Abstract
The detection of inactivating mutations in tumor suppressor genes is critical to their characterization, as well as to the development of diagnostic testing. Most approaches for mutational screening of germ-line specimens are complicated by the fact that mutations are heterozygous and that missense mutations are difficult to interpret in the absence of information about protein function. We describe a novel method using Saccharomyces cerevisiae for detecting protein-truncating mutations in any gene of interest. The PCR-amplified coding sequence is inserted by homologous recombination into a yeast URA3 fusion protein, and transformants are assayed for growth in the absence of uracil. The high efficiency of homologous recombination in yeast ensures that both alleles are represented among transformants and achieves separation of alleles, which facilitates subsequent nucleotide sequencing of the mutated transcript. The specificity of translational initiation of the URA3 gene leads to minimal enzymatic activity in transformants harboring an inserted stop codon, and hence to reliable distinction between specimens with wild-type alleles and those with a heterozygous truncating mutation. This yeast-based stop codon assay accurately detects heterozygous truncating mutations in the BRCA1 gene in patients with early onset of breast cancer and in the APC gene in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. This approach offers a rapid and reliable method for genetic diagnosis in individuals at high risk for germ-line mutations in cancer susceptibility genes.
The identification of novel germ-line mutations in tumor suppressor genes presents a major difficulty in their initial characterization, as well as in the adaptation of reliable and effective approaches to clinical diagnostics. The large size of many of these genes and the fact that germ-line mutations are heterozygous have complicated analysis based exclusively on nucleotide sequencing. We have previously described a functional assay to detect germ-line mutations in p53, a gene that is affected primarily by missense mutations and whose function as a transcriptional activator can be tested in yeast (1). While the functional properties of other cancer susceptibility genes are not well understood, many of these are disrupted primarily by truncating mutations. Virtually all mutations in the colon cancer gene APC (2–5) and 80% of mutations in the breast cancer predisposition gene BRCA1 (6) consist of nonsense or frameshift mutations, leading to the development of screening assays based on the in vitro production of truncated peptides, so-called PTT assays (7–11). These methods are reliable and effective, but require significant levels of technical expertise and interpretation of results. Here we describe a simple yeast-based method that makes use of homologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to separate alleles and involves the production of a marker fusion protein to test for truncating mutations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plasmid Construction.
The plasmid pCI-HA(URA3)-2 was constructed as follows: a fragment spanning nucleotides 423–1239 of the plasmid pRS316 (12) (GenBank U03442U03442), which contains URA3 coding sequence from codon 5 to the natural termination codon, was amplified by PCR using a set of primers containing a BamHI site or a BglII site at the 5′ end. The BamHI/BglII fragment was inserted in-frame into the BamHI site of the plasmid pRS-PGK (13) to produce pCI-HA(URA3). This vector was digested with NsiI and PstI and religated to produce pCI-HA(URA3)-2 (see Fig. 1a). Three fragments spanning nucleotides 96–908 (BRCA1a), nucleotides 789–4214 (BRCA1b), and nucleotides 4089–5708 (BRCA1c) of the BRCA1 cDNA (GenBank U14680U14680), were amplified and inserted in-frame into the BamHI site of the pCI-HA(URA3)-2 to produce pCI-BR1a, pCI-BR1b, and pCI-BR1c, respectively (see Fig. 1b). Four fragments spanning nucleotides 19–1977 (APCa), nucleotides 1978–5256 (APCb), nucleotides 1978–3570 (APCc), and nucleotides 3571–5256 (APCd) of the APC cDNA (GenBank M74088M74088) were amplified and inserted in-frame into the BamHI site of pCI-HA(URA3)-2 to produce pCI-APCa, pCI-APCb, pCI-APCc, and pCI-APCd, respectively (see Fig. 1b). All the vectors described above result in a uracil-independent (Ura+) phenotype, following introduction into YPH499 strain. The gap vectors, pCI-BR1ag, pCI-BR1bg, pCI-BR1cg, pCI-APCag, pCI-APCbg, and pCI-APCcg (see Fig. 1b) are identical to pCI-BR1a, pCI-BR1b, pCI-BR1c, pCI-APCa, pCI-APCb, and pCI-APCc, respectively, except that the central portions of the inserted fragments, BRCA1a, BRCA1b, BRCA1c, APCa, APCb, and APCc, between nucleotides 183–827, nucleotides 888–4111, nucleotides 4215–5609 (GenBank U14680U14680), nucleotides 109–1899, nucleotides 2054–5201, and nucleotides 2086–3489 (GenBank M74088M74088), were replaced by the unique restriction sites BglII, StuI/BamHI/SmaI, BglII, BglII, NsiI, and BglII, respectively. All the gap vectors except pCI-APCbg were produced by PCR using ExTaq (Takara Shuzo, Kyoto) and the original plasmids with full-length insertion as templates, followed by ligation using the unique restriction sites described above and transformation of Escherichia coli (DH5α). The pCI-APCbg was obtained by removing the central portion of APCb fragment of the pCI-APCb using two NsiI sites.
PCR.
For BRCA1 and APC analysis, genomic DNA and/or total cellular RNA was isolated from Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-immortalized cell lines or peripheral blood mononuclear cells. cDNA was synthesized by using a First-Strand cDNA synthesis kit (Pharmacia). BRCA1a–c and APCa (see Fig. 1b) were amplified from cDNA. BRCAb and APCb–d were amplified from genomic DNA. Primers for amplification of BRCA1 fragments were
5′-GAAAGTTCATTGGAACAGAAAGAA-3′ and
5′-ACCCTGATACTTTTCTGGATG-3′ for BRCA1a,
5′-CCCAGATCTGCTGCTTGTGAATTTTCTGAG-3′ and
5′-CCCAGATCTTAAGTTTGAATCCATGCTTTG-3′ for BRCA1b, and
5′-ATGAGGCATCAGTCTGAAAGC-3′ and
5′-GTAGTGGCTGTGGGGGATCT-3′ for BRCA1c.
Primers for amplification of APC fragments were
5′-ATGGCTGCAGCTTCATATGAT-3′ and
5′-CTGTGGTCCTCATTTGTAGC-3′ for APC1a,
5′-CAAATCCTAAGAGAGAACAAC-3′ and
5′-GTCCATTATCTTTTTCACACG-3′ for APCb,
5′-CAAATCCTAAGAGAGAACAA-3′ and
5′-GGCATATTTTAAACTATAATC-3′ for APCc, and
5′-ACAGATATTCCTTCATCACAG-3′ and
5′- GTCCATTATCTTTTTCACACG-3′ for APCd.
All PCR fragments were obtained by using ExTaq DNA polymerase (Takara Shuzo). The PCR parameters are available from the authors upon request.
Yeast Transformation.
The yeast strain used in this study was YPH499 (MATa, ura3–52, lys2–801amber, ade2–101ocher, trp1Δ63, his3Δ200, leu2Δ1) (Stratagene). Competent yeast cells were prepared by lithium acetate (LiOAc) treatment of the strain cultured in YPD liquid medium (1) and were stored at −80°C in the presence of 5% (vol/vol) dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) until use. Frozen competent yeast retain high transformation efficiency for at least 3 months. Gap repair assays were performed by cotransformation of unpurified PCR product (≈200 ng) and linearized gap vector (≈30 ng) by the LiOAc method (14) with minor modifications (1). To analyze the PCR fragments BRCA1a, BRCA1b, BRCA1c, APCa, APCb, APCc, and APCd, linearized gap vectors pCI-BR1ag (BglII digest), pCI-BR1bg (BamHI/SmaI digest), pCI-BR1cg (BglII digest), pCI-APCag (BglII digest), pCI-APCbg (NsiI digest), pCI-APCcg (BglII digest), and pCI-APCg (NdeI/NsiI digest) were used, respectively. Transformants were selected on synthetic complete medium lacking leucine (SC-Leu); 25 transformants were then assayed for the Ura+ phenotype by growth on synthetic complete medium lacking leucine and uracil (SC-Leu-Ura). If more than 85% of transformants are Ura+, the sample is scored as homozygous wild-type, whereas if all transformants are Ura−, the sample is scored as homozygous mutant. If 40–50% of colonies are Ura+, the sample is scored as heterozygous for a truncation mutant.
Sequencing.
Yeast DNA extraction from pooled Ura− transformants was described previously (15). Template APC fragments were amplified as described above and were sequenced using a CircumVent Thermal Cycle Dideoxy DNA Sequencing Kit (New England Biolabs). Appropriate APC-specific oligonucleotides were used as sequencing primers after end-labeling by [γ-33P]dATP.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Stop codon (SC) Assay.
The SC assay benefits from two advantages of yeast systems. First, the ability to synthesize fusion proteins with orotidine-5′-phosphate decarboxylase (OMPD) encoded by the URA3 gene and, second, the use of gap repair and homologous recombination to efficiently insert a PCR-generated sequence into this fusion construct and separate the products of different alleles. The outline of the assay is summarized in Fig. 1c. We constructed a centromeric yeast expression vector, pCI-HA(URA3)-2, with two selectable markers: LEU2 and URA3 (codons 5–267), which complement the genetic defects of the YPH499 strain, allowing growth in the absence of leucine and uracil. The URA3 gene is driven by the strong PGK promoter, tagged at the N terminus by hemagglutinin (HA) and interrupted by a BamHI site to allow introduction of exogenous DNA fragments. To test whether fusion of proteins to the N terminus of URA3 preserves the Ura+ phenotype, 15 different coding sequences of 0.8–3.4 kb in size, derived from 7 different genes, were inserted in-frame. All insertions demonstrated the Ura+ phenotype, confirming that this selectable marker is not disrupted by N-terminal fusion to a variety of protein domains (data not shown). The Ura+ phenotype was dependent on use of the correct upstream promoter and translational initiation codon, as demonstrated by its loss following placement of the URA3 fragment in the reverse orientation, by insertion of 4 bp into the BamHI site, or by insertion of exogenous DNA fragments containing an out-of-frame insertion or in the reverse orientation. Synthesis of the expected full-length URA3 fusion protein from Ura+ colonies was confirmed by immunoblotting analysis using anti-HA antibody. As predicted, insertion of out-of-frame sequences into pCI-HA(URA3)-2 led to the expression of HA-positive truncated fusion proteins in Ura− colonies (data not shown).
Screening for BRCA1 Mutations.
To test the SC assay in detecting truncating mutations in BRCA1, the coding sequence was divided into three overlapping fragments, which were amplified by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR and inserted in-frame into the BamHI site of the pCI-HA(URA3)-2 vector. The resulting constructs, pCI-BR1a, -b, and -c, showed preservation of the Ura+ phenotype following introduction into yeast. The plasmids were converted into the corresponding “gap vectors,” pCI-BR1ag, pCI-BR1bg, and pCI-BR1cg, by removing most of the BRCA1 insert, leaving 100 bp of flanking BRCA1 sequence to allow for homologous recombination (see Fig. 1b and Materials and Methods). The three corresponding BRCA1 fragments were then amplified by RT-PCR from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with known BRCA1 truncating mutations and controls. Cotransformation of unpurified PCR products and corresponding linearized gap vectors into yeast allowed homologous recombination and growth of leucine auxotrophs containing the recircularized plasmid. Twenty-five independent transformants were assayed for growth in the absence of uracil. Following gap repair with PCR products derived from control lymphocytes, 88–100% of transformants were Ura+, demonstrating efficient homologous recombination of the BRCA1 fragment and reconstitution of the URA3 fusion protein (Table 1). The small fraction of Ura− transformants is presumably due to infidelity of the ExTaq DNA polymerase and to recombination error, as described previously (1). In contrast, PCR products derived from the lymphocytes of patients with known heterozygous BRCA1 mutations (11) led to 44–64% Ura+ transformants. These included specimens from two patients (nos. 231 and 253) with a heterozygous 2-bp deletion at codon 23 (the so-called 185delAG mutation) (gap vector pCI-BR1ag), one patient (no. 99) with a 2-bp deletion at codon 327 (gap vector pCI-BR1bg), one patient (no. 364) with a nonsense mutation at codon 563 (gap vector pCI-BR1bg), and one patient (no. 250) with a 1-bp insertion at codon 1756 (the so-called 5382insC mutation) (gap vector pCI-BR1cg). Another 6 samples that only contained BRCA1 polymorphisms (11) scored as wild type (Table 1). The distribution of Ura+ and Ura− colonies derived from specimens with or without BRCA1 truncating mutations was reproducible and nonoverlapping (Fig. 2), demonstrating the reliability of this assay for diagnostic purposes.
Table 1.
Patient | BRCA1 fragment: Codons: PCR template: | SC assay, % Ura+ colonies
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1a 1–263 cDNA | 1b 224–1365
|
1c 1324–1863 cDNA | Mutation
|
||||
cDNA | gDNA | Sequence | Location | ||||
43 | 92 | ND | 88 | 92 | WT | ||
79 | 88 | 92 | ND | 92 | WT | ||
84 | 92 | 91 | 92 | 96 | WT | ||
99 | 96 | 44 | 48 | 88 | 2-bp deletion (frameshift) | Codon 327 (exon 11) | |
103 | 88 | ND | 88 | 96 | WT | ||
118 | 88 | 94 | 94 | 88 | WT | ||
231 | 44 | ND | 88 | 92 | 2-bp deletion (frameshift) | Codon 23 (exon 2) | |
250 | 96 | ND | 88 | 64 | C insertion (frameshift) | Codon 1756 (exon 20) | |
253 | 48 | ND | 88 | 100 | 2-bp deletion (frameshift) | Codon 23 (exon 2) | |
364 | 96 | ND | 44 | 92 | CGA to TGA (nonsense) | Codon 563 (exon 11) |
All patients are women with breast cancer before the age 30 and have been characterized for BRCA1 mutations previously (11). Location of BRCA1 fragment was indicated in Fig. 1b. A boldface number indicates existence of truncating mutation in examined DNA fragment by SC assay. gDNA, genomic DNA; ND, not determined; WT, wild-type in the entire coding sequence. The mutations detected in patients 231 and 253 are known as 185delAG. The mutation detected in patient 250 is known as 5382insC. These mutations are prevalent in the Ashkenazi Jewish population.
Screening for APC Mutations.
To test the ability of the SC assay to detect unknown mutations, we chose the familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) gene APC, which is inactivated exclusively (≈93%) by truncating mutations located within the N-terminal 60% of the coding sequence (16). This portion of the APC cDNA was divided into two fragments, APCa and APCb, which contains the so-called mutation cluster region (MCR) (17), was further divided into two overlapping fragments, APCc and APCd. As expected, in-frame insertion of these fragments into the BamHI site of pCI-HA(URA3)-2 preserved the Ura+ phenotype. We then analyzed 24 individuals derived from six unrelated families with FAP (Table 2). Analysis of the mutation cluster region for 6 patients (individuals I-1 from families B, D, E, and F; individual I-7 from family C; individual II-2 from family A) who were clinically diagnosed as affected, using gap vector pCI-APCbg, yielded yeast transformants, half of which retained the Ura+ phenotype (mean 49%, range 38–60%), consistent with the presence of a heterozygous truncating mutation (Table 2). To identify the precise location of each mutation, gap repair assays were performed using the internal gap vectors pCI-APCcg and pCI-APCd (NdeI/NsiI digest): individual II-2 from family A and individual I-1 from family B scored positive for mutations within fragment APCc, but not APCd, whereas the converse was true for individual I-7 from family C and individuals I-1 from families D-F. This analysis was extended to the remaining 18 members of these families, identifying 5 individuals as having heterozygous truncating mutations within the same fragment as the proband (Table 2). Six independent Ura− colonies were pooled and subjected to direct nucleotide sequencing. The separation of APC alleles resulting from the gap repair assay made it possible to specifically analyze the mutant allele, avoiding the difficulties inherent in sequencing heterozygous mutations. All specimens scored as positive by SC assay were found to have truncating APC mutations: a 4-bp deletion at codon 929 (3765del4) in family A, a 1-bp insertion at codon 938 (2831insT) in family B, a 2-bp deletion at codon 1249 (3765del2) in family C, a 5-bp deletion at codon 1309 (3945del5) in both families D and family E, and a 1-bp deletion at codon 1322 (3983delA) in family F (Table 2). Analysis of other members from each family demonstrated a complete concordance between the results of the SC assay and direct sequencing analysis (Table 2).
Table 2.
Family | Individual | APC fragment: Codons: PCR template: | SC assay, % Ura+ colonies
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
b 654–1748 gDNA | c 654–1184 gDNA | d 1185–1748 gDNA | Mutation
|
||||
Sequence | Location | ||||||
A | II-1 | 100 | 92 | ND | WT | ||
II-2 | 38 | 48 | 92 | 4-bp deletion (frameshift) | Codon 929–930 (Exon 15) | ||
II-3 | 56 | 48 | ND | 4-bp deletion (frameshift) | Codon 929–930 (Exon 15) | ||
B | I-1 | 50 | 44 | 100 | T insertion (frameshift) | Codon 938 (Exon 15) | |
II-1 | 96 | 92 | ND | WT | |||
II-2 | 88 | 100 | ND | WT | |||
C | I-1 | ND | ND | 100 | WT | ||
I-2 | ND | ND | 100 | WT | |||
I-3 | ND | ND | 96 | WT | |||
I-7 | 40 | 92 | 56 | 2-bp deletion (frameshift) | Codon 1249–1250 (Exon 15) | ||
I-8 | ND | ND | 92 | WT | |||
II-1 | ND | ND | 40 | 2-bp deletion (frameshift) | Codon 1249–1250 (Exon 15) | ||
II-2 | ND | ND | 48 | 2-bp deletion (frameshift) | Codon 1249–1250 (Exon 15) | ||
II-3 | ND | ND | 52 | 2-bp deletion (frameshift) | Codon 1249–1250 (Exon 15) | ||
D | I-1 | 60 | 92 | 56 | 5-bp deletion (frameshift) | Codon 1309–1311 (Exon 15) | |
II-1 | ND | ND | 92 | WT | |||
II-2 | ND | ND | 96 | WT | |||
II-3 | ND | ND | 88 | WT | |||
E | I-1 | 44 | 96 | 48 | 5-bp deletion (frameshift) | Codon 1309–1311 (Exon 15) | |
II-1 | ND | ND | 92 | WT | |||
II-2 | ND | ND | 48 | 5-bp deletion (frameshift) | Codon 1309–1311 (Exon 15) | ||
II-3 | ND | ND | 92 | WT | |||
F | I-1 | 57 | 92 | 48 | A deletion (frameshift) | Codon 1322 (Exon 15) | |
II-1 | ND | ND | 92 | WT |
All individuals in the six FAP families are Japanese. Location of APC fragment is indicated in Fig. 1b. A boldface number indicates existence of truncating mutation in examined DNA fragment by SC assay. gDNA, genomic DNA; ND, not determined; WT, wild-type in the examined coding sequence.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
The mutational analysis that we describe here is comparable in its efficacy to previously described protein truncation (PTT) techniques that involve PCR amplification of gene fragments, followed by in vitro transcription-translation and resolution of encoded peptides by SDS/PAGE. However, the yeast-based SC assay provides a number of important technical advantages compared with these in vitro gel-based assays. Among these are (i) the ability to analyze larger (≈3.5-kb) DNA fragments, which reduces the number of PCRs required to scan an entire gene for truncating mutations; (ii) the ability to detect mutations that arise adjacent to the PCR primers, which minimizes the overlap required between fragments; (iii) the separation of alleles, which greatly simplifies confirmation of heterozygous mutations by nucleotide sequencing; and (iv) avoidance of the requirement for radioisotopes and for protein gel-electrophoresis. From a technical standpoint, the SC assay requires few manipulations, and the time required to perform the assay (4 days) reflects that required to clearly visualize yeast colonies after sequential plating on leucine- and uracil-deficient plates. The use of a mutational screening test based on the detection of truncating mutations also has important advantages in the adaptation of such approaches to clinical diagnostics. Protein truncating mutations constitute the majority of inactivating mutations for a number of important cancer predisposition genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2, APC, mismatch repair genes, and potentially ATM. Furthermore, the difficulty in interpreting missense mutations precludes their use in most clinical diagnostics. The SC assay thus provides a rapid and reliable test that can be readily adapted to detect heterozygous truncating mutations in cancer predisposition genes and other genes implicated in human disease.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to our patients and their families for participating in this study and we thank all the physicians who provided clinical samples for analysis. We also acknowledge S. H. Friend and M. Vidal for helpful discussions early in this study and H. Shibata for useful comments on the manuscript.
ABBREVIATIONS
- HA
hemagglutinin
- FAP
familial adenomatous polyposis
- SC assay
stop codon assay
References
- 1.Ishioka C, Frebourg T, Yan Y-X, Vidal M, Friend S H, Schmidt S, Iggo R. Nat Genet. 1993;5:124–129. doi: 10.1038/ng1093-124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kinzler K W, Nilbert M C, Su L K, Vogelstein B, Bryan T M, et al. Science. 1991;253:661–665. doi: 10.1126/science.1651562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nishisho I, Nakamura Y, Miyoshi Y, Miki Y, Ando H, et al. Science. 1991;253:665–669. doi: 10.1126/science.1651563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Groden J, Thliveris A, Samowitz W, Carlson M, Gelbert L, et al. Cell. 1991;66:589–600. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90021-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Joslyn G, Carlson M, Thliveris A, Albertsen H, Gelbert L, et al. Cell. 1991;66:601–613. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(81)90022-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Miki Y, Swensen J, Shattuck-Eidens D, Futreal P A, Harshmann K, et al. Science. 1994;266:66–71. doi: 10.1126/science.7545954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Roest P A M, Roberts R G, Sugino S, van Ommen G J B, Den Dunnen J T. Hum Mol Genet. 1993;2:1719–1721. doi: 10.1093/hmg/2.10.1719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Powell S M, Peterson G, Krush A J, Booker S, Jen J, Giardiello F M, Hamilton S R, Vogelstein B, Kinzler K W. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1982–1987. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199312303292702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.van der Luijt R, Meera Khan P, Vasen H, van Leeuwen C, Tops C, Roest P, den Dunnen J, Fodde R. Genomics. 1994;20:1–4. doi: 10.1006/geno.1994.1119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hogervorst F B, Cornelis R S, Bout M, van Vliet M, Oosterwijk J C, Olmer R, Bakker B, Klijn J G, Vasen H F, Meijers-Heijboer H, Menko F H, Cornelisse C J, den Dunnen J T, Devilee P, van Ommen G-J B. Nat Genet. 1995;10:208–212. doi: 10.1038/ng0695-208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.FitzGerald M G, MacDonald D J, Krainer M, Hoover I, O’Neil E, Unsal H, Silva A S, Finkelstein D M, Beer R P, Englert C, Sgroi D C, Smith B L, Younger J W, Garber J E, Duda R B, Mayzel K A, Isselbacher K J, Friend S H, Haber D A. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:143–149. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199601183340302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sikorski R S, Hieter P A. Genetics. 1989;122:19–27. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.1.19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ishioka C, Ballester R, Engelstein M, Vidal M, Kassel J, The I, Bernards A, Gusella J F, Friend S H. Oncogene. 1995;10:841–847. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ito H, Fukuda K, Nurata K, Kimura A. J Bacteriol. 1983;153:163–168. doi: 10.1128/jb.153.1.163-168.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ishioka C, Englert C, Winge P, Yan Y-X, Engelstein M, Friend S H. Oncogene. 1995;10:1485–1492. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nakamura Y. In: New Strategies for Treatment of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer. Baba S, editor. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1996. pp. 93–98. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Miyoshi Y, Ando H, Nagase H, Nishisho I, Horii A, Miki Y, Mori T, Utsunomiya J, Baba S, Petersen G, Hamilton S R, Kinzler K W, Vogelstein B, Nakamura Y. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:4452–4456. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.10.4452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]