Skip to main content
PMC home page
Anesthesia Progress logoLink to Anesthesia Progress
. 2004;51(4):126–133.

Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.

John Nusstein 1, Jeffrey Berlin 1, Al Reader 1, Mike Beck 1, Joel M Weaver 1
PMCID: PMC2007494  PMID: 15675261

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to compare the pain of injection, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of the intraligamentary injection of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system. Using a crossover design, intraligamentary injections of 1.4 mL of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 1.4 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine were randomly administered on the mesial and distal aspects of the mandibular first molar with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system in a double-blind manner at 2 separate appointments to 51 subjects. The results demonstrated the incidence of moderate pain was 14%-27% with needle insertion, with 0%-4% reporting severe pain. For solution deposition, moderate pain was reported 8%-18% of the time, with no reports of severe pain. There were no significant differences between the articaine and lidocaine solutions. Regarding heart rate changes, neither anesthetic solution resulted in a significant increase in heart rate over baseline readings. On day 1 postinjection, there was a 31% incidence of moderate/severe pain with the articaine solution and 20% incidence of moderate/severe pain with the lidocaine solution. The moderate/severe pain ratings decreased over the next 2 days. There were no significant differences between the articaine and lidocaine solutions. We concluded that the intraligamentary injection of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine was similar to 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine for injection pain and postinjection pain in the mandibular first molar when administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system. For both anesthetic solutions, heart rate did not significantly increase with the intraligamentary injection using the computer-controlled local anesthetic system.

Full text

PDF
126

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brännström M., Nordenvall K. J., Hedström K. G. Periodontal tissue changes after intraligamentary anesthesia. ASDC J Dent Child. 1982 Nov-Dec;49(6):417–423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cannell H., Kerawala C., Webster K., Whelpton R. Are intraligamentary injections intravascular? Br Dent J. 1993 Oct 23;175(8):281–284. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4808302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Childers M., Reader A., Nist R., Beck M., Meyers W. J. Anesthetic efficacy of the periodontal ligament injection after an inferior alveolar nerve block. J Endod. 1996 Jun;22(6):317–320. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(96)80267-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. D'Souza J. E., Walton R. E., Peterson L. C. Periodontal ligament injection: an evaluation of the extent of anesthesia and postinjection discomfort. J Am Dent Assoc. 1987 Mar;114(3):341–344. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1987.0080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Daubländer M., Müller R., Lipp M. D. The incidence of complications associated with local anesthesia in dentistry. Anesth Prog. 1997 Fall;44(4):132–141. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dumbrigue H. B., Lim M. V., Rudman R. A., Serraon A. A comparative study of anesthetic techniques for mandibular dental extraction. Am J Dent. 1997 Dec;10(6):275–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Edwards R. W., Head T. W. A clinical trial of intraligamentary anesthesia. J Dent Res. 1989 Jul;68(7):1210–1213. doi: 10.1177/00220345890680071301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Friedman M. J., Hochman M. N. A 21st century computerized injection system for local pain control. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1997 Oct;18(10):995-1000, 1002-3; quiz 1004. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Froum S. J., Tarnow D., Caiazzo A., Hochman M. N. Histologic response to intraligament injections using a computerized local anesthetic delivery system. A pilot study in mini-swine. J Periodontol. 2000 Sep;71(9):1453–1459. doi: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.9.1453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fuhs Q. M., Walker W. A., 3rd, Gough R. W., Schindler W. G., Hartman K. S. The periodontal ligament injection: histological effects on the periodontium in dogs. J Endod. 1983 Oct;9(10):411–415. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80254-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Galili D., Kaufman E., Garfunkel A. A., Michaeli Y. Intraligamentary anesthesia--a histological study. Int J Oral Surg. 1984 Dec;13(6):511–516. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9785(84)80022-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Haas D. A., Lennon D. A 21 year retrospective study of reports of paresthesia following local anesthetic administration. J Can Dent Assoc. 1995 Apr;61(4):319-20, 323-6, 329-30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Heft M. W., Parker S. R. An experimental basis for revising the graphic rating scale for pain. Pain. 1984 Jun;19(2):153–161. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(84)90835-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Isen D. A. Articaine: pharmacology and clinical use of a recently approved local anesthetic. Dent Today. 2000 Nov;19(11):72–77. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jakobs W., Ladwig B., Cichon P., Ortel R., Kirch W. Serum levels of articaine 2% and 4% in children. Anesth Prog. 1995;42(3-4):113–115. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Johnson G. K., Hlava G. L., Kalkwarf K. L. A comparison of periodontal intraligamental anesthesia using etidocaine HCl and lidocaine HCl. Anesth Prog. 1985 Sep-Oct;32(5):202–205. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kaufman E., Galili D., Garfunkel A. A. Intraligamentary anesthesia: a clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 1983 Mar;49(3):337–339. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90273-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kaufman E., Galili D., Garfunkel A. A. Intraligamentary anesthesia: a clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 1983 Mar;49(3):337–339. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(83)90273-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kaufman E., LeResche L., Sommers E., Dworkin S. F., Truelove E. L. Intraligamentary anesthesia: a double-blind comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc. 1984 Feb;108(2):175–178. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1984.0434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. List G., Meinster F., Jr, Nery E. B., Prey J. H. Gingival crevicular fluid response to various solutions using the intraligamentary injection. Quintessence Int. 1988 Aug;19(8):559–563. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Malamed S. F., Gagnon S., Leblanc D. A comparison between articaine HCl and lidocaine HCl in pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug;22(4):307–311. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Malamed S. F., Gagnon S., Leblanc D. Articaine hydrochloride: a study of the safety of a new amide local anesthetic. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001 Feb;132(2):177–185. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Malamed S. F. The periodontal ligament (PDL) injection: an alternative to inferior alveolar nerve block. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982 Feb;53(2):117–121. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(82)90273-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. McDaniel K. F., Rowe N. H., Charbeneau G. T. Tissue response to an electric pulp tester. J Prosthet Dent. 1973 Jan;29(1):84–87. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(73)90144-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. McLean M. E., Wayman B. E., Mayhew R. B. Duration of anesthesia using the periodontal ligament injection: a comparison of bupivacaine to lidocaine. Anesth Pain Control Dent. 1992 Fall;1(4):207–213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Meechan J. G. A comparison of ropivacaine and lidocaine with epinephrine for intraligamentary anesthesia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002 Apr;93(4):469–473. doi: 10.1067/moe.2002.121390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Meechan J. G., Ledvinka J. I. M. Pulpal anaesthesia for mandibular central incisor teeth: a comparison of infiltration and intraligamentary injections. Int Endod J. 2002 Jul;35(7):629–634. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00532.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Moller R. A., Covino B. G. Cardiac electrophysiologic effects of articaine compared with bupivacaine and lidocaine. Anesth Analg. 1993 Jun;76(6):1266–1273. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199306000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Moore K. D., Reader A., Meyers W. J., Beck M., Weaver J. A comparison of the periodontal ligament injection using 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and saline in human mandibular premolars. Anesth Prog. 1987 Sep-Oct;34(5):181–186. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Oertel R., Ebert U., Rahn R., Kirch W. The effect of age on pharmacokinetics of the local anesthetic drug articaine. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999 Nov-Dec;24(6):524–528. doi: 10.1016/s1098-7339(99)90043-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Oertel R., Rahn R., Kirch W. Clinical pharmacokinetics of articaine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Dec;33(6):417–425. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199733060-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pertot W. J., Déjou J. Bone and root resorption. Effects of the force developed during periodontal ligament injections in dogs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1992 Sep;74(3):357–365. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(92)90076-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ran Diana, Peretz Benjamin. Assessing the pain reaction of children receiving periodontal ligament anesthesia using a computerized device (Wand). J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2003 Spring;27(3):247–250. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ricciardi A. Periodontal anesthesia for all dental procedures: a seven year clinical study. CDS Rev. 1984 Jul;77(6):24–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Roahen J. O., Marshall F. J. The effects of periodontal ligament injection on pulpal and periodontal tissues. J Endod. 1990 Jan;16(1):28–33. doi: 10.1016/s0099-2399(07)80027-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Schertzer E. R., Jr Articaine vs. lidocaine. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000 Sep;131(9):1248–1250. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Schleder J. R., Reader A., Beck M., Meyers W. J. The periodontal ligament injection: a comparison of 2% lidocaine, 3% mepivacaine, and 1:100,000 epinephrine to 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in human mandibular premolars. J Endod. 1988 Aug;14(8):397–404. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80124-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Simon M. A., Gielen M. J., Alberink N., Vree T. B., van Egmond J. Intravenous regional anesthesia with 0.5% articaine, 0.5% lidocaine, or 0.5% prilocaine. A double-blind randomized clinical study. Reg Anesth. 1997 Jan-Feb;22(1):29–34. doi: 10.1016/s1098-7339(06)80053-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Smith G. N., Pashley D. H. Periodontal ligament injection: evaluation of systemic effects. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1983 Dec;56(6):571–574. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(83)90069-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Smith G. N., Walton R. E., Abbott B. J. Clinical evaluation of periodontal ligament anesthesia using a pressure syringe. J Am Dent Assoc. 1983 Dec;107(6):953–956. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1983.0357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Walton R. E., Abbott B. J. Periodontal ligament injection: a clinical evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc. 1981 Oct;103(4):571–575. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1981.0307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Walton R. E., Garnick J. J. The periodontal ligament injection: histologic effects on the periodontium in monkeys. J Endod. 1982 Jan;8(1):22–26. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(82)80312-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. White J. J., Reader A., Beck M., Meyers W. J. The periodontal ligament injection: a comparison of the efficacy in human maxillary and mandibular teeth. J Endod. 1988 Oct;14(10):508–514. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80109-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wilburn-Goo D., Lloyd L. M. When patients become cyanotic: acquired methemoglobinemia. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999 Jun;130(6):826–831. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Wright G. Z., Weinberger S. J., Friedman C. S., Plotzke O. B. Use of articaine local anesthesia in children under 4 years of age--a retrospective report. Anesth Prog. 1989 Nov-Dec;36(6):268–271. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. van Oss G. E., Vree T. B., Baars A. M., Termond E. F., Booij L. H. Pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and renal excretion of articaine and its metabolite articainic acid in patients after epidural administration. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1989 Jan;6(1):49–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Anesthesia Progress are provided here courtesy of American Dental Society of Anesthesiology

RESOURCES