Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Canadian Family Physician logoLink to Canadian Family Physician
. 2001 May;47:988–995.

Dépistage de la violence faite aux femmes. Epreuves de validation et de fiabilité d'un instrument de mesure français.

Screening for violence against women. Validation and feasibility studies of a French screening tool

J B Brown 1, G Schmidt 1, B Lent 1, G Sas 1, J Lemelin 1
PMCID: PMC2018499  PMID: 11398732

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To replicate, in a Francophone community, our prior work determining the reliability and validity of the full Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST) and a two-item version (WAST-Short). DESIGN: Questionnaires completed by abused and nonabused women. SETTING: Two women's shelters in Francophone communities in Ontario and Quebec and participants' homes or workplaces. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 25 abused women currently residing in two women's shelters and a convenience sample of 21 women who reported they were not abused. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Women's responses to French versions of the WAST, the Abuse Risk Inventory (ARI), and comfort in answering the questions were compared. Also, the reliability and validity of French versions of WAST and WAST-Short were assessed. RESULTS: Abused (n = 23) and not abused (n = 21) women were demographically similar. A strong single-factor structure that accounted for 81% of total variance in the French WAST items was identified. The French WAST was found to be highly reliable with a coefficient alpha of .95 and demonstrated construct and discriminant validity. The WAST-Short correctly classified all the nonabused women and 78.7% of the abused women. The abused women reported feeling less comfortable responding to the WAST questions than the nonabused women. CONCLUSION: The French version of the WAST demonstrated good reliability and validity and discriminated between known samples of abused and nonabused women. Even though the French WAST-Short did not perform as well as the English version, results of this study support further evaluation of the WAST for screening women in Francophone or bilingual family practice settings.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (56.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Archer L. A. Empowering women in a violent society. Role of the family physician. Can Fam Physician. 1994 May;40:974-6, 979-80, 983-5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown J. B., Lent B., Brett P. J., Sas G., Pederson L. L. Development of the Woman Abuse Screening Tool for use in family practice. Fam Med. 1996 Jun;28(6):422–428. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown J. B., Lent B., Sas G. Identifying and treating wife abuse. J Fam Pract. 1993 Feb;36(2):185–191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown J. B., Lent B., Schmidt G., Sas G. Application of the Woman Abuse Screening Tool (WAST) and WAST-short in the family practice setting. J Fam Pract. 2000 Oct;49(10):896–903. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burge S. K. Violence against women as a health care issue. Fam Med. 1989 Sep-Oct;21(5):368–373. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Candib L. M. Moving on to strengths. Arch Fam Med. 1995 May;4(5):397–400. doi: 10.1001/archfami.4.5.397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Candib L. M. Violence against women: no more excuses. Fam Med. 1989 Sep-Oct;21(5):339, 341-2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Elliott B. A., Johnson M. M. Domestic violence in a primary care setting. Patterns and prevalence. Arch Fam Med. 1995 Feb;4(2):113–119. doi: 10.1001/archfami.4.2.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ferris L. E., Tudiver F. Family physicians' approach to wife abuse: a study of Ontario, Canada, practices. Fam Med. 1992 May-Jun;24(4):276–282. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hamberger L. K., Saunders D. G., Hovey M. Prevalence of domestic violence in community practice and rate of physician inquiry. Fam Med. 1992 May-Jun;24(4):283–287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hopayian K., Horrocks G., Garner P., Levitt A. Battered women presenting in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1983 Aug;33(253):506–507. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Knowlden S. M., Frith J. F. Domestic violence and the general practitioner. Med J Aust. 1993 Mar 15;158(6):402–406. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1993.tb121835.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mehta P., Dandrea L. A. The battered woman. Am Fam Physician. 1988 Jan;37(1):193–199. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sugg N. K., Inui T. Primary care physicians' response to domestic violence. Opening Pandora's box. JAMA. 1992 Jun 17;267(23):3157–3160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tudiver F., Permaul-Woods J. A. Physicians' perceptions of and approaches to woman abuse. Does certification in family medicine make a difference? Can Fam Physician. 1996 Aug;42:1475–1480. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Family Physician are provided here courtesy of College of Family Physicians of Canada

RESOURCES