Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Pathology (Oxford, England) logoLink to Journal of Experimental Pathology (Oxford, England)
. 1990 Jun;71(3):367–373.

A quantitative study of the tissue reaction and its relationship to debris production from a joint implant.

B D Ferris 1
PMCID: PMC1998693  PMID: 2372413

Abstract

An attempt has been made to refine the quantitative evaluation of the tissue response to a prosthesis using the goat hip as an experimental model. Total joint replacement was performed in six goats; in three the cup was made of conventional ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene and in three a new silane cross-linked ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene was used. The pseudocapsule of the hips was examined histologically at 15, 19 and 24 months following surgery. Small and large polyethylene debris were visualized using semi-crossed polars and were counted. Giant cells were counted after staining with toluidine blue as were macrophages which were identified by dense staining after the acid phosphatase reaction. The amount of small birefringent debris was closely related to the number of macrophages in the pseudocapsule. This method of assessment may be helpful in comparing the tissue reaction of different polymers.

Full text

PDF
367

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Atkinson J. R., Cicek R. Z. Silane cross-linked polyethylene for prosthetic applications. Part I. Certain physical and mechanical properties related to the nature of the material. Biomaterials. 1983 Oct;4(4):267–275. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(83)90026-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkinson J. R., Cicek R. Z. Silane crosslinked polyethylene for prosthetic applications. II. Creep and wear behaviour and a preliminary moulding test. Biomaterials. 1984 Nov;5(6):326–335. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(84)90030-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Atkinson J. R., Dowling J. M., Cicek R. Z. Materials for internal prostheses: the present position and possible future developments. Biomaterials. 1980 Apr;1(2):89–99. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(80)90005-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carter R. L., Roe F. J. Induction of sarcomas in rats by solid and fragmented polyethylene: experimental observations and clinical implications. Br J Cancer. 1969 Jun;23(2):401–407. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1969.52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mirra J. M., Amstutz H. C., Matos M., Gold R. The pathology of the joint tissues and its clinical relevance in prosthesis failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976 Jun;(117):221–240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. OPPENHEIMER E. T., WILLHITE M., DANISHEFSKY I., STOUT A. P. Observations on the effects of powdered polymer in the carcinogenic process. Cancer Res. 1961 Jan;21:132–134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Salthouse T. N., Matlaga B. F., O'Leary R. K. Microspectrophotometry of macrophage lysosomal enzyme activity: a measure of polymer implant tissue toxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1973 Jun;25(2):201–211. doi: 10.1016/s0041-008x(73)80006-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Willert H. G., Buchhorn G., Semlitsch M. Die Reaktion des Gewebes auf Verschleissprodukte von Gelenk-Endoprothesen der oberen Extremitäten. Orthopade. 1980 Apr;9(2):94–107. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of experimental pathology (Oxford, England) are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES