Skip to main content
Archives of Disease in Childhood logoLink to Archives of Disease in Childhood
. 1968 Apr;43(228):200–203. doi: 10.1136/adc.43.228.200

Further fate of the foreskin. Incidence of preputial adhesions, phimosis, and smegma among Danish schoolboys.

J Oster
PMCID: PMC2019851  PMID: 5689532

Full text

PDF
200

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersen H., Ehlers N., Matthiessen M. E. Histochemistry and development of the human eyelids. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1965;43(5):642–668. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1965.tb00335.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BERRY C. D., Jr, CROSS R. R., Jr Urethral meatal caliber in circumcised and uncircumcised males. AMA J Dis Child. 1956 Aug;92(2):152–156. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1956.02060030146007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BLEICH A. R. Prophylaxis of penile carcinoma. J Am Med Assoc. 1950 Jul 22;143(12):1054–1057. doi: 10.1001/jama.1950.02910470014005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. GAIRDNER D. The fate of the foreskin, a study of circumcision. Br Med J. 1949 Dec 24;2(4642):1433-7, illust. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4642.1433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. HAND E. A. History of circumcision. J Mich State Med Soc. 1950 May;49(5):573–passim. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MACCARTHY D., DOUGLAS J. W. B., MOGFORD C. Circumcision in a national sample of 4-year-old children. Br Med J. 1952 Oct 4;2(4787):755–756. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4787.755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. OSMOND T. E. Is routine circumcision advisable? J R Army Med Corps. 1953 Oct;99(5):254–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. SPEERT H. Circumcision of the newborn; an appraisal of its present status. Obstet Gynecol. 1953 Aug;2(2):164–172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Archives of Disease in Childhood are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES