Abstract
Two new methods for coliphage detection, a colorimetric agar-based (CAB) method and a liquid colorimetric presence-absence (LCPA) method, were compared to the coliphage method proposed by the American Public Health Association (APHA; Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th ed., American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C., 1992). Both new methods are based on the induction of β-galactosidase in Escherichia coli and the release of the enzyme through a lytic cell infection. The released enzyme then cleaves a chromogenic substrate which produces a colored reaction product. Ninety split water samples from four different sources were tested. A total of 52 samples were positive by the CAB method, 52 were positive by the LCPA method, and 53 were positive by the APHA method. Results indicated that (i) the CAB and LCPA methods were as sensitive in coliphage detection as the APHA method, (ii) both the CAB and LCPA methods were easier to read and interpret than the APHA method, and (iii) the CAB method detected more coliphages in a positive sample than the APHA method in two of the four types of water sources. Importantly, the rapid and simple LCPA method was as reliable and sensitive as either of the two agar-based methods in coliphage detection.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Edberg S. C., Allen M. J., Smith D. B. National field evaluation of a defined substrate method for the simultaneous detection of total coliforms and Escherichia coli from drinking water: comparison with presence-absence techniques. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Apr;55(4):1003–1008. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.4.1003-1008.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grabow W. O., Coubrough P. Practical direct plaque assay for coliphages in 100-ml samples of drinking water. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1986 Sep;52(3):430–433. doi: 10.1128/aem.52.3.430-433.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Havelaar A. H., Hogeboom W. M. Factors affecting the enumeration of coliphages in sewage and sewage-polluted waters. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1983 Nov;49(4-5):387–397. doi: 10.1007/BF00399318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ijzerman M. M., Falkinham J. O., 3rd, Hagedorn C. A liquid, colorimetric presence-absence coliphage detection method. J Virol Methods. 1993 Dec 15;45(2):229–233. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(93)90106-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ijzerman M. M., Hagedorn C. Improved method for coliphage detection based on beta-galactosidase induction. J Virol Methods. 1992 Oct;40(1):31–36. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(92)90004-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Isbister J. D., Simmons J. A., Scott W. M., Kitchens J. F. A simplified method for coliphage detection in natural waters. Acta Microbiol Pol. 1983;32(2):197–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kennedy J. E., Jr, Bitton G., Oblinger J. L. Comparison of selective media for assay of coliphages in sewage effluent and lake water. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Jan;49(1):33–36. doi: 10.1128/aem.49.1.33-36.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kott Y. Estimation of low numbers of Escherichia coli bacteriophage by use of the most probable number method. Appl Microbiol. 1966 Mar;14(2):141–144. doi: 10.1128/am.14.2.141-144.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lewis C. M., Mak J. L. Comparison of membrane filtration and Autoanalysis Colilert presence-absence techniques for analysis of total coliforms and Escherichia coli in drinking water samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Dec;55(12):3091–3094. doi: 10.1128/aem.55.12.3091-3094.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Purdy R. N., Dancer B. N., Day M. J., Stickler D. J. A note on a membrane filtration method for the concentration and enumeration of bacteriophages from water. J Appl Bacteriol. 1985 Feb;58(2):231–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1985.tb01452.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]