Abstract
Background
Leiomyosarcoma of the pancreas is a very rare tumour; only 33 cases have been reported in the English literature. Because these tumours tend to be large and locally advanced, extended resection such as pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy has been advocated.
Case outline
A 25-year-old woman with left-sided back pain had a small low-density lesion (2×2 cm) in the pancreatic body on computed tomography (CT). The tumour was initially diagnosed as a pseudocyst and was managed conservatively. A repeat CT scan 10 months later showed an increase in the size of the lesion (3.5×3.5 cm) with contrast enhancement of a high-density area. The diagnosis was therefore changed to papillary-cystic neoplasm. At laparotomy, the tumour seemed to be arising from the mid-body of the pancreas with no invasion into surrounding organs. Local excision of the tumour was performed. Pathological examination revealed a leiomyosarcoma of the pancreas.
Discussion
Complete surgical resection offers the only potential chance of cure for patients with leiomyosarcoma of the pancreas.The lack of evidence of recurrence at three-and-a-half years suggests that the less invasive surgical procedure in the present case has been curative. Careful and intraoperative exploration was important to determine the best surgical procedure.
Keywords: Leiomyosarcoma, pancreas, local excision
Introduction
Pancreatic leiomyosarcoma is a rare tumour, with only 33 previous case reports in the English literature. Baylor and Berg gave an incidence of 0.1% among 5057 pancreatic malignant tumours 1. We report a case of pancreatic leiomyosarcoma in a young woman who underwent surgical resection.
Case Report
A 25-year-old woman presented with left-sided back pain and left-sided epigastric tenderness in May 1998. Serum amylase and other laboratory data were nomal. CT scan revealed a 2 cm low-density lesion located in the body of the pancreas (Figure 1). The initial diagnosis was of a pseudocyst developing in an area of localised pancreatitis, and it was decided to observe the tumour. In March 1999, 10 months after the initial investigation, CT scan and ultrasonogram (US) showed an increase in the size of the lesion. In the arterial phase of the CT scan, a mass measuring 3.5×3.5 cm was shown to be heterogeneously enhanced by contrast medium (Figure 2). No masses were seen in the liver. Abdominal angiography showed an approximately 4 cm tumour stain arising from the dorsal pancreatic artery. There was no encasement of vessels (Figure 3). These findings led to a revised diagnosis of papillary-cystic neoplasm.
Figure 1. .
Contrast-enhanced axial CT demonstrating a 2 cm low-density pancreatic lesion.
Figure 2. .
CT scan showing growth of the tumour, which is heterogeneously enhanced by contrast medium.
Figure 3. .
Abdominal angiography shows an approximately 4 cm tumour stain arising from the dorsal pancreatic artery.
Laparotomy was performed in June 1999. At exploration, the tumour was seen to arise from the mid-body of the pancreas with no invasion into the surrounding organs. Local excision of the tumour was performed. The surgical margins were macroscopically negative.
The size of the tumour was 3.5 cm. A sagittal section showed a yellowish–white tumour with spotty necrosis (Figure 4). The tumour was examined histologically as well as immunohistochemically. Surgical margin was also histologically negative. It had a spindle cell pattern arranged in interlacing fascicles (Figure 5). On the basis of the degree of cellular atypia and the mitotic count (20 per high power field), malignancy was strongly suspected. Immunohistochemical studies revealed positivity for smooth muscle actin and desmin and negativity for S-100 protein. The pathological diagnosis was thus confirmed to be leiomyosarcoma.
Figure 4. .
Sagittal section of the tumour.
Figure 5. .
Photomicrograph showing the tumour comprises spindle-shaped cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm in an interlacing arrangement (haematoxylin and eosin stain, ×200).
The patient remained well with no radiological sign of recurrence three-and-a-half years after the operation.
Discussion
Pancreatic leiomyosarcoma is extremely rare. Details of the 34 reported cases are shown in Table 1. Some authors are doubtful about a pancreatic origin because it is such an unusual site for stromal tumours 2,3. Leiomyosarcomas originating from other organs such as the stomach, duodenum, and retroperitoneal organs often invade the pancreas, simulating a primary tumour of the pancreas. The diagnosis of pancreatic leiomyosarcoma is confirmed by ruling out a tumour arising from other surrounding organs. In the present case, the tumour was predominantly located in the mid-body of pancreas, and the CT scan, US and operative findings showed no evidence of tumour invasion into the adjacent organs. Abdominal angiography revealed that the tumour was supplied by the dorsal pancreatic artery. The pancreatic origin of leiomyosarcoma was thus confirmed.
Table 1. Thirty-four reported cases of leiomyosarcoma of the pancreas (including the present case).
| Case no. | Author | Year | Age (y) | Sex | Site and Size | Treatment | Clinical outcome | Metastasis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ross 5 | 1951 | 80 | M | whole pancreas, LM | autopsy case | – | widespread |
| 2 | Berman 6 | 1956 | 47 | M | head, 5.5 cm | pancreatoduodenectomy | alive, 12 months | none |
| 3 | Feinberg 4 | 1957 | 14 | M | head, 11 cm | pancreatoduodenectomy | – | none |
| 4 | Becker 7 | 1965 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 5–9 | Baylor 1 | 1973 | – | M:3, F:2 | – | – | – | – |
| 10, 11 | Heerden 8 | 1981 | – | – | – | pancreatoduodenectomy | – | – |
| 12 | Ishikawa 9 | 1981 | 44 | M | head, 8 cm | pancreatoduodenectomy | died, 4 years | liver |
| 13 | Murata 10 | 1990 | 55 | M | tail: 10 cm, head: 5 cm | distal pancreatectomy | _ | none |
| 14 | Lakhoo 11 | 1991 | 68 | M | body, 17 cm | distal pancreatectomy | alive, 32 months | none |
| 15 | Takashima 12 | 1991 | 68 | M | head, 10 cm | pancreatoduodenectomy | alive, 18 months | Liver |
| 16 | De Alava 13 | 1993 | 71 | M | body, 3.6 cm | distal pancreatectomy | – | none |
| 17 | Russ 14 | 1993 | 67 | M | body–tail, 10 cm | non-resectable | – | liver, spleen, LN |
| 18 | Sato 15 | 1994 | 53 | F | tail, 25 cm | distal pancreatectomy | – | – |
| 19 | Ishii 16 | 1994 | 66 | M | tail, 4.5 cm | non-resectable | alive, 34 months | widespread |
| 20 | Aranha 17 | 1995 | 45 | F | body, 3 cm | distal pancreatectomy | died, 9 months | liver |
| 21 | Hamamoto 18 | 1995 | 55 | F | tail, 5.5 cm | distal pancreatectomy | died, 15 months | lymph nodes |
| 21 | Shimizu 19 | 1997 | 49 | F | head, 15 cm | non-resectable | died, 3 months | widespread |
| 22 | Chawla 20 | 1998 | 45 | F | head, 9.2 cm | non-resectable | alive, 19 months | liver, Lung |
| 23 | Zalatnai 21 | 1998 | 57 | M | head, 6 cm | non-resectable | died, 7 months | liver |
| 24 | Paciorek 22 | 1998 | 63 | F | body, 2 cm | distal pancreatectomy | – | – |
| 25 | Machado 23 | 2000 | 52 | M | head, 7.5 cm | pancreatoduodenectomy | alive, 24 months | none– |
| 26 | Srivastava 24 | 2000 | 49 | M | body–tail, LM | distal pancreatectomy | – | – |
| 27 | Srivastava | 2000 | 38 | M | body–tail, LM | non-resectable | died, 3 months | peritoneum |
| 28 | Srivastava | 2000 | 45 | M | head, LM | non-resectable | – | – |
| 29 | Srivastava | 2000 | 41 | M | head, 3.5 cm | pancreatoduodenectomy | died, 6 months | liver |
| 30 | Ferlan Marolt 25 | 2000 | 57 | F | body, 12 cm | distal pancreatectomy | died, 5 days | none |
| 31 | Nesi 26 | 2001 | 76 | M | tail, 8 cm | distal pancreatectomy | died, 12 months | none |
| 32 | Deveaux 27 | 2001 | 44 | F | head, 7 cm | pancreatoduodenectomy | alive, 4 years | none |
| 33 | Aihara | 2001 | 25 | F | body, 3.5 cm | local resection | alive, 24 months | none |
LM = large mass, LN = lymph node; – =no information available.
Feinberg et al. stated that these tumours arise from the wall of the blood vessels of the pancreas or from the pancreatic duct itself 4. In our case, the tumour was microscopically recognised as arising from the edge of the pancreatic tissue, but there were no definitive findings to determine its origin with clarity.
Pancreatic leiomyosarcoma is reported to be a highly aggressive malignancy, which spreads in a similar manner to gastric leiomyosarcoma, i.e. by adjacent organ invasion, haematogenous spread, and lymph node metastasis. As shown in Table 1, these tumours are large at the time of diagnosis and are usually found at an advanced stage. Therefore, extended resection such as pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy has been advocated. In our case, however, the tumours were small, and preoperative imaging revealed no regional or distant metastasis. Furthermore, intraoperative exploration revealed an apparent margin of the tumour, which was therefore selected for local excision; both macroscopic and microscopic margins were negative. Although histopathological examination revealed a relatively high mitotic count, the patient has shown no sign of recurrence during a follow-up period of three-and-a-half years.
Future innovations in diagnostic technology may allow earlier diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma of the pancreas. Small lesions may be suitable for local exision, as is the present case, but thorough preoperative imaging and careful operative exploration are needed to justify such an approach.
References
- 1.Baylor SM, Berg JW. Cross classification and survival characteristics of 5000 cases of cancer of the pancreas. J Surg Oncol. 1973;5:335–58. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930050410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Neibling HA. Primary sarcoma of the pancreas. Am Surg. 1968;34:690–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Struthers JE, Gauss H. Malignant leiomyoma (leiomyosarcoma) of the retroperitoneum simulating sarcoma of the pancreas. Am J Dig Dis. 1952;19:116–20. doi: 10.1007/BF02876319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Feinberg SB, Margulis AR, Lober P. Roentgen findings in leiomyosarcoma of the pancreas. Minn Med. 1956;36:505–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ross CF. Leiomyosarcoma of the pancreas. Br J Surg. 1951;39:53–56. doi: 10.1002/bjs.18003915311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Berman JK, Leven N. Sarcoma of the pancreas. AMA Arch Surg. 1956;73:894–6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1956.01280050162030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Becker WF, Welsh RA, Pratt HS. Cystadenoma and cystadenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Surg. 1965;161:845–61. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196506000-00005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Heerden JA, McIlrath DC, Dozois RR, et al. Radical pancreatoduodenectomy — a procedure to be abandoned? Mayo Clin Proc. 1981;56:601–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ishikawa O, Iwanaga T, Matsui Y, et al. Leiomyosarcoma of the pancreas. Am J Surg Pathol. 1981;5:597–602. doi: 10.1097/00000478-198109000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Murata L, Tsuchiya T, Ayakawa Y, et al. Primary leiomyosarcoma of the pancreas. Nippon Igaku Houshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 1990;50:1215–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lakhoo K, Mannell A. Pancreatic leiomyosarcoma. A case report. S Afr J Surg. 1991;29:59–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Takashima T, Matsushita M, Kumaki T, et al. A case of leiomyosarcoma of the pancreas head. J Jpn Pancreas Soc. 1991;6:542–7. [Google Scholar]
- 13.De Alava E, Torramade J, Vazquez JJ. Leiomyosarcoma of the pancreas. Virchows Arch. 1993;522:419–22. doi: 10.1007/BF01605462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Russ P. Leiomyosarcoma of the pancreas bed detected on CT scan. Am J Roentgenol. 1993;161:210. doi: 10.2214/ajr.161.1.8517309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sato T, Asanuma Y, Nanjo H, et al. A resected case of giant leiomyosarcoma of the pancreas. J Gastroenterol. 1994;29:223–7. doi: 10.1007/BF02358688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ishii H, Okada S, Okazaki N, et al. Leiomyosarcoma of the pancreas: report of a case diagnosed by fine needle aspiration biopsy. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1994;24:42–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Aranha GV, Simples PE, Veselik K. Leiomyosarcoma of the pancreas. Int J Pancreatol. 1995;17:95–7. doi: 10.1007/BF02788364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hamamoto J, Tada H, Hongo Y, et al. A case of pancreatic leiomyosarcoma. Gastroenterol Endoscopy. 1995;37:1210–15. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shimizu M, Hirokawa M, Matsumoto T, et al. Fatty replacement of the pancreatic body and tail associated with leiomyosarcoma of the pancreatic head. Pathol Int. 1997;47:633–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1827.1997.tb04554.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chawla S, Gairola M, Nachiappan PL, et al. Pancreatic leiomyosarcoma in a middle-aged lady. Trop Gastroenterol. 1998;19:118–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zalatnai A, Kovacs M, Flautner L, et al. Pancreatic leiomyosarcoma. Virchows Arch. 1998;432:469–72. doi: 10.1007/s004280050193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Paciorek ML, Ross GJ. MR imaging of primary pancreatic leiomyosarcoma. Br J Radiol. 1998;71:561–3. doi: 10.1259/bjr.71.845.9691904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Machado MCC, Cunha JEM, Penteado S, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of pancreatic leiomyosarcoma. Int J Pancreatol. 2000;28:97–100. doi: 10.1385/IJGC:28:2:097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Srivastava DN, Batra A, Thulkar S, et al. Leiomyosarcoma of pancreas: imaging features. Ind J Gastroenterol. 2000;19:187–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ferlan Marolt V, Vladislav P, Alojz P. Pancreatic keiomyosarcoma: clinicopathological presentation of a rare tumour. Hepatogastroenterol. 2000;47:556–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nesi G, Pantalone D, Ragionieri I, et al. Primary leiomyosarcoma of the pancreas: a case report and review of literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2001;125:152–5. doi: 10.5858/2001-125-0152-PLOTP. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Deveaux PG, Aranha GV, Yong S. Leiomyosarcoma of the pancreas. HPB. 2001;3:175–7. doi: 10.1080/136518201317077206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





