Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Pathology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Pathology
. 2006 Jun 14;60(4):392–396. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2005.036418

Nasal polyposis in Peutz–Jeghers syndrome: a distinct histopathological and molecular genetic entity

Wendy W J de Leng 1,2,3,4, Anne Marie Westerman 1,2,3,4, Marian A J Weterman 1,2,3,4, Marnix Jansen 1,2,3,4, Herman van Dekken 1,2,3,4, Francis M Giardiello 1,2,3,4, Felix W M de Rooij 1,2,3,4, J H Paul Wilson 1,2,3,4, G Johan A Offerhaus 1,2,3,4, Josbert J Keller 1,2,3,4
PMCID: PMC2001113  PMID: 16775120

Abstract

Background

Peutz–Jeghers syndrome (PJS) is an autosomal dominant hamartomatous polyposis syndrome of the gastrointestinal tract, caused by a germline STK11/LKB1 mutation. Nasal polyposis was described in the original report by Peutz. Recently, a molecular–genetic association between nasal polyposis and PJS has been reported.

Objective

To further explore the occurrence and pathogenesis of PJS‐related nasal polyposis.

Methods

51 patients with PJS, 84 unaffected family members and 36 spouses from 18 families with PJS were questioned for the presence of nasal polyposis. 12 PJS‐related nasal polyps, 1 carcinoma of the nasal cavity and 28 sporadic nasal polyps were analysed for loss of (wild type) STK11/LKB1, eosinophilia, squamous metaplasia, dysplasia and expression of cyclo‐oxygenase 2 and p53.

Results

Nasal polyps occurred in 8 of 51 patients with PJS, and were not reported by non‐affected family members (p<0.001). Germline STK11/LKB1 mutations were identified in all patients with PJS and nasal polyposis. Loss of heterozygosity was found in four of eight PJS‐related nasal polyps, but not in sporadic nasal polyps (p = 0.002). PJS‐related nasal polyps showed less eosinophilia than sporadic nasal polyps (p<0.001). Expression of cyclo‐oxygenase 2 was found in 11 of 12 PJS‐related nasal polyps and 19 of 28 sporadic nasal polyps (p>0.05). Overexpression of p53 was not found.

Conclusions

Nasal polyposis occurs in a significant number of Dutch patients with PJS, one of whom developed a carcinoma in the nasal cavity. The loss of heterozygosity, and the absence of eosinophilia suggest a distinct pathogenesis compared with sporadic nasal polyposis.


Peutz–Jeghers syndrome (PJS) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder, characterised by hamartomatous polyposis of the gastrointestinal tract and melanin pigmentation of the skin and mucous membranes.1,2 Patients with PJS have an increased risk of developing gastrointestinal and extraintestinal cancer at a relatively young age.3,4,5,6 PJS is caused by a germline mutation in the STK11/LKB1 tumour suppressor gene on chromosome 19p13.3.7,8 Molecular analysis of tumours from patients with PJS has shown loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at chromosome 19p13.3, indicating inactivation of wild‐type STK11/LKB1.9,10,11

In 1921, the Dutch physician Peutz described the first family with PJS with both nasal and gastrointestinal polyposis.1 Evaluation of this original family revealed that 6 of 22 patients had nasal polyposis, and one of these individuals developed a nasopharyngeal carcinoma.12 Nasal polyposis associated with PJS has also been described by others.13,14,15,16,17,18,19 In addition, we reported LOH at the STK11/LKB1 locus in PJS‐related nasal polyps; haplotype analysis, indeed, confirmed that this resulted in loss of wild‐type STK11/LKB1, providing genetic support for the association between nasal polyposis and PJS.20

In the general population, nasal polyposis is common,21 and thought to be an allergic inflammatory disorder with common pathogenesis to asthma.22 This is reflected by extensive infiltration of eosinophilic leucocytes in most cases.23 Nasal polyps are not considered as a pre‐neoplastic entity. To the best of our knowledge, reports about malignant degeneration are lacking, and oncogenic mutations have not been described. However, there are case reports of nasal polyposis associated with PJS.13,14,15,16,17,18 LOH in nasal polyps of patients with PJS,20 and the co‐occurrence of nasal polyposis and a carcinoma of the nasal cavity in a patient with PJS,12 suggest that these nasal polyps follow a distinct pathogenesis and could be part of the PJS.

This study further investigates the relationship between nasal polyposis and PJS. The presence of nasal polyposis in Dutch families with PJS was assessed. PJS‐related and sporadic nasal polyps were studied for LOH at 19p13.3, and for eosinophilia, squamous metaplasia and dysplasia. Also, the expression of cyclo‐oxygenase (COX) 2 and p53 was evaluated. A carcinoma of the nasal cavity from a patient with PJS having nasal polyposis was investigated for inactivation of STK11/LKB1.

Methods

Patients and tissue specimens

A total of 51 patients with PJS, from 18 families with PJS11,12,24,25 were included. The clinical diagnosis was confirmed by histopathological review of gastrointestinal hamartomas by an experienced pathologist (GJAO). In all but one family, germline STK11/LKB1 mutations were identified.

From the above study group, 35 patients with PJS were questioned about a medical history of nasal polyposis. In addition, data from 16 deceased patients with PJS from the original family, described by Peutz, were used. Clinical information about these patients was obtained from medical charts, previous publications1,12,25 and interviews with first‐degree relatives. As controls, 84 non‐affected (genetically related) family members, and 36 spouses were questioned about the occurrence of nasal polyposis. The protocol was approved by the medical ethics committee of the University Hospital Rotterdam. Informed consent was given by all participating individuals.

From 4 patients with PJS with nasal polyposis, 12 nasal polyps and 1 carcinoma of the nasal cavity were available for study. The specimens were collected from several hospitals in The Netherlands. A control group consisted of 28 randomly selected sporadic nasal polyps from age‐ and gender‐matched patients without PJS, cystic fibrosis, Kartagener's syndrome or aspirin hypersensitivity, removed between 1996 and 1998 at the Academic Medical Center in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Tissue preparation and DNA isolation

Formalin‐fixed paraffin wax‐embedded samples were cut into 5 μm thick sections, and stained with H&E for histopathological examination. Polyp and carcinoma epithelium were carefully microdissected from haematoxylin stained slides. For wild‐type DNA, stromal tissue from the same sample was used. DNA was isolated from microdissected tissue as described previously.11

LOH at 19p13.3, mutation analysis, CpG‐island hypermethylation

LOH was analysed as described previously,20 comparing DNA from polyp or carcinoma tissue with normal tissue from the same patient. Polymorphic microsatellite markers (D19S886 and D19S565) flanking the STK11/LKB1 gene on chromosome 19p13.3 were used. If a marker was homozygous in normal DNA, polyps of this patient were defined as non‐informative for the tested marker. DNA from a PJS‐related carcinoma of the nasal cavity was also studied for somatic STK11/LKB1 mutations by exon sequencing using reported primers,26 and for silencing the promoter region of STK11/LKB1 by CpG‐island methylation using a methylation‐specific PCR as described previously.27

Histopathological examination

H&E‐stained slides of nasal polyps were examined for the presence of eosinophils, squamous metaplasia and dysplasia by two observers (JJK and GJAO) in a coded fashion. The presence of eosinophils in the stroma underneath the surface epithelium was assessed in a semiquantitative manner (0, none/only a few eosinophils; +, moderate number of eosinophils; and ++, large number of eosinophils). Squamous metaplasia and dysplasia were assessed as either present or absent.

Immunohistochemical analysis for COX 2 and p53

Immunohistochemical analysis was performed as described previously.11 Primary monoclonal antibodies used were: antibody 160112 against COX 2 (Cayman Chemical Co, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA) at a dilution of 1:100; and DO7 (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) against p53 at a dilution of 1:200. For antigen retrieval, slides were boiled for 10 min in 0.01 M citrate buffer, pH 6.0, incubated with the primary antibody overnight at 4°C (COX 2) or for 1 h at room temperature (p53). As positive control, a known positive colorectal carcinoma was used.

Immunostained slides were scored by two observers (JJK and GJAO) in a coded fashion. Epithelial COX 2 staining was assessed as negative or positive (ranging from weak to intense staining28). p53 staining was considered positive if >10% of nuclei were positive. Nuclear p53 staining restricted to the basal (proliferative) compartment of squamous metaplasia was not considered positive.

Statistics

Comparisons between groups were made using the Mann–Whitney U test or Fisher's exact test. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant; p values were two sided.

Results

Nasal polyposis in patients with PJS

Nasal polyposis occurred in 8 out of 51 (16%) patients with PJS, whereas none of the non‐affected family members or spouses of patients with PJS reported nasal polyposis (p<0.001).

The eight patients with PJS having nasal polyposis were from three different families with established germline STK11/LKB1 mutations (table 1). Nasal polyposis did not occur in patients with PJS from 15 other families. Clustering of nasal polyposis and PJS was found in one family. In this well‐documented family,1,12,25 6 out of 22 (27%) patients with PJS had nasal polyposis. Detailed clinical information was available from four patients with PJS having nasal polyposis, from three different families with PJS. Three of these patients had recurrent and serious nasal polyposis for which multiple polypectomies were performed. Of note, nasal polyposis was symptomatic and diagnosed at a young age in four patients aged 7, 8, 11, and 14 years. One patient with PJS who first presented with (recurrent) nasal polyposis in infancy developed a moderately differentiated carcinoma of the nasal cavity at the age of 52 years.12 The patient had also had a pulmonary adenoma at the age of 38 years.

Table 1 Germline STK11/LKB1 mutation, number of patients with Peutz–Jeghers syndrome (PJS), and number of patients with PJS having nasal polyposis from families with PJS having nasal polyposis.

Family STK11 mutation Exon/intron; codon Nucleotide change Alteration mRNA Patients with PJS (n) Patients with PJS with nasal polyposis (n)
1* Deletion Exon 2–3; codon 98–150 Loss of 57 codons Deletion of 57 amino acids 1 1
2 Missense Exon 7; codon 297 4016 G/A AGG/AAG 1 1
3 Insertion Exon 1; codon 66 535 ins T Frameshift 162 TGA/stop 22 6†

PJS, Peutz–Jeghers syndrome.

*Not previously published mutation.

†Including a patient who developed a carcinoma of the nasal cavity.

Inactivation of STK11

A total of 12 nasal polyps from 4 patients with PJS and 28 sporadic nasal polyps were studied for LOH at polymorphic markers flanking the STK11/LKB1 locus 19p13.3. As reported previously,20 LOH was found in four of eight informative nasal polyps from two patients with PJS from different families. Markers were non‐informative in one patient from whom two polyps were selected for study. DNA from two polyps from different patients did not amplify consistently. LOH was not found in 23 informative sporadic nasal polyps from the controls. The difference in frequency of LOH in PJS‐related nasal polyps compared with sporadic nasal polyps was significant (p = 0.002; table 2).20

Table 2 Loss of heterozygosity at 19p13.3 (informative cases), eosinophilia, squamous metaplasia, expression of cyclo‐oxygenase 2 and overexpression of p53 in nasal polyps from patients with Peutz–Jeghers syndrome having sporadic nasal polyps.

LOH 19p p<0.01 Eosinophilia* p<0.001 Sq metaplasia p>0.05 COX 2 p>0.05 P53 p>0.05
PJS 4/8 1/12 1/12 11/12 0/12
Sporadic 0/23 23/28 6/28 20/28 0/27

COX, cyclo‐oxygenase; LOH, loss of heterozygosity; PJS, Peutz–Jeghers syndrome; Sq, squamous.

*Moderate or strong infiltration of eosinophils.

DNA isolated from a carcinoma of the nasal cavity from a patient with PJS having nasal polyposis was studied for inactivation of STK11/LKB1. Markers used for LOH analysis were non‐informative (see above). However, sequencing revealed that tumour DNA contained wild‐type STK11/LKB1 in addition to known germline mutant STK11/LKB1 DNA (insert T at codon 66, exon 1), indicating the absence of LOH at 19p13.3. No somatic mutation in STK11/LKB1 or CpG‐island hypermethylation within the promoter region of STK11/LKB1 was found.

