Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1987 Jul;56(1):73–78. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1987.157

The significance of learned food aversions in the aetiology of anorexia associated with cancer.

J A Levine, P W Emery
PMCID: PMC2001665  PMID: 3476146

Abstract

The results of 24 h food preference tests have suggested that learned food aversions may be involved in the development of anorexia in tumour bearing rats and in patients with cancer. We have performed similar tests over longer periods, up to 10 days, in male rats implanted with Leydig cell tumours, using semisynthetic diets containing differing proportions of fat, protein and carbohydrate. Tumour growth caused anorexia (16-30% decrease in food intake) and cachexia (78% decrease in body fat and 18% decrease in body protein, but 16% increase in body water). Both tumour bearing and control rats preferred a high carbohydrate diet to a high fat diet regardless of their previous diet: tumour bearing rats showed no evidence of a learned food aversion in these experiments. Tumour bearing rats did show an initial preference for a novel high protein diet when this was offered as an alternative to the normal protein diet they had previously been consuming, but this apparent learned food aversion disappeared on the second day of the test and was in fact reversed on all the subsequent days of the test. However, tumour bearing rats did show a sustained preference for a novel low protein diet when this was offered as an alternative to the normal protein diet they had previously been consuming. These results suggest that anorexia in the tumour bearing rats was not caused by a learned food aversion. However the results do indicate that the tumour bearing rats may have developed a specific aversion to protein in the diet. Leydig cell tumours are known to secrete large amounts of oestradiol. However injections of oestradiol in normal male rats caused an increase in body fat content and had no effect on the rats' preference for dietary protein. Clearly hypersecretion of oestradiol was not responsible for the loss of body fat, the fluid retention and the aversion to dietary protein which characterised the tumour bearing rats. The mechanisms by which tumour growth causes anorexia and cachexia in these rats remains obscure.

Full text

PDF
73

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bernhart F. W., Tomarelli R. M. A salt mixture supplying the national research council estimates of the mineral requirements of the rat. J Nutr. 1966 Aug;89(4):495–500. doi: 10.1093/jn/89.4.495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernstein I. L., Fenner D. P. Learned food aversions: heterogeneity of animal models of tumor-induced anorexia. Appetite. 1983 Jun;4(2):79–86. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6663(83)80004-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernstein I. L., Sigmundi R. A. Tumor anorexia: a learned food aversion? Science. 1980 Jul 18;209(4454):416–418. doi: 10.1126/science.6930106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bernstein I. L., Webster M. M. Learned taste aversions in humans. Physiol Behav. 1980 Sep;25(3):363–366. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(80)90274-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cooke B. A., Lindh L. M., Janszen F. H., van Driel M. J., Bakker C. P., van der Plank M. P., van der Molen H. J. A Leydig cell tumour: a model for the study of lutropin action. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1979 Mar 22;583(3):320–331. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(79)90456-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Costa G. Cachexia, the metabolic component of neoplastic diseases. Cancer Res. 1977 Jul;37(7 Pt 2):2327–2335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. De Wys W. Working conference on anorexia and cachexia of neoplastic disease. Cancer Res. 1970 Nov;30(11):2816–2818. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Djazayery A., Miller D. S., Stock M. J. Energy balances in obese mice. Nutr Metab. 1979;23(5):357–367. doi: 10.1159/000176281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Emery P. W., Cotellessa L., Holness M., Egan C., Rennie M. J. Different patterns of protein turnover in skeletal and gastrointestinal smooth muscle and the production of N tau-methylhistidine during fasting in the rat. Biosci Rep. 1986 Feb;6(2):143–153. doi: 10.1007/BF01115000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lindmark L., Bennegård K., Edén E., Ekman L., Scherstén T., Svaninger G., Lundholm K. Resting energy expenditure in malnourished patients with and without cancer. Gastroenterology. 1984 Aug;87(2):402–408. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lundholm K., Edström S., Karlberg I., Ekman L., Scherstén T. Relationship of food intake, body composition, and tumor growth to host metabolism in nongrowing mice with sarcoma. Cancer Res. 1980 Jul;40(7):2516–2522. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Moffitt P. E., Wilson G. R., Preston R. L. Comparative response of castrate and intact male rats to diethylstilbestrol. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1975 Mar;148(3):650–652. doi: 10.3181/00379727-148-38602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mook D. G., Kenney N. J., Roberts S., Nussbaum A. I., Rodier W. I., 3rd Ovarian-adrenal interactions in regulation of body weight by female rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1972 Nov;81(2):198–211. doi: 10.1037/h0033526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nixon D. W., Heymsfield S. B., Cohen A. E., Kutner M. H., Ansley J., Lawson D. H., Rudman D. Protein-calorie undernutrition in hospitalized cancer patients. Am J Med. 1980 May;68(5):683–690. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(80)90254-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tomas F. M., Munro H. N., Young V. R. Effect of glucocorticoid administration on the rate of muscle protein breakdown in vivo in rats, as measured by urinary excretion of N tau-methylhistidine. Biochem J. 1979 Jan 15;178(1):139–146. doi: 10.1042/bj1780139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES