Skip to main content
Canadian Family Physician logoLink to Canadian Family Physician
. 2001 Sep;47:1769–1775.

La régionalisation des services de réadaptation. Ce qu'en pensent les usagers dans le centre et l'est du Québec.

Regionalization of rehabilitation services. Survey of users of a Quebec center

C Vincent 1, C Dumont 1, L Bégin 1, L Beauregard 1, P Fougeyrollas 1
PMCID: PMC2018562  PMID: 11570302

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To understand the situation of and difficulties encountered by users of a supraregional rehabilitation institute when they are transferred from the institute to facilities in their own regions, and to discover how they address these difficulties. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive study. SETTING: Regions in Quebec served by a physical rehabilitation institute (Institut de réadaptation en déficience physique de Québec). PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine people who used services at the institute and then sought rehabilitation in their own regions. METHOD: Telephone survey using a validated questionnaire with both open-ended and closed questions. MAIN FINDINGS: About 69% of users had difficulty obtaining adequate follow up in their regions; the regions lacked professionals with expertise; more efficient methods of communication are required; and physicians' role in providing continuity of care needs to be recognized. CONCLUSION: Providing continuity of care on a regional basis is a formidable challenge for the entire health and social services network, but ways of meeting this challenge are within reach.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (178.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. DeJong G. Independent living: from social movement to analytic paradigm. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979 Oct;60(10):435–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fougeyrollas P., Noreau L., Bergeron H., Cloutier R., Dion S. A., St-Michel G. Social consequences of long term impairments and disabilities: conceptual approach and assessment of handicap. Int J Rehabil Res. 1998 Jun;21(2):127–141. doi: 10.1097/00004356-199806000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Krefting L. Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. Am J Occup Ther. 1991 Mar;45(3):214–222. doi: 10.5014/ajot.45.3.214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Verville R. E. Federal legislative history of independent living programs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979 Oct;60(10):447–451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Canadian Family Physician are provided here courtesy of College of Family Physicians of Canada

RESOURCES