Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Anesthesia Progress logoLink to Anesthesia Progress
. 2003;50(3):105–110.

Parental evaluation of quality of life measures following pediatric dental treatment using general anesthesia.

Halley White 1, Jessica Y Lee 1, William F Vann Jr 1
PMCID: PMC2007439  PMID: 14558585

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine (a) parental satisfaction with the dental care their child received under general anesthesia, and (b) perception of the impact of this care on physical and social quality of life. The sample included 45 children (median age 50 months, 26 boys and 19 girls). Data were collected using a 1-page survey instrument completed by the parent at the first follow-up appointment. Dichotomous dependent variables were developed to measure parental satisfaction, dental outcome, and social impact of treatment. There was an overwhelmingly positive impression with dental outcomes (pain relief and improved masticatory efficiency). Parental perceptions in the social dimension were also positive. Parents reported more smiling, improved school performance, and increased social interaction. Relative to overall health, the majority of parents reported an improvement. Logit regression analysis revealed that absence of pain (P < .05) and increased social interaction (P < .01) had a significant impact on parents' perception of overall health. Our findings indicate that dental care under general anesthesia for preschool children has a high degree of acceptance by parents and is perceived to have a positive social impact on their child.

Full text

PDF
105

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Acs G., Pretzer S., Foley M., Ng M. W. Perceived outcomes and parental satisfaction following dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia. Pediatr Dent. 2001 Sep-Oct;23(5):419–423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hulka B. S., Zyzanski S. J. Validation of a patient satisfaction scale: theory, methods and practice. Med Care. 1982 Jun;20(6):649–653. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198206000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kressin N., Spiro A., 3rd, Bosse R., Garcia R., Kazis L. Assessing oral health-related quality of life: findings from the normative aging study. Med Care. 1996 May;34(5):416–427. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199605000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Low W., Tan S., Schwartz S. The effect of severe caries on the quality of life in young children. Pediatr Dent. 1999 Sep-Oct;21(6):325–326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Phillips J., Whitaker L. A. The social effects of craniofacial deformity and its correction. Cleft Palate J. 1979 Jan;16(1):7–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Pillemer F. G., Cook K. V. The psychosocial adjustment of pediatric craniofacial patients after surgery. Cleft Palate J. 1989 Jul;26(3):201–208. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ready M. A., Barenie J. T., Hanes C. M., Myers D. R. Parental attitudes concerning children's hospitalization and general anesthesia for dental care. J Pedod. 1988 Fall;13(1):38–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Slade G. D., Spencer A. J., Locker D., Hunt R. J., Strauss R. P., Beck J. D. Variations in the social impact of oral conditions among older adults in South Australia, Ontario, and North Carolina. J Dent Res. 1996 Jul;75(7):1439–1450. doi: 10.1177/00220345960750070301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Strauss R. P., Hunt R. J. Understanding the value of teeth to older adults: influences on the quality of life. J Am Dent Assoc. 1993 Jan;124(1):105–110. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1993.0019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Anesthesia Progress are provided here courtesy of American Dental Society of Anesthesiology

RESOURCES