Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1975 Jan;31(1):1–6. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1975.1

Failure to detect antibody against Gross virus in tetraparental AKR reversible CBA mouse chimaeras.

R D Barnes, M Tuffrey, J Holliday
PMCID: PMC2009353  PMID: 168912

Abstract

In spite of early acquisition upon the germ line, tolerance to the Gross (gs) virus is short-lived in the AKR. From about the age of 3 months anti-gs antibodies occur and these complex with the corresponding viral antigens. Such complexes are best seen in the glomeruli by means of immunofluorescence. In marked contrast to the AKR, renal complexes were minimal in a group of AKR reversible CBA/H-T6 chimaeras derived by early embryo aggregation. This was particularly surprising since large numbers of type C murine leukaemia virus-like particles were identified in the chimaeras and the tissues were found to be saturated with gs antigen. The lack of renal antigen-antibody complexes was the first suggestion that anti-gs antibody might not be present in the chimaeras and renal elution studies here support this assumption. In contrast to the AKR where "split " renal eluates have been shown to have anti-gs activity, no activity was demonstrated in eluates from any of the chimaras. Tolerance to the oncogenic Gross virus in the chimaeras has to be attributed to the CBA parental strain component and since this component is also held responsible for the tumour resistance of these chimaeras, both phenomena could well be related. In this context it would appear that in the absence of masking by antibody viral antigenic complexes, tumour specific sites can be recognized in the chimaeras and unlike the AKR "normal" tumour immunity can be effected. This hypothesis is currently bei-ng tested.

Full text

PDF
1

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ALFORD C. A., Jr, NEVA F. A., WELLER T. H. VIROLOGIC AND SEROLOGIC STUDIES ON HUMAN PRODUCTS OF CONCEPTION AFTER MATERNAL RUBELLA. N Engl J Med. 1964 Dec 17;271:1275–1281. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196412172712501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Acton R. T., Blankenhorn E. P., Douglas T. C., Owen R. D., Hilgers J., Hoffman H. A., Boyse E. A. Variations among sublines of inbred AKR mice. Nat New Biol. 1973 Sep 5;245(140):8–10. doi: 10.1038/newbio245008a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barnes R. D., Tuffrey M., Ford C. E. Suppression of lymphoma development in tetraparental AKR mouse chimaeras derived from ovum fusion. Nat New Biol. 1973 Aug 29;244(139):282–284. doi: 10.1038/newbio244282a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Barnes R. D., Tuffrey M., Kingman J. The delay of leukaemia in tetraparental ovum fusion-derived AKR chimaeras. Clin Exp Immunol. 1972 Dec;12(4):541–545. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barnes R. D., Tuffrey M., Kingman J., Thornton C., Turner M. W. The disease of the NZB mouse. I. Examination of ovum fusion derived tetraparental NZB:CFW chimaeras. Clin Exp Immunol. 1972 Aug;11(4):605–628. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barnes R. D., Tuffrey M. Lymphoma susceptibility of the AKR mouse strain acquired before the stage of implantation. Br J Cancer. 1974 May;29(5):400–402. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1974.87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bona C. A., Tuffrey M., Barnes R. D. Distribution of theta antigens in ovum fusion derived AKR--CBA-H-T6T6 tetraparental mouse chimaeras. Tissue Antigens. 1974;4(1):31–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.1974.tb00221.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. GROSS L. "Spontaneous" leukemia developing in C3H mice following inoculation in infancy, with AK-leukemic extracts, or AK-embrvos. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1951 Jan;76(1):27–32. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hirsch M. S., Allison A. C., Harvey J. J. Immune complexes in mice infected neonatally with Moloney leukaemogenic and murine sarcoma viruses. Nature. 1969 Aug 16;223(5207):739–740. doi: 10.1038/223739a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Markham R. V., Sutherland J. C., Cimino E. F., Drake W. P., Mardiney M. R. Immune complexes localized in the renal glomeruli of AKR mice: the presence of MuLV gs-I and C-type RNA tumor virus gs-3 determinants. Rev Eur Etud Clin Biol. 1972 Aug-Sep;17(7):690–694. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mintz B. Experimental Study of the Developing Mammalian Egg: Removal of the Zona Pellucida. Science. 1962 Nov 2;138(3540):594–595. doi: 10.1126/science.138.3540.594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Notkins A. L., Mage M., Ashe W. K., Mahar S. Neutralization of sensitized lactic dehydrogenase virus by anti-gammglobulin. J Immunol. 1968 Feb;100(2):314–320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Notkins A. L., Mahar S., Scheele C., Goffman J. Infectious virus-antibody complex in the blood of chronically infected mice. J Exp Med. 1966 Jul 1;124(1):81–97. doi: 10.1084/jem.124.1.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Oldstone M. B., Aoki T., Dixon F. J. The antibody response of mice to murine leukemia virus in spontaneous infection: absence of classical immunologic tolerance (AKR mice-complement-fixing antibodies-lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus-immunofluorescence-glomerular deposits of antigen-antibody complexes). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Jan;69(1):134–138. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.1.134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Oldstone M. B., Dixon F. J. Early events in allergic encephalomyelitis. Trans Am Neurol Assoc. 1968;93:257–259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Oldstone M. B., Dixon F. J. Lactic dehydrogenase virus-induced immune complex type of glomerulonephritis. J Immunol. 1971 May;106(5):1260–1263. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Oldstone M. B., Dixon F. J. Lymphocytic choriomeningitis: production of antibody by "tolerant" infected mice. Science. 1967 Dec 1;158(3805):1193–1195. doi: 10.1126/science.158.3805.1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Oroszlan S., Fisher C. L., Stanley T. B., Gilden R. V. Proteins of the murine C-type RNA tumour viruses: isolation of a group-specific antigen by isoelectric focusing. J Gen Virol. 1970 Jul;8(1):1–10. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-8-1-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. PHILLIPS C. A., MELNICK J. L., YOW M. D., BAYATPOUR M., BURKHARDT M. PERSISTENCE OF VIRUS IN INFANTS WITH CONGENITAL RUBELLA AND IN NORMAL INFANTS WITH A HISTORY OF MATERNAL RUBELLA. JAMA. 1965 Sep 20;193:1027–1029. doi: 10.1001/jama.1965.03090120035008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. PLOTKIN S. A., DUDGEON J. A., RAMSAY A. M. LABORATORY STUDIES ON RUBELLA AND THE RUBELLA SYNDROME. Br Med J. 1963 Nov 23;2(5368):1296–1299. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5368.1296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Porter D. D., Larsen A. E., Porter H. G. The pathogenesis of Aleutian disease of mink. I. In vivo viral replication and the host antibody response to viral antigen. J Exp Med. 1969 Sep 1;130(3):575–593. doi: 10.1084/jem.130.3.575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Porter D. D., Porter H. G. Deposition of immune complexes in the kidneys of mice infected with lactic dehydrogenase virus. J Immunol. 1971 May;106(5):1264–1266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. TARKOWSKI A. K. Mouse chimaeras developed from fused eggs. Nature. 1961 Jun 3;190:857–860. doi: 10.1038/190857a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tuffrey M., Barnes R. D., Evans E. P., Ford C. E. Dominance of AKR lymphocytes in tetraparental AKR and CBA-T6T6 chimaeras. Nat New Biol. 1973 Jun 13;243(128):207–208. doi: 10.1038/newbio243207a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. WELLER T. H., ALFORD C. A., Jr, NEVA F. A. RETROSPECTIVE DIAGNOSIS BY SEROLOGIC MEANS OF CONGENITALLY ACQUIRED RUBELLA INFECTIONS. N Engl J Med. 1964 May 14;270:1039–1041. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196405142702004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES