Skip to main content
British Journal of Cancer logoLink to British Journal of Cancer
. 1983 Feb;47(2):215–219. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1983.29

High dose cyclophosphamide treatment of human oat cell xenografts in immune deprived mice.

B D Evans, I E Smith, J L Millar
PMCID: PMC2011284  PMID: 6297529

Abstract

Immunodeprived mice survived a high, otherwise lethal dose of cyclophosphamide (Cy) provided they had been "primed" with a low dose (50 mg kg-1) of the drug 4 days earlier. These combinations were then tested on 2 oat cell xenograft lines (which are known to reproduce the chemotherapeutic responses of the parent tumours) grown in immunodeprived mice. In the treatment of the first oat cell xenograft, 200 mg kg-1 Cy produced a growth delay of 34 days in the unprimed group and 45 days in the primed group. At a dose of 300 mg kg-1 a growth delay could not be assessed in the control group as 16/17 of these unprimed mice bearing this xenograft died. However, 14/22 tumours went into complete remission in this group before death occurred. In contrast only 3/16 deaths occurred in the group of mice that were primed before receiving the same challenge dose. In these animals 19/26 tumours went into complete remission and were still completely absent when the experiment was terminated at 60 days. Using the second oat cell xenograft, 300 mg kg-1 Cy produced a growth delay of 27 days. However, at this dose level all the animals were dead by day 46. In mice which had been primed with 50 mg kg-1 Cy 4 days before the administration of 300 mg kg-1 a growth delay of 32 days was achieved and 2/9 animals were alive at day 60. This study shows that priming allows larger doses of Cy to be given to immunodeprived mice bearing human tumour xenografts than would normally be tolerated and that the priming does not alter the anti-tumour efficacy of the large challenge dose as measured by tumour growth delay or complete remission rate. As the tumours were human in origin it raises the question whether high dose cyclophosphamide therapy and priming have a role to play in the treatment of patients with oat cell carcinoma.

Full text

PDF
215

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Evans B. D., Smith I. E., Shorthouse A. J., Millar J. L. A comparison of the response of human lung carcinoma xenografts to vindesine and vincristine. Br J Cancer. 1982 Mar;45(3):466–468. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1982.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Millar J. L., Blackett N. M., Hudspith B. N. Enhanced post-irradiation recovery of the haemopoietic system in animals pretreated with a variety of cytotoxic agents. Cell Tissue Kinet. 1978 Sep;11(5):543–553. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.1978.tb00826.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Millar J. L., Clutterbuck R. D., Smith I. E. Improving the therapeutic index of two alkylating agents. Br J Cancer. 1980 Sep;42(3):485–487. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1980.263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Millar J. L., Hudspith B. N., McElwain T. J., Phelps T. A. Effect of high-dose melphalan on marrow and intestinal epithelium in mice pretreated with cyclophosphamide. Br J Cancer. 1978 Jul;38(1):137–142. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1978.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Millar J. L., McElwain T. J. Combinations of cytotoxic agents that have less than expected toxicity on normal tissues in mice. Antibiot Chemother (1971) 1978;23:271–282. doi: 10.1159/000401490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Millar J. L., Stephens T. C., Wist E. A. An explanation for the ability of cytotoxic drug pretreatment to reduce bone marrow related lethality of total body irradiation (TBI). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1982 Mar-Apr;8(3-4):581–583. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(82)90688-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Shorthouse A. J., Smyth J. F., Steel G. G., Ellison M., Mills J., Peckham M. J. The human tumour xenograft--a valid model in experimental chemotherapy? Br J Surg. 1980 Oct;67(10):715–722. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800671011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Steel G. G., Courtenay V. D., Rostom A. Y. Improved immune-suppression techniques for the exongrafting of human tumours. Br J Cancer. 1978 Feb;37(2):224–230. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1978.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wist E., Millar J. L., Shorthouse A. J. Melphalan uptake in relation to vascular and extracellular space of human lung-tumour xenografts. Br J Cancer. 1981 Apr;43(4):458–463. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1981.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British Journal of Cancer are provided here courtesy of Cancer Research UK

RESOURCES