Skip to main content
Canadian Family Physician logoLink to Canadian Family Physician
. 2001 Mar;47:557–563.

Small-group CME using e-mail discussions. Can it work?

J N Marshall 1, M Stewart 1, T Ostbye 1
PMCID: PMC2018401  PMID: 11281090

Abstract

PROBLEM BEING ADDRESSED: Traditional continuing medical education (CME) approaches do not work well in changing physicians' behaviour, but some promising strategies and technologies might help. Our program sought to meld small-group learning with an Internet e-mail approach. OBJECTIVE OF PROGRAM: In 1994, the Family medicine Education and Research Network (FERN) was developed to support on-line discussion among London, Ont, and area family physicians. To support educational, moderated case discussions using e-mail, FERN Dissemination (FERN-D) was introduced to a subgroup of participants. We hoped to increase awareness and use of evidence-based research in clinical practice and to increase use of Internet-based resources for CME. The target group was family physicians in the London area. MAIN COMPONENTS OF PROGRAM: Forty volunteers were recruited and were e-mailed one case every 2 weeks; 34 completed the study. Each case was followed by further postings and, at the end of 2 weeks, by a summary of the group's discussion. Background material for each case was researched and was evidence-based. Evaluation was conducted using preintervention and postintervention mailed surveys combined with an e-mail feedback questionnaire and a modified focus group. CONCLUSION: On-line case-based discussion is a promising strategy for encouraging family physicians to access current research. More research is needed to determine whether it can be effectively used to change physicians' practice.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (73.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armstrong D., Reyburn H., Jones R. A study of general practitioners' reasons for changing their prescribing behaviour. BMJ. 1996 Apr 13;312(7036):949–952. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7036.949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chan D. H., Leclair K., Kaczorowski J. Problem-based small-group learning via the Internet among community family physicians: a randomized controlled trial. MD Comput. 1999 May-Jun;16(3):54–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Connelly D. P., Rich E. C., Curley S. P., Kelly J. T. Knowledge resource preferences of family physicians. J Fam Pract. 1990 Mar;30(3):353–359. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davis D. A., Thomson M. A., Oxman A. D., Haynes R. B. Evidence for the effectiveness of CME. A review of 50 randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1992 Sep 2;268(9):1111–1117. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dee C., Blazek R. Information needs of the rural physician: a descriptive study. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1993 Jul;81(3):259–264. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gruppen L. D., Wolf F. M., Van Voorhees C., Stross J. K. Information-seeking strategies and differences among primary care physicians. Mobius. 1987;7(3):18–26. doi: 10.1002/chp.4760070306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Horn K. D., Sholehvar D., Nine J., Gilbertson J., Hatton C., Richert C., Becich M. J. Continuing medical education on the World Wide Web (WWW). Interactive pathology case studies on the Internet. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997 Jun;121(6):641–645. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lomas J. Diffusion, dissemination, and implementation: who should do what? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Dec 31;703:226–237. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26351.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Premi J., Shannon S., Hartwick K., Lamb S., Wakefield J., Williams J. Practice-based small-group CME. Acad Med. 1994 Oct;69(10):800–802. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199410000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Family Physician are provided here courtesy of College of Family Physicians of Canada

RESOURCES