Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate the design of a grid that assesses doctor-patient relationship skills. DESIGN: Evaluation study of an assessment instrument. SETTING: Private practices and family practice units. PARTICIPANTS: From a sample of volunteers, 100 family physicians either in private practice or in a family practice unit completed the proposed grid independently. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Cronbach alpha coefficient was used to analyze internal consistency. Factorial analysis was used to determine whether the grid's anticipated dimensions were in fact present. RESULTS: The Cronbach alpha coefficient had a very high value (0.92), indicating that the items in the grid were highly homogeneous. Two key factors emerged from the factorial analysis; the first factor alone (understanding patients' experience) accounted for almost 42% of the variance. CONCLUSION: The proposed grid presents some interesting metrologic qualities. It is short and relatively simple to use to assess relationship skills of future and practising family physicians. The grid must now be further validated using a variety of cases.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (56.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Boon H., Stewart M. Patient-physician communication assessment instruments: 1986 to 1996 in review. Patient Educ Couns. 1998 Nov;35(3):161–176. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00063-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brockway B. S. Evaluating physician competency: what difference does it make? Eval Program Plann. 1978;1(3):211–220. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(78)90075-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hess J. W. A comparison of methods for evaluating medical student skill in relating to patients. J Med Educ. 1969 Oct;44(10):934–938. doi: 10.1097/00001888-196910000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ong L. M., de Haes J. C., Hoos A. M., Lammes F. B. Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1995 Apr;40(7):903–918. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00155-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]