Histological comparison of PJS and sporadic nasal polyps

A total of 12 nasal polyps from 4 patients with PJS were compared with 28 sporadic nasal polyps. There were significantly less eosinophils in nasal polyps of patients with PJS compared with sporadic nasal polyps (p<0.001; table 2). Only 1 of 12 nasal polyps from patients with PJS showed a moderate number of eosinophils, whereas 23 of 28 sporadic nasal polyps showed moderate (n = 8) or large (n = 15) numbers of eosinophils (table 2; figs 1A,B and 2). No other histological differences were encountered. Squamous metaplasia was found in 1 polyp of a patient with PJS (8%), and in 6 sporadic polyps (21%; p = 0.65; table 2). No dysplasia was found in any of the polyps.

graphic file with name cp36418.f1.jpg

Figure 1 Histology and immunohistochemical cyclo‐oxygenase (COX) 2 expression of nasal polyps and a Peutz–Jeghers syndrome (PJS)‐related carcinoma of the nasal cavity. H&E staining of a sporadic nasal polyp with strong infiltration of eosinophils (A); and a PJS‐related nasal polyp lacking eosinophilia (B). Expression of COX 2 in a PJS‐related nasal polyp (C) and a carcinoma of the nasal cavity of a patient with PJS having nasal polyposis (D). Of note, expression of COX 2 was also found in sporadic nasal polyps.

graphic file with name cp36418.f2.jpg

Figure 2 Distribution of eosinophilia in nasal polyps from patients with Peutz–Jeghers syndrome (PJS) and sporadic nasal polyps, assessed in a semiquantitative manner as weak/absent, moderate or strong. Eosinophilia was significantly more common in sporadic than PJS‐related nasal polyposis (p<0.001).

Immunohistochemical analysis for COX 2 and p53

PJS‐related and sporadic nasal polyps were evaluated for the immunohistochemical expression of COX2 and p53. Expression of COX2 is upregulated in PJS‐related gastrointestinal hamartomatous polyps,28,29 and could be a target for chemoprevention in pre‐malignant neoplastic disorders. Also, dysregulated expression of COX2 occurs in sporadic nasal polyposis.30 Expression of COX2 (ranging from weak to intense staining) could be found in the cytoplasm of epithelial cells of 11 of 12 nasal polyps of patients with PJS, and 20 of 28 sporadic nasal polyps (fig 1C). Expression of COX2 was also found in a PJS‐related carcinoma of the nasal cavity (fig 1D). p53 staining was assessed because overexpression was reported in 96% of nasopharyngeal carcinomas and 79% of adjacent dysplastic lesions,31 suggesting a potential as marker for (pre‐) malignant growth of nasopharyngeal epithelium. Nuclear overexpression of p53 (>10% positive nuclei) was not found in PJS‐related or sporadic nasal polyps.

Discussion

This study investigates the association between nasal polyposis and PJS, first reported by Peutz in 1921.1 Our findings suggest a different pathogenesis for PJS‐related nasal polyps compared with sporadic nasal polyps. LOH of the non‐mutated STK11/LKB1 locus at 19p13.3 was found in some of the PJS‐related nasal polyps, but not in sporadic lesions.20 To date, no report of genetic alterations in sporadic nasal polyps exists. In general, nasal polyps are characterised by extensive infiltration of eosinophilic inflammatory cells, consistent with an allergic/inflammatory pathogenesis.22 Nasal polyps from patients with PJS had significantly fewer eosinophils than sporadic nasal polyps (p<0.001). Similar observations are reported in nasal polyps associated with other specific syndromes. For example, those from patients with cystic fibrosis or Kartagener's syndrome also lack extensive eosinophilia.23,32

In our study, only 16% of the patients with PJS had nasal polyposis, found in 3 of 18 families with PJS studied. In the family originally described by Peutz, 6 of 22 patients with PJS had nasal polyposis, but not their 54 non‐affected family members and spouses, making a PJS‐independent cause unlikely. Familial clustering seems to occur, but large genotype–phenotype investigations would be necessary to elucidate whether nasal polyposis is correlated with a specific genotype. The relatively low incidence of nasal polyposis in PJS presumably explains the limited number of reports of this association. Nasal polyposis is common in the general population with an estimated incidence of 0.627 patients per 1000 persons per year. Of note, nasal polyposis in the general population is rare at a younger age.21 In contrast, nasal polyposis occurred at a very young age in several patients with PJS. Thus, although nasal polyposis cannot serve as a marker for PJS in the general population, an early onset of nasal polyposis in a patient from a family with known PJS suggests that the person is affected. Also, PJS should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a patient with nasal polyposis under the age of 12 years. The early onset of the nasal polyps in patients with PJS is certainly yet another argument that nasal polyposis can indeed be considered as part of the syndrome.

One patient with PJS, recurrent nasal polyposis beginning at a young age and carcinoma of the nasal cavity at the age of 52 years was identified. Genetic analysis of this carcinoma could not prove inactivation of STK11/LKB1 by LOH, somatic mutation or CpG‐island hypermethylation in the promoter region of STK11/LKB1. However, inactivation could have occurred by an intronic mutation resulting in alternative splicing, or by large deletions6 not detected by exon sequencing of short strands of DNA isolated from paraffin wax‐embedded tissue. Taken together, the association between the development of this nasopharyngeal carcinoma and the PJS in this patient remains uncertain.

The finding of LOH in nasal PJS polyps is consistent with clonal growth. At the microscopic level, no pre‐neoplastic features such as dysplasia were seen. Thus whether or not nasal PJS polyps carry an intrinsic neoplastic potential needs to be seen. The observed overexpression of COX 2 could provide a rationale for experimental chemopreventive treatment with non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs or COX 2 inhibitors in patients with PJS having (severe) nasal polyposis.

In conclusion, nasal polyposis associated with PJS should be considered as extraintestinal hamartomas. The absence of eosinophils compared with sporadic nasal polyps and the early onset indicate a distinct pathogenesis, in which LOH at the STK11/LKB1 locus 19p13.3 could be involved. Whether or not the polyps in PJS carry a neoplastic risk needs to be seen, but in the clinical management of these patients careful examination is warranted.

Take‐home messages

  • Nasal polyposis should be considered as an extraintestinal manifestation of Peutz–Jeghers syndrome (PJS), although it occurs in a minority of patients.

  • Nasal polyposis in patients with PJS can occur at a very young age and cause serious morbidity.

  • The early onset, the absence of eosinophils and the loss of heterozygosity in PJS‐related nasal polyps suggest a distinct pathogenesis compared with sporadic nasal polyps.

Acknowledgements

We thank E Caspers, F Morsink and A Musler for technical assistance, and W Meun for his help in preparing the figures. This work is supported by grant WS 01‐03 from The Netherlands Digestive Disease Foundation, The John G Rangos Sr Charitable Foundation and the Clayton Fund.

Abbreviations

COX - cyclo‐oxygenase

LOH - loss of heterozygosity

PJS - Peutz–Jeghers syndrome

Footnotes

Competing interests: None declared.

References

  • 1.Peutz J L A. Over een zeer merkwaardige, gecombineerde familiaire polyposis van de slijmvliezen van den tractus intestinalis met die van de neuskeelholte en gepaard met eigenaardige pigmentaties van huid‐ en slijmvliezen. Ned Maandschr v Geneesk 192110134–146. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jeghers H, Mc Kusick V A, Katz K H. Generalized intestinal polyposis and melanin spots of the oral mucosa, lips and digits. N Engl J Med 19492411031–1036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Giardiello F M, Welsh S B, Hamilton S R.et al Increased risk of cancer in the Peutz‐Jeghers syndrome. N Engl J Med 19873161511–1514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Boardman L A, Thibodeau S N, Schaid D J.et al Increased risk for cancer in patients with the Peutz‐Jeghers syndrome. Ann Intern Med 1998128896–899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Spigelman A D, Murday V, Phillips R K. Cancer and the Peutz‐Jeghers syndrome. Gut 1989301588–1590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lim W, Olschwang S, Keller J J.et al Relative frequency and morphology of cancers in STK11 mutation carriers. Gastroenterology 20041261788–1794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hemminki A, Markie D, Tomlinson I.et al A serine/threonine kinase gene defective in Peutz‐Jeghers syndrome. Nature 1998391184–187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jenne D E, Reimann H, Nezu J.et al Peutz‐Jeghers syndrome is caused by mutations in a novel serine threonine kinase. Nat Genet 19981838–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gruber S B, Entius M M, Petersen G M.et al Pathogenesis of adenocarcinoma in Peutz‐Jeghers syndrome. Cancer Res 1998585267–5270. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Miyaki M, Iijima T, Hosono K.et al Somatic mutations of LKB1 and beta‐catenin genes in gastrointestinal polyps from patients with Peutz‐Jeghers syndrome. Cancer Res 2000606311–6313. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Entius M M, Keller J J, Westerman A M.et al Molecular genetic alterations in hamartomatous polyps and carcinomas of patients with Peutz‐Jeghers syndrome. J Clin Pathol 200154126–131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Westerman A M, Entius M M, de Baar E.et al Peutz‐Jeghers syndrome: 78‐year follow‐up of the original family. Lancet 19993531211–1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.De Facq L, De Sutter J, De Man M.et al A case of Peutz‐Jeghers syndrome with nasal polyposis, extreme iron deficiency anemia, and hamartoma‐adenoma transformation: management by combined surgical and endoscopic approach. Am J Gastroenterol 1995901330–1332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jancu J. Peutz‐Jeghers syndrome. Involvement of the gastrointestinal and upper respiratory tracts. Am J Gastroenterol 197156545–549. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cerqua N, D'Ottavi L R, Perrotti V.et al Rare manifestation of nasal polyposis in the Peutz‐Jeghers syndrome. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 199313333–338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hartweg H, Goerlich R. Uber das Peutz syndrome. Fortschr Geb Rontgenstralen 196093203–211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Manegold B C, Bussmann J F, Furstenberg H S. Clinical contribution to the Peutz‐Jeghers syndrome with involvement of the gastrointestinal tract, the upper respiratory tract and both breasts. Med Welt 1969251435–1439. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Vogel T, Schumacher V, Saleh A.et al Extraintestinal polyps in Peutz‐Jeghers syndrome: presentation of four cases and review of the literature. Deutsche Peutz‐Jeghers‐Studiengruppe. Int J Colorectal Dis 200015118–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lim W, Hearle N, Shah B.et al Further observations on LKB1/STK11 status and cancer risk in Peutz‐Jeghers syndrome. Br J Cancer 200389308–313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Keller J J, Westerman A M, de Rooij F W.et al Molecular genetic evidence of an association between nasal polyposis and the Peutz‐Jeghers syndrome. Ann Intern Med 2002136855–856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Larsen K, Tos M. The estimated incidence of symptomatic nasal polyps. Acta Otolaryngol 2002122179–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Drake‐Lee A B. Nasal polyps. In: Kerr AG, ed. Scott‐Brown's otolaryngology. Oxford: Butterworth‐Heinemann, 1997
  • 23.Mygind N, Dahl R, Bachert C. Nasal polyposis, eosinophil dominated inflammation, and allergy. Thorax 200055(Suppl 2)S79–S83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Westerman A M, Entius M M, Boor P P.et al Novel mutations in the LKB1/STK11 gene in Dutch Peutz‐Jeghers families. Hum Mutat 199913476–481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wijk TWv Over het syndroom polyposis adenomatosa gastro‐intestinalis generalisata heredofamiliaris gecombineerd met huid‐ en slijmvliespigmentaties; of ziekte van Peutz [thesis]. Leiden, University of Leiden 1950
  • 26.Connolly D C, Katabuchi H, Cliby W A.et al Somatic mutations in the STK11/LKB1 gene are uncommon in rare gynecological tumor types associated with Peutz‐Jeghers syndrome. Am J Pathol 2000156339–345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sato N, Rosty C, Jansen M.et al STK11/LKB1 Peutz‐Jeghers gene inactivation in intraductal papillary‐mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Am J Pathol 20011592017–2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.De Leng W W, Westerman A M, Weterman M A.et al COX‐2 expression and molecular alterations in Peutz‐Jeghers hamartomas and carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 200393065–3072. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rossi D J, Ylikorkala A, Korsisaari N.et al Induction of cyclooxygenase‐2 in a mouse model of Peutz‐Jeghers polyposis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 20029912327–12332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Vignola A M, Bellia V. Transcriptional regulation of COX‐2: a key mechanism in the pathogenesis of nasal polyposis in aspirin‐sensitive asthmatics? Allergy 20035895–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sheu L F, Chen A, Tseng H H.et al Assessment of p53 expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Hum Pathol 199526380–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sorensen H, Mygind N, Tygstrup I. Histology of nasal polyps of different etiology. Rhinology 197715121–128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES