Abstract
Minkler, Gofman and Tandy (1970a, b) have recently reported data on the karyotype constitutions of human tissue culture cell lines and human tumours, as gathered by a semi-automatic chromosome analysis system. The data appears to show a relationship between the relative number of “number 16” chromosomes and malignancy. We have tested the ability of the “cutting line” approach they used to correctly classify chromosomes from a sample of 723 cells from 100 normal subjects. The cutting line scheme gave very different results from those of an experienced cytogeneticist. The method also failed to give correct average numbers of chromosomes per class. We are thus led to question the conclusions reached by Minkler et al. It appears possible that their relatively consistent finding of an excess of “number 16” chromosomes in their largely hyperploid material may be an artefact of their classification scheme, arising from measurement normalization problems, rather than a reflection of a real excess of “number 16” or even of “number 16-like” chromosomes.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bender M. A., Kastenbaum M. A. Statistical analysis of the normal human karyotype. Am J Hum Genet. 1969 Jul;21(4):322–351. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LEDLEY R. S. HIGH-SPEED AUTOMATIC ANALYSIS OF BIOMEDICAL PICTURES. Science. 1964 Oct 9;146(3641):216–223. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Minkler J. L., Gofman J. W., Tandy R. K. A specific common chromosomal pathway for the origin of human malignancy. II. Br J Cancer. 1970 Dec;24(4):726–740. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1970.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muldal S., Elejalde R., Harvey P. W. Specific chromosome anomaly associated with autonomous and cancerous development in man. Nature. 1971 Jan 1;229(5279):48–49. doi: 10.1038/229048a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- PENROSE L. S. A NOTE ON THE MEAN MEASUREMENTS OF HUMAN CHROMOSOMES. Ann Hum Genet. 1964 Nov;28:195–196. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1964.tb00477.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]