Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2007 Oct 11.
Published in final edited form as: Protein Expr Purif. 2006 Sep 6;52(1):123–130. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2006.08.013

Increased Yield of High Purity Recombinant Human Interferon-γ Utilizing Reversed Phase Column Chromatography

Praveen K Reddy a, Srinivasa G Reddy a, Venkata R Narala a, Sangita S Majee b, Sudhakar Konda b, Sripad Gunwar b, Raju C Reddy a,*
PMCID: PMC2015061  NIHMSID: NIHMS18765  PMID: 17049266

Abstract

Increasing therapeutic applications for recombinant human interferon-γ (rhIFN-γ), an antiviral proinflammatory cytokine, has broadened interest in optimizing methods for its production and purification. We describe a reversed phase chromatography (RPC) procedure using Source-30 matrix in the purification of rhIFN-γ from Escherichia coli that results in a higher yield than previously reported. The purified rhIFN-γ monomer from the RPC column is refolded in Tris buffer. Optimal refolding occurs at protein concentrations between 50–100 μg/ml. This method yields greater than 90% of the dimer form with a yield of 40 mg g−1 cell mass. Greater than 99% purity is achieved with further purification over a Superdex G-75 column to obtain specific activities of from 2 to 4 × 107 IU/mg protein as determined via cytopathic antiviral assay. The improved yield of rhIFN-γ in a simple chromatographic purification procedure promises to enhance the development and therapeutic application of this biologically potent molecule.

Keywords: recombinant human interferon-gamma, protein expression, reversed phase chromatography, protein purification, antiviral assay

Introduction

A member of the antiviral interferons, interferon-γ (IFN-γ) is a proinflammatory immunomodulatory cytokine involved in a broad range of biological activities [15]. As a result of its numerous functions, recombinant human IFN-γ (rhIFN-γ) is finding increasing therapeutic applications. In the treatment of chronic granulomatous disease [69], and in severe malignant osteopetrosis [10,11], rhIFN-γ has clinically accepted beneficial effectiveness. Additionally, in the almost uniformly fatal progressive fibrosing lung disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a recent metaanalysis has concluded that rhIFN-γ treatment is associated with reduced mortality [12]. Interest is also being expressed in the use of rhIFN-γ in the treatment of drug resistant tuberculosis [13], atopic dermatitis [14], and hepatitis B infections [15]. In the food and animal industries, IFN-γ is effective against a variety of economically important animal viral diseases [16,17]. Hence, the commercial interests in efficiently optimizing the production yields and specific activities of IFN-γ preparations are tremendous [1822].

Most commonly, rhIFN-γ is prepared via cloning and gene expression in Escherichia coli(E. coli). The peptide accumulates in inactive aggregates, inclusion bodies (IB), that must be isolated and then solubilized [23]. Structurally, rhIFN-γ monomers have highly hydrophobic domains and contain no disulfide bonds. To achieve an active configuration, these monomers must be refolded [24,25] and dimerized [26]. Complex aggregate formation and misfolding is to be avoided in the isolation and purification procedures. Solubilized rhIFN-γ has been purified using a variety of chromatographic and affinity techniques, including size exclusion gel-filtration [25], CM-Sepharose [27], MonoS [28], S-Sepharose [29], and cation exchange [30] chromatography, sometimes incorporating monoclonal antibodies [31], and affinity tags [32].

Typically, purified rhIFN-γ is refolded in vitro with or without arginine as an aggregation suppressor [29,33,34]. While original techniques used solution phase refolding procedures, more recent attempts have utilized hydrophobic chromatographic column matrices as templates or stabilizing surfaces for the refolding process in order to help avoid inactive aggregate formation seen in the solution phase [3537]. The problem of aggregate clogging of chromatographic columns can be reduced or eliminated through the use of expanded bed adsorption chromatography [24]. Molecular chaperones that play an essential role in the correct folding of proteins in vivo have been explored for in vitro refolding of rhIFN-γ [3840]. Attempts to enhance rhIFN-γ stability and specific activity are being made through the exploration of potential mutant analogues [41]. Purified product yields from all procedures range from 0.3–14 mg g−1 cell mass with specific activities of 107–108 IU/mg.

We present a technique whereby rhIFN-γ solubilized from genetically engineered E. coli inclusion bodies is chromatographically purified utilizing rigid, monosized, polystyrene/divinyl benzene reversed phase chromatography columns in a process that enhances the yield after refolding nearly 3-fold to 40 mg g−1 cell mass while retaining specific activities of from 2 × 107 to 4 × 107 IU/mg protein. Additionally, the DNA and endotoxin content per mg of protein is considerably less than that allowed for therapeutic purposes.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Plasmid (pET21a) and E. coli host cells (Rosetta) were obtained from Novagen (Darmstadt, Germany). Source-30 reversed phase chromatography matrix and Superdex-75 gel filtration columns were purchased from Amersham Biosciences (Buckinghamshire, England). Ultrafiltration membrane cassettes were purchased from Sartorious (Goettingen, Germany). The BioLogic DuoFlow chromatography system used for column purification was purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Hercules, CA, U.S.A.). HEP2C cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, Virginia, U.S.A.), and the encephylomyocarditis virus (EMCV) was from the National Institute of Virology (Pune, India). rhIFN-γ standard was procured from Chemicon International (Temecula, CA, U.S.A.).

cDNA Synthesis, Cloning and Expression of rhIFN-γ

Normal human peripheral blood was centrifuged over Ficoll-Hypaque gradients to isolate T-lymphocytes. T-lymphocytes were then incubated at a density of 106 cells/ml in serum-free RPMI 1640 medium containing phytohemagglutinin at 5 μg/ml for 24 h at 37° C in a humidified CO2 atmosphere. Cells were centrifuged, resuspended in lysis buffer [5 M guanidine thiocyanate, 50 mM Tris pH 7.6, 8% (vol/vol) 2-mercaptoethanol], and disrupted for 1 min with a Polytron tissue homogenizer. RNA was isolated, and poly(A) mRNA was prepared by oligo(dT) chromatography as described [42].

IFN-γ cDNA was synthesized from mRNA using the following gene specific primers:

  • forward primer: 5′-ATGCAGGACCCATACGTAAAAGAAGCA-3′

  • reverse primer: 5′-TCGACCTCGAAACAGCATCTGAC-3′.

The PCR amplified human IFN-γ gene was cloned into pET21a as an NdeI and EcoRI fragment. The internal NdeI restriction site was altered while doing PCR amplification using specific primers:

  • forward primer: 5′-GGCCATATGCAGGACCCATACGTAAAAGAAGCA-3′

  • reverse primer: 5′-GGCGAATTCTCATCGACCTCGAAACAGCATCTGAC-3′.

E. coli strain Rosetta(DE3)pLysS was transformed with recombinant plasmid containing the hIFN-γ gene. The expression of the hIFN-γ gene was driven by a Lac promoter, which can be regulated by inducing the culture with isopropyl β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) thereby allowing high level of expression of the hIFN-γ gene.

Cell Growth and Harvesting

Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (300 ml containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin) was inoculated with 500 μl of glycerol stock of E. coli host cells and cultured overnight at 37° C, 200 rpm.

The overnight culture was inoculated into 3 L of LB with 100 μg/ml ampicillin and distributed aseptically into 1 L flasks (300 ml per flask). The cells were cultured at 37° C at 200 rpm. The culture was then induced after reaching an optical density of 0.6 at 600 nm by the addition of IPTG to a final concentration of 0.5 mM and cultured at 37° C, 200 rpm for 4 h.

The culture was centrifuged at 6,600g for 10 min, the supernatant carefully removed, and the cell pellet washed by gently suspending in Buffer A (100 mM Tris pH 8.0, 10 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl). The washed cell mass (5.8 g) was collected by centrifuging at 14,900g, 4° C for 15 min and stored at −20° C.

Cell Lysis and Inclusion Bodies Purification

The cell pellet was suspended in 58 ml of Buffer A in a beaker maintained on ice. The cells were disrupted with a sonicator programmed for 5 cycles of 5 min on and 5 min off. The sonicate was then centrifuged at 14,900g at 4° C for 15 min. The supernatant was discarded. The crude inclusion body pellet was suspended in Buffer A containing 4 M urea and incubated while being magnetically stirred for 45 min at 4° C. The sample was then centrifuged as before and the supernatant discarded.

The pellet was suspended in Buffer B (100 mM Tris pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 1 M NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100) and centrifuged at 14,900g at 4° C for 15 min. The pellet was washed with Buffer A and suspended in Buffer C (10 mM Tris pH 8.0, 0.25 M Sucrose, 1 mM EDTA). The sample was centrifuged at 3,700g, 4° C for 15 min.

The pellet was then washed with Buffer A and the inclusion bodies pellet was collected by centrifugation at 14,900g for 30 min. The inclusion bodies pellet (2.8 g) was stored at −70° C.

Solubilization of Inclusion Bodies

The inclusion bodies pellet was suspended in 28 ml of solubilization buffer (6 M guanidine hydrochloride, 100 mM Tris pH 8.0, 0.2 mM EDTA) and dissolved by stirring overnight at 4° C with a magnetic bar. The solution was centrifuged at 14,900g at 4° C for 30 min. The supernatant was then collected and stored at 4° C.

Reversed Phase Chromatography

The solubilized sample was loaded onto a column (1.2 cm × 10 cm) packed with Source-30 RPC matrix equilibrated with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in water. The column was then washed with 0.1% TFA and the protein was eluted with a linear gradient of acetonitrile. The eluted fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Pure fractions were pooled for renaturation.

Renaturation

The pooled fractions (50 ml) from the column were renatured by dilution in refolding buffer (1100 ml; 100 mM Tris pH 7.2, 0.2 mM EDTA). The protein concentration (2.3 mg/ml) of the pooled fraction was determined by the Bradford method and diluted for optimal refolding. This buffer was stirred while diluting the protein pool and the solution was incubated for 24–36 h at 4° C for refolding.

After refolding the solution was concentrated by ultrafiltration to a protein concentration of approximately 2–5 mg/ml.

Gel Filtration Chromatography

The concentrated rhIFN-γ was purified on a Superdex-75 column equilibrated with PBS buffer. Ovalbumin (43 kDa), chymotrypsinogen (25 kDa) and ribonuclease (13.7 kDa) were also loaded onto the column as calibration standards. The profile of rhIFN-γ was then compared with the standards for molecular weight confirmation and determination of dimer formation.

Dialysis

The refolded protein was dialyzed against 50 mM sodium acetate at pH 5.0. The dialysis was carried out at 4° C with frequent buffer changes. The dialyzed sample was then stored at 4° C.

SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting

Electrophoresis of the expression samples, purified protein and the crosslinked rhIFN-γ was carried out on SDS-PAGE gels, stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) G-250. For western blots, after electrophoresis the samples and molecular weight standards were electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (0.2 μm pore size) from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, U.S.A.). After transfer the PVDF membrane was incubated in blocking buffer (Pierce, Rockford, IL, U.S.A.) for 30 min at room temperature. The transferred rhIFN-γ were probed with a mouse monoclonal anti-INF-γ antibody (#ab9801; Abcam, Cambridge, U.K.) for 16 h at 4° C followed by incubation with specific secondary antibodies in blocking buffer for 1 h at room temperature. Three washes with a buffer containing 10 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl and 0.1% Tween 20 were then performed. SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce, Rockford, IL, U.S.A.) was used for detection and results were recorded using chemiluminescent-sensitive Kodak X-OMAT AR film (Kodak, Rochester, NY, U.S.A.).

Cross-linking Analysis

Interchain cross-linking of rhIFN-γ was performed using disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS) (Pierce, Rockford, IL, U.S.A). For reaction, 40 μl of rhIFN-γ (0.6 mg/ml in PBS) and 10 μl DSS (20 mM in DMSO) were mixed and incubated for 5 min at room temperature. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 25 μl 0.5 M Tris pH 8.7.

Antiviral Assay

An antiviral assay of rhIFN-γ activity was performed as previously described by Lewis [43] by challenging the human lung carcinoma cell line (HEP2C) with EMCV in the presence and absence of rhIFN-γ. 20,000 cells in 100 μl were seeded in each well of 96 well microtiter plates along with various concentrations of rhIFN-γ or the reference standard. Cells were seeded in DMEM containing 10% FBS and incubated for 24 h. 100 μl of 103 diluted virus was then added to all but the control wells. The plate was then developed by tapping off the media and adding amido black. Colorimetric analysis was performed at 450 nm after adding 0.38% NaOH. The antiviral activity was calculated in comparison with the standard. Absorbance values were calculated for each well and plotted against the concentration of rhIFN-γ using a semi-log plot. The standard and sample curves were fitted using nonlinear sigmoidal (4 parameter) regression (SigmaPlot software, Systat Software Inc., Point Richmond, CA, U.S.A.). The concentration yielding a 50% increase in absorbance between baseline and maximum plateau absorbance values (marking a 50% reduction in cytopathic effect) defined the assay endpoint. The potency of the experimental sample was calculated by comparing the endpoint concentration of the rhIFN-γ preparation against that of the standard.

Results and Discussion

Cloning and Expression

The first reported recombinant interferon-γ [44] consisted of 146 amino acids with the N-terminal portion of the molecule commencing with the sequence Cys-Tyr-Cys. Later, however, it was shown that the native human interferon-γ lacks the Cys-Tyr-Cys sequence at the N-terminal. Our cloned rhIFN-γ protein is identical with the native IFN-γ except for having an N-terminal methionine residue (an artifact encoded by the mRNA translational “start” signal AUG for E. coli expression, which is not removed by this bacterial host system) (Fig. 1A). The rhIFN-γ expressed in transformed and induced E. coli cells demonstrated to be ~55% of the total cell proteins and was harvested as inclusion bodies (Fig. 1B). These inclusion bodies were then purified and renatured to yield biologically active rhIFN-γ.

Fig. 1. Expression of rhIFN-γ.

Fig. 1

(A) The E. coli expression vector. The IFN-γ gene was spliced into pET21a as an NdeI and EcoRI fragment. Expression was driven by the Lac promoter regulated with IPTG. (B) SDS-PAGE of the expressed gene product. Lane 1: uninduced; lanes 2–5: induced samples after 1, 2, 3 and 4 h, respectively. IB denotes inclusion bodies prepared as described in Materials and Methods.

IB Purification

The crude IB preparation was washed with chaotropic agent (urea) and detergent (Triton X-100) to remove E. coli proteins and other soluble components. The procedure also removes significant amounts of endotoxins (to less than 5 EU/mg protein) and DNA from the host cells (to less than 100 pg/mg of protein). The IB preparation was then washed with sucrose and centrifuged at low speed to remove low-density protein contaminants. This final IB isolate was 80% pure.

Reversed Phase Chromatography

Solubilized IB of rhIFN-γ was loaded onto a Source-30 column and eluted with a linear gradient of acetonitrile. The elution profile showed three peaks (Fig. 2). The first peak contained contaminants (lane 1 of Fig. 2 inset). The major peak was collected in fractions. The fractions were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE (lanes 2 to 6, inset of Fig. 2). These fractions proved to be uncontaminated and were pooled for renaturation of the protein.

Fig. 2. Reversed phase HPLC purification of the rhIFN-γ monomer.

Fig. 2

The solubilized inclusion body was fractionated on a Source-30 column (1.2 cm × 10 cm) equilibrated with 0.1% TFA and eluted with a linear gradient of acetonitrile. The pure monomer peak (fractions of peak 2), which eluted at 43–48% acetonitrile, free from other E. coli proteins (peaks 1 and 3), was pooled and subsequently refolded. The figure inset shows the SDS-PAGE of peak fractions. Lane 1: peak 1; lane 2–6: various fractions of peak 2.

Renaturation and Gel Filtration

The pure fractions from the Source-30 RPC column were renatured by dilution and incubated in refolding buffer. Optimal refolding occurred at a final protein concentration between 50–100 μg/ml. Concentrations above 100 μg/ml resulted in excessive protein aggregation, whereas below 50 μg/ml, suboptimal dimer formation was observed (data not shown). The refolded protein was concentrated and then dialyzed several times to remove traces of acetonitrile.

The refolded rhIFN-γ was then purified on Superdex-75 to yield greater than 90% of the dimer form (in some batches even 95%). Properly assembled dimers were assessed against ovalbumin, chymotrypsinogen and ribonuclease standards using gel filtration chromatography on a Superdex-75 fast protein liquid chromatography column. The rhIFN-γ eluted between ovalbumin (43 kDa) and chymotrypsinogen (25 kDa) indicating that it was a dimer of ~38 kDa (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Confirmation of dimerization of rhIFN-γ on Superdex-75.

Fig. 3

The refolded fraction of the RP column was concentrated to 2–5 mg/ml and purified on a FPLC Superdex-75 column. Peaks 1, 3 and 4 represent the standards: ovalbumin (43 kDa), chymotrypsinogen (25 kDa) and ribonuclease A (13.7 kDa), respectively. Peak 2 is the pure rhIFN-γ dimer with an apparent mass of approximately 38 kDa.

The eluted dimer peak was collected and then both rechromatographed on a Superdex-75 column (Fig. 4) and assessed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 5) to analyze purity followed by western blotting to determine immunoreactivity (Fig. 6). The host cell protein and DNA content were measured in the concentrated sample and were found to be absent. The protein yield obtained in the present method was ~40 mg of purified rhIFN-γ per gram of cell mass (Table 1). Purified product yields from the published procedures previously discussed ranged from 0.3–14 mg per gram cell mass. Interestingly, one study [20] reported a batch process yield of 100 mg per gram of dry cell mass. Since E. coli is from 70–80% water, this still converts to a value less than what we obtained per gram of wet cell mass (although an exact conversion cannot be calculated). Therefore, our yields represent a significant improvement over previously published reports.

Fig. 4. Pure rhIFN-γ dimer on Superdex-75.

Fig. 4

Final highly purified rhIFN-γ showing a single peak of the dimer form on Superdex-75.

Fig. 5. SDS-PAGE analysis of monomeric and cross-linked rhIFN-γ.

Fig. 5

Purified monomeric rhINF-γ was cross-linked with DSS. The dimeric form of the rhINF-γ was then visualized on a 4–20% SDS-PAGE gel. Lane 1: monomeric form of rhINF-γ; lane 2–3: different concentrations of cross-linked protein. M, molecular weight marker.

Fig. 6. Western blot analysis of purified and cross-linked rhINF-γ.

Fig. 6

Lane 1: Purified rhINF-γ migrating at ~18 kDa as a monomer; lane 2: cross-linked rhINF-γ migrating at ~33 kDa as a dimer. Western blots were developed using a mouse monoclonal anti-INF-γ antibody.

Table 1.

Yields and purities achieved at each purification step

Step Number Purification Step Total protein (mg) IFN-γ (mg) Step yield (%) Purity (%)
1 Whole Cells* 1740 957 100 55
2 Cell Lysis 1040 728 60 70
3 Purified Inclusion Bodies 850 680 82 80
4 IB Solubilization 657 558 77 85
5 Source-30 Chromatography** 115 109 70 95
6 Refolding 76 72 66 95
7 Superdex-75 Chromatography 58 58 76 99.99
*

Initial wet cell mass: 5.8 gm

**

One fourth of solubilized protein (164 mg) was loaded onto the Source-30 column.

Cross-linking Analysis

Dimer formation was further confirmed by interchain crosslinking of the monomeric rhIFN-γ using DSS as a cross-linker [37]. The crosslinked dimer was then analyzed by SDS-PAGE. A single band corresponding to ~33 kDa was confirmed (Fig. 6). This experiment verifies that the most stable configuration of the purified product is, in fact, a homodimer and not the monomeric form.

Antiviral Assay

Antiviral assay of interferon-γ was evaluated as described by Lewis [43] by challenging the human lung carcinoma cell line (HEP2C) with EMCV in the presence and absence of rhIFN-γ. In three determinations, the calculated specific activities of rhIFN-γ were found to range from 2 × 107 to 4 × 107 IU/mg of protein as assessed against the standard (Fig. 7). The specific activities obtained from our recombinant protein were similar to those obtained with the standard (2 × 107 IU/mg protein) and previously published results.

Fig. 7. Antiviral assay.

Fig. 7

Purified rhIFN-γ activity was assessed against a commercially available standard obtained from Chemicon. The assay involved challenging the human lung carcinoma cell line (HEP2C) with EMCV in the presence and absence of rhIFN-γ. The concentration yielding a 50% increase in absorbance between baseline and maximum plateau absorbance values (marking a 50% reduction in cytopathic effect) defined the assay endpoint. The calculated specific activities of the prepared rhIFN-γ were found to range from 2 × 107 to 4 × 107 IU/mg of protein after three determinations. The graph is representative of one experiment. Squares: Chemicon standard (specific activity 2 × 107 IU/mg protein); circles: purified rhIFN-γ (specific activity 3.1 × 107 IU/mg protein).

Conclusions

The methods described here for the preparation of rhIFN-γ are simple and easily reproducible. The chromatographic purification step utilizing the Source-30 RPC column followed by solution-phase refolding and dimerization provided overall yields that are higher than those obtained by previously described methods. Our methods should prove useful for not only making rhIFN-γ, but potentially for other recombinant proteins as well. rhIFN-γ and other biologically important recombinant proteins are being studied and used extensively in a variety of diseases and thus efficient production of these molecules is of significant importance.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported, in part, by NIH grant HL070068 (R.C.R.).

Abbreviations

EMCV

encephylomyocarditis virus

rhIFN-γ

recombinant human interferon-γ

IB

inclusion bodies

RPC

reversed phase chromatography

DSS

disuccinimidyl suberate

TFA

trifluoroacetic acid

EU

endotoxin unit

IU

International Units

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Trinchieri G, Perussia B. Immune interferon: a pleiotropic lymphokine with multiple effects. Immunol Today. 1985;6:131–136. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(85)90080-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stewart WE., II . The Interferon System. Springer-Verlag; Berlin: 1979. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Langer JA, Pestka S. Structure of interferons. Pharmacol Ther. 1985;27:371–401. doi: 10.1016/0163-7258(85)90076-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pestka S, Langer JA, Zoon KC, Samuel CE. Interferons and their actions. Annu Rev Biochem. 1987;56:727–777. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.56.070187.003455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Salazar-Mather TP, Hokeness KL. Cytokine and chemokine networks: pathways to antiviral defense. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2006;303:29–46. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-33397-5_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ezekowitz RA, Dinauer MC, Jaffe HS, Orkin SH, Newburger PE. Partial correction of the phagocyte defect in patients with X-linked chronic granulomatous disease by subcutaneous interferon gamma. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:146–51. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198807213190305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sechler JM, Malech HL, White CJ, Gallin JI. Recombinant human interferon-gamma reconstitutes defective phagocyte function in patients with chronic granulomatous disease of childhood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85:4874–4878. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.13.4874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nunoi H, Ishibashi F, Mizukami T, Hidaka F. Clinical evaluation of interferon-gamma treatment to chronic granulomatous disease patients with splice site mutations. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2004;57:S25–S26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Marciano BE, Wesley R, De Carlo ES, Anderson VL, Barnhart LA, Darnell D, Malech HL, Gallin JI, Holland SM. Long-term interferon-gamma therapy for patients with chronic granulomatous disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:692–699. doi: 10.1086/422993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Key LL, Jr, Rodriguiz RM, Willi SM, Wright NM, Hatcher HC, Eyre DR, Cure JK, Griffin PP, Ries WL. Long-term treatment of osteopetrosis with recombinant human interferon gamma. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:1594–1599. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199506153322402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kocher MS, Kasser JR. Osteopetrosis. Am J Orthop. 2003;32:222–228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bajwa EK, Ayas NT, Schulzer M, Mak E, Ryu JH, Malhotra A. Interferon-γ 1b therapy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, A metaanalysis. Chest. 2005;128:203–206. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.1.203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Suarez-Mendez R, Garcia-Garcia I, Fernandez-Olivera N, Valdes-Quintana M, Milanes-Virelles MT, Carbonell D, Machado-Molina D, Valenzuela-Silva CM, Lopez-Saura PA. Adjuvant interferon gamma in patients with drug - resistant pulmonary tuberculosis: a pilot study. BMC Infect Dis. 2004;4:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-4-44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chang TT, Stevens SR. Atopic dermatitis: the role of recombinant interferon-gamma therapy. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002;3:175–183. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200203030-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Parvez MK, Sehgal D, Sarin SK, Basir SF, Jameel S. Inhibition of hepatitis B virus DNA replicative intermediate forms by recombinant interferon-gamma. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:3006–3014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i19.3006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yashiro K, Lowenthal JW, O’Neil TE, Ebisu S, Takagi H, Moore RJ. High-level production of recombinant chicken interferon-γ by Brevibacillus choshinensis. Protein Expr Purif. 2001;23:113–120. doi: 10.1006/prep.2001.1481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Xia C, Dan W, Wen-Xue W, Jian-Qing W, Li W, Tian-Yao Y, Qin W, Yi-Bao N. Cloning and expression of interferon-alpha/gamma from a domestic porcine breed and its effect on classical swine fever virus. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2005;104:81–89. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2004.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang Z, Tong KT, Belew M, Pettersson T, Janson JC. Production, purification and characterization of recombinant human interferon gamma. J Chromatogr. 1992;604:143–155. doi: 10.1016/0021-9673(92)85539-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Khalilzadeh R, Shojaosadati SA, Bahrami A, Maghsoudi N. Over-expression of recombinant human interferon-gamma in high cell density fermentation of Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Lett. 2003;25:1989–1992. doi: 10.1023/b:bile.0000004390.98648.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Khalilzadeh R, Shojaosadati SA, Maghsoudi N, Mohammadian-Mosaabadi J, Mohammadi MR, Bahrami A, Maleksabet N, Nassiri-Khalilli MA, Ebrahimi M, Naderimanesh H. Process development for production of recombinant human interferon-gamma expressed in Escherichia coli. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;31:63–69. doi: 10.1007/s10295-004-0117-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mohammadian-Mosaabadi J, Naderi-Manesh H, Maghsoudi N, Khalilzadeh R, Shojaosadati SA, Ebrahimi M. Effect of oxidative stress on the production of recombinant human interferon-gamma in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2005;41:37–42. doi: 10.1042/BA20030230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mannall GJ, Titchener-Hooker NJ, Chase HA, Dalby PA. A critical assessment of the impact of mixing on dilution refolding. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006;93:955–963. doi: 10.1002/bit.20796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Singh SM, Panda AK. Solubilization and refolding of bacterial inclusion body proteins. J Biosci Bioeng. 2005;99:303–310. doi: 10.1263/jbb.99.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jin T, Guan YX, Yao SJ, Lin DQ, Cho MG. On-column refolding of recombinant human interferon-gamma inclusion bodies by expanded bed adsorption chromatography. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006;93:755–760. doi: 10.1002/bit.20763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vandenbroeck K, Martens E, D’Andrea S, Billiau A. Refolding and single-step purification of porcine interferon-gamma from Escherichia coli inclusion bodies, Conditions for reconstitution of dimeric IFN-gamma. Eur J Biochem. 1993;215:481–486. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18057.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yphantis DA, Arakawa T. Sedimentation equilibrium measurements of recombinant DNA derived human interferon gamma. Biochemistry. 1987;26:5422–5427. doi: 10.1021/bi00391a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Marekov LN, Vassileva RA, Ivanov VP, Sarafova AA, Zanev RG, Ivanov IG, Ivanova VS. Method for producing of recombinant human cysteine less gamma-interferon free of methionine at n-terminal. Eur. Patent App. No. 0446582 AI. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Perez L, Vega J, Chuay C, Menendez A, Ubieta R, Montero M, Padron G, Silva A, Santizo C, Besada V, Herrera L. Production and characterization of human gamma interferon from Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1990;33:429–434. doi: 10.1007/BF00176659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Arora D, Khanna N. Method for increasing the yield of properly folded recombinant human gamma interferon from inclusion bodies. J Biotechnology. 1996;52:127–133. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1656(96)01636-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Haelewyn J, De Ley M. A rapid single-step purification method for human interferon-gamma from isolated Escherichia coli inclusion bodies. Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1995;37:1163–1171. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Honda S, Asano T, Kajio T, Nakagawa S, Ikeyama S, Ichimori Y, Sugino H, Nara K, Kakinuma A, Kung HF. Differential purification by immunoaffinity chromatography of two carboxy-terminal portion-deleted derivatives of recombinant human interferon-gamma from Escherichia coli. J Interferon Res. 1987;7:145–154. doi: 10.1089/jir.1987.7.145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Arnau J, Lauritzen C, Petersen GE, Pedersen J. Current strategies for the use of affinity tags and tag removal for the purification of recombinant proteins. Protein Expr Purif. 2006;48:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2005.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lu H, Zhang H, Wang Q, Yuan H, He W, Zhao Z, Li Y. Purification, refolding of hybrid hIFNgamma-kringle 5 expressed in Escherichia coli. Curr Microbiol. 2001;42:211–216. doi: 10.1007/s002840010206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ejima D, Yumioka R, Arakawa T, Tsumoto K. Arginine as an effective additive in gel permeation chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2005;1094:49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.07.086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cho TH, Ahn SJ, Lee EK. Refolding of protein inclusion bodies directly from E. coli homogenate using expanded bed adsorption chromatography. Bioseparation. 2002;10:189–196. doi: 10.1023/a:1016305603569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Geng X, Bai Q, Zhang Y, Li X, Wu D. Refolding and purification of interferon-gamma in industry by hydrophobic interaction chromatography. J Biotechnol. 2004;113:137–149. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang F, Liu Y, Li J, Ma G, Su Z. On-column refolding of consensus interferon at high concentration with guanidine-hydrochloride and polyethylene glycol gradients. J Chromatogr A. 2006;1115:72–80. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.02.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Gao YG, Guan YX, Yao SJ, Cho MG. On-column refolding of recombinant human interferon-gamma with an immobilized chaperone fragment. Biotechnol Prog. 2003;19:915–920. doi: 10.1021/bp025775l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Guan YX, Fei ZZ, Luo M, Yao SJ, Cho MG. Production of minichaperone (sht GroEL191–345) and its function in the refolding of recombinant human interferon gamma. Protein Pept, Lett. 2005;12:85–8. doi: 10.2174/0929866053405995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Guan YX, Fei ZZ, Luo M, Jin T, Yao SJ. Chromatographic refolding of recombinant human interferon gamma by an immobilized sht GroEL191–345 column. J Chromatogr A. 2006;1107:192–197. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.12.090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pechenov SE, Tikhonov RV, Shingarova LN, Korobko VG, Yakimov SA, Klyushnichenko VE, Babajantz AA, Beliaev DL, Kuznetzov VP, Shvetz VI, Wulfson AN. Methods for preparation of recombinant cytokine proteins, V, mutant analogues of human interferon-gamma with higher stability and activity. Protein Expr Purif. 2002;24:173–180. doi: 10.1006/prep.2001.1565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jacobson A. Purification and fractionation of poly(A)+ RNA. Methods Enzymol. 1987;152:254–261. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)52028-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lewis JA. Antiviral activity of cytokines. In: Richwood D, Homes BD, editors. Cytokines. Oxford University Press; New York: 1988. pp. 129–141. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gray PW, Leung DW, Pennica D, Yelverton E, Najarian R, Simonsen CC, Derynck R, Sherwood PJ, Wallace DM, Berger SL, Levinson AD, Goeddel DV. Expression of human immune interferon cDNA in E. coli and monkey cells. Nature. 1982;295:503–508. doi: 10.1038/295503a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES