Skip to main content
NCBI home page
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1974 Mar;29(3):240–246. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1974.63

Survival Rates of Lung Cancer According to Histological Type

O Campobasso, B Invernizzi, M Musso, F Berrino
PMCID: PMC2009090  PMID: 4364383

Abstract

The post-operative survival in 554 lung carcinomata, classified according to the histological type, was calculated by the actuarial method. On the whole, squamous cell carcinoma was the most favourable and anaplastic small cell carcinoma the least favourable lesion. However, in tumours smaller than 4 cm, confined to the lung and with negative lymph nodes (stage I), small cell carcinoma had the highest percentage of 5 year survivors, followed by large cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. When tumours had attained a larger size and/or spread to neighbouring structures and regional lymph nodes (stage II and III), the histological type was a much more determining factor in survival, squamous cell carcinoma being a significantly more favourable lesion. On the other hand, no difference in survival in relation to the histological type was found when distant metastases were probably present (stage IV). It was concluded that in assessing the role of histopathology in the prognosis of lung cancer, the mutual relationship to other pathological factors must be taken into account.

Full text

PDF
240

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ashley D. J., Davies H. D. Cancer of the lung. Histology and biological behavior. Cancer. 1967 Feb;20(2):165–174. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(1967)20:2<165::aid-cncr2820200202>3.0.co;2-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BERKSON J., GAGE R. P. Calculation of survival rates for cancer. Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin. 1950 May 24;25(11):270–286. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berrino F., Musso M., Campobasso O. Pathological factors in survival of lung tumours: local extent, size, and nodal involvement. Br J Cancer. 1971 Dec;25(4):669–679. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1971.82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Campobasso O., Musso M., Berrino F. Categorie istopatologiche di estensione locale dei tumori polmonari. Tumori. 1970 Jul-Aug;56(4):223–232. doi: 10.1177/030089167005600404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Campobasso O. The characteristics of peripheral lung tumours that suggest their bronchiolo-alveolar origin. Br J Cancer. 1968 Dec;22(4):655–662. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1968.77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. HUKILL P. B., STERN H. Adenocarcinoma of the lungs: histological factors affecting prognosis. A study of 38 patients with resection and 5-year follow-up. Cancer. 1962 May-Jun;15:504–514. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196205/06)15:3<504::aid-cncr2820150310>3.0.co;2-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jackman R. J., Good C. A., Clagett O. T., Woolner L. B. Survival rates in peripheral bronchogenic carcinomas up to four centimeters in diameter presenting as solitary pulmonary nodules. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1969 Jan;57(1):1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jones J. C., Kern W. H., Chapman N. D., Meyer B. W., Lindesmith G. G. Long-term survival after surgical resection for bronchogenic carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1967 Sep;54(3):383–393. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kern W. H., Jones J. C., Chapman N. D. Pathology of bronchogenic carcinoma in long-term survivors. Cancer. 1968 Apr;21(4):772–780. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(196804)21:4<772::aid-cncr2820210430>3.0.co;2-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kirsh M. M., Prior M., Gago O., Moores W. Y., Kahn D. R., Pellegrini R. V., Sloan H. The effect of histological cell type on the prognosis of patients with bronchogenic carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 1972 Apr;13(4):303–310. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)64858-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lennox S. C., Flavell G., Pollock D. J., Thompson V. C., Wilkins J. L. Results of resection for oat-cell carcinoma of the lung. Lancet. 1968 Nov 2;2(7575):925–927. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(68)91163-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mantel N. Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966 Mar;50(3):163–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mollo F., Canese M. G., Campobasso O. Human peripheral lung tumours: light and electron microscopic correlation. Br J Cancer. 1973 Feb;27(2):173–182. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1973.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sobin L. H. Multiplicity of lung tumour classifications. Recent Results Cancer Res. 1972;39:29–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Weiss W., Boucot K. R., Cooper D. A. The histopathology of bronchogenic carcinoma and its relation to growth rate, metastasis, and prognosis. Cancer. 1970 Nov;26(5):965–970. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197011)26:5<965::aid-cncr2820260502>3.0.co;2-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Weiss W. Peripheral measurable bronchogenic carcinoma. Growth rate and period of risk after therapy. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1971 Feb;103(2):198–208. doi: 10.1164/arrd.1971.103.2.198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES