Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1973 Oct;28(4):322–331. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1973.155

Histological Cell Type and DNA Value in the Prognosis of Squamous Cell Cancer of Uterine Cervix

A B P Ng, N B Atkin
PMCID: PMC2008903  PMID: 4759940

Abstract

Based on the evaluation of 362 cases of squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix, the distribution of the tumours in relation to their modified Broders' grade, histological cell type as proposed by Wentz and Reagan, and the clinical stage of disease was evaluated. The morphological characteristics of the 3 cell types—large cell non-keratinizing, keratinizing, and small cell cancers—were described. The 5 year survival in relation to Broders' grade, cell type, extent and DNA values of the malignant cells were evaluated and compared. Broders' grading system was not useful in predicting the biological behaviour of cervical squamous cancer. The histological cell type and extent of the tumour were important factors in prognosis. The 5 year survival for large cell cancer was 51·8%, keratinizing cancer 34·7% and small cell cancer 10·0%. The 5 year survival was 63·3% for stage I neoplasms, 52·9% for stage II neoplasms, 30·7% for stage III neoplasms and 15·0% for stage IV neoplasms. When the DNA values of neoplastic cells were considered in relation to cell type and extent of disease, the biological behaviour of cervical squamous cell cancers was determined more accurately. The 5 year survival of women with cervical cancer in which the DNA values of the neoplastic cells exceeded 155 was more favourable than those with DNA values of less than 155. This difference in 5 year survival was evident for comparable cell type and clinical stage of disease.

Full text

PDF
322

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ATKIN N. B., RICHARDS B. M. Clinical significance of ploidy in carcinoma of cervix: its relation to prognosis. Br Med J. 1962 Dec 1;2(5317):1445–1446. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5317.1445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. ATKIN N. B., RICHARDS B. M. Deoxyribonucleic acid in human tumours as measured by microspectrophotometry of Feulgen stain: a comparison of tumours arising at different sites. Br J Cancer. 1956 Dec;10(4):769–786. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1956.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. ATKIN N. B., RICHARDS B. M., ROSS A. J. The deoxyribonucleic acid content of carcinoma of the uterus: an assessment of its possible significance in relation to histopathology and clinical course, based on data from 165 cases. Br J Cancer. 1959 Dec;13:773–787. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1959.86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Atkin N. B., Mattinson G., Baker M. C. A comparison of the DNA content and chromosome number of fifty human tumours. Br J Cancer. 1966 Mar;20(1):87–101. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1966.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BANGLE R., Jr, BERGER M., LEVIN M. VARIATIONS IN THE MORPHOGENESIS OF SQUAMOUS CARCINOMA OF THE CERVIX. Cancer. 1963 Sep;16:1151–1159. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196309)16:9<1151::aid-cncr2820160909>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Finck F. M., Denk M. Cervical carcinoma: relationship between histology and survival following radiation therapy. Obstet Gynecol. 1970 Mar;35(3):339–343. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. KISTNER R. W., HERTIG A. T. A correlation of histologic grade, clinical state, and radiation response in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1951 Jun;61(6):1293–1300. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(51)90914-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ng A. B., Reagan J. W. Microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Am J Clin Pathol. 1969 Nov;52(5):511–529. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/52.5.511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. REAGAN J. W., HICKS D. J. A study of in situ and squamous-cell cancer of the uterine cervix. Cancer. 1953 Nov;6(6):1200–1214. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(195311)6:6<1200::aid-cncr2820060614>3.0.co;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Reagan J. W., Ng A. B., Wentz W. B. Concepts of genesis and development in early cervical neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1969 Jul;24(7 Pt 2):860–874. doi: 10.1097/00006254-196907001-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Reagan J. W., Wentz W. B. Genesis of carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1967 Dec;10(4):883–921. doi: 10.1097/00003081-196712000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sidhu G. S., Koss L. G., Barber R. K. Relation of histologic factors to the response of stage I epidermoid carcinoma of the cervix to surgical treatment. Analysis of 115 patients. Obstet Gynecol. 1970 Mar;35(3):329–338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. WENTZ W. B. Histologic grade and survival in cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1961 Oct;18:412–416. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. WENTZ W. B., LEWIS G. C., Jr CORRELATION OF HISTOLOGIC MORPHOLOGY AND SURVIVAL IN CERVICAL CANCER FOLLOWING RADIATION THERAPY. Obstet Gynecol. 1965 Aug;26:228–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. WENTZ W. B., REAGAN J. W. Survival in cervical cancer with respect to cell type. Cancer. 1959 Mar-Apr;12(2):384–388. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(195903/04)12:2<384::aid-cncr2820120222>3.0.co;2-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES