Skip to main content
Anesthesia Progress logoLink to Anesthesia Progress
. 2001 Winter;48(1):3–8.

Recruiting phobic research subjects: effectiveness and cost.

T Kaakko 1, H Murtomaa 1, P Milgrom 1, T Getz 1, D S Ramsay 1, S E Coldwell 1
PMCID: PMC2007331  PMID: 11495403

Abstract

Efficiently enrolling subjects is one of the most important and difficult aspects of a clinical trial. This prospective study evaluated strategies used in the recruitment of 144 dental injection phobics for a clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of combining alprazolam with exposure therapy. Three types of recruitment strategies were evaluated: paid advertising, free publicity, and professional referral. Sixty-three percent of subjects were enrolled using paid advertising (the majority of them from bus advertisements [27.0%], posters on the University of Washington campus [20.1%], and newspaper advertisements [13.2%]). Free publicity (eg, television coverage, word of mouth) yielded 18.8% of enrolled subjects and professionaL referrals 14.6% of subjects. The average cost (1996 dollars) of enrolling 1 subject was $79. Bus and poster advertising attracted more initial contacts and yielded the greatest enrollment.

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bielski R. J., Lydiard R. B. Therapeutic trial participants: where do we find them and what does it cost? Psychopharmacol Bull. 1997;33(1):75–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Milgrom P. M., Hujoel P. P., Weinstein P., Holborow D. W. Subject recruitment, retention, and compliance in clinical trials in periodontics. Ann Periodontol. 1997 Mar;2(1):64–74. doi: 10.1902/annals.1997.2.1.64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Segal D. L., Hersen M., Van Hasselt V. B. Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R: an evaluative review. Compr Psychiatry. 1994 Jul-Aug;35(4):316–327. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(94)90025-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Skre I., Onstad S., Torgersen S., Kringlen E. High interrater reliability for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R Axis I (SCID-I). Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1991 Aug;84(2):167–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1991.tb03123.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Spitzer R. L., Williams J. B., Gibbon M., First M. B. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). I: History, rationale, and description. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992 Aug;49(8):624–629. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820080032005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Weinstein P., Milgrom P., Sanghvi H. Recruitment issues: errors of omission in dental research. J Dent Res. 1995 Apr;74(4):1028–1029. doi: 10.1177/00220345950740040101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Anesthesia Progress are provided here courtesy of American Dental Society of Anesthesiology

RESOURCES