Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1978 Mar;37(3):411–417. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1978.61

Differences in Metabolism of Vinylidene Chloride Between Mice and Rats

B K Jones, D E Hathway
PMCID: PMC2009538  PMID: 638019

Abstract

The present finding that mice metabolize a greater proportion of an oral dose (50 mg/kg) of vinylidence chloride. (1,1 - dichloroethylene, DCE) than rats implies (a) that the efficiency of DCE metabolism follows the known activity of cytochrome P-450 in the organs of these animals, and (b) that, in accordance with the LD50 values, the real exposure (expressed as the amount of DCE metabolized) is relatively higher for orally dosed mice than rats, and (c) that DCE carcinogenicity would appear to be more likely in mice than rats.

Mice metabolize DCE simiarly to rats (Jones and Hathway, 1977) but there are some differences. Thus, qualitatively, treated mice (but not rats) excrete a small amount of N-acetyl-S-(2carboxymethyl)cysteine. Quantitatively, (i) the relative proportions of the N-acetyl-S-(2-cysteinyl acetyl derivative that are formed in mice and rats parallel the activity of liver glutathione-S-epoxide transferase in these rodents, and (ii) there are marked differences in the proportions of DCE metabolites belonging to the chloroacetic acid branch of the metabolic pathway. Furthermore, the previously assumed β-thionase hydrolysis of thiodiglycollic acid (Jones and Hathway, 1977) is now established in vivo, and the possible biogenesis of the N-acetyl-S-cysteinyl acetyl derivative is verified by another tracer study. The conclusion is drawn that the DCE metabolites, 1,1-dichloroethylene oxide and chloroacetyl chloride, may be important to murine DCE carcinogenicity.

Full text

PDF
411

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Clayson D. B. Editorial: Bladder carcinogenesis in rats and mice: possibility of artifacts. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1974 Jun;52(6):1685–1689. doi: 10.1093/jnci/52.6.1685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Haley T. J. Vinylidene chloride: a review of the literature. Clin Toxicol. 1975;8(6):633–643. doi: 10.3109/15563657508990088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hayakawa T., Lemahieu R. A., Udenfriend S. Studies on glutathione-S-arene oxidase transferase. A sensitive assay and partial purification of the enzyme from sheep liver. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1974 May;162(1):223–230. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(74)90122-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jaeger R. J., Trabulus M. J., Murphy S. D. Biochemical effects of 1,1-dichloroethylene in rats: dissociation of its hepatotoxicity from a lipoperoxidative mechanism. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1973 Mar;24(3):457–467. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(73)90052-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Litterst C. L., Mimnaugh E. G., Reagan R. L., Gram T. E. Comparison of in vitro drug metabolism by lung, liver, and kidney of several common laboratory species. Drug Metab Dispos. 1975 Jul-Aug;3(4):259–265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Maltoni C., Cotti G., Morisi L., Chieco P. Carcinogenicity bioassays of vinylidene chloride. Research plan and early results. Med Lav. 1977 Jul-Aug;68(4):241–262. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Prendergast J. A., Jones R. A., Jenkins L. J., Jr, Siegel J. Effects on experimental animals of long-term inhalation of trichloroethylene, carbon tetrachloride, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, dichlorodifluoromethane, and 1,1-dichloroethylene. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1967 Mar;10(2):270–289. doi: 10.1016/0041-008x(67)90110-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Thompson W. R. USE OF MOVING AVERAGES AND INTERPOLATION TO ESTIMATE MEDIAN-EFFECTIVE DOSE: I. Fundamental Formulas, Estimation of Error, and Relation to Other Methods. Bacteriol Rev. 1947 Jun;11(2):115–145. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Walker G. H., Hathway D. E. Electrochemical analysis of the carboxy-14C-labelled aliphatic carboxylic acid metabolites resulting from tracer studies. Biochem J. 1977 Nov 1;167(2):505–507. doi: 10.1042/bj1670505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES