Results

Ten SCA atherosclerosis measures were studied (Table 1). For each SCA measurement, sex-specific, age-adjusted phenotypes as well as age- and multivariable-adjusted phenotypes were evaluated. Measures for ABI and carotid IMT phenotypes were available in 880–984 participants, whereas measures for MDCT phenotypes were available in 673–680 participants.

Tables 2a, 2b and 2c provides a summary of the most significant findings in GEE, FBAT and linkage analyses, respectively, across a number of selected multivariable-adjusted phenotypes described in Table 1. Full-disclosure of all results for all associations can be found at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/cgi-bin/study.cgi?id=phs000007. The top 25 most statistically significant associated SNPs in GEE analyses are presented in Table 2a. There were 11 SNPs with p < 10-5 in GEE analyses. The top three associated SNPs are rs1376877 (p < 1*10-6, located in ABI2) associated with maximum internal carotid IMT, rs2390582 (p = 1*10-6, not located near a known gene) associated with maximum CAC score, and rs3849150 (p = 2*10-6, located near LRRC18) associated with AAC score. The top 25 most significantly associated SNPs in FBAT analyses are shown in Table 2b. There were 5 SNPs with p < 10-5 by FBAT. The top three associated SNPs by FBAT are rs4814615 (p = 3*10-6, located in PCSK2) associated with maximum common carotid IMT, rs6053733 (p = 4*10-6, located near FLJ25067) associated with mean common carotid IMT, and rs10499903 (p = 4*10-6, located near PFTK1) associated with ABI.

When we examined below the top 25 associations on our list of nominally significant GEE results for various SCA phenotypes, there were significant associations with multivariable-adjusted CAC for several SNPs on chromosome 9, including three SNPs (rs10511701, rs1556516 and rs1537371; p-values for association 1.1 × 10-4, 8.8 × 10-5, and 1.7 × 10-4, respectively) lying within a 15 kB region implicated in recent GWAS's for coronary heart disease. Similar associations were noted for age-and sex-adjusted residuals for CAC.

Results for all multipoint LOD scores > 2.0 are displayed in Table 2c. There were four LOD score results exceeding 3.0 and ten additional LOD score results exceeding 2.0. Results for linkage of internal carotid artery IMT phenotypes to chromosome 12 and 1 (the top three LOD score results) and for chromosome 11 are consistent with findings from our previous report [32]. Upon further inspection of the list of associations with p < 0.01 for each of the phenotypes, SNPs in or near biologically plausible genes were noted, including: fibroblast growth factor (FGF1) for AAC, adrenergic, beta-2-, receptor (ADRB2) for CAC, myocyte enhancer factor 2C (MEF2C) and thrombospondin 2 (THBS2) for common carotid artery IMT, and cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase 4D (PDE4D) for ankle brachial index.

In Table 3, we provide a summary of the top five associated SNPs for each of four phenotypic categories – ABI, common carotid artery IMT, internal carotid artery IMT, and CAC. SNPs were rank ordered first according to percent of phenotypes with p < 0.01 for GEE and FBAT associations and second by geometric mean of GEE p-values. A number of SNPs were common to the top 25 associated SNPs by GEE or FBAT reported in Tables 2a and 2b, respectively, including rs28207 and rs4814615 for common carotid IMT and rs10483853 and rs10507130 for CAC.

We further examined associations with SNPs in or near regions of 37 candidate genes previously reported to have been associated with SCA or overt coronary heart disease. Of these genes, there were 28 genes with SNPs on the 100K array that were in or nearby (within 60 kb of) the gene. In Table 4, we report significant associations for SNPs in or near nine of these 28 candidate genes with p < 0.01 in GEE or FBAT analyses or p < 0.05 in both GEE and FBAT analyses. Associations were noted with one or more SCA measure for: CCR5, FGB, ESR1, IL6, NOS3, TNFRSF11, ADM, CD44, and CCL2 (Table 4).

Table 4.

SNPs in or near previously reported candidate genes for coronary heart disease or subclinical atherosclerosis for multivariable-adjusted SCA phenotypes: SNPs with p < 0.01 in GEE or FBAT analyses, or p < 0.05 in both GEE and FBAT analyses.

Chr Gene N SNPs within 60 kb SNP from Affy 100K Array MAF Physical Location Phenotype Lowest P-value
GEE FBAT
3 CCR5 1/6 rs3762823 0.25 46,371,620 Common carotid artery IMT 0.02 0.04
Common carotid artery IMT 0.05 0.04
4 FGB 1/7 rs871540 0.22 155,766,635 Abdominal aortic calcification 0.11 3.0 × 10-3
6 ESR1 8/18 rs3866461 0.12 152,238,835 Coronary artery calcification 5.4 × 10-3 0.11
Coronary artery calcification 3.4 × 10-3 0.12
rs3853250 0.45 152,252,014 Ankle brachial index 0.05 0.04
rs3853251 0.34 152,252,870 Ankle brachial index 0.03 0.02
rs722208 0.27 152,414,999 Coronary artery calcification 0.54 5.7 × 10-3
Coronary artery calcification 0.57 5.0 × 10-3
rs3798573 0.11 152,481,476 Internal carotid artery IMT 6.4 × 10-3 0.78
rs3778099 0.10 152,510,689 Common carotid artery IMT 0.82 6.9 × 10-3
rs2813563 0.19 152,538,601 Abdominal aortic calcification 0.02 0.03
rs725467 0.19 152,539,833 Abdominal aortic calcification 0.02 0.03
7 IL6 2/9 rs1581498 0.45 22,681,483 Coronary artery calcification 0.16 7.7 × 10-3
Coronary artery calcification 0.04 3.3 × 10-3
rs10240716 0.27 22,765,225 Ankle brachial index 0.01 0.04
7 NOS3 2/3 rs768403 0.38 150,297,894 Abdominal aortic calcification 2.0 × 10-3 0.02
rs7812088 0.12 150,357,477 Internal carotid artery IMT 0.05 5.5 × 10-3
Internal carotid artery IMT 0.05 0.01
8 TNFRSF11 1/9 rs10505346 0.21 120,033,024 Ankle brachial index 0.04 0.05
11 ADM 3/5 rs10500724 0.44 10,258,592 Ankle brachial index 2.0 × 10-4 5.0 × 10-4
rs4444073 0.47 10,288,240 Ankle brachial index 3.3 × 10-3 5.0 × 10-4
rs4444073 Ankle brachial index 0.01 0.04
11 CD44 10/24 rs1365057 0.22 35,066,251 Coronary artery calcification 0.05 8.9 × 10-3
Coronary artery calcification 0.05 7.7 × 10-3
rs353589 0.21 35,077,802 Ankle brachial index 9.0 × 10-3 0.08
Abdominal aortic calcification 7.4 × 10-3 0.10
rs353639 0.21 35,140,940 Ankle brachial index 8.3 × 10-3 0.03
Ankle brachial index 3.1 × 10-3 0.04
rs353638 0.21 35,141,103 Ankle brachial index 5.6 × 10-3 0.05
Ankle brachial index 4.2 × 10-3 0.06
rs353636 0.21 35,141,306 Ankle brachial index 7.6 × 10-3 0.05
Ankle brachial index 4.2 × 10-3 0.06
rs353635 0.46 35,141,399 Ankle brachial index 0.09 4.6 × 10-3
rs353631 0.20 35,144,144 Ankle brachial index 4.8 × 10-3 0.06
Ankle brachial index 4.5 × 10-3 0.15
rs1467558 0.21 35,186,249 Coronary artery calcification 0.03 0.02
Coronary artery calcification 0.03 0.02
rs10488813 0.13 35,225,530 Abdominal aortic calcification 8.8 × 10-3 0.48
rs7115246 0.46 35,243,054 Ankle brachial index 7.1 × 10-3 9.4 × 10-3
17 CCL2 1/7 rs1024612 0.41 29,573,469 Abdominal aortic calcification 3.6 × 10-3 0.22
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism; Chr = chromosome; GEE = generalized estimating equations; FBAT = family based association testing; IMT = intimal medial thickness; MAF = minor allele frequency.

Of 37 candidate genes considered, there were 28 genes covered by the 100K array and meeting exclusion criteria, of which nine genes had a significantly associated SNP(s) with either p < 0.01 for GEE, p < 0.01 for FBAT, or p < 0.05 for both GEE and FBAT. Genes without significant associations meeting these criteria included: F5, MTHFR, REN, APOB, CX3CR1, GATA2, EDN1, CTGF, VEGF, PON1, MMP3, SCARB1, ALOX5AP, CETP, ITGB3, NOS2A, APO3, and MMP9. However, it should be noted that 100K SNP coverage of any given gene region may be insufficient to exclude real associations. Better coverage may be afforded by newer, more dense SNP arrays. Only SNPs within the introns or exons of the candidate gene or no greater than 60 kb away from the candidate gene were considered for Table 4 (denominator of Column 3).

Discussion

In this manuscript, we report the principle findings for a GWAS of SNPs from a 100K Affymetrix scan with SCA phenotypes in multiple major arterial beds. A conservative Bonferroni correction using this number of tests (0.05/1,000,000) would yield an approximate threshold of genome-wide significance to be 5*10-8, and none of our association findings meet these criteria for genome-wide association., However, we did note a number of associations with p < 10-5 after rank-ordering SNP associations using GEE and/or FBAT analysis. While we expect that many of these genotype-phenotype associations may be false positives, the SNPs identified in this manner are nonetheless hypothesized to include SNPs that merit further follow-up. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a GWAS using SCA phenotypes.

The first replicated GWAS findings for clinically apparent coronary heart disease were recently reported by two independent groups, identifying an association with SNPs in a region of chromosome 9p21 [23,24]. Interestingly, there was an association of this chromosome 9 region with CAC in one replication study [24], and this same chromosome 9 region was associated with diabetes mellitus in three other recent GWAS [20-22]. When we examined our GEE results for various SCA phenotypes, there were nominally significant associations with multivariable-adjusted CAC for several SNPs on chromosome 9 lying within a 15 kB region implicated in the recent GWAS's for coronary heart disease. While these SNPs were not our top-ranked SNPs, their specific association with coronary artery atherosclerosis (CAC) phenotypes likely represent strong evidence of replication in light of the recent GWAS.

Because there may be distinct genetic determination for atherosclerosis occurring in individual vascular beds (e.g., carotid arteries versus coronary arteries versus aorta versus peripheral arteries), we further examined for consistency of association of specific SNPs within five trait groups – ABI, common carotid artery IMT, internal carotid artery IMT, AAC and CAC. By this method of ranking associations, we identified distinct sets of SNPs, for which there was consistency of overlap with top SNP results by both GEE and FBAT (Table 3). There is evidence for partial correlation between SCA measures [6], and it is interesting to note that there were some SNPs for which there were nominally significant associations with more than one SCA measure. For example, rs10263213 is associated with both multivariable adjusted CAC (p = 0.001) and multivariable adjusted wall thickness of the carotid bulb (p = 0.013). Further research is warranted to determine whether SNPs showing association with two or more SCA measures are more likely to replicate in follow-up studies. Again, because no results from these approaches met criteria for genome-wide association, further validation studies will be required to confirm such associations.

An extensive literature exists for prior studies of candidate gene variation associated with clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, in particular coronary heart disease [15], as well as SCA, particularly carotid IMT [8]. While many associations are not consistently noted from study to study, a review of the available studies reveals a modest overall association of clinical cardiovascular disease or SCA with variants in candidate genes, such as APOE, ACE, and NOS3 [15]. More recently, a number of screens of larger numbers of variants have revealed new candidate gene hypotheses, such as ALOX5AP [33,34] and LGALS2 [35]. When we examined for associations between SCA and SNPs on the 100K chip that reside in or near some previously studied candidate genes, we confirmed a number of modestly significant SNP associations with SCA phenotypes (Table 4). These and other associations between SNPs and various SCA measures may be viewed as supportive though not strongly confirmatory of prior hypotheses. However, it should be noted that 100K SNP coverage of any given gene region may be insufficient to exclude real associations. Better coverage may be afforded by newer, more dense SNP arrays. Nevertheless, these data suggest that GWAS may be used to contribute substantial information to the literature on the presence and strength of previously reported "candidate gene" associations, including those identified from other GWAS, as well as for unbiased searches for novel variants.

Our study was conducted in a moderate-sized, well-characterized community-based sample, and the conduct of SCA imaging was conducted without ascertainment for prior cardiovascular disease. Strengths and limitations of the GWAS in this sample using a 100K screen are discussed in the Overview [25]. A strength of this particular study is the substantial heritability of SCA phenotypes determined by high resolution imaging conducted in a reproducible manner. While these SCA phenotypes represent state of the art, non-invasive imaging in populations, it must be acknowledged that the available modalities allow a focus on only fixed anatomic components (e.g., calcific plaque or IMT) rather than dynamic or metabolically active components. Moreover, the occurrence and distribution of these modalities may differ by race or environmental background. Thus, our results may not extrapolate to non-white populations.

In conclusion, using a GWAS unconstrained by existing knowledge, we have identified new candidate SNP association hypotheses and further confirm some existing candidate gene and candidate SNP hypotheses. In particular, the evidence for association of several SNPs with CAC in the region of chromosome 9 that was recently reported to be associated with CHD or CAC in tens of thousands of subjects [23,24] provides evidence that we were able to identify true associations. These findings provide evidence for the exciting promise of GWAS of SCA to identify novel genetic variants underlying atherosclerosis within specific arterial territories or across multiple arterial territories. In this manuscript and in the accompanying web-posted results http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/gap/cgi-bin/study.cgi?id=phs000007., we provide a full disclosure of the totality of our results, including all "non-significant" associations. In light of the multiple association tests that result from a GWAS, a powerful and efficient follow-up approach to increase the statistical confidence for an association of common variants with complex traits is a staged design, in which a modest number of results from the first stage are then tested in a second independent sample and the combined statistical evidence considered [36]. A further approach may be to seek evidence of in silico replication of our initial findings in other GWAS studies. The latter approach will be feasible with completion of the planned dense GWAS (the NHLBI's SNP Health Association [SHARe] Study) in over 9,000 men and women from the Framingham Heart Study [37].

Abbreviations

AAC = abdominal aortic calcium; ABI = ankle-brachial index; CAC = coronary artery calcium; FBAT = family-based association test; GEE = generalized estimating equations; GWAS = genome-wide association study; IMT = intimal-media thickness; LOD = logarithm of the odds; MDCT = multidetector computed tomography; SCA = subclinical atherosclerosis; SNP = single-nucleotide polymorphism.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

CJO conceived of the MDCT project, planned the analyses, and drafted and critically revised the manuscript. LAC assisted in planning andconducting the analyses, and inwriting and critically revising the manuscript. RBD assisted in planning the carotid measurements and contributed to critically revised the manuscript. CSF assisted in planning andconducting the analyses, and inwriting and critically revising the manuscript. UH planned the MDCT project and assisted in writing and critically revising the manuscript. SJH planned and conducted the analyses. EI critically revised the manuscript. CYL assisted in the analysis and critically revised the manuscript. JMM conceived of the ABI measurement project and contributed to drafting and critically revising the manuscript. JFP contributed to conceiving the carotid measurement project and contributed to critically revising the manuscript. PAW contributed to conceiving the carotid measurement project and contributed to critically revising the manuscript. SD planned and conducted the analyses, and drafted and critically revised the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Christopher J O'Donnell, Email: odonnellc@nhlbi.nih.gov.

L Adrienne Cupples, Email: adrienne@bu.edu.

Ralph B D'Agostino, Email: ralph@bu.edu.

Caroline S Fox, Email: foxca@nhlbi.nih.gov.

Udo Hoffmann, Email: uhoffman@partners.org.

Shih-Jen Hwang, Email: hwangs2@mail.nih.gov.

Erik Ingellson, Email: erik.ingelsson@pubcare.uu.se.

Chunyu Liu, Email: liuchunyu2002@yahoo.com.

Joanne M Murabito, Email: murabito@bu.edu.

Joseph F Polak, Email: JPolak@tufts-nemc.org.

Philip A Wolf, Email: pawolf@bu.edu.

Serkalem Demissie, Email: demissie@bu.edu.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the following collaborators: Martin G. Larson, ScD, Daniel Levy, MD, and Thomas J. Wang, MD. Supported by the by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study (Contract No. N01-HC-25195). A portion of the research was conducted using the Boston University Linux Cluster for Genetic Analysis (LinGA) funded by the NIH NCRR (National Center for Research Resources) Shared Instrumentation grant (1S10RR163736-01A1). The funding agencies had no role in the design, conduct or analysis of the research. The National Heart Lung and Blood Institute reviewed the manuscript prior to submission.

This article has been published as part of BMC Medical Genetics Volume 8 Supplement 1, 2007: The Framingham Heart Study 100,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms resource. The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2350/8?issue=S1.

References

  1. Thom T, Haase N, Rosamond W, Howard VJ, Rumsfeld J, Manolio T, Zheng ZJ, Flegal K, O'Donnell C, Kittner S, Lloyd-Jones D, Goff DC Jr, Hong Y, Adams R, Friday G, Furie K, Gorelick P, Kissela B, Marler J, Meigs J, Roger V, Sidney S, Sorlie P, Steinberger J, Wasserthiel-Smoller S, Wilson M, Wolf P. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2006 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2006;113:e85–151. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.171600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Evidence-based health policy – lessons from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Science. 1996;274:740–743. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5288.740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Pathobiological Determinants of Atherosclerosis in Youth (PDAY) Research Group. Natural history of aortic and coronary atherosclerotic lesions in youth. Findings from the PDAY Study. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13:1291–1298. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.13.9.1291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McNamara JJ, Molot MA, Stremple JF, Cutting RT. Coronary artery disease in combat casualties in Vietnam. JAMA. 1971;216:1185–1187. doi: 10.1001/jama.216.7.1185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Enos WF Jr, Beyer JC, Holmes RH. Pathogenesis of coronary disease in American soldiers killed in Korea. JAMA. 1954;158:912–914. doi: 10.1001/jama.1955.02960110018005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kathiresan S, Larson MG, Keyes MJ, Polak JF, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB, Jaffer FA, Clouse ME, Levy D, Manning WJ, O'Donnell CJ. Assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance, electron beam computed tomography, and carotid ultrasonography of the distribution of subclinical atherosclerosis across Framingham risk strata. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:310–314. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.08.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Murabito JM, Guo CY, Fox CS, D'Agostino RB. Heritability of the ankle-brachial index: the Framingham Offspring study. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164:963–968. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Manolio TA, Boerwinkle E, O'Donnell CJ, Wilson AF. Genetics of ultrasonographic carotid atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24:1567–1577. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000138789.11433.c1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. O'Donnell CJ, Chazaro I, Wilson PW, Fox C, Hannan MT, Kiel DP, Cupples LA. Evidence for heritability of abdominal aortic calcific deposits in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2002;106:337–341. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000022663.26468.5B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Peyser PA, Bielak LF, Chu JS, Turner ST, Ellsworth DL, Boerwinkle E, Sheedy PF. Heritability of coronary artery calcium quantity measured by electron beam computed tomography in asymptomatic adults. Circulation. 2002;106:304–308. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000022664.21832.5D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Doobay AV, Anand SS. Sensitivity and specificity of the ankle-brachial index to predict future cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:1463–1469. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000168911.78624.b7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. O'Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Manolio TA, Burke GL, Wolfson SK Jr. Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:14–22. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199901073400103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pletcher MJ, Tice JA, Pignone M, Browner WS. Using the coronary artery calcium score to predict coronary heart disease events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:1285–1292. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.12.1285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wilson PW, Kauppila LI, O'Donnell CJ, Kiel DP, Hannan M, Polak JM, Cupples LA. Abdominal aortic calcific deposits are an important predictor of vascular morbidity and mortality. Circulation. 2001;103:1529–1534. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.11.1529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ginsburg GS, Donahue MP, Newby LK. Prospects for personalized cardiovascular medicine: the impact of genomics. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1615–1627. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.06.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Klein RJ, Zeiss C, Chew EY, Tsai JY, Sackler RS, Haynes C, Henning AK, Sangiovanni JP, Mane SM, Mayne ST, Bracken MB, Ferris FL, Ott J, Barnstable C, Hoh J. Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration. Science. 2005;308:385–389. doi: 10.1126/science.1109557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Herbert A, Gerry NP, McQueen MB, Heid IM, Pfeufer A, Illig T, Wichmann HE, Meitinger T, Hunter D, Hu FB, Colditz G, Hinney A, Hebebrand J, Koberwitz K, Zhu X, Cooper R, Ardlie K, Lyon H, Hirschhorn JN, Laird NM, Lenburg ME, Lange C, Christman MF. A common genetic variant is associated with adult and childhood obesity. Science. 2006;312:279–283. doi: 10.1126/science.1124779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Arking DE, Pfeufer A, Post W, Kao WH, Newton-Cheh C, Ikeda M, West K, Kashuk C, Akyol M, Perz S, Jalilzadeh S, Illig T, Gieger C, Guo CY, Larson MG, Wichmann HE, Marban E, O'Donnell CJ, Hirschhorn JN, Kaab S, Spooner PM, Meitinger T, Chakravarti A. A common genetic variant in the NOS1 regulator NOS1AP modulates cardiac repolarization. Nat Genet. 2006;38:644–651. doi: 10.1038/ng1790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sladek R, Rocheleau G, Rung J, Dina C, Shen L, Serre D, Boutin P, Vincent D, Belisle A, Hadjadj S, Balkau B, Heude B, Charpentier G, Hudson TJ, Montpetit A, Pshezhetsky AV, Prentki M, Posner BI, Balding DJ, Meyre D, Polychronakos C, Froguel P. A genome-wide association study identifies novel risk loci for type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2007;445:881–885. doi: 10.1038/nature05616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Saxena R, Voight BF, Lyssenko V, Burtt NP, de Bakker PI, Chen H, Roix JJ, Kathiresan S, Hirschhorn JN, Daly MJ, Hughes TE, Groop L, Altshuler D, Almgren P, Florez JC, Meyer J, Ardlie K, Bengtsson K, Isomaa B, Lettre G, Lindblad U, Lyon HN, Melander O, Newton-Cheh C, Nilsson P, Orho-Melander M, Rastam L, Speliotes EK, Taskinen MR, Tuomi T, Guiducci C, Berglund A, Carlson J, Gianniny L, Hackett R, Hall L, Holmkvist J, Laurila E, Sjogren M, Sterner M, Surti A, Svensson M, Svensson M, Tewhey R, Blumenstiel B, Parkin M, DeFelice M, Barry R, Brodeur W, Camarata J, Chia N, Fava M, Gibbons J, Handsaker B, Healy C, Nguyen K, Gates C, Sougnez C, Gage D, Nizzari M, Gabriel SB, Chirn GW, Ma Q, Parikh H, Richardson D, Ricke D, Purcell S. Genome-Wide Association Analysis Identifies Loci for Type 2 Diabetes and Triglyceride Levels. Science. 2007. [DOI] [PubMed]
  21. Scott LJ, Mohlke KL, Bonnycastle LL, Willer CJ, Li Y, Duren WL, Erdos MR, Stringham HM, Chines PS, Jackson AU, Prokunina-Olsson L, Ding CJ, Swift AJ, Narisu N, Hu T, Pruim R, Xiao R, Li XY, Conneely KN, Riebow NL, Sprau AG, Tong M, White PP, Hetrick KN, Barnhart MW, Bark CW, Goldstein JL, Watkins L, Xiang F, Saramies J, Buchanan TA, Watanabe RM, Valle TT, Kinnunen L, Abecasis GR, Pugh EW, Doheny KF, Bergman RN, Tuomilehto J, Collins FS, Boehnke M. A Genome-Wide Association Study of Type 2 Diabetes in Finns Detects Multiple Susceptibility Variants. Science. 2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  22. Zeggini E, Weedon MN, Lindgren CM, Frayling TM, Elliott KS, Lango H, Timpson NJ, Perry JR, Rayner NW, Freathy RM, Barrett JC, Shields B, Morris AP, Ellard S, Groves CJ, Harries LW, Marchini JL, Owen KR, Knight B, Cardon LR, Walker M, Hitman GA, Morris AD, Doney AS, McCarthy MI, Hattersley AT. Replication of Genome-Wide Association Signals in U.K. Samples Reveals Risk Loci for Type 2 Diabetes. Science. 2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  23. Helgadottir A, Thorleifsson G, Manolescu A, Gretarsdottir S, Blondal T, Jonasdottir A, Jonasdottir A, Sigurdsson A, Baker A, Palsson A, Masson G, Gudbjartsson D, Magnusson KP, Andersen K, Levey AI, Backman VM, Matthiasdottir S, Jonsdottir T, Palsson S, Einarsdottir H, Gunnarsdottir S, Gylfason A, Vaccarino V, Hooper WC, Reilly MP, Granger CB, Austin H, Rader DJ, Shah SH, Quyyumi AA, Gulcher JR, Thorgeirsson G, Thorsteinsdottir U, Kong A, Stefansson K. A Common Variant on Chromosome 9p21 Affects the Risk of Myocardial Infarction. Science. 2007. [DOI] [PubMed]
  24. McPherson R, Pertsemlidis A, Kavaslar N, Stewart A, Roberts R, Cox DR, Hinds DA, Pennacchio LA, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Folsom AR, Boerwinkle E, Hobbs HH, Cohen JC. A Common Allele on Chromosome 9 Associated with Coronary Heart Disease. Science. 2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  25. Cupples LA, Arruda HT, Benjamin EJ, D'Agostino RB Sr, Demissie S, DeStefano AL, Dupuis J, Falls K, Fox CS, Gottlieb DJ, Govindaraju DR, Guo CY, Heard-Costa NL, Hwang SJ, Kathiresan S, Kiel DP, Laramie JM, Larson MG, Levy D, Liu CY, Lunetta KL, Mailman MD, Manning AK, Meigs JB, Murabito JM, Newton-Cheh C, O'Connor GT, O'Donnell CJ, Pandey MA, Seshadri S, Vasan RS, Wang ZY, Wilk JB, Wolf PA, Yang Q, Atwood LD. The Framingham Heart Study 100K SNP genome-wide association study resource: Overview of 17 phenotype working group reports. BMC Med Genet. 2007;8(Suppl 1):S1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-8-S1-S1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Cupples LA, D'Agostino RB. In: The Framingham Heart Study: An Epidemiological Investigation of Cardiovascular Disease. Kannel WB, Polf PA, Garrison RJ, editor. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1987. Some risk factors related to the annual incidence of cardiovascular disease and death using pooled repeated biennial measurements: Framingham Study, 30-year follow-up. [Google Scholar]
  27. O'Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Manolio TA, Burke GL, Wolfson SK. , Jr. N Engl J Med. Vol. 340. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group; 1999. Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults; pp. 14–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Fox CS, Polak JF, Chazaro I, Cupples A, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RA, O'Donnell CJ. Genetic and environmental contributions to atherosclerosis phenotypes in men and women: heritability of carotid intima-media thickness in the Framingham Heart Study. Stroke. 2003;34:397–401. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000048214.56981.6F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. O'Leary DH, Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Savage PJ, Borhani NO, Kittner SJ, Tracy R, Gardin JM, Price TR, Furberg CD. Stroke. Vol. 27. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group; 1996. Thickening of the carotid wall. A marker for atherosclerosis in the elderly? pp. 224–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hoffmann U, Siebert U, Bull-Stewart A, Achenbach S, Ferencik M, Moselewski F, Brady TJ, Massaro JM, O'Donnell CJ. Evidence for lower variability of coronary artery calcium mineral mass measurements by multi-detector computed tomography in a community-based cohort – consequences for progression studies. Eur J Radiol. 2006;57:396–402. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.12.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Levy D, DeStefano AL, Larson MG, O'Donnell CJ, Lifton RP, Gavras H, Cupples LA, Myers RH. Evidence for a gene influencing blood pressure on chromosome 17. Genome scan linkage results for longitudinal blood pressure phenotypes in subjects from the Framingham Heart Study. Hypertension. 2000;36:477–483. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.36.4.477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Fox CS, Cupples LA, Chazaro I, Polak JF, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB, Ordovas JM, O'Donnell CJ. Genomewide linkage analysis for internal carotid artery intimal medial thickness: evidence for linkage to chromosome 12. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74:253–61. doi: 10.1086/381559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Helgadottir A, Manolescu A, Thorleifsson G, Gretarsdottir S, Jonsdottir H, Thorsteinsdottir U, Samani NJ, Gudmundsson G, Grant SF, Thorgeirsson G, Sveinbjornsdottir S, Valdimarsson EM, Matthiasson SE, Johannsson H, Gudmundsdottir O, Gurney ME, Sainz J, Thorhallsdottir M, Andresdottir M, Frigge ML, Topol EJ, Kong A, Gudnason V, Hakonarson H, Gulcher JR, Stefansson K. The gene encoding 5-lipoxygenase activating protein confers risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. Nat Genet. 2004;36:233–239. doi: 10.1038/ng1311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Helgadottir A, Gretarsdottir S, St Clair D, Manolescu A, Cheung J, Thorleifsson G, Pasdar A, Grant SF, Whalley LJ, Hakonarson H, Thorsteinsdottir U, Kong A, Gulcher J, Stefansson K, MacLeod MJ. Association between the gene encoding 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein and stroke replicated in a Scottish population. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;76:505–509. doi: 10.1086/428066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ozaki K, Inoue K, Sato H, Iida A, Ohnishi Y, Sekine A, Sato H, Odashiro K, Nobuyoshi M, Hori M, Nakamura Y, Tanaka T. Functional variation in LGALS2 confers risk of myocardial infarction and regulates lymphotoxin-alpha secretion in vitro. Nature. 2004;429:72–75. doi: 10.1038/nature02502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Skol AD, Scott LJ, Abecasis GR, Boehnke M. Joint analysis is more efficient than replication-based analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006;38:209–213. doi: 10.1038/ng1706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kaiser J. Genomic databases. NIH goes after whole genome in search of disease genes. Science. 2006;311:933. doi: 10.1126/science.311.5763.933a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Medical Genetics are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES