Abstract
Pleurotus sajor-caju (Fr.) Singer was cultivated on selected agro wastes viz. cotton stalks, groundnut haulms, soybean straw, pigeon pea stalks and leaves and wheat straw, alone or in combinations. Cotton stalks, pigeon pea stalks and wheat straw alone or in combination were found to be more suitable than groundnut haulms and soybean straw for the cultivation. Organic supplements such as groundnut oilseed cake, gram powder and rice bran not only affected growth parameters but also increased yields. Thus bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass by P. sajor-caju offers a promising way to convert low quality biomass into an improved human food.
Keywords: Pleurotus sajor-caju, Agricultural wastes, Yield
INTRODUCTION
The use of fungi for the conversion of lignocellulose into food and feed rich in protein offers an alternative for developing unconventional source of proteins as food/feed. Yeast and algal proteins require sophisticated techniques and heavy inputs whereas the beauty of mushroom cultivation lies in its ability to grow on cheap lignocellulosic materials with minimum inputs and a high yield of valued food protein for direct human consumption.
A wide range of diverse cellulosic substrates are used for cultivation of Pleurotus sajor-caju. Amongst various cereal straws, paddy straw was reported to be the best substrate for the cultivation of oyster mushroom (Bano and Srivastava, 1962; Jandaik and Kapoor, 1974; Khanna and Garcha, 1982), whereas, next to the paddy straw, wheat straw proved to be the best substrate for the cultivation of Pleurotus spp. (Bano and Rajarathnam, 1982; Bhatti et al., 1987; Thampi et al., 1996; Bonatti et al., 2004). Sorghum straw was also effectively used to cultivate P. sajor-caju (Bahukhandi and Munjal, 1989; Patil et al., 1989). Similarly, Garcha et al.(1984) and Diwakar et al.(1989) reported the utility of pearl millet stalks in the cultivation of P. sajor-caju. Rye straw waste (Pal and Thapa, 1979), lawn grass (Yamashita et al., 1983), maize cobs (Bhatti et al., 1987), Banana waste (Bonatti et al., 2004) and maize straw (Bahukhandi and Munjal, 1989) were reported as suitable substrates for cultivations of different Pleurotus spp. Bhandari et al.(1991) successfully cultivated P. sajor-caju on straws of millets viz. Echinochloa frumentacea (Poaceae) and Eleusine coracana (Poaceae), and grasses viz. Heteropogon contortus (Poaceae) and Andropogon purtuses (Poaceae). Many other types of substrates were also reported to be useful for the cultivation of various species of Pleurotus spp. (Table 1).
Table 1.
Substrate | References |
Chopped branches of Euphorbia royleana (Euphorbiaceae) | Kaul and Janardhan, 1970 |
Saw dust | Gurjar and Doshi, 1995 |
Waste tea leaves | Bisht and Harsh, 1983 |
Pulp mill sludge | Mueller and Gawley, 1983 |
Coffee pulp | Guzman and Martinez, 1986 |
Oil palm bunch refuse | Ramesh and Ansari, 1987 |
Water weeds | Jain et al., 1988 |
Sugarcane baggasse | Bahukhandi and Munjal, 1989 |
Coconut and anjali logs | Suharban and Nair, 1991 |
Sericulture/agriculture industry wastes | Sharma and Madan, 1992 |
Wood logs and trunks | Chang and Miles, 1993 |
Lantana camara (Verbenaceae) | Vats et al., 1994 |
Mustard haulm | Mukherjee and Nandi, 2001 |
Water hyacinth | Murugesan et al., 1995 |
Straws of Saccharum munja (Poaceae), Abelmoschus esculentus (Malvaceae) and Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (Fabaceae) | Patrabansh and Madan, 1995 |
Salvinia molesta (Salviniaceae) and Eichhorinia crassipes (Pontederiaceae) | Mani and Philip, 1995 |
Leonotis sp. (Lamiaceae), Sida acuta (Malvaceae), Parthenium argentatum (Asteraceae), Ageratum conyzoides (Asteraceae), Cassia sophera (Caesalpiniaceae), Tephrosia purpurea (Fabaceae) and Lantana camara (Verbenaceae) | Das and Mukherjee, 2007 |
Supplementation of main substrates with nutrient or combination of two or more substrates were reported to increase the yields of P. sajor-caju (Jadhav et al., 1998). Amendments or mixtures of various straws were tried to assess possibilities for main substrates to increase the yield of P. sajor-caju. The second objective was to determine an effective substrate combination for the cultivation of Pleurotus spp. in the paucity of wheat or paddy straws.
Lignocellulosic materials are generally low in protein content, insufficient for the cultivation of mushrooms, which requires nitrogen, phosphate and potassium. Since the C:N ratio plays an important role in spawn running and the growth of fruiting body, nitrogen supplementation is an important factor for the growth and yield of mushrooms. So far, however, addition of substrates with organic nitrogen supplements has not been much studied yet.
Based on earlier studies and local availabilities of the agricultural wastes, in the present study we utilize cotton stalks, groundnut haulms, soybean straw, pigeon pea stalks and leaves and wheat straw for the cultivation and production of P. sajor-caju. We also study the effects of organic nitrogen supplementation on the growth and yield of mushrooms in substrate combinations in which the nitrogen content is relatively low by addition of cheap and locally available nitrogenous materials.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Culture of Pleurotus sajor-caju
Stock culture of P. sajor-caju was obtained from the Mushroom Research Centre, College of Agriculture, Pune, India. The cultures were maintained on 2% malt extract agar slants at 4 °C. Subculturing was performed every 15 d.
Spawn preparation
Spawn was prepared in polystyrene packets or 1 L bottles. Wheat grains were boiled in waterbath for 10~15 min and mixed with 4% (w/w) CaCO3 and 2% (w/w) CaSO4. The strains were inoculated with actively growing mycelium of the Pleurotus from malt extract slants and incubated at (27±2) °C for mycelial growth for 12 to 15 d until the mycelium fully covered the grains.
Cultivation of Pleurotus sajor-caju
Cotton stalks, groundnut haulms, soybean straw, pigeon pea stalks and leaves and wheat straw were used for the cultivation of P. sajor-caju, following the method proposed by Bano and Srivastava (1962) with slight modifications. Dried agro wastes were chopped into 1 to 2 cm long bits and soaked in water overnight. Excess water was drained off and these substrates were pasteurised by dipping in hot water at 80 °C. Spawn (20 g/kg) was added and mixed with the wet straw. Polyethylene bags of 30 cm×20 cm with holes were filled with the mixture. One kg of dry substrate was used in each bag. Spawning was done in five layers at the rate of 2% of net substrate. These bags were incubated at room temperature [(27±2) °C] in a room with sufficient light and ventilation for 15 d. Next, the polyethylene bags were cut open on the sides without disturbing the bed and were sprayed with water twice a day using a hand sprayer. The mass of substrate was kept undisturbed for the appearance of fruiting bodies. The spray of water was discontinued a day before the harvest of the fruiting bodies. The mushroom was collected in three flushes, and after each flush a small layer of substrate was scrapped off from all the side of the substrate.
The substrates were supplemented with 1% organic nitrogenous material i.e. gram flour or groundnut oil seed cake or rice bran alone in dry powder form during filling of bags.
RESULTS
The effect of different substrates on yield contributing characters such as pileus size and stipe length varied significantly (Table 2). The pileus size on different substrates ranged from 20.83 to 28.88 cm2, the largest being on cotton stalks+wheat straw (28.88 cm2) and the smallest obtained on the soybean straw (20.83 cm2). The stipe length of mushrooms ranged from 2.24 to 3.63 cm. The highest stipe length was observed in fruit bodies grown on the combination of cotton stalks+groundnut haulms+soybean straw+pigeon pea stalks and leaves+wheat straw (3.63 cm) and the smallest on soybean straw (2.24 cm).
Table 2.
No. | Substrate | Spawn running | Stipe length (cm) | Pileus size (cm2) | Yield (g/kg substrate) |
1 | Cotton stalks | ++ | 2.95 | 25.61 | 510.63 |
2 | Groundnut haulms | + | 2.45 | 22.35 | 365.05 |
3 | Soybean straw | + | 2.24 | 20.83 | 257.75 |
4 | Pigeon pea stalks and leaves | ++ | 2.83 | 24.68 | 463.36 |
5 | Wheat straw | ++ | 2.65 | 23.00 | 447.12 |
6 | Cotton stalks+groundnut haulms | ++ | 3.00 | 26.35 | 596.50 |
7 | Cotton stalks+soybean straw | ++ | 3.15 | 27.83 | 661.00 |
8 | Cotton stalks+pigeon pea stalks and leaves | ++ | 3.27 | 28.21 | 713.27 |
9 | Cotton stalks+wheat straw | ++ | 3.25 | 28.88 | 796.12 |
10 | Groundnut haulms+soybean straw | ++ | 2.64 | 21.32 | 333.12 |
11 | Groundnut haulms+pigeon pea stalks and leaves | ++ | 2.85 | 25.00 | 556.61 |
12 | Groundnut haulms+wheat straw | ++ | 2.78 | 26.11 | 635.83 |
13 | Soybean straw+pigeon pea stalks and leaves | ++ | 2.43 | 24.35 | 457.05 |
14 | Soybean straw+wheat straw | ++ | 3.10 | 27.80 | 668.36 |
15 | Pigeon pea stalks and leaves+wheat straw | ++ | 3.17 | 28.21 | 735.89 |
16 | Cotton stalks+groundnut haulms+soybean straw | +++ | 3.10 | 24.65 | 487.25 |
17 | Cotton stalks+groundnut haulms+pigeon pea stalks and leaves | +++ | 3.37 | 26.11 | 533.12 |
18 | Cotton stalks+groundnut haulms+wheat straw | +++ | 3.45 | 27.83 | 657.33 |
19 | Cotton stalks+soybean straw+pigeon pea stalks and leaves | +++ | 3.27 | 26.18 | 633.49 |
20 | Cotton stalks+soybean straw+wheat straw | +++ | 3.35 | 27.25 | 641.36 |
21 | Cotton stalks+pigeon pea stalks and leaves+wheat straw | +++ | 3.26 | 28.62 | 703.22 |
22 | Groundnut haulms+soybean straw+pigeon pea stalks and leaves | +++ | 2.95 | 23.55 | 395.26 |
23 | Groundnut haulms+soybean straw+wheat straw | +++ | 3.20 | 25.66 | 512.96 |
24 | Soybean straw+pigeon pea stalks and leaves+wheat straw | +++ | 3.00 | 24.33 | 450.63 |
25 | Cotton stalks+groundnut haulms+soybean straw+pigeon pea stalks and leaves | +++ | 3.35 | 26.65 | 582.56 |
26 | Cotton stalks+groundnut haulms+soybean straw+wheat straw | +++ | 3.32 | 26.83 | 591.13 |
27 | Groundnut haulms+soybean straw+pigeon pea stalks and leaves +wheat straw | +++ | 3.45 | 27.23 | 615.23 |
28 |
Cotton stalks+groundnut haulms+soybean straw+pigeon pea stalks and leaves+wheat straw |
+++ |
3.63 |
28.50 |
750.30 |
(±)SE | − | 0.05 | 0.62 | 16.62 | |
CD at 5% | − | 0.17 | 1.92 | 48.82 |
+=Sparse growth; ++=Moderate growth; +++=Abundance growth. SE: Standard error; CD: Critical difference
The yield of mushrooms was affected by different substrates. The highest yield of mushrooms was recorded on cotton stalks+wheat straw (796.12 g/kg substrate), which was found to be markedly higher than all other treatments except cotton stalks+groundnut haulms+soybean straw+pigeon pea stalks and leaves treatment.
The supplementation of nitrogenous material was performed to the substrates containing neither groundnut nor soybean wastes. The combination of cotton stalks+pigeon pea stalks and leaves+wheat straw with the supplementation of gram flour yielded 716.50 g/kg substrate, whereas the substrate without this supplementation produced 703.22 g/kg substrate. In cotton stalks alone, the yield was 510.63 g/kg substrate, whereas with the supplementation of gram flour the yield increased to 617.53 g/kg substrate (Table 3).
Table 3.
No. | Substrate | Spawn running | Stipe length (cm) | Pileus size (cm2) | Yield (g/kg substrate) |
1 | Cotton stalks | +++ | 3.32 | 26.42 | 617.53 |
2 | Pigeon pea stalks and leaves | +++ | 3.15 | 25.68 | 556.89 |
3 | Wheat straw | +++ | 2.93 | 24.50 | 481.19 |
4 | Cotton stalks+pigeon pea stalks and leaves | +++ | 3.22 | 25.83 | 563.56 |
5 | Cotton stalks+wheat straw | +++ | 3.18 | 24.00 | 453.42 |
6 | Pigeon pea stalks and leaves+wheat straw | +++ | 3.29 | 26.35 | 605.24 |
7 |
Cotton stalks+pigeon pea stalks and leaves+wheat straw |
+++ |
3.56 |
29.12 |
716.50 |
(±)SE | − | 0.05 | 0.70 | 15.10 | |
CD at 5% | − | 0.15 | 2.15 | 45.50 |
+=Sparse growth; ++=Moderate growth; +++=Abundance growth. SE: Standard error; CD: Critical difference
The addition of groundnut seed cake to cotton stalks+pigeon pea stalks and leaves+wheat straw yielded 914.03 g/kg substrate, whereas without supplementation it was 703.22 g/kg substrate. The yield was 510.63 g/kg substrate in cotton stalks alone vs 845.27 g/kg substrate with the addition of groundnut seed cake. Similar results of other combinations were recorded in Table 4. The supplementation of rice bran to cotton stalks+pigeon pea stalks and leaves+wheat straw yielded 756.88 g/kg substrate, whereas without supplementation it was 703.22 g/kg substrate. In cotton stalks alone the yield was 510.63 g/kg substrate, whereas with supplementation it gave 661.25 g/kg substrate. Listed in Table 5 were similar results from other combinations.
Table 4.
No. | Substrate | Spawn running | Stipe length (cm) | Pileus size (cm2) | Yield (g/kg substrate) |
1 | Cotton stalks | +++ | 3.51 | 57.17 | 845.27 |
2 | Pigeon pea stalks and leaves | +++ | 3.32 | 25.43 | 754.30 |
3 | Wheat straw | +++ | 3.26 | 25.00 | 693.84 |
4 | Cotton stalks+pigeon pea stalks and leaves | +++ | 3.38 | 26.25 | 712.25 |
5 | Cotton stalks+wheat straw | +++ | 3.41 | 26.66 | 796.27 |
6 | Pigeon pea stalks and leaves+wheat straw | +++ | 3.48 | 27.47 | 883.65 |
7 |
Cotton stalks+pigeon pea stalks and leaves+wheat straw |
+++ |
3.63 |
29.38 |
914.03 |
(±)SE | − | 0.06 | 0.65 | 20.43 | |
CD at 5% | − | 0.19 | 1.90 | 60.65 |
+=Sparse growth; ++=Moderate growth; +++=Abundance growth. SE: Standard error; CD: Critical difference
Table 5.
No. | Substrate | Spawn running | Stipe length (cm) | Pileus size (cm2) | Yield (g/kg substrate) |
1 | Cotton stalks | +++ | 3.45 | 26.85 | 661.25 |
2 | Pigeon pea stalks and leaves | +++ | 3.27 | 25.43 | 582.56 |
3 | Wheat straw | +++ | 3.17 | 25.10 | 517.63 |
4 | Cotton stalks+pigeon pea stalks and leaves | +++ | 3.31 | 26.00 | 617.68 |
5 | Cotton stalks+wheat straw | +++ | 3.27 | 25.50 | 542.33 |
6 | Pigeon pea stalks and leaves+wheat straw | +++ | 3.36 | 26.43 | 712.50 |
7 |
Cotton stalks+pigeon pea stalks and leaves+wheat straw |
+++ |
3.53 |
27.20 |
756.88 |
(±)SE | − | 0.06 | 0.62 | 17.23 | |
CD at 5% | − | 0.18 | 1.88 | 50.45 |
+=Sparse growth; ++=Moderate growth; +++=Abundance growth. SE: Standard error; CD: Critical difference
DISCUSSION
Most of the mushroom species possess the ability to degrade lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose and to produce fruiting bodies containing most of the essential amino acids, valuable vitamins, minerals and low energy carbohydrates. Pleurotus spp. have the potential to convert cheap cellulosics into valuable protein at a low cost. Following the cultivation on paddy straw for the first time and subsequent standardization by Bano and Srivastava (1962), a great number of investigations have confirmed its wide adaptability and its suitability for developing countries such as India that have vast areas under tropical and sub-tropical zones and produce crop residues in abundance.
Mushrooms get nutrition from cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin, which are abundantly available in cereal straws. If only one-fourth of the world’s annual yield of cereal straw (2 325 million tonnes) was used to grow mushrooms, about 377.8 million tonnes of fresh mushrooms could be produced and such an amount would provide 4.103 million people with 250 g of fresh mushroom daily (Madan et al., 1994; Jandaik and Goyal, 1995; Royse, 2002).
The variation in stipe length was observed in the combination of all five agro wastes used in this study. Cotton stalks gave the longest stipe, followed by pigeon pea stalks and leaves, and wheat straw, with the least stipes in groundnut haulms and soybean straw. There appears a definite co-relation between the substrate composition and stipe length; whenever cotton stalks were present in various combinations, the stipe length was greater than 3 cm, whereas in the absence of cotton stalks the stipe ranged from 2.43 to 3.45 cm. Similar observations on the cultivation of cotton stalks alone were also reported by others (Lavie, 1988; Sharma, 1983) and lower stipe lengths were recorded in groundnut haulms alone (Jadhav et al., 1996).
The pileus size of mushrooms varied markedly in different substrates and combinations of different substrates. While the trend of the variation of the pileus size was more or less similar to that of stipe length, the bigger pileus sizes were associated with cotton, pigeon pea and wheat agro waste, whereas the size relationship in groundnut and soybean combination was inconsistent. The superiority of cotton stalks over paddy straw in relation to pileus size for P. ostreus and P. florida was also reported by others (Lavie, 1988; Leong, 1980). It is clear from the yield on various combinations of substrates that cotton stalks or pigeon pea stalks and leaves or wheat straw in combination with groundnut haulms or soybean straw was considerably higher than a single substrate cultivation. Similar results were obtained by Patil et al.(1989). They reported a superiority of cotton stalks over paddy straw. Leong (1980), Lavie (1988), Silanikove et al.(1988), Patil et al.(1989) and Jadhav et al.(1996) also observed relatively higher yields on cotton wastes.
Veena and Savalgi (1991) reported a low yield of mushrooms on groundnut haulms. They attributed the low yield to a high moisture holding capacity and a high susceptibility to fungi and improper aeration. Anastazia et al.(1982) observed that legumes rich in nitrogen gave a higher yield in combination with paddy or wheat straw or corncobs. Jadhav et al.(1996) reported lower yields on soybean straw and groundnut haulms. It can be stated that groundnut haulms and soybean straw give good results when used in combination with cotton straw and/or pigeon pea stalks and leaves and/or wheat straw.
Whenever cotton straw and/or pigeon pea stalks and leaves and/or wheat straw were used, the yields decreased; but when supplemented with groundnut haulms and soybean straw, relatively higher yields occurred. This is due probably to the high nitrogen content of groundnut and soybean waste. Supplementation with a nitrogenous source is a key for higher yields in combinations containing neither groundnut haulms nor soybean straw.
Organic supplements viz. soybean meal, alfalfa meal, and cotton seed powder increase not only yields but also proteins of mushrooms (Zadražil, 1980). Several nitrogen sources tried as supplements to the rice straw, yeast mud, cotton seed powder and rice bran proved ideal in increasing the mushroom yields (Jandaik, 1989). Although the supplementations have been reported to enhance the yield, they have not been adopted by growers yet.
Various legume crop wastes viz. soybean, mash clover, kulthi and mixture of soybean, mash and kulthi (1:1:1) were found effective in cultivating P. sajor-caju (Pal and Paul, 1985). Rana and Subag (1990) recorded that gram pod waste in combination with wheat straw (1:1) improved mushroom yields by 5.26% over the wheat straw alone. Various legume straws, including groundnut straw and seed husk (Diwakar et al., 1989), cowpea and guar straw (Patrabansh and Madan, 1995), and green gram and gram straw (Kadlag, 1997) were found to be suitable substrates for cultivating Pleurotus spp.
In the present study, the substrates, such as cotton stalks, with more cellulose and lignin were found to induce more growth of Pleurotus spp., consistent with established data (Kandaswamy and Ramaswamy, 1978; Poo-Chow, 1980; Bhatti et al., 1987; Muhamad and Khan, 1993). In conclusion, the treatment of lignocellulosic biomass with P. sajor-caju offers a promising means to convert low quality biomass into a high protein food. All five agro wastes applied in this study are viable substrates for mushroom cultivation alone or in combinations, and the low cost organic supplementation of substrate increases mushroom yield.
References
- 1.Anastazia G, Michael C, Olger J. Substrates for growing oyster mushrooms. Ceska Mycol. 1982;36(4):232–235. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bahukhandi D, Munjal RL. Cultivation of Pleurotus sp. on different agricultural residues. Indian Phytopath. 1989;42(4):492–495. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bano Z, Srivastava HC. Studies in the cultivation of Pleurotus sp. on paddy straw. Food Sci. 1962;12:363–368. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bano Z, Rajarathnam S. Studies on cultivation of Pleurotus sajor-caju . Mushroom J. 1982;115:243–245. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bhandari TPS, Singh RN, Verma BL. Cultivation of oyster mushroom on different substrates. Indian Phytopath. 1991;44(4):555–557. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bhatti M, Mir FA, Siddiq M. Effect of different bedding material on relative yield of oyster mushroom in successive flushes. Pak J Agric Res. 1987;8:256–259. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bisht S, Harsh NS. Cultivation of Pleurotus ostreatus on used tea leaves. British Mycol Soc Bull. 1983;17(1):51–52. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bonatti M, Karnopp P, Soares HM, Furlan SA. Evaluation of Pleurotus ostreatus and Pleurotus sajor-caju nutritional characteristics when cultivated in different lignocellulosic wastes. Food Chem. 2004;88(3):425–428. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.01.050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chang ST, Miles PG. Edible Mushrooms and Their Cultivation. Delhi, India: CBS Publ; 1993. pp. 8–40. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Das N, Mukherjee M. Cultivation of Pleurotus ostreatus on weed plants. Biores Technol. 2007;98(14):2723–2726. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.09.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Diwakar B, Munjal RL, Bahukhandi D. Cultivation of Pleurotus sp. on different agricultural residues. Indian Phytopath. 1989;42(4):492–499. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Garcha HS, Dhanda S, Khanna P. Evaluation of various organic residues for the cultivation of Pleurotus (Dhingri) species. Mush Newslett Trop. 1984;5(1):13–16. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gurjar KL, Doshi A. Effect of substrates and supplements on fruit bodies production of Pleurotus cornucopiae . Mush Inform. 1995;108:12–22. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Guzman G, Martinez D. Pleurotus growing on coffee-pulp in a semi-industrial plant—a new promising mushroom cultivation technology in the subtropics of Mexico. Mush Lett. 1986;6(3):6–7. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jadhav AB, Bagal PK, Jadhav SW. Effect of different substrates on yield of oyster mushroom. J Maharashtra Agric Univ. 1996;21(4):424–426. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Jadhav AB, Bagal PK, Jadhav SW. Biochemical changes in different agro residue to oyster mushroom cultivation. J Maharashtra Agric Univ. 1998;23(1):22–24. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jain SK, Gujral GS, Bisaria H, Vasudevan P. Cultivation of Pleurotus sajor-caju on aquatic weeds. Aquatic Bot. 1988;30(4):242–251. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Jandaik CL. Response of Pleurotus sajor-caju to supplementation prior to and after pasteurisation of straw. Indian Phytopath. 1989;42(2):284–285. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jandaik CL, Kapoor JN. Studies on cultivation of Pleurotus sajor-caju (Fr.) Singer. Mush Sci. 1974;9(1):667–672. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jandaik CL, Goyal SP. Farm and Farming of Oyster Mushroom (Pleurotus Species) In: Singh RP, Chaube HS, editors. Mushroom Production Technology. Pantnagar, India: G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology; 1995. pp. 72–78. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kadlag GK. Rahuri: Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth; 1997. Comparative Performance of Different Pleurotus spp. on Green Gram and Gram Straws. M.Sc. (Agric.) Dissertation, (in India) [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kandaswamy TK, Ramaswamy K. Effect of organic substrates with different C:N ratio on the yield of Pleurotus sajor-caju . Indian Mush Sci. 1978;1:423–427. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kaul TN, Janardhan KK. Experimental cultivation of Plerurotus ostreatus white form in Jammu. Indian Phytopath. 1970;3:578–581. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Khanna P, Garcha HS. Utilization of paddy straw for cultivation of Pleurotus species. Mush Newslett Trop. 1982;2(1):5–9. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lavie D. Production of oyster mushroom on cotton straw. Mush J. 1988;82:453–463. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Leong PC. Utilization of cotton waste substrate with temperature for cultivation of oyster mushroom in Singapore. J Primary Industry. 1980;8:21–27. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Madan M, Sharma S, Bisaria R. Cultivation of edible mushrooms. Inven Intell. 1994;29:117–120. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mani PK, Philip B. Potential application of African wood (Savinia molesta) for the cultivation of oyster mushroom, Pleurotus sajor-caju (Fr.) Singer. Indian J Expt Biol. 1995;33:806–808. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mueller JC, Gawley JR. Cultivation of phoenix mushroom on pulp mill sludge. Mush Newslett Trop. 1983;4(1):3–7. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Muhamad I, Khan SM. Yield performance of different species/strains of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus sp.) on cotton waste. Pakistan J Phytopath. 1993;5:53–57. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mukherjee R, Nandi B. Changes in dry matter digestibility and composition of bioconverted mustard biomass by two Pleuorotus sp. under mushroom growing conditions. J Sci Ind Res. 2001;60:405–409. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Murugesan AG, Vijayalakshami GS, Sukumaran N, Mariappan C. Utilization of water hyacinth for oyster mushroom cultivation. Biores Technol. 1995;51(1):97–98. doi: 10.1016/0960-8524(95)00063-K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pal J, Thapa CD. Cultivation of Dhingri (Pleurotus sajor-caju) made easy. Indian J Mush. 1979;5(1):17–20. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pal J, Paul YS. Cultivation of Pleurotus sajor-caju on lyma wastes. Indian J Mycol Pl Pathol. 1985;15(1):76–78. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Patil BD, Jadhav SW, Kakade SS. Studies on cultivation of Pleurotus sajor-caju on different substrates. J Maharashtra Agric Univ. 1989;14(1):156–158. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Patrabansh S, Madan M. The microbial conversion of different agricultural residues and its biological efficiency. Acta Biotechnol. 1995;15(1):131–135. doi: 10.1002/abio.370150119. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Poo-Chow L. Utilization of cotton waste substrate wit temperature treatment for the cultivation of oyster mushroom, Pleurotus in Singapore. J Prim Indust. 1980;8(1):1–27. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ramesh CR, Ansari MM. Substrate evaluation for cultivation of oyster mushroom Pleurotus sajor-caju in Andamans. J Andaman Sci Assoc. 1987;3(2):110–112. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rana RS, Subag LS. Proc. Ann. Conf. on Mushroom. Hissar: Soc. Mycol. Pl. Path; 1990. Effect of Legume Pod Waste Addition on Biological Efficiency of Pleurotus sajor-caju ; pp. 19–20. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Royse DJ. Influence of spawn rate and commercial delayed release nutrient levels on Pleurotus cornucopiae (oyster mushroom) yield, size and time to production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002;58(4):527–531. doi: 10.1007/s00253-001-0915-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sharma AD. Effect of cropping environment on some quality parameter of oyster mushroom Pleurotus sajor-caju . Mush Sci. 1983;4:1–5. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sharma S, Madan M. Optimal utilization of sericulture waste. Resour Conserv Recycl. 1992;7(4):295–304. doi: 10.1016/0921-3449(92)90024-V. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Silanikove N, Danai O, Leavanan O. Cotton straw silage as a substrate for Pleurotus sp. cultivation. Biol Wastes. 1988;25(3):219–226. doi: 10.1016/0269-7483(88)90081-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Suharban M, Nair MC. Cultivation of oyster mushroom on wooden logs of common trees. Adv Mush Sci. 1991;1:39–43. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Thampi SC, Wani PV, Bachchhav MB, et al. Nat. Symp. on Integrated Disease Manag. Rahuri, India: Indian Soc. Pl. Pathol.; 1996. Studies on Different Pleurotus Species: Spawn Production and Morphological Features; pp. 53–54. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Vats SK, Sood RP, Gulati A, Sharma OP. Lantana camara A lignocellulosic substrate for cultivation of Pleurotus sajor-caju . Biores Technol. 1994;48(1):49–52. doi: 10.1016/0960-8524(94)90135-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Veena SV, Savalgi VP. Proc. Nat. Mush. Symp. Thiruanantapuram, Kerala: 1991. Studies on Cultivation of Oyster Mushroom on Different Farm Substrates in Konkan; pp. 109–112. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yamashita I, Mori T, Tino K, Yanai S. Utilization of cobs tears husk, peanut shell, lawn grass and porous stone for cultivation of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus Jacqex. Fr.) Quat J Fd Sci Technol. 1983;30:693–697. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zadražil F. Conversion of different plant waste into feed by Basidomycetes. Eur J Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1980;9(3):243–248. doi: 10.1007/BF00504491. [DOI] [Google Scholar]