Skip to main content
British Journal of Experimental Pathology logoLink to British Journal of Experimental Pathology
. 1987 Apr;68(2):133–143.

Dose-response relationships in chemical carcinogenesis: renal mesenchymal tumours induced in the rat by single dose dimethylnitrosamine.

H E Driver, I N White, W H Butler
PMCID: PMC2013020  PMID: 3580278

Abstract

A single intraperitoneal dose of dimethylnitrosamine (DMN) given to weanling rats after 3 days' treatment with a protein-free diet results in the induction of renal mesenchymal tumours, the incidence of which is related to the dose of DMN in a sigmoid dose-response curve. The number of tumours per kidney is small, most animals given 40 mg/kg DMN (the TD100) having either one or two tumours in each kidney. However, within a few days of dosing a large number of small proliferative foci of mesenchymal cells, which resemble the tumours, appears in the renal cortex. The number of these foci is linearly related to the dose of DMN. By 12 weeks, the majority of these foci have disappeared, leaving an essentially normal kidney with only one or two developing tumours. The initial amount of methylation of guanine at the O6 and 7 positions in the kidney DNA measured 18 h after dosing is also linearly related to the dose of DMN. Thus, the formation of the early lesions is directly proportional to the amount of DNA alkylation, but the eventual tumour incidence is not. It is suggested that the mechanisms which operate to remove the majority of the early proliferative foci determine the shape of the dose-response curve for the tumours, which is independent of the initial alkylation levels.

Full text

PDF
133

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bannasch P., Benner U., Enzmann H., Hacker H. J. Tigroid cell foci and neoplastic nodules in the liver of rats treated with a single dose of aflatoxin B1. Carcinogenesis. 1985 Nov;6(11):1641–1648. doi: 10.1093/carcin/6.11.1641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Driver H. E., McLean A. E. Dose-response relationships for initiation of rat liver tumours by diethylnitrosamine and promotion by phenobarbitone or alcohol. Food Chem Toxicol. 1986 Mar;24(3):241–245. doi: 10.1016/0278-6915(86)90235-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hard G. C. Effect of age at treatment on incidence and type of renal neoplasm induced in the rat by a single dose of dimethylnitrosamine. Cancer Res. 1979 Dec;39(12):4965–4970. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Peraino C., Carnes B. A., Stevens F. J. Evidence for growth heterogeneity among foci with different phenotypes in the population of altered hepatocyte foci induced by a single neonatal treatment with carcinogen. Carcinogenesis. 1986 Feb;7(2):191–192. doi: 10.1093/carcin/7.2.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Swann P. F., Kaufman D. G., Magee P. N., Mace R. Induction of kidney tumours by a single dose of dimethylnitrosamine: dose response and influence of diet and benzo(a)pyrene pretreatment. Br J Cancer. 1980 Feb;41(2):285–294. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1980.41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Swann P. F., Magee P. N. Nitrosamine-induced carcinogenesis. The alklylation of nucleic acids of the rat by N-methyl-N-nitrosourea, dimethylnitrosamine, dimethyl sulphate and methyl methanesulphonate. Biochem J. 1968 Nov;110(1):39–47. doi: 10.1042/bj1100039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from British journal of experimental pathology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES