Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether McMaster University's family medicine residents training in the Family Medicine North (FMN) program have better quality lives than those based in Hamilton, Ont (urban). DESIGN: Residents at both sites were simultaneously given the Quality of Life Questionnaire, a standardized measurement tool. They were asked to complete the questionnaire anonymously and to provide demographic data. SETTING: Family practice residencies in Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: McMaster University's family medicine residents. Of 66 residents living in Hamilton, 36 completed the questionnaire; five respondents were ineligible. Of 25 residents living in Thunder Bay, Ont, 24 completed the questionnaire; none were ineligible. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total quality-of-life score. Score was divided into five major domains, each with several subdomains: general well-being (material, physical, and personal growth), interpersonal relations (marital, parent-child, extended family, and extramarital), organizational activity (altruistic and political behaviour), occupational activity (job characteristics, occupational relations, and job satisfiers), and leisure and recreational activity (creative/esthetic behaviour, sports activity, vacation behaviour). RESULTS: The FMN residents scored significantly higher than the Hamilton-based residents on overall quality of life (124.7 vs 112.5, P < .05) and tended to score higher in the five major domains. The trend reached statistical significance in general well-being and occupational activity; it was also apparent in various subdomains, with statistically significant differences in material well-being, marital relations, job characteristics, job satisfiers, and vacation behaviour. CONCLUSION: Family Medicine North residents enjoy better quality of life than their urban counterparts based on responses to a standardized questionnaire.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (43.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Damestoy N., Brouillette L., De Courval L. P. Stress and residents' lifestyle. Survey of family medicine residents at McGill University. Can Fam Physician. 1993 Jul;39:1576–1580. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glenn J. K., Hofmeister R. W. Rural training settings and practice location decision. J Fam Pract. 1981 Sep;13(3):377–382. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Godenick M. T., Musham C., Palesch Y., Hainer B. L., Michels P. J. Physical and psychological health of family practice residents. Fam Med. 1995 Nov-Dec;27(10):646–651. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gray J. D., Steeves L. C., Blackburn J. W. The Dalhousie University experience of training residents in many small communities. Acad Med. 1994 Oct;69(10):847–851. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199410000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gray S. Labrador program prepares MDs for northern, remote practice. CMAJ. 1997 Nov 15;157(10):1429–1430. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rourke J. T. Postgraduate training for rural family practice. Goals and opportunities. Can Fam Physician. 1996 Jun;42:1133–1138. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Young E. H. Relationship of residents' emotional problems, coping behaviors, and gender. J Med Educ. 1987 Aug;62(8):642–650. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198708000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